<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0103-9016</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Scientia Agricola]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0103-9016</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[São Paulo - Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0103-90162002000300023</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-90162002000300023</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil organisms in organic and conventional cropping systems]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Organismos do solo em sistemas de cultivo orgânico e convencional]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bettiol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wagner]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Raquel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galvão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Abrahão Haddad]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ligo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcos Antônio Vieira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mineiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeferson Luiz de Carvalho]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Embrapa Meio Ambiente  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Jaguariúna SP]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>565</fpage>
<lpage>572</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0103-90162002000300023&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0103-90162002000300023&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0103-90162002000300023&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Despite the recent interest in organic agriculture, little research has been carried out in this area. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare, in a dystrophic Ultisol, the effects of organic and conventional agricultures on soil organism populations, for the tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and corn (Zea mays) crops. In general, it was found that fungus, bacterium and actinomycet populations counted by the number of colonies in the media, were similar for the two cropping systems. CO2 evolution during the cropping season was higher, up to the double for the organic agriculture system as compared to the conventional. The number of earthworms was about ten times higher in the organic system. There was no difference in the decomposition rate of organic matter of the two systems. In general, the number of microartropods was always higher in the organic plots in relation to the conventional ones, reflectining on the Shannon index diversity. The higher insect population belonged to the Collembola order, and in the case of mites, to the superfamily Oribatuloidea. Individuals of the groups Aranae, Chilopoda, Dyplopoda, Pauropoda, Protura and Symphyla were occasionally collected in similar number in both cropping systems.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Apesar do crescente interesse pela agricultura orgânica, são poucas as informações de pesquisa disponíveis sobre o assunto. Assim, num Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo distrófico foram comparados os efeitos de sistemas de cultivo orgânico e convencional, para as culturas do tomate (Lycopersicum esculentum) e do milho (Zea mays), sobre a comunidade de organismos do solo e suas atividades. As populações de fungos, bactérias e actinomicetos, determinadas pela contagem de colônias em meio de cultura, foram semelhantes para os dois sistemas de produção. A atividade microbiana, avaliada pela evolução de CO2, manteve-se superior no sistema orgânico, sendo que em determinadas avaliações foi o dobro da evolução verificada no sistema convencional. O número de espécimes de minhoca foi praticamente dez vezes maior no sistema orgânico. Não foi observada diferença na taxa de decomposição de matéria orgânica entre os dois sistemas. De modo geral, o número de indivíduos de microartrópodos foi superior no sistema orgânico do que no sistema convencional, refletindo no maior índice de diversidade de Shannon. As maiores populações de insetos foram as da ordem Collembola, enquanto para os ácaros a maior população foi a da superfamília Oribatuloidea. Indivíduos dos grupos Aranae, Chilopoda, Dyplopoda, Pauropoda, Protura e Symphyla foram ocasionalmente coletados e de forma similar entre os sistemas.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[soil microorganisms]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[organic agriculture]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[microartropods]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cropping systems]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[environmental impacts]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[microbiota do solo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[agricultura orgânica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[microartrópodos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[sistemas de cultivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[impacto ambiental]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><font size="4"><B>SOIL ORGANISMS IN ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL    CROPPING SYSTEMS</B></font></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <P>     <P><font size="4"><b>Wagner Bettiol<SUP>1,2</SUP>*; Raquel Ghini<SUP>1,2</SUP>;    Jos&eacute; Abrah&atilde;o Haddad Galv&atilde;o<SUP>1</SUP>; Marcos Ant&ocirc;nio    Vieira Ligo<SUP>1</SUP>; Jeferson Luiz de Carvalho Mineiro<SUP>1    <br>   </SUP></b></font><SUP><I>1</I></sup><i>Embrapa Meio Ambiente, C.P. 69 - CEP:    13820-000 - Jaguari&uacute;na, SP.    <br>   <SUP>2</SUP>CNPq Fellow.     <br>   *Corresponding author &lt;<a href="mailto:bettiol@cnpma.embrapa.br">bettiol@cnpma.embrapa.br</a>&gt;</i>     <P>&nbsp;     <P>&nbsp;     <P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P><b>ABSTRACT:</b> Despite the recent interest in organic agriculture, little    research has been carried out in this area. Thus, the objective of this study    was to compare, in a dystrophic Ultisol, the effects of organic and conventional    agricultures on soil organism populations, for the tomato (<I>Lycopersicum esculentum</I>)    and corn (<I>Zea mays</I>) crops. In general, it was found that fungus, bacterium    and actinomycet populations counted by the number of colonies in the media,    were similar for the two cropping systems. CO<SUB>2 </SUB>evolution during the    cropping season was higher, up to the double for the organic agriculture system    as compared to the conventional. The number of earthworms was about ten times    higher in the organic system. There was no difference in the decomposition rate    of organic matter of the two systems. In general, the number of microartropods    was always higher in the organic plots in relation to the conventional ones,    reflectining on the Shannon index diversity. The higher insect population belonged    to the Collembola order, and in the case of mites, to the superfamily Oribatuloidea.    Individuals of the groups Aranae, Chilopoda, Dyplopoda, Pauropoda, Protura and    Symphyla were occasionally collected in similar number in both cropping systems.        <br>   <b> Key words:</b> soil microorganisms, organic agriculture, microartropods,    cropping systems, environmental impacts     <P>&nbsp;     <P>     <P>     <P>     <p align="center"><B>ORGANISMOS DO SOLO EM SISTEMAS DE CULTIVO ORG&Acirc;NICO    E CONVENCIONAL</B> </p>     <P>     <P>     <P><b>RESUMO:</b> Apesar do crescente interesse pela agricultura org&acirc;nica,    s&atilde;o poucas as informa&ccedil;&otilde;es de pesquisa dispon&iacute;veis    sobre o assunto. Assim, num Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo distr&oacute;fico foram    comparados os efeitos de sistemas de cultivo org&acirc;nico e convencional,    para as culturas do tomate (<I>Lycopersicum esculentum</I>) e do milho (<I>Zea    mays</I>), sobre a comunidade de organismos do solo e suas atividades. As popula&ccedil;&otilde;es    de fungos, bact&eacute;rias e actinomicetos, determinadas pela contagem de col&ocirc;nias    em meio de cultura, foram semelhantes para os dois sistemas de produ&ccedil;&atilde;o.    A atividade microbiana, avaliada pela evolu&ccedil;&atilde;o de CO<SUB>2,</SUB>    manteve-se superior no sistema org&acirc;nico, sendo que em determinadas avalia&ccedil;&otilde;es    foi o dobro da evolu&ccedil;&atilde;o verificada no sistema convencional. O    n&uacute;mero de esp&eacute;cimes de minhoca foi praticamente dez vezes maior    no sistema org&acirc;nico. N&atilde;o foi observada diferen&ccedil;a na taxa    de decomposi&ccedil;&atilde;o de mat&eacute;ria org&acirc;nica entre os dois    sistemas. De modo geral, o n&uacute;mero de indiv&iacute;duos de microartr&oacute;podos    foi superior no sistema org&acirc;nico do que no sistema convencional, refletindo    no maior &iacute;ndice de diversidade de Shannon. As maiores popula&ccedil;&otilde;es    de insetos foram as da ordem Collembola, enquanto para os &aacute;caros a maior    popula&ccedil;&atilde;o foi a da superfam&iacute;lia Oribatuloidea. Indiv&iacute;duos    dos grupos Aranae, Chilopoda, Dyplopoda, Pauropoda, Protura e Symphyla foram    ocasionalmente coletados e de forma similar entre os sistemas.     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <b>Palavras-chave:</b> microbiota do solo, agricultura org&acirc;nica, microartr&oacute;podos,    sistemas de cultivo, impacto ambiental     <P>&nbsp;     <P>&nbsp;     <p align="center"><B>INTRODUCTION</B> </p>     <P>Contamination of the water-soil-plant system  with pesticides and fertilizers, in addition to breaking up  the soil structure due to inadequate use of machinery  and implements, is one of the main problems caused  by intensive agriculture. The implementation of  integrated cropping systems and the reduction of the  external energy requirements have been suggested to  minimize these problems. The organic cropping system is  defined as a production system that is sustainable in time  and space, by means of management and protection of  the natural resources, without the use of chemicals  that  are aggressive to humans and to the environment,  retaining fertility increases, soil life and biological diversity.  Thus, the use of highly soluble fertilizers, pesticides and  growth regulators must be excluded in this system  (Paschoal, 1995). Not only does the system have to satisfy the need   for reducing the environmental negative-impact  problems caused by intensive agriculture, it must also  be economically competitive. In comparing the organic  and the conventional cropping systems, an important step  is to establish which social, economic and ecological  factors influence the production systems the most. Besides,  a knowledge of those factors allows for a better understanding of how the production systems  are structured and how they work.     <P>With respect to the biological activity, in  studies to compare the conventional, integrated and  organic cropping systems, Bokhorst (1989) found that the  number of worms in a soil planted with sugar beets was five  times higher in the organic system than in other systems,  and that the percentage of wheat and potato roots  infected with arbuscular mycorrhizae was twice as high in  the organic as compared to the conventional and  integrated systems. Gliessman et al. (1990, 1996), working  with similar objectives, compared conventional and  organic strawberry cropping systems in areas where  farmers became organic producers, and verified an increase  in the number of plants infected with mycorrhizae.  Swezey et al. (1994) found higher microbial biomass in the  soil and in arbuscular mycorrhizae in the organic system  than in the conventional, in an area being changed  from conventional into an organic apple growing area. All  these studies emphasize the biological elasticity in the  organic systems as a fundamental characteristic, influencing  the occurrence of pests and diseases.     <P>With regard to soil organisms, Brussaard et al. (1988, 1990) verified that the total biomass of  soil organisms was higher for the integrated than for  the conventional cropping system, with figures averaging  907 kg C ha<SUP>-1</SUP> and 690 kg C  ha<SUP>-1</SUP>, respectively. Of these biomasses, bacteria accounted for over 90%,  fungi represented approximately 5% and protozoa were  less than 2% of the total biomass. El Titi &amp; Ipach (1989)  studied the effect of a cropping system with low input rate  index as well as the conventional system on the soil  fauna components and observed there were smaller  populations of nematodes pathogenic to plants, higher worm  biomass, and larger populations of collembolans and  Mesostigmata mites in the system with low input index. Collembola is  a microarthropod related to the soil's capacity to  suppress <I>Rhizoctonia</I> <I>solani</I> (Lartey et al., 1994). Rickerl et al.  (1989) found that populations of this organism were 29%  larger in soils under minimum tillage as compared to soils  under conventional tillage. Ladd et al. (1994) verified that the  C biomass of microbial populations was greater in soils  under crop rotation than in soils under continuous  monoculture; greater in soils where plant residues were incorporated  or remained on the soil surface than where they  were removed; and smaller in a nitrogen-fertilized soil than  in non-fertilized ones. This information is important  because these are characteristics that contribute to soil  biological equilibrium, nutrient mineralization and  suppressive capacity toward plant pathogens, among others,  making the system less dependent on external input.     <P>The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the organic and    the conventional cropping systems, for tomato and corn, on the community of    soil organisms.     <P>&nbsp;     <p align="center"><B>MATERIAL E METHODS</B> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>The experiment was carried out in Jaguari&uacute;na, SP, Brasil, latitude 22&#176;    41' S, longitude 47&#176; W Gr., and an altitude of 570 m, on a dystrophic Ultisol,    with the following chemical properties of the 0-0.2 m topsoil layer, before    liming: pH (CaCl<SUB>2</SUB>) 4.4; OM 0.6%; P (resin) 1 <font face="Symbol">m</font>g    cm<SUP>-3</SUP>; K 0.5; Ca 7; Mg 7; H + Al 28; CEC 43 and S 15 mmol dm<SUP>-3</SUP>    of soil; and V 35%. The studies were conducted from January 1993 to September    1995.      <P>The experiment was set up as randomized blocks with six replicates, and plots measuring 25 x 17 m.  Tomato planting pits were spaced 0.5 m apart with 1.20 m  between rows. Each plot was split in two halves, the first 12.5 x  17 m-half being planted with the variety D&eacute;bora and the  other planted with the variety Santa Clara. Therefore, each  of the twelve rows contained 17 planting pits for each  variety. The edging between plots was 10 m wide and was  planted with sorghum. Two tomato plants were transplanted  per pit. The tomato crop was conducted using the  stake system, with one or two stems/plant. The number of  stems was determined based on the successful establishment  of the seedlings. Furrow irrigation and plant pruning  were performed as often as necessary.     <P>The entire area received 4.2 t ha<SUP>-1 </SUP>lime and 2  kg per meter, 110 and 12 days before planting,  respectively. Fertilization in the organic system employed 2.5 L  of organic compost (pH=6.4; C=29.6%; N=1.6%;  P<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>5</SUB>=1.8; K<SUB>2</SUB>O=0.17% and U=25.3%) plus 130 g of  single superphosphate/pit; additionally, 2.5 L of  organic compost, 60 g of single superphosphate, and 60 g  of dolomitic lime/pit were applied as sidedressing;  plants were sprayed twice a week with biofertilizer (Bettiol et  al., 1997), at concentrations of 5 or 10%. In the  conventional system, fertilization consisted of 200 g 4-14-8  (NPK)/pit and, after planting, a sidedressing application of 30 g  N, 33 g K and 10.5 g P/pit; 52 days after planting  and beyond, plants were sprayed once a week with  foliar fertilizer [5-8-0,5 (NCaB)] at a rate of 3 mL  L<SUP>-1</SUP>.     <P>In the conventional system, 0.15g/pit of active ingredient of the insecticide carbofuram were  applied before planting. According to the procedures utilized  by conventional local growers, a blend of  insecticides, fungicides and miticides was sprayed twice a week,  after planting. Active ingredients of fungicides sprayed  during the crop cycle were metalaxyl, mancozeb,  chlorothalonil, copper oxychloride, kasugamycine, cuprous oxide,  methyl thyophanate, iprodione, benomyl, cymoxamil, maneb  and monohydrate zinc sulphate, at the rates  recommended by the manufacturers. Insecticides used  were deltamethrin, permethrin, methomyl,  methamidophos, acephate, avermectin and cartap, also at  the recommended rates.     <P>Extracts of black pepper, <I>Eucalyptus</I>, garlic  and fern; Bordeaux mixture, and biofertilizer were  applied twice a week (Bettiol et al., 1997; Abreu Junior, 1998)  to control diseases and pests in the organic system.  These applications were performed according to the  program adopted by organic producers in the region.     <P>Weed control was carried out by mechanical weeding and with the herbicide glyphosate  (directed spray) on post-planting in the conventional system,  and with mechanical weeding in the organic system.     <P>After harvesting the tomato the area was  planted with 'BR 201' corn; sowing occurred 178 days  after planting the tomatoes. The organic system plots  received an application of 4 m<SUP>3</SUP> of organic compost and  single superphosphate at the rate of 20 g per meter; in  addition, the biofertilizer was sprayed at 10% as sidedressing.  In the conventional system fertilization consisted of 500  kg ha<SUP>-1</SUP> of the 4-14-8 NPK rate applied pre-planting and 15  g m<SUP>-1</SUP> urea as sidedressing. Weed control used the  herbicide paraquat (directed spray) in the conventional system,  and mechanical weeding was used in the organic.     <P>After harvesting the corn, 'D&eacute;bora' tomatoes  were again cultivated, as previously described.  Transplantation was made 401 days after the initial tomato planting.     <P>     <P><B>Soil Microorganisms</B>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>A sample composed of 20 sub-samples of soil taken at the planting row from the 0-7 cm-depth layer  was obtained for each plot. Samples were placed in  plastic bags and immediately transported to the  laboratory. Assessments were performed within 24 hours  after collecting the samples.     <P>Populations of fungi, bacteria and  actinomycetes: The populations of fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes  were quantified through the serial-dilution method, followed  by plating in culture medium. Martin's culture medium  (Tuite, 1969) added of 100 mg mL<SUP>-1</SUP> streptomycine was used  for fungi; for bacteria, the agar nutrient medium added  of nistatin (42 mg L<SUP>-1</SUP>) was used; for the actinomycetes,  the alkalized agar-water medium was utilized. Aliquots  (0.1 mL) from three dilutions, for each soil sample,  were transferred to the culture media in three  replications. Assessments were performed by counting the number  of colonies per Petri dish and expressed as  colony-forming units/g of dry soil (CFU  g<SUP>-1</SUP> dry soil).     <P>Total respiratory activity: Total microbial respiration was evaluated according the  method described by Grisi (1978). Soil samples (200 g)  were incubated for 10, 20, and 30 days within tightly  sealed containers holding 10 mL of a 0.5 mol  L<SUP>-1</SUP> (10 mL) KOH solution. At 10-day intervals, the solution was  substituted and titrated with 0.1 mol  L<SUP>-1</SUP> of HCl. Incubation was conducted in the dark, at 25&#176;C. This parameter  was expressed as g CO<SUB>2</SUB> (g dry  soil<SUP>-1</SUP>) (day<SUP>-1</SUP>). Since the  more substantial changes happened in the first days,  only readings up to the tenth day were used to  determine mean values. For the statistical analysis, data  were transformed into square root (x + 0.5) and subjected  to analysis of variance and Duncan's mean comparison test.     <P>Soil microarthropods: Collecting was made with  a Uhland-type, stainless steel auger 5 cm in diameter and  10 cm in height, totaling four samples per plot. Samples  were placed in plastic bags and taken to the laboratory.  Collecting was between 8:00 and 10:30 h, 82 days before and  325 days after the first tomato seeding, for a total of  16 evaluations. Extraction was according to Tullgren's  modified method, which uses heat and desiccation to force  the animals to leave the soil. Samples remained in the  extractor for 72 hours. An alcohol:glycerin (1:1) aqueous solution  was used for specimen preservation. After extraction, the  animals were counted and separated into groups with the use of  a stereoscopic microscope. Mites and other smaller  animals were fixed on permanent slides for identification. Data  were expressed as number of individuals per 785  cm<SUP>3</SUP> soil. Shannon's diversity index (Shannon &amp; Weaver, 1949)  was calculated for a better understanding of the variations in  the soil microarthropod populations.     <P>Organic matter decomposition rate estimate: The decomposition rate was estimated via loss of  organic content from leaf litter confined in nylon bags, 20 x  20 cm, with a 1 mm mesh, where 10 g of elephant  grass dried at 60&#176;C for three days. The field-collected  samples, were collected every 20 days and transported to  the laboratory, dried at 105&#176;C for 24 hours and ashed  at 600&#176;C for 4 hours. The loss of organic matter  estimate was calculated using the equation described by  Santos &amp; Whitford (1981), which corrects for the adhesion of  soil particles to the organic matter.      <P>Evaluation of earthworms in the soil: The first evaluation was carried out    81 days before the first planting, <I>i.e.</I>, before plowing and liming. A    hand excavator was used to collect samples; two samples were collected from    each plot, up to a depth of 20 cm, with 20 cm diameter. Shortly after planting    the tomatoes, and 90 days later, samples were taken at about 40 cm depth, with    a diameter of 10 cm. Three samples were collected from the compost: one from    the pile surface; another at a layer up to 35 cm, and the third at a depth of    90 cm. The worm populations were determined 370, 407, and 471 days after the    first tomato planting.     <P>&nbsp;     <p align="center"><B>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</B> </p>     <P>The populations of fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes were similar for the two    cropping systems over the entire period of study, with populations of fungi    varying from 10<SUP>4</SUP> to 10<SUP>5</SUP>, whereas populations of bacteria    and actinomycetes varied from 10<SUP>5</SUP> to 10<SUP>7</SUP> CFU g<SUP>-1</SUP>    dry soil (<a href="#figura1">Figure 1</a>). Similar results were obtained by    Castro et al. (1993), when several types of soybean management were compared,    and by Cattelan &amp; Vidor (1990) on soils cultivated with different crop rotation    systems. Grigorova &amp; Norris (1990) justified not adopting this method for    evaluating soil microorganisms, because only a small fraction of microbial biomass    could be cultivated on a selective medium. However, Cattelan &amp; Vidor (1990)    demonstrated the effectiveness of the method in studies with different cropping    systems. In spite of a similar behavior in regard to microbial populations,    starting 145 days after planting the tomatoes, the bacteria populations (<a href="#figura1">Figure    1 C</a>) were higher in the organic system as compared to the conventional.    This could be due to soil plant cover, like Cattelan &amp; Vidor (1990) who    found a smaller bacterial population on naked as compared to cultivated soil.      <P align="center"><a name="figura1"></a>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align="center">&nbsp;     <P align="center"><img src="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591f1.gif">      
<P align="center">&nbsp;     <P>Soil total respiratory activity continued higher in the organic system during    the crop cycles, showing in some evaluations twice as much as the evolution    observed in the conventional system (<a href="#figura2">Figure 2</a>). Differences    were found during the intermediate period, that is, between 142 and 400 days    after planting. There were no statistical differences between treatments at    the initial periods or at the end. The higher respiratory rate in the organic    system could be due to the addition of an exogenous source of organic matter    to the soil and the consequent stimulation of heterotrophic microorganisms (Lambais,    1997).      <P align="center"><a name="figura2"></a>     <P align="center">&nbsp;     <P align="center"><img src="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591f2.gif">      
<P align="center">&nbsp;     <P>Observed organic matter decomposition rates ranged from 15 to 45% of organic    carbon loss in a 20-day period. Rodrigues et al. (1997) observed, in corn cultivated    during the summer, values reaching 70% of carbon loss in a period of 30 days.    There was no difference among results from the organic and the conventional    systems (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591f3.gif">Figure 3</a>). However, regardless of    the system, there was an influence of time on the organic matter decomposition    rate was, although no interaction between time and the treatments was found.    This suggests that variations found during the study period could be related    to the humidity and temperature fluctuations that occur in the field, thus providing    no evidence that the adopted management forms influenced decomposition rate.      
<P>The CO<SUB>2</SUB> release method used in this study  to evaluate respiratory activity favors the  microorganism population, since soil manipulation can eliminate  the majority of the microarthropod community.  Several authors have, in microcosmos studies, demonstrated  the role microarthropods in soil organic matter  decomposition process. A low fungivore density (Collembola) has  a stimulating effect on microbial respiration, whereas  high densities inhibited microorganism respiration Barsdate  et al, 1974; Hanlon &amp; Anderson, 1979).     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>Mites and insects, belonging to various families, were the two main groups    of arthropods found in the soil in 1993 and 1994 (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t1.gif">Tables    1</a> and <a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t2.gif">2</a>). In general, rates and numbers    of individuals from these groups were higher in the organic cropping system,    reflecting on Shannon's diversity indices, which were higher in the organic    system on all sampling dates (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591f4.gif">Figure 4</a>), but    not on the soil organic matter decomposition (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591f3.gif">Figure    3</a>).      
<P>The largest populations of insects were from the Order Collembola, and the    number of individuals found in the organic system was three times as high as    that in the conventional system, during the first nine months (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t1.gif">Table    1</a>). During the following six months, the number of collembolans remained    20% higher in the organic cropping system than in the conventional (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t2.gif">Table    2</a>). These data agree with El Titi &amp; Ipach (1989), who verified larger    populations of collembolans for the low-input system than for the conventional.    Collembolans contribute to the soil's abilitity of suppressing plant pathogens    such as <I>Rhizoctonia solani</I>, <I>Fusarium oxysporum</I> f. sp. <I>vasinfectum</I>,    and <I>Pythium</I> (Wiggins &amp; Curl, 1979; Curl et al., 1985a, b; Rickerl    et al., 1989; Lartey et al., 1994), because these organisms are, for the most    part, mycophagous, modifying the community of fungi. Because in this work the    practices in the organic system stimulated the community of collembolans, it    can be inferred that these organisms are responsible, at least in part, for    the suppression ability in soils enriched with organic matter. Still, in regard    to insects, the number of individuals was low for the rest of the orders (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t1.gif">Tables    1</a> and <a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t2.gif">2</a>).      
<P>During the first nine months of evaluation (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t1.gif">Table    1</a>), for both cropping systems, the largest mite population was of the superfamily    Oribatuloidea, followed by the family Galumnidae and by the superfamily Passalozetoidea,    all in the suborder Oribatida and with similar behavior between cropping systems.    In the suborder Gamasida the most abundant population was Laelapidae and in    Actinedida the most abundant was Pygmephoridae, both more numerous in the organic    system. Populations in the suborders Acaridida and Ixodida were very small.    In the six subsequent months (<a href="/img/fbpe/sa/v59n3/10591t2.gif">Table 2</a>), when    only the families of mites were quantified, the largest population was of Scheloribatidae    followed by Galumnidae, with similar behavior between the systems. The expressive    number of individuals in the families Galumnidae and Scheloribatidae for both    cropping systems is due to the characteristic these families exhibit toward    occupying space in agroecosystems. In the orders Actinedida and Gamasida, families    Cunaxidae and Laelapidae were the largest, respectively. In general, mite population    densities in the classes Gamasida and Actinedida were higher in the organic    system. The fact that the Gamasida showed high numbers is possibly due to a    large Collembola population, because these organisms are a source of food for    this class of mites. El Titi &amp; Ipach (1989) verified the existence of larger    populations of collembolans and Gamasida mites in the low-input system than    in the conventional.      
<P>Due to the more abundance of microarthropods in the organic system, it was believed that the  organic matter decomposition rate would be higher in this  system, because these organisms contribute for organic  matter degradation and stimulate microbial activity in the  soil (Nosek, 1981). Accordingly, when the presence  of Oribatida and Collembola in litterbags incorporated into  the organic and the conventional systems was evaluated,  a larger number of individuals in the litterbags was found  for the organic system (Melo &amp; Ligo, 1999), indicating that  this system contributes for an increase in biological  diversity. Since the presence of these organisms in larger  numbers was not accompanied by a higher decomposition  of organic matter, one can say that the differences  in arthropod density found in the soil between the  organic and the conventional systems did not reflect on  the organic matter decomposition rate, as evaluated by  the litterbag method. The community of microarthropods in  the soil might have, among other factors, influenced  microbial activity, since the organic system showed a  higher microbial activity potential than the conventional  system. The influence of the soil fauna on the organic  matter decomposition rate of forest soils is well documented,  but this is not true for agricultural ecosystems (Crossley et  al., 1989). In agroecosystems the effect of the fauna on  the organic matter decomposition rate seems not to be  very significant and consequently, there are many points  that need to be clarified when it comes to the role of fauna  in agricultural soils. Occasionally, and similarly among  the crop systems evaluated, individuals belonging in  the groups Aranae, Chilopoda, Diploploda, Diplura, Pauropoda, Protura and Symphila were collected.  In addition to these, individuals of the insect  orders Dermaptera, Hemiptera, Homoptera, Isoptera  and Thysanoptera were found in limited numbers.     <P>The higher biological diversity in the organic system is important because it contributes to keeping  the biological equilibrium, essential in an  agroecosystem. This equilibrium may bring about greater stability for  the system and consequently fewer problems with  diseases and pests.     <P>With respect to the worm community, after a one-year period of cropping, the    soil in the organic system showed at least a ten-fold higher number of specimens    per 3140 mL soil sample than the conventional system. After 370, 407 and 471    days from planting a total of 18, 24 and 101 specimens were found in the organic    cropping system, and 1, 2 and 12 specimens were found in the conventional system,    respectively. These data agree with Bokhorst (1989), who found that the number    of worm individuals per square meter, in a soil planted with sugar beets, was    five times higher in the organic system as compared to the conventional. Also,    El Titi &amp; Ipach (1989) observed the existence of greater worm biomass in    a low-input system than in the conventional. The higher number of species in    the organic system is possibly due to the availability of organic substrates    for them to breed on and the absence of pesticides. On the other hand, the presence    of pesticides explains the small number of species in the conventional system,    since the worms are sensitive to the products used in the conventional system    (Lee, 1985). These organisms are important because they not only improve the    physical properties (Lee, 1985), but also contribute to the soil's ability to    suppress pathogens, such as <I>R</I>. <I>solani</I>, among others (Stephens    et al., 1993). No worm specimens were found in the recently plowed soil (81    days before planting) and in the evaluations carried out at planting time and    90 days after planting the seeding, as well as in the organic compost.     <P>&nbsp;     <p align="center"><B>REFERENCES</B> </p>     <!-- ref --><P>ABREU JR., H. <B>Pr&aacute;ticas alternativas de controle de pragas e doen&ccedil;as  na agricultura</B>. Campinas:<B> </B>EMOPI<B>,</B> 1998. 112p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>BETTIOL, W.; TRATCH, R.; GALV&Atilde;O,  J.A.H.<B> Controle de doen&ccedil;as de plantas com  biofertilizantes</B>. Jaguari&uacute;na: EMBRAPA, CNPMA,  1997. 22p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref -->(Circular T&eacute;cnica, 2).     <!-- ref --><P>BARSDATE, R.J.; PRETKI, R.T.; FENCHEL, T. Phosphorus cycle of  model ecosystems: significance for decomposer food chains and effect  of bacterial grazers.<B> OIKOS</B>, v.25, p.239-251, 1974.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>BOKHORST, J.G. The organic farm at Nageli. In: ZADOKS, J.C.  <B>Development of farming systems</B>. Pudoc: Wageningen, 1989. p.57-65.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>BRUSSAARD, L.; VAN VEEN, J.A.; KOOISTRA, M.J.; LEBBINK, E. The  Dutch programme on soil ecology of arable farming systems: I.  Objectives, approach and some preliminary  results.<B> Ecological Bulletins</B>,<B> </B>v.39,  p.35-40, 1988.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000076&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>BRUSSAARD, L.; BOUWMAN, L.A.; GEURS, M.; HASSINK, J.; ZWART,  K.B. Biomass, composition and temporal dynamics of soil organisms of a  silt loam soil under conventional and integrated  management.<B> Netherlands Journal of Agricultural  Science</B>,<B> </B>v.38, p.283-302, 1990.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000077&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>CASTRO, O.M. de; PRADO, H. do; SEVERO, A.C.R.; CARDOSO,  E.J.B.N. Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da atividade de microrganismos do solo em diferentes  sistemas de manejo de soja.<B> Scientia  Agricola</B>,<B> </B>v.50, p.212-219, 1993.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000078&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>CATTELAN, A.J.; VIDOR, C. Sistemas de culturas e a popula&ccedil;&atilde;o  microbiana do solo. <B>Revista Brasileira de Ci&ecirc;ncia do  Solo,</B> v.14, p.125-132, 1990.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000079&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>CROSSLEY JR., D.A.; COLEMAN, D.C.; HENDRIX, P.F. The importance  of the fauna in agricultural soils: research approaches and  perspectives.<B> Agriculture, Ecosystems and  Environment,</B> v.27, p.47-55, 1989.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000080&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>CURL, E.A.; HARPER, J.D.; PETERSON, C.M.; GUDAUSKAS,  R.T. Relationships of mycophagous collembola and  <I>Rhizoctonia solani </I>populations in biocontrol.  <B>Phytopathology</B>, v.75, p.1360 (Abstract). 1985a.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000081&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>CURL, E.A.; GUDAUSKAS, R.T.; HARPER, J.D.; PETERSON, C.M.  Effects of soil insects on populatons and germination of fungal propagules.  In: PARKER, C.A.; ROVIRA, A.D.; MOORE, K.J.; WONG, P.T.W.  <B>Ecology and management of soilborne plant  pathogens.</B> St. Paul: APS, 1985b. p.20-23.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000082&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>EL TITI, A.; IPACH, U. Soil fauna in sustainable agriculture: results of  na integrated farming system at Lautenbach, F.R.G.  <B>Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, </B>v.27, p.561-572, 1989.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000083&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>GLIESSMAN, S.R.; SWEZEY, S.L.; ALLISON, J.; COCHRAN, J.;  FARRELL, J.; KLUSON, R.; ROSADO-MAY, F.; WERNER, M. Strawberry  production systems during conversion to organic management.  <B>California Agriculture</B>, v.44, p.4-7, 1990.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000084&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>GLIESSMAN, S.R.; WERNER, M.R.; SWEZEY, S.L.; CASWELL, E.;  COCHRAN, J.; ROSADO-MAY, F. Conversion to organic strawberry management  changes ecological processes<B>. California  Agriculture</B>, v.50, p.24-31, 1996.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000085&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>GRIGOROVA, R.; NORRIS, J.R. <B>Methods in  microbiology</B>. Techniques in microbial ecology. London: Academic Press, 1990, 627p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000086&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>GRISI, B.M. M&eacute;todo qu&iacute;mico de medi&ccedil;&atilde;o da respira&ccedil;&atilde;o ed&aacute;fica:  alguns aspectos t&eacute;cnicos. <B>Ci&ecirc;ncia e  Cultura</B>, v.30, p.82-88, 1978.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000087&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>HANLON, R.D.G.; ANDERSON, J.M. The effects of Collembola grazing  on microbial activity in decomposing leaf litter.  <B>Oecologia, </B>v.30, p.93-99, 1979.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000088&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LADD, J.N.; AMATO, M.; LI-KAI, Z.; ZCHULTZ, J.E. Differential effects  of rotation, plant residue and nitrogen fertilizers on microbial biomass  and organic matter in na Australian Alfisol. <B>Soil Biology &amp;  Biochemistry</B>, v.26, p.821-831, 1994.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000089&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LAMBAIS, M.R. Atividades microbiol&oacute;gicas envolvidas na mineraliza&ccedil;&atilde;o  da mat&eacute;ria org&acirc;nica: potenciais indicadores da qualidade de solos  agr&iacute;colas. In: MARTOS, H.L.; MAIA, N.B. <B>Indicadores  ambientais</B>. Sorocaba: PUC, 1997. p.167-174.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000090&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LARTEY, R.T.; CURL, E.A.; PETERSON, C.M. Interacitons of  mycophagous collembola and biological control fungi in the suppression of  <I>Rhizoctonia solani. </I><B>Soil Biology &amp; Biochemistry,  </B>v.26, p.81-88, 1994.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000091&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>LEE, K.E. <B>Earthworms: </B>Their ecology and relationships with soils and  land use<B>.</B> Sydney: Academic Press, 1985. 411p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000092&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>MELO, L.A.S.; LIGO, M.A.V. Amostragem de solo e uso de &quot;litterbags&quot;  na avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o populacional de microartr&oacute;podos ed&aacute;ficos.  <B>Scientia Agricola, </B>v.56, p.523-528, 1999.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000093&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>NOSEK, J. Ecological niche of Collembola in biogeocoenoses.  <B>Pedobiologia</B>, v.21, p.166-171, 1981.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000094&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>PASCHOAL, A.B. Modelos sustent&aacute;veis de agricultura.  <B>Agricultura Sustent&aacute;vel</B>, v.2, p.11-16, 1995.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000095&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>RICKERL, D.H.; CURL, E.A.; TOUCHTON, J.T. Tillage and rotation  effects on Collembola populations and <I>Rhizoctonia  </I>infestation. <B>Soil &amp; Tillage  Research</B>, v.15, p.41-49, 1989.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000096&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>RODRIGUES, G.S.; LIGO, M.A.V.; MINEIRO, J.L.de C. Organic  matter decomposition and microartropod community structure in corn fields  under low input and intensive management in Gua&iacute;ra, SP.  <B>Scientia Agricola</B>, v.54, p.69-77, 1997.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000097&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>SANTOS, P.F.; WHITFORD, W.G. The effects of microarthopods on  litter decompositions in a Chihuahuan desert ecosystem.  <B>Ecology</B>, v.62, p.654-663, 1981.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000098&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>SHANNON, C.E.; WEAVER, W. <B>The mathematical theory  of communications</B>. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, 1949. 117p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000099&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>STEPHENS, P.M.; DAVOREN, C.W.; DOUBE, B.M.; RYDER, M.H.;  BENGER, A.M.; NEATE, S.M. Reduced severety of <I>Rhizoctonia solani  </I>disease on wheat seedlings associated with the presence of the  earthworm <I>Aporrectodea trapezoides </I>(LUMBRICIDAE).  <B>Soil Biology &amp; Biochemistry</B>, v.25, p.1447-1484, 1993.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000100&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>SWEZEY, S.L.; RIDER, J.; WERNER, M.R.; BUCHANAN, M.; ALLISON,  J.; GLIESSMAN, S.R. Granny Smith conversions to organic show  early success. <B>California Agriculture</B>, v.48, p.36-44, 1994.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000101&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>TUITE, J. <B>Plant pathological methods fungi and bacteria.  </B>Minneapolis: Burgess, 1969. 239p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000102&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>WIGGINS, E.A.; CURL, E.A. Interactions of Collembola and microflora of cotton    rhizosphere. <B>Phytopathology</B>, v.69, p.244-249, 1979.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000103&pid=S0103-9016200200030002300032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><P>&nbsp;     <P>&nbsp;     <P>Received July 29, 2001      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ABREU JR.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Práticas alternativas de controle de pragas e doenças na agricultura]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EMOPI]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BETTIOL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRATCH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GALVÃO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Controle de doenças de plantas com biofertilizantes]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Jaguariúna ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EMBRAPA, CNPMA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARSDATE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRETKI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FENCHEL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Phosphorus cycle of model ecosystems: significance for decomposer food chains and effect of bacterial grazers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[OIKOS]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>239-251</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOKHORST]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The organic farm at Nageli]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZADOKS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Development of farming systems]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<page-range>57-65</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Pudoc ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wageningen]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRUSSAARD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN VEEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOOISTRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEBBINK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Dutch programme on soil ecology of arable farming systems: I. Objectives, approach and some preliminary results]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Bulletins]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>35-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRUSSAARD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOUWMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GEURS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HASSINK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZWART]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biomass, composition and temporal dynamics of soil organisms of a silt loam soil under conventional and integrated management]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>283-302</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CASTRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.M. de]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRADO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. do]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SEVERO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARDOSO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.J.B.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação da atividade de microrganismos do solo em diferentes sistemas de manejo de soja]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scientia Agricola]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>212-219</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CATTELAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIDOR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Sistemas de culturas e a população microbiana do solo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<page-range>125-132</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CROSSLEY JR.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COLEMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HENDRIX]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The importance of the fauna in agricultural soils: research approaches and perspectives]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>47-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CURL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HARPER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PETERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GUDAUSKAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relationships of mycophagous collembola and Rhizoctonia solani populations in biocontrol]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytopathology]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>1360</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CURL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GUDAUSKAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HARPER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PETERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of soil insects on populatons and germination of fungal propagules]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROVIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOORE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WONG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.T.W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology and management of soilborne plant pathogens]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<page-range>20-23</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[St. Paul ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[APS]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[EL TITI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[IPACH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil fauna in sustainable agriculture: results of na integrated farming system at Lautenbach, F. R.G]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>561-572</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLIESSMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SWEZEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALLISON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COCHRAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FARRELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KLUSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROSADO-MAY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WERNER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Strawberry production systems during conversion to organic management]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[California Agriculture]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>4-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLIESSMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WERNER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SWEZEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CASWELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COCHRAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROSADO-MAY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Conversion to organic strawberry management changes ecological processes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[California Agriculture]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>24-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRIGOROVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NORRIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Methods in microbiology: Techniques in microbial ecology]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRISI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Método químico de medição da respiração edáfica: alguns aspectos técnicos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ciência e Cultura]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>82-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HANLON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.D.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ANDERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effects of Collembola grazing on microbial activity in decomposing leaf litter]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>93-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LADD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AMATO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LI-KAI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZCHULTZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Differential effects of rotation, plant residue and nitrogen fertilizers on microbial biomass and organic matter in na Australian Alfisol]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Biology & Biochemistry]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>821-831</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LAMBAIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Atividades microbiológicas envolvidas na mineralização da matéria orgânica: potenciais indicadores da qualidade de solos agrícolas]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Indicadores ambientais]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>167-174</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Sorocaba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[PUC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LARTEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CURL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PETERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Interacitons of mycophagous collembola and biological control fungi in the suppression of Rhizoctonia solani]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Biology & Biochemistry]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>81-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Earthworms: Their ecology and relationships with soils and land use]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Sydney ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MELO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIGO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Amostragem de solo e uso de "litterbags" na avaliação populacional de microartrópodos edáficos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scientia Agricola]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<page-range>523-528</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NOSEK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecological niche of Collembola in biogeocoenoses]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pedobiologia]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>166-171</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PASCHOAL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Modelos sustentáveis de agricultura]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agricultura Sustentável]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>11-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RICKERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CURL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TOUCHTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tillage and rotation effects on Collembola populations and Rhizoctonia infestation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil & Tillage Research]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>41-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RODRIGUES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIGO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MINEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.de C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Organic matter decomposition and microartropod community structure in corn fields under low input and intensive management in Guaíra, SP]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scientia Agricola]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>69-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SANTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WHITFORD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effects of microarthopods on litter decompositions in a Chihuahuan desert ecosystem]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<page-range>654-663</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SHANNON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEAVER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The mathematical theory of communications]]></source>
<year>1949</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Urbana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Illinois Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STEPHENS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DAVOREN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DOUBE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RYDER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BENGER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEATE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Reduced severety of Rhizoctonia solani disease on wheat seedlings associated with the presence of the earthworm Aporrectodea trapezoides (LUMBRICIDAE)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Biology & Biochemistry]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>1447-1484</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SWEZEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIDER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WERNER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUCHANAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALLISON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLIESSMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Granny Smith conversions to organic show early success]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[California Agriculture]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>36-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUITE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Plant pathological methods fungi and bacteria]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Minneapolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Burgess]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WIGGINS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CURL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Interactions of Collembola and microflora of cotton rhizosphere]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytopathology]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<page-range>244-249</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
