<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0103-3131</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0103-3131</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0103-31312001000200004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-31312001000200004</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Concentration of photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence of mahogany and tonka bean under two light environments]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Concentração de pigmentos fotossintéticos e fluorescência da clorofila em mogno e cumaru sob dois ambientes de luz]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONÇALVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JOSÉ FRANCISCO DE CARVALHO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARENCO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RICARDO ANTONIO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GIL]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,MCT INPA ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Manaus AM]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2001</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2001</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>149</fpage>
<lpage>157</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0103-31312001000200004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0103-31312001000200004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0103-31312001000200004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This study was carried out in a plantation of a degraded area in Central Amazon, Brazil, in order to assess environmental light effects on leaf pigment concentrations and chlorophyll a fluorescence in mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) and tonka bean (Dipteryx odorata Aubl. Willd). Three-year old saplings were grown in an open site (sun) with maximum radiation of approximately 2000 mumol m-2 s-1 and under the shade of a Ochroma pyramidale (Cav. ex Lam. Urb) canopy. A leaf area index of 2.46 was optically determined for the Ochroma foliage with 13% of full sunlight (maximum radiation about 260 mumol m-2 s-1). Carotenoid and chlorophyll concentrations were spectrophotometrically determined. Initial (Fo), maximum (Fm) and variable fluorescence (Fv) were determined with a portable fluorometer. Chlorophyll concentrations (Chl a, Chl b and Chl tot) on a fresh mass basis were greater in shade leaves than in sun acclimated leaves in both species. On the other hand, when comparisons were made on a per area basis, Chl a concentrations were greater in the sun than in shade leaves of tonka bean. In contrast, Chl b concentrations were higher in the shade environment for this species. No differences were observed in Chl concentrations per unit area in mahogany leaves. Carotenoid concentrations were higher for sun-acclimated leaves of mahogany, both on a per unit area and on a fresh mass basis. In tonka bean, higher carotenoid concentrations in shade leaves were only observed on a fresh weight basis. No differences were found between environments when carotenoid concentrations were expressed as a function of leaf area. Fluorescence variables (Fo, Fm, and Fv) were greater in sun leaves than in shade leaves of mahogany. In contrast, Fv and Fm, but not Fo, values were higher in shade acclimated leaves than in full sunlight-adapted leaves of tonka bean. However, there was a higher Fv/Fm ratio value for tonka bean in sunlight environments. We conclude that these species, classified as mid and late successional species, differ markedly regarding the utilization of photosynthetic pigments, increasing either light harvesting efficiency at low irradiance or protection against photosynthetic machinery damage in higher solar radiation environments.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Estudou-se o efeito do ambiente de luz sobre as concentraçõesdos pigmentos fotossintéticos e a fluorescência da clorofila a em plantas de mogno (Swietenia macrophylla King) e de cumaru (Dipteryx odorata Aubl. Willd), com o objetivo de analisar a eficiência fotossintética dessas espécies sob dois ambientes de luz em plantio sob área degradada, na Amazônia Central, Brasil. Utilizaram-se plantas jovens, com 3 anos de idade, em plantio a céu aberto (sol) com cerca de 2000 mimol m-2 s-1 e sob cobertura natural do dossel de plantas (sombra) de pau-de-balsa (Ochroma pyramidale Cav. Ex Lam. Urb) com índice de área foliar de 2,46 e sombreamento de 13% da luz no ambiente aberto com cerca de 260 µmol m-2 s-1. As concentrações dos carotenóides e das clorofilas foram determinadAs por espectrofotometria, e a fluorescência, utilizando-se um fluorômetro portátil. Analisando-se as variáveis: fluorescência inicial (Fo), fluorescência máxima (Fm), fluorescência variável (Fv) e a razão Fv/Fm,, constatou-se que as concentrações de clorofila (Chl) a, b e total em µmol. g-1 MF, nas duas espécies, foram maiores no ambiente de sombra quando comparadAs com o ambiente de sol. Por outro lado, no mogno, essas mesmas concentrações, por unidade de área, não foram diferentes para os ambientes sol ou sombra. Porém, no caso do cumaru, as Chl a e total foram maiores no ambiente de sol, enquanto a Chl b continuou maior no ambiente de sombra. Para os carotenóides, tanto por unidade de massa quanto de área, verificaram-se diferenças para o mogno, ou seja, as concentrações de carotenóides foram sempre maiores no ambiente de sol. Por outro lado, no cumaru, por unidade de massa, as concentrações desses pigmentos foram maiores na sombra e por unidade de área não se observaram diferenças entre os ambientes. Quanto à fluorescência, verificou-se que, no mogno, os valores de Fo, Fm e Fv foram sempre maiores no ambiente de sol. Já no cumaru, não verificou-se diferença para Fo, entre os ambientes. Os valores de Fm e Fv foram maiores no ambiente de sombra. No ambiente de sol, a razão Fv/Fm foi maior nas folhas de cumaru, quando comparada com o mogno. Concluiu-se que essas espécies, classificadas como espécies intermediárias e sucessional tardia, usam estratégias diferentes quanto ao acúmulo e ao uso dos pigmentos fotossintéticos no que se refere à captação de luz em ambientes de menor luminosidade e à proteção contra a fotodestruição em ambientes de maior luminosidade.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Carotenoid]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Dipteryx odorata]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Swietenia macrophylla]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tropical species]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Carotenóides]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Dipteryx odorata]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[espécies tropicais Swietenia macrophylla]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <B><FONT SIZE=5>      <p align="center"><a name="top1"></a>CONCENTRATION OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENTS    AND CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE OF MAHOGANY AND TONKA BEAN UNDER TWO LIGHT ENVIRONMENTS</p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p> </FONT>     <P></P> </B>     <p align="center"><b>JOS&Eacute; FRANCISCO DE CARVALHO GON&Ccedil;ALVES<SUP><a href="#back1">1</a></SUP><a href="#back1"><sup>*</sup></a>,    RICARDO ANTONIO MARENCO<SUP><a href="#back1">1</a></SUP> AND GIL VIEIRA<SUP><a href="#back1">1</a></sup></b><FONT SIZE=3>    </FONT></p> <FONT SIZE=3>      <P align="center">Coordena&ccedil;&atilde;o de Pesquisas em Silvicultura Tropical,    Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amaz&ocirc;nia (INPA), C.P. 478, 69011-970,    Manaus, AM, Brasil.</P>     <P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <P align="center">&nbsp;</P> </FONT><B><FONT SIZE=5>      <P></P> </FONT></B>      <P><FONT SIZE=3><B>ABSTRACT</b></font><FONT SIZE=3> – This study was carried out    in a plantation of a degraded area in Central Amazon, Brazil, in order to assess    environmental light effects on leaf pigment concentrations and chlorophyll <I>a</I>    fluorescence in mahogany<B><I> </i></B>(<I>Swietenia macrophylla</I> King) and    tonka bean (<I>Dipteryx odorata </I>Aubl. Willd). Three-year old saplings were    grown in an open site (sun) with maximum radiation of approximately 2000 <font face="Symbol">&#109;</font>mol    m<SUP>-2</SUP> s<SUP>-1</SUP> and under the shade of a <I>Ochroma pyramidale    </I>(Cav. ex Lam. Urb) canopy. A leaf area index of 2.46 was optically determined    for the <I>Ochroma</I> foliage with 13% of full sunlight (maximum radiation    about 260 <font face="Symbol">&#109;</font>mol m<SUP>-2</SUP> s<SUP>-1</SUP>).    Carotenoid and chlorophyll concentrations were spectrophotometrically determined.    Initial (F<SUB>o</SUB>), maximum (F<SUB>m</SUB>) and variable fluorescence (Fv)    were determined with a portable fluorometer. Chlorophyll concentrations (Chl<I>    a</I>, Chl <I>b</I> and Chl <I>tot</I>) on a fresh mass basis were greater in    shade leaves than in sun acclimated leaves in both species. On the other hand,    when comparisons were made on a per area basis, Chl<I> a</I> concentrations    were greater in the sun than in shade leaves of tonka bean. In contrast, Chl    <I>b</I> concentrations were higher in the shade environment for this species.    No differences were observed in Chl concentrations per unit area in mahogany    leaves. Carotenoid concentrations were higher for sun-acclimated leaves of mahogany,    both on a per unit area and on a fresh mass basis. In tonka bean, higher carotenoid    concentrations in shade leaves were only observed on a fresh weight basis. No    differences were found between environments when carotenoid concentrations were    expressed as a function of leaf area. Fluorescence variables (F<SUB>o</SUB>,    F<SUB>m</SUB>, and F<SUB>v</SUB>) were greater in sun leaves than in shade leaves    of mahogany. In contrast, F<SUB>v</SUB> and F<SUB>m</SUB>, but not F<SUB>o</SUB>,    values were higher in shade acclimated leaves than in full sunlight-adapted    leaves of tonka bean. However, there was a higher F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB>    ratio value for tonka bean in sunlight environments. We conclude that these    species, classified as mid and late successional species, differ markedly regarding    the utilization of photosynthetic pigments, increasing either light harvesting    efficiency at low irradiance or protection against photosynthetic machinery    damage in higher solar radiation environments. </font>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <B>ADDITIONAL INDEX TERMS:</b> Carotenoid, <I>Dipteryx odorata, Swietenia macrophylla</I>,    tropical species.<B><FONT SIZE=5></FONT></B><B><FONT SIZE=5> </FONT></B></P> <B><FONT SIZE=5>     <p align="center"><font size="4">CONCENTRA&Ccedil;&Atilde;O DE PIGMENTOS FOTOSSINT&Eacute;TICOS    E FLUORESC&Ecirc;NCIA DA CLOROFILA EM MOGNO E CUMARU SOB DOIS AMBIENTES DE LUZ</font></p>     <P></P> </FONT></B>      <P><FONT SIZE=3><B>RESUMO</b></font><FONT SIZE=3> - Estudou-se o efeito do ambiente    de luz sobre as concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es<SUP> </SUP>dos pigmentos fotossint&eacute;ticos    e a fluoresc&ecirc;ncia da clorofila <I>a</I> em plantas de mogno (<I>Swietenia    macrophylla</I> King) e de cumaru (<I>Dipteryx odorata </I>Aubl. Willd), com    o objetivo de analisar a efici&ecirc;ncia fotossint&eacute;tica dessas esp&eacute;cies    sob dois ambientes de luz em plantio sob &aacute;rea degradada, na Amaz&ocirc;nia    Central, Brasil. Utilizaram-se plantas jovens, com 3 anos de idade, em plantio    a c&eacute;u aberto (sol) com cerca de 2000 <font face="Symbol">&#109;</font>mol    m<SUP>-2</SUP> s<SUP>-1 </SUP>e sob cobertura natural do dossel de plantas (sombra)    de pau-de-balsa (<I>Ochroma pyramidale</I> Cav. Ex Lam. Urb) com &iacute;ndice    de &aacute;rea foliar de 2,46 e sombreamento de 13% da luz no ambiente aberto    com cerca de 260 µmol m<SUP>-2</SUP> s<SUP>-1</SUP>. As concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es    dos caroten&oacute;ides e das clorofilas<I> </I>foram determinadAs por espectrofotometria,    e a fluoresc&ecirc;ncia, utilizando-se um fluor&ocirc;metro port&aacute;til.    Analisando-se as vari&aacute;veis: fluoresc&ecirc;ncia inicial (F<SUB>o</SUB>),    fluoresc&ecirc;ncia m&aacute;xima (F<SUB>m</SUB>), fluoresc&ecirc;ncia vari&aacute;vel    (F<SUB>v</SUB>) e a raz&atilde;o F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB>,, constatou-se    que as concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es de clorofila (Chl) <I>a</I>, <I>b</I> e total    em µmol. g<SUP>-1</SUP> MF, nas duas esp&eacute;cies, foram maiores no ambiente    de sombra quando comparadAs com o ambiente de sol. Por outro lado, no mogno,    essas mesmas concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es, por unidade de &aacute;rea, n&atilde;o    foram diferentes para os ambientes sol ou sombra. Por&eacute;m, no caso do cumaru,    as Chl <I>a </I>e total foram maiores no ambiente de sol, enquanto a Chl <I>b</I>    continuou maior no ambiente de sombra. Para os caroten&oacute;ides, tanto por    unidade de massa quanto de &aacute;rea, verificaram-se diferen&ccedil;as para    o mogno, ou seja, as concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es de caroten&oacute;ides foram    sempre maiores no ambiente de sol. Por outro lado, no cumaru, por unidade de    massa, as concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es desses pigmentos foram maiores na sombra    e por unidade de &aacute;rea n&atilde;o se observaram diferen&ccedil;as entre    os ambientes. Quanto &agrave; fluoresc&ecirc;ncia, verificou-se que, no mogno,    os valores de F<SUB>o</SUB>, F<SUB>m</SUB> e F<SUB>v</SUB> foram sempre maiores    no ambiente de sol. J&aacute; no cumaru, n&atilde;o verificou-se diferen&ccedil;a    para F<SUB>o</SUB>, entre os ambientes. Os valores de F<SUB>m</SUB> e F<SUB>v</SUB>    foram maiores no ambiente de sombra. No ambiente de sol, a raz&atilde;o F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB>    foi maior nas folhas de cumaru, quando comparada com o mogno. Concluiu-se que    essas esp&eacute;cies, classificadas como esp&eacute;cies intermedi&aacute;rias    e sucessional tardia, usam estrat&eacute;gias diferentes quanto ao ac&uacute;mulo    e ao uso dos pigmentos fotossint&eacute;ticos no que se refere &agrave; capta&ccedil;&atilde;o    de luz em ambientes de menor luminosidade e &agrave; prote&ccedil;&atilde;o    contra a fotodestrui&ccedil;&atilde;o em ambientes de maior luminosidade.</font>    <br>   <B>TERMOS ADICIONAIS PARA INDEXA&Ccedil;&Atilde;O:</b> Caroten&oacute;ides,    <I>Dipteryx odorata</I>, esp&eacute;cies tropicais <I>Swietenia macrophylla</I>.</P> <FONT SIZE=3>     <P></P> <B>    <p> </p>     <p> </p >    <p align="center"><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p> </B>     <P>Agricultural projects, selective logging and other human activities have increased    considerably over the last decades, causing negative impacts on Amazonian ecosystems    and resulting in destroyed and burned vegetation in several parts of the Amazon.    Between 1993 and 1997 the logged area was around 38,000 km<SUP>2</SUP>, resulting    in impoverished, disturbed, abandoned, and degraded areas (Nepstad <I>et al.,    </I>1999). Consequently, growth factors such as light, nutrients, and water    availability in the soil have changed so drastically that growth and establishment    of plants have been severely affected in such areas. In deforested areas in    the Amazonian region, early successional (pioneer) species show greater tolerance    to new environmental conditions due to a high degree of rusticity and physiological    plasticity. On the other hand, in late successional (climax) species, mortality    rates are higher and growth is reduced, and reforestation of degraded areas    with these species usually does not succeed. Kageyama (1990), suggested that    this failure occurs because foresters do not consider the differences in physiological    traits and successional stage of native species. Environmental stress during    early growth stages in climax species is the main cause of this failure. Plants    will experience photoinhibition, nutrient deficiencies and water stress during    the annual dry season. Light stress is frequent under tropical conditions, and    chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations are indicators of plant responsiveness    to light intensity (Strauss-Debenedetti and Bazzaz, 1991; Vieira, 1996). Chlorophyll    tends to be photooxidized at high irradiance and, because carotenoids can prevent    chlorophyll photooxidation, the relationship between chlorophyll and carotenoids    may be used as a potential indicator of photooxidative damages caused by strong    irradiation (Hendry and Price, 1993).</P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>Damage caused by photoinhibition may be assessed by determining fluorescence and emission through chlorophyll <I>a</I> in plants treated with strong irradiation pulses. By measuring the emission of fluorescence, it has been found that photoinhibition is mainly observed in photosystem II, PS II (Krause and Weis, 1991; Shole and Horton, 1993). This non-destructive technique has been a common approach for estimating PS II efficiency and recently further attention has been focused on plants subjected to low temperature and high irradiance environments (Lamontagne <I>et al., </I>2000), as well as canopy trees and seedlings of tropical forests (Krause and Winter, 1996; Franco <I>et al., </I>1999; Valio, 2001). Fluorescence variables used for evaluating PS II functioning include: initial fluorescence (F<SUB>o</SUB>), maximum fluorescence (F<SUB>m</SUB>) variable fluorescence (F<SUB>v</SUB>) and F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio (Shole and Horton, 1993). F<SUB>v </SUB>represents the difference between F<SUB>m</SUB> and F<SUB>o</SUB> (F<SUB>v </SUB>= F<SUB>m</SUB>-F<SUB>o</SUB>). The F<SUB>o </SUB>parameter is the minimal fluorescence yielded when all reaction centers are in the oxidized or open state. When leaves are briefly exposed to a saturating light level, all PS II centers are closed. That is, quinone A (QA) is reduced and a maximum yield of fluorescence (F<SUB>m</SUB>) is observed. The F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio, calculated as F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB>=(F<SUB>m</SUB>-F<SUB>o</SUB>)/F<SUB>m</SUB>, is a fluorescence variable directly correlated with the physiological efficiency of the photosynthetic machinery. This ratio is been considered to be proportional to the quantum efficiency of PS II (Bjorkman and Demming, 1987). In a wide number of plant species and ecotypes, an F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio of 0.83 has been obtained in unstressed leaves. Hence, the effects of stressful environmental factors on PS II may be examined by determining the reduction in the F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio (Ogren and Evans, 1992; Sholes and Horton, 1993).</P>     <P>The species in the present study  are from different stages in the successional scale. <I>Swietenia macrophylla</I> King (Meliaceae) and <I>Dipteryx odorata</I> Willd. (Fabaceae) are tropical species found in the Amazonian forest (Marenco, in press). They are found in primary forest but differ in their regeneration niche: late successional tonka bean can regenerate under closed forest canopy (Vieira, 1996), while mahogany needs large gaps for establishment (Tanaka, 1998; Morris <I>et al., </I>2000). Therefore the latter species could be classified as mid-successional or gap opportunist (Gomez-Pompa and V&aacute;zquez-Yanes, 1982). We hypothesize that species from different successional stages (e.g., shade tolerance or regeneration mode) respond differently to high levels of irradiance. To answer this question, we focused on the following objectives: a) changes in photosynthetic pigment concentrations and b) chlorophyll <I>a</I> fluorescence in leaves of these two tropical species grown under contrasting light environments.</P> </FONT><FONT SIZE=3>      <P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <P align="center"><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b></P>     <P align="left">The study was conducted in an experimental plantation near Presidente    Figueiredo in the Brazilian Amazon (01<SUP>o</SUP>51' S; 60<SUP>o</SUP>04' W).    Mean annual temperature is about 27<SUP>o</SUP>C and annual precipitation ranges    from 1750 to 2500 mm. The soil is an oxisol, and pH ranges from 3.9 to 4.6.    The area had remained as an abandoned pasture for about eight years and a mixed    plantation was set up in May 1998 following a "quinc&ocirc;ncio" system (one    slow growth successional species neighbored by four fast growth pioneer species).    Seedlings from both species (mahogany and tonka bean) were planted in holes    spaced 3 x 3 m apart. The seedlings were grown under shade and full sunlight    about 2000 <FONT>&#109;</FONT> mol photons m<SUP>-2 </SUP>s<SUP>-1</SUP>. Shade    was produced by balsa wood canopy (<I>Ochroma pyramidale</I> Cav. Ex Lam. Urb).    Data for this study were collected from three-year-old saplings either grown    under balsa wood canopy or in an open site. Mahogany saplings were 1.1 m tall,    whereas tonka-been saplings were 4.30 m in height. By the time data were collected,    balsa wood was about 11.1 m height and 15-20 cm DBH (diameter at breath height)    and the leaf area index of its foliage (optically determined) was 2.46 (Licor    – 2050 Lincoln, NE USA) with 13% of full sunlight about 260 µmol photons m<SUP>-2    </SUP>s<SUP>-1</SUP>.</P>     <P>Chlorophyll and carotenoids were determined using a spectrophotometric method    modified from Lichtenthaler (1983). For photosynthetic pigment determinations,    ten plants per species were chosen at random and three fully expanded leaves    per plant were collected, placed between layers of ice in a thermal insulated    box and taken to the Amazon National Research Institute’s (INPA) Plant Physiology    laboratory where they were analyzed immediately. Leaf samples (0.1 g fresh weigh    or 3.0 cm<SUP>2</SUP>) were ground in an aqueous acetone solution (80% v/v)    containing MgCO<SUB>3</SUB> (0.5% w/v). After homogenization (Biohomogenizer    m 133/1281 – ESGE, Bartlesville OK, USA), the samples were centrifuged at 5000    x <I>g</I> for 5 min at 20<FONT>&#176;</FONT> C. The supernatant was used for    determining absorbance at 480, 645 and 663 nm to obtain carotenoid and chlorophyll    concentrations.</P>     <P>Fluorescence emission was assessed in fully expanded, <I>in situ</I> leaves    between 9:00 and 11:00 am with a plant efficiency analyzer (PEA, MK2 - 9600    - Hansatech, Norfolk, UK). After 15 min dark adaptation, each leaf disc was    exposed to a saturation pulse of high light intensity (2250 <FONT>&#109;</FONT>    mol m<SUP>-2</SUP> s<SUP>-1</SUP>) for five seconds and fluorescence variables    (F<SUB>o</SUB>, F<SUB>m</SUB>, F<SUB>v</SUB>, F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB>) were    determined.</P>     <P>The experiment was an entirely randomized design with treatments arranged as    a 2 x 2 factorial, with ten replications. The factors were: (1) two species    (mahogany and tonka bean) and (2) two light environments (shade and sun). Data    were analyzed by using the analysis of variance and the means compared by Tukey    test (P = 0.05).</P>     <P></P> <B>      <p> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><b>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</b></p> </B>      <P>Leaf chlorophyll concentrations (Chl<I> a</I>, Chl <I>b</I>, Chl <I>tot</I>)    on a fresh mass basis were higher in shade leaves than in sun leaves, for both    species (<a href="#tabela1">Table 1</a>). According to Tan <I>et al</I>. (2000)    there is widespread interest in chlorophylls and their degradation reactions.    Chlorophyll is synthesized and degraded (photooxidation) under irradiation.    At high irradiance, however, the degradation rate overtakes the rate of synthesis,    therefore, a lower chlorophyll concentration is observed. Due to this fact,    shade leaves in comparison with sun leaves tend to show higher chlorophyll concentrations    per unit leaf weight (Boardman, 1977). In addition, Chl<I> a</I> and Chl <I>tot</I>    concentrations were higher in tonka bean leaves than in mahogany, regardless    of environments. It is worth noting that no differences were observed between    species for Chl<I> b</I> concentrations in either sun or shade plants. Slight    differences in Chl<I> a</I>/<I>b</I> ratio were observed both between species    and environments. In the open site, the Chl <I>a</I>/<I>b</I> ratio was higher    in tonka bean than in mahogany, on a mass basis (28%) or per unit area (44%),    respectively (<a href="#tabela1">Tables 1</a> and <a href="#tabela2">2</a>).    In the shade environment Chl <I>b</I> concentration on a mass basis was higher    in both species. This is particularly important because higher Chl <I>b</I>    levels allow light interception in wider wavelength bands. As a result, the    transfer of a larger amount of energy to reaction centers is expected. For this    reason the Chl<I> a</I>/<I>b</I> ratio has been frequently used as an indicator    of plant response to shading (Hendry and Price, 1993). Lower Chl <I>a</I>/<I>b</I>    ratios in mahogany saplings may indicate better acclimation to shade, while    tonka bean appears to be better acclimated to the sunny environments. </P>     <P align="center"><a name="tabela1"></a></P>     <P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <P align="center"><img src="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364t1.gif"></P>     
<P align="center"><a name="tabela2"></a></P>     <P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <P align="center"><img src="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364t2.gif"></P>     
<P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <P>Sun leaves of mahogany showed higher carotenoid concentrations on a mass basis    or per unit area (<a href="#tabela1">Tables 1</a> and <a href="#tabela2">2</a>).    In contrast, tonka bean presented higher sun leaf carotenoid levels, which suggests    that these species use different foraging strategies for light capture, depending    on variations in light levels. Thus, either chlorophyll or carotenoid synthesis    may increase to enhance acclimation to higher irradiation. Hendry and Price    (1993) stressed that the chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio is a sensitive indicator    of photoxidative damage. We observed that in both species the chlorophyll/carotenoid    ratio was lower in the sunny environment, mainly on a mass basis (<a href="#tabela1">Table    1</a>). This reduction was more pronounced in mahogany, 3.89 versus 2.06 for    sun and shade leaves, respectively, suggesting that in this species both synthesis    and carotenoid accumulation are very important as a mechanism for attenuating    stress caused by high irradiance. The contrary was true for tonka bean. In this    species the chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio was similar, 3.25 versus 2.97 (<a href="#tabela1">Table    1</a>), indicating that its strategy for sun acclimation included other mechanisms    such as thick and leathery leaves, in comparison to the thinner and tender leaves    of mahogany. Both species are apparently quite different from each other in    leaf anatomy and morphology. Furthermore, differences between species in terms    of leaf anatomy (J.F.C.Gon&ccedil;alves, pers. obs.) may indicate physiological    differences between species relative to the synthesis and accumulation of photosynthetic    pigments. In mahogany, pigment concentrations per unit leaf area (<a href="#tabela2">Table    2</a>) showed no differences in chlorophyll concentrations between light environments.    However, Chl<I> a</I> and Chl <I>tot</I> concentrations were higher in tonka    bean than in mahogany, both in sun and shade leaves. Nevertheless, there was    no environmental effect on Chl <I>tot</I> and carotenoid concentration in tonka    bean. </P> </FONT><FONT SIZE=3></FONT>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P></P> <FONT SIZE=3>    <P>Chlorophyll concentration per unit leaf area is generally higher in sunny environments. However, some studies indicate a different relationship between irradiance and chlorophyll levels (Lee, 1988). Hence, plant response to irradiance may show a great deal of variability, in terms of chlorophyll concentration per unit leaf area. Thus, we may emphasize that an increase in carotenoid levels is an essential mechanism for mahogany acclimation to the sunny environment, which prevents photoxidative injury to chloroplast pigments. Krause <I>et al. </I>(1995) reported that young leaves contained more carotenoids than mature leaves under strong illumination in tropical forest. In tonka bean, however, leaf anatomy, in addition to physiological mechanisms, appears to be a determining factor for its acclimation to high irradiance.</P>     <P>The chlorophyll <I>a</I>/<I>b</I> ratio declined in the shade environment in both species per unit area, but mainly in tonka bean leaves. Similar results have been observed in other species (Lee, 1988). On the other hand, Tanaka (1998) did not observe any differences in the chl <I>a/b</I> ratio of mahogany seedlings grown under different levels of shade. However, it is important to note that contrasting results may be observed if pigment concentrations were expressed per unit weight or on a leaf area basis.</P>     <P>Initial fluorescence was higher in sun leaves than in shade leaves of mahogany    (<a href="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364f1.gif">Figure 1A</a>), perhaps due to the degradation    of D1 protein in PS II (Aro <I>et al., </I>1994). However, there was no difference    in F<SUB>o </SUB>values between environments in tonka bean leaves, suggesting    a greater stability of the photosynthetic machinery in this species than in    mahogany. In mahogany, F<SUB>m</SUB> was higher for leaves developed in the    open site than under shading (<a href="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364f1.gif">Figure 1B</a>). Conversely,    in tonka bean, higher F<SUB>m</SUB> values were observed in the shade environment    than in the open site. Lower F<SUB>m</SUB> values in sun leaves of tonka bean    were attributed to a larger amount of energy released as heat (quenching capacity).    On the other hand, F<SUB>m</SUB> values were lower in mahogany than in tonka    bean in both environments, suggesting that energy dissipation as heat was less    important for mahogany. Like F<SUB>o</SUB> and F<SUB>m</SUB> variables, the    variable fluorescence in mahogany was also greater in the sunny environment    than under shading. However F<SUB>v</SUB> was lower in sun leaves than in shade    leaves for tonka bean (<a href="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364f1.gif">Figure 1C</a>). Furthermore,    within the environment, F<SUB>v</SUB> values were higher in tonka bean than    in mahogany. In the open site the F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio was higher    in tonka bean 0.77 (<a href="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364f1.gif">Figura 1D</a>) than in mahogany    0.72 (<a href="/img/fbpe/rbfv/v13n2/9364f1.gif">Figure 1D</a>), but no differences were observed    between species in the shade environment. In addition, within each environment    no differences in the F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio were observed. Kitao    <I>et al. </I>(2000) examined the effects of strong light in combination with    high temperatures on the photosynthetic system in four dipterocarp tree species    and also observed little difference in F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio values    among species.</P> </FONT>     
<P></P> <FONT SIZE=3>     <P>By examining fluorescence variables and pigment concentrations we found that, in the open site, tonka bean apparently experienced less damage than mahogany. However, the synthesis and accumulation of anti-oxidative pigments increased as a mechanism to prevent photoinhibitory damages in mahogany. Krause <I>et al. </I>(1995) reported that the high degree of reversible photoinhibition observed in young sun leaves probably represents a dynamic regulatory process protecting the photosynthetic apparatus from severe damage by excessive light. Since a F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio of 0.83 has been reported for unstressed plants (Krause and Weis, 1991), reductions of the F<SUB>v</SUB>/F<SUB>m</SUB> ratio in this study may not seem severe. However, this may only reflect increased levels of photoprotection. In addition, both species may have grown at non-optimum light intensities and, as a result, differences with respect to synthesis, use and accumulation of photosynthetic pigments were observed. The plants used photosynthetic pigments either to increase light harvesting at low light levels or to prevent photoxidative damage under high solar radiation.</P>     <P>Our hypothesis was that species from different successional stages adapt differently their photosynthetic apparatus to changes in light environment. Mahogany showed greater physiological plasticity than tonka bean, which is consistent with results obtained recently by Marenco <I>et</I> <I>al. </I>(in press). Therefore, we concluded that these species use different strategies with respect to the mechanism of accumulation and uses of photosynthetic pigments. They increase light capture in shade environment, whereas protection against photoinhibition is increased in bright environments. </P> <B>    <P></P>     <p> </p>     <p align="center"><b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</b></p> </B></FONT><FONT SIZE=3>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P></P> </FONT><FONT SIZE=3>      <P>The study was supported by the Brazilian Ministry Science and Technology and    the Brazilian Amazon Forest Research Project – Japanese International Cooperation    Agency for financial support (Phase II project n<SUP>o</SUP>: 309 – 1064 - E    – 1).</P>     <P>&nbsp;</P> <B>     <p align="center">REFERENCES</p> </B>      <!-- ref --><P>ARO, N.R.; Mc CARRERY, S. &amp; ANDERSSON, J.M. Recovery from photoinibition    in peas (<I>Pisum sativum</I> L.) acclimated to varying growth irradiances,    Role of D1 protein turnover. <B>Plant Physiology</B>. 104:1119-1129, 1994.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923472&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>BJ&Ouml;RKMAN, O. &amp; DEMMING, B. Photon yield of O<SUB>2</SUB> evolution    and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of    diverse origins. <B>Planta</B>, 170:489-504, 1987.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923473&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>BOARDMAN, N.K. Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. <B>Annual    Review of Plant Physiology</B>,<B> </B>California, 28:355-377, 1977.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923474&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>FRANCO, A.C.; HERZOG, B.; HUBNER, C.; MATTOS, E.A.; SCARANO, F.R.; BALL, E.    &amp; L&Uuml;TTGE, U. Diurnal changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence, CO<SUB>2</SUB>-    exchange and organic acid decarboxylation in the tropical CAM tree <I>Clusia    hilariana</I>. <B>Tree Physiology</B> 19:635-644, 1999.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923475&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>GOMEZ-POMPA, G. &amp; V&Aacute;ZQUEZ-YANES, C. Successional studies of a rain    forest in Mexico. In: <B>Forest Succession Concepts and Applications</B>, D.C.    West, H.H Shugart e D.B. Botkin (Eds.), New York, 1982.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923476&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>HENDRY, G.A.F. &amp; PRICE, A.H. Stress indicators: chlorophylls and carotenoids.    In: Hendry, G.A.F. and Grime J.P. (Eds.) <B>Methods in comparative plant ecology</B>.    Chapman &amp; Hall, London, 1993, 148-152p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923477&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>KAGEYAMA, P.Y. Genetic structure of tropical tree species of Brazil. In: <B>Reproductive    Ecology of Tropical Forest Plants</B>. Ed. by K.S. Bawa and M. Hadley. Unesco,    Paris, 1990, 421p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923478&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>KITAO, M.; LEI, T.T.; KOIKE, T.; TOBITA, H.; MARUYAMA, Y.; MATSUMOTO, Y. &amp;    ANG, L.H. Temperature response and photoinhibition investigated by chlorophyll    fluorescence measurements for four distinct species of dipterocarp trees. <B>Physiologia    Plantarum</B>, 109:284-290, 2000.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923479&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>KRAUSE, G.H. &amp; WEIS, E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the    basis. <B>Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology</B>.    42:313-349, 1991.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923480&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>KRAUSE, G.H. &amp; WINTER, K. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in plants growing    in natural tropical forest gaps. A chlorophyll fluorescence study. <B>Botanical    Acta</B>,<B> </B>109:456-462, 1996.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923481&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>KRAUSE, G.H.; VIRGO, A. &amp; WINTER, K. High susceptibility to photoinhibition    of young leaves of tropical forest trees. <B>Planta</B>, 197:4, 583-591, 1995.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923482&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LAMONTAGNE, M.; BIGRAS, F.J. &amp; MARGOLIS, H.A. Chlorophyll fluorescence    and CO<SUB>2 </SUB>assimilation of black spruce seedlings following frost in    different temperature and light conditions. <B>Tree Physiology</B>, 20:249-255,    2000.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923483&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LEE, D.W. Simulating forest shade to study the development ecology of tropical    plants: Juvenile growth in three vines in India. <B>Journal of Tropical Ecology</B>,    4:281-292, 1988.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923484&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LICHTENTHALER, H.K. &amp; WELLBURN, A.R. Determination of total carotenoids    and chlorophylls <I>a</I> and <I>b </I>of leaf extracts in different solvents.    <B>Biochemical Society Transactions</B>, 603, 591, 1983 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923485&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>MARENCO, R.A.; GON&Ccedil;ALVES, J.F.C. &amp; VIEIRA, G. Leaf gas exchange    andcarbohydrates in tropical trees deffering in successional status in two light    environments in<I> </I>central<I> </I>Amazonian<I>. </I><B>Tree</B> <B>Physiology</B>    (in press).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923486&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>MORRIS, M.H.; NEGREROS-CASTILLO, P. &amp; MIZE, C. Sowing date, shade, and    irrigation affect big leaf mahogany (<I>Swietenia</I> <I>macrophylla</I> King).    <B>Forest Ecology and Management</B>, 132:2-3, 173-181, 2000.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923487&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>NEPSTAD, D.C.; VER&Iacute;SSIMO, A.; ALENCAR, A.; NOBRE, C.; LIMA, E.; LEFEBVRE,    P.; SCHLESINGER, P.; POTTER, C.; MOUTINHO, P.; MENDOZA, E.; COCHRANE, M. &amp;    BROOKS, V. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire.    <B>Nature</B>, 398:505-508, 1999.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923488&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>OGREN, E. &amp; EVANS, J.R. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis <I>in situ</I>    in species of Eucalyptus. <B>Australian Journal of Plant Physiology</B>, 19:    224-232,<I> </I>1992.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923489&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>SHOLES, J.D. &amp; HORTON, P. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence:    simultaneous measurements. In: Hendry, G.A.F. and Grime J.P. (Eds.) <B>Methods    in comparative plant ecology</B>. Chapman and Hall, London, 130-136, 1993.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923490&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>STRAUSS-DEBENEDETTI, S. &amp; BAZZAZ, F.A. Plasticity acclimation to light    in tropical Moraceae of different successional positions. <B>Oecologia</B>,    87:377-387, 1991. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923491&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>TAN, Y.; JIANG, J.H.; WU, H.L.; CUI, H. &amp; YU, R.Q. Resolution of kinetic    system of simultaneous degradation of chlorophyll <I>a</I> and <I>b</I> by PARAFAC.    <B>Analytica Chimica Acta</B>, 412:195-202, 2000. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923492&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>TANAKA, A. <B>Ecofisiologia do estabelecimento de pl&acirc;ntulas em plantios    de enriquecimento em novo Aripuan&atilde;,</B> <B>Manaus</B>. Instituto Nacional    de Pesquisas da Amaz&ocirc;nia, 137p., 1998. Tese de Mestrado.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923493&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>VALIO, I.F.M. Effects of shading and removal of plant parts on growth of <I>Trema</I>    <I>micrantha</I> seedlings. <B>Tree</B> <B>Physiology</B>, 21:65-70, 2001.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923494&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>VIEIRA, G. <B>Gap dynamics in managed Amazonian forest: Structural and ecophysiological    aspects.</B> Oxford, University of Oxford, 162p., 1996. Tese de Doutorado.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5923495&pid=S0103-3131200100020000400024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><P>&nbsp;</P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P><font size="3"><a name="back1"></a>Received: 23.03.2001 - Accepted: 26.06.2001</font>    <br>   <font size="3"><a href="#top1">1</a> Coordena&ccedil;&atilde;o de Pesquisas    em Silvicultura Tropical, INPA / MCT, 69011.970, Manaus, AM, Brasil</font>    <br>   <font size="3"><a href="#top1">*</a> Author to whom correspondence should be    addressed (email: <a href="mailto:jfc@inpa.gov.br">jfc@inpa.gov.br</a>)</font></P> </FONT>       ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ARO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mc CARRERY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ANDERSSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Recovery from photoinibition in peas (Pisum sativum L.) acclimated to varying growth irradiances, Role of D1 protein turnover]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Physiology]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<page-range>1119-1129</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BJÖRKMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DEMMING]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>170</volume>
<page-range>489-504</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOARDMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Plant Physiology]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>355-377</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[California ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FRANCO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HERZOG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUBNER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCARANO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BALL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LÜTTGE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Diurnal changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence, CO2- exchange and organic acid decarboxylation in the tropical CAM tree Clusia hilariana]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tree Physiology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>635-644</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOMEZ-POMPA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VÁZQUEZ-YANES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Successional studies of a rain forest in Mexico]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[West]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shugart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Botkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Succession Concepts and Applications]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HENDRY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRICE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Stress indicators: chlorophylls and carotenoids]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hendry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grime]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Methods in comparative plant ecology]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<page-range>148-152</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Chapman & Hall]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KAGEYAMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genetic structure of tropical tree species of Brazil]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bawa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reproductive Ecology of Tropical Forest Plants]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unesco]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KITAO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOIKE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TOBITA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARUYAMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATSUMOTO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ANG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Temperature response and photoinhibition investigated by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements for four distinct species of dipterocarp trees]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Physiologia Plantarum]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<page-range>284-290</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KRAUSE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>313-349</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KRAUSE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WINTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in plants growing in natural tropical forest gaps: A chlorophyll fluorescence study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Botanical Acta]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<page-range>456-462</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KRAUSE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIRGO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WINTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[High susceptibility to photoinhibition of young leaves of tropical forest trees]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>197</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>583-591</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LAMONTAGNE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BIGRAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARGOLIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Chlorophyll fluorescence and CO2 assimilation of black spruce seedlings following frost in different temperature and light conditions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tree Physiology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<page-range>249-255</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Simulating forest shade to study the development ecology of tropical plants: Juvenile growth in three vines in India]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Tropical Ecology]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>281-292</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LICHTENTHALER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WELLBURN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biochemical Society Transactions]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>603</volume>
<page-range>591</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARENCO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONÇALVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.F.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Leaf gas exchange andcarbohydrates in tropical trees deffering in successional status in two light environments in central Amazonian]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tree Physiology]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORRIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEGREROS-CASTILLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MIZE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Sowing date, shade, and irrigation affect big leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Ecology and Management]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>132</volume>
<numero>2</numero><numero>3</numero>
<issue>2</issue><issue>3</issue>
<page-range>173-181</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEPSTAD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VERÍSSIMO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALENCAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NOBRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEFEBVRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHLESINGER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[POTTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOUTINHO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDOZA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COCHRANE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BROOKS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nature]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>398</volume>
<page-range>505-508</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[OGREN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[EVANS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in situ in species of Eucalyptus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Australian Journal of Plant Physiology]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>224-232</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SHOLES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HORTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence: simultaneous measurements]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hendry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grime]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Methods in comparative plant ecology]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<page-range>130-136</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Chapman and Hall]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STRAUSS-DEBENEDETTI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAZZAZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Plasticity acclimation to light in tropical Moraceae of different successional positions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>377-387</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JIANG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CUI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[YU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.Q.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Resolution of kinetic system of simultaneous degradation of chlorophyll a and b by PARAFAC]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Analytica Chimica Acta]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>412</volume>
<page-range>195-202</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TANAKA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ecofisiologia do estabelecimento de plântulas em plantios de enriquecimento em novo Aripuanã, Manaus]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VALIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.F.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of shading and removal of plant parts on growth of Trema micrantha seedlings]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tree Physiology]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>65-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gap dynamics in managed Amazonian forest: Structural and ecophysiological aspects]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Oxford]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
