SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

PINHEIRO, Carlos E. G.; MEDRI, Ísis Meri  and  SALCEDO, Ana Karina Moreyra. Why do the ithomiines (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) aggregate? Notes on a butterfly pocket in central Brazil. Rev. Bras. entomol. [online]. 2008, vol.52, n.4, pp.610-614. ISSN 0085-5626.

    Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 23: 495–566. [ Links ]

    Beatty, C. D.; R. S. Bain & T. N. Sherratt. 2005. The evolution of aggregation in profitable and unprofitable prey. Animal Behaviour 70: 199–208. [ Links ]

    Becaloni, G. W. 1997. Vertical stratification of Ithomiinae butterfly (Nymphalidae, Ithomiinae) mimicry complexes: the relationship between adult height flight and larval host-plant height. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 313–341. [ Links ]

    Beehler, B. M. & M. S. Foster. 1988. Hotshots, hotspots and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. American Naturalist 131: 203–219. [ Links ]

    Benson, W. W. 1972. Natural selection for Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 176: 936–939. [ Links ]

    Bradbury, J. W. 1981. The evolution of leks, p. 138–169. In: R. D. Alexander & D. W. Tinkle (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour: recent research and new theory. New York, Chiron Press. [ Links ]

    Bradbury, J. W. & R. M. Gibson. 1983. Leks and mate choice, p. 273–289. In: P. Bateson (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 461 p. [ Links ]

    Brower, L. P. 1988. Avian predation on the Monarch butterfly and its implications for mimicry theory. American Naturalist 131: S4– S6. [ Links ]

    Brower, L. P. & W. H. Calvert. 1985. Foraging dynamics of bird predators on overwintering Monarch butterflies in Mexico. Evolution 39: 852–868. [ Links ]

    Brown, K. S. Jr. 1985. Chemical ecology of dehydropyrrolizidine alkaloids in adult Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 44: 435–460. [ Links ]

    Brown, K. S. Jr. 1987. Chemistry at the Solanaceae/Ithomiinae interface. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74: 359–397. [ Links ]

    Brown, K. S. Jr. 1988. Mimicry, aposematism and crypsis in Neotropical Lepidoptera: the importance of dual signals. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 113: 83–101. [ Links ]

    Brown, K. S. Jr. 1992. Borboletas da Serra do Japi: diversidade, habitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal, p. 142-187. In: L. Morellato (org). Historia natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservação de uma área florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Campinas, Ed. Unicamp, 321 p. [ Links ]

    Brown, K. S. Jr.; J. R. Trigo; R. B. Francini; A. B. B. Morais & P. C. Motta. 1991. Aposematic insects on toxic host plants: coevolution, colonisation, and chemical emancipation, p. 375–402. In: P. W. Price, T. M. Lewinson, G. W. Fernandes & W. W. Benson (eds). Plant-animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 639 p. [ Links ]

    Brown, K. S. Jr. & J. Vasconcellos-Neto. 1976. Predation on aposematic Ithomiine butterflies by tanagers (Pipraeidea melanonota). Biotropica 8: 136–141. [ Links ]

    Clark, B. R. & S. H. Faeth. 1997. The consequences of larval aggregation in the butterfly Chlosyne lacinia. Ecological Entomology 22: 408–415. [ Links ]

    Cook, L. M.; L. P. Brower & J. Alcock. 1976. An attempt to verify mimetic advantage in a neotropical environment. Evolution 23: 339–345. [ Links ]

    DeVries, P. J. 1987. The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 327 p. [ Links ]

    Drummond III, B. A. & K. S. Brown Jr. 1987. Ithominae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): summary of known larval foodplants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74: 341–358. [ Links ]

    Emery, E. O.; K. S. Brown Jr. & C. E. G. Pinheiro. 2006. As borboletas (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 50: 85–92. [ Links ]

    Fink, L. S.; L. P. Brower; R. B. Waide & P. R. Spitzer. 1983. Overwintering monarch butterflies as food for insectivorous birds in Mexico. Biotropica 15: 151–153. [ Links ]

    Fisher, R. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. New York, Dover. [ Links ]

    Freitas, A. V. L. 1993. Biology and population dynamics of Placidula euryanassa, a relict Ithomiine butterfly (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 47: 87–105. [ Links ]

    Freitas, A. V. L. 1996. Population biology of Heterosais edessa (Nymphalidae) and its associated Atlantic Forest Ithomiinae community. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 50: 273–289. [ Links ]

    Gagliardo, A. & Gilford, T. 1993. Why do warningly coloured prey live gregariously? Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 251: 69–74. [ Links ]

    Haber, W. 1978. Evolutionary ecology of tropical mimetic butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae). Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota. [ Links ]

    Langham, G. M. 2006. Rufous-tailed jacamars and aposematic butterflies: do older birds attack novel prey? Behavioral Ecology 17: 285–290. [ Links ]

    Mappes, J. & R. V. Alatalo. 1997. Effects of novelty and gregariousness in survival of aposematic prey. Behavioral Ecology 8: 174–177. [ Links ]

    Marden, J. H. 1992. Newton's second law of butterflies. Natural History 1: 54–60. [ Links ]

    Pinheiro, C. E. G. 1996. Palatability and escaping ability in Neotropical butterflies: tests with wild Kingbirds (Tyrannus melancholicus, Tyrannidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 59: 351–365. [ Links ]

    Pinheiro, C. E. G. 2003. Does Müllerian mimicry work in nature? Experiments with butterflies and birds (Tyrannidae). Biotropica 35: 356–364. [ Links ]

    Pinheiro, C. E. G. 2004. Jacamars (Aves, Galbulidae) as selective agents of mimicry in neotropical butterflies. Ararajuba 12: 137–139. [ Links ]

    Pinheiro, C. E. G. 2007. Asynchrony in daily activity patterns of butterfly models and mimics. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23: 119–123. [ Links ]

    Pinheiro, C. E. G.; M. A. Bagno & R. A. Brandão. 2003. Diet and foraging behavior of the rufous-tailed jacamar (Galbula ruficauda, Galbulidae) in central Brazil. Ararajuba 11: 241–243. [ Links ]

    Riipi, M.; R. V. Alatalo; L. Lindström & J. Mappes. 2001. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs is aposematic aggregations. Nature 413: 512–514. [ Links ]

    Sillén-Tullberg, B. 1988. Evolution of gregariousness in aposematic butterfly larvae: a phylogenetic analysis. Evolution 42: 293–305. [ Links ]

    Southwood, T. R. E. 1971. Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insects. London, Chapman and Hall, 524 p. [ Links ]

    Trigo, J. R.; K. S. Brown Jr; L. Witte; T. Hartmann; L. Ernst & L. E. S. Barata. 1996. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58: 99–123. [ Links ]

    Vasconcellos-Neto, J. 1980. Dinâmica de populações de Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) em Sumaré, São Paulo. Ph. D. dissertation, Campinas, Unicamp. [ Links ]

    Vasconcellos-Neto, J. & Brown, K. S. Jr. 1982. Interspecific hybridization in Mechanitis butterflies (Ithomiinae): a novel pathway for the breakdown of isolating mechanisms. Biotropica 14: 288–294. [ Links ]

    Willmott, K. R. & J. Mallet. 2004. Correlations between adult mimicry and larval host plants in ithomiine butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271: S266–S269. [ Links ]