SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

VIANA, Vander; MENEZES, Danielle  and  MENDES, Milena. Revelando sentidos na prática docente: a abordagem de corpus na análise do discurso. DELTA [online]. 2011, vol.27, n.2, pp. 175-217. ISSN 0102-4450.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502011000200001.

    Allwright, D. 1996. Social and pedagogical pressures in the language classroom: the role of socialization. In: Coleman, H. (Ed.). Society and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 207-228. [ Links ]

    ______. 2003. Exploratory practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, v. 7, n. 2, p. 113-141. [ Links ]

    ______. 2006. Six promising directions in applied linguistics. In: Gieve, S.; Miller, I. K. (Ed.). Understanding the language classroom. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 11-17. [ Links ]

    Allwright, D.; Bailey, K. M. 1991. Focus on the language classroom: an introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Almeida Filho, J. C. P. 2007. Linguística aplicada: ensino de línguas e comunicação. 2. ed. Campinas, SP: Pontes/Arte Língua. [ Links ]

    Baker, P. 2004. Querying keywords: questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, v. 32, n. 4, p. 346-359. [ Links ]

    ______. 2006. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London/New York: Continuum. [ Links ]

    Berns, M.; Matsuda, K. 2006. Applied linguistics: overview and history. In: Brown, K. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2. ed. Oxford: Elsevier, p. 394-405. [ Links ]

    Biber, D.; Connor, U.; Upton, T. A. 2007. Discourse on the move: using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Blakemore, D. 2001. Discourse and relevance theory. In: Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 100-118. [ Links ]

    Cavalcanti, M. C. 1986. A propósito de linguística aplicada. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, Campinas, n. 7, p. 5-12. [ Links ]

    ______. 2004. Applied linguistics: Brazilian perspectives. AILA Review, v. 17, p. 23-30. [ Links ]

    Conrad, S. 2002. Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, v. 22, p. 75-95. [ Links ]

    Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    Dubois, S.; Sankoff, D. 2001. The variationist approach toward discourse structural effects and socio-interactional dynamics. In: Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 282-303. [ Links ]

    Edwards, D.; Mercer, N. 1987. Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge. [ Links ]

    Edwards, J. A. 2001. The transcription of discourse. In: Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 321-348. [ Links ]

    Ferreira, A. B. H. 1999. Dicionário Aurélio eletrônico: século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira. [ Links ]

    Fleischman, S. 2001. Language and medicine. In: Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 470-502. [ Links ]

    Freire, P. 1978. Pedagogia do oprimido. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. [ Links ]

    Gee, J. P. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. London: Routledge. [ Links ]

    Holliday, A. 1999. Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, v. 20, n. 2, p. 237-264. [ Links ]

    Hyland, K. 2009. Academic discourse: English in a global context. London/New York: Continuum. [ Links ]

    Izarra, L. P. Z. 1999. 'Teaching back' literatures in English: reading (de)centered voices as a cultural hologram. In: Encontro Nacional de Professores Universitários de Língua Inglesa, 14., 1999, Belo Horizonte. Anais do XIV ENPULI. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, p. 199-205. [ Links ]

    Jordão, C. M. 2001. A educação literária no lado dos anjos. 218 f. Tese (Doutorado em Estudos Linguísticos e Literários) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. [ Links ]

    Lakoff, R. T. 2001. Nine ways of looking at apologies: the necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis. In: Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 199-214. [ Links ]

    Lazaraton, A. 2002. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, v. 22, p. 32-51. [ Links ]

    Mcenery, T.; Xiao, R.; Tono, Y. 2006. Corpus-based language studies: an advanced resource book. London: Routledge. [ Links ]

    Nunan, D. 1992. Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    O'Keeffe, A.; McCarthy, M.; Carter, R. 2007. From corpus to classroom: language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Pennycook, A. 1998. A linguística aplicada dos anos 90: em defesa de uma abordagem crítica. In: Signorini, I.; Cavalcanti, C. (Org.). Linguística aplicada e transdisciplinaridade: questões e perspectivas. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras, p. 23-50. [ Links ]

    Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. 2001. Introduction. In: ______ (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 1-10. [ Links ]

    Scollon, R.; Scollon, S. W. 2001. Discourse and intercultural communication. In: Schriffin, D.; Tannen, D.; Hamilton, H. E. (Ed.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p. 538-547. [ Links ]

    Scott, M. 2007a. Oxford WordSmith Tools: version 4.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponível em: <http://www.lexically.net/downloads/version4/wordsmith.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2009. [ Links ]

    ______. 2007b. WordSmith Tools. Version 4.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    Scott, M.; Tribble, C. 2006. Textual patterns: key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Sealey, A.; Carter, B. 2004. Applied linguistics as social science. London: Continuum. [ Links ]

    Signorini, I. 1998. Do residual ao múltiplo e ao complexo: o objeto da pesquisa em linguística aplicada. In: Signorini, I; Cavalcanti, C. (Org.). Linguística aplicada e transdisciplinaridade: questões e perspectivas. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras, p. 99-110. [ Links ]

    Steen, G. 2004. Perspectives on discourse: the state of the art. Language and Literature, v. 13, n. 2, p. 161-179. [ Links ]

    Tardif, M. 2005. Saberes docentes e formação profissional. 5. ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes. [ Links ]

    Tognini-Boneli, E. 2001. Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Trappes-Lomax, H. 2004. Discourse analysis. In: Davies, A.; Elder, C. (Ed.). The handbook of applied linguistics. Malden, MA; Blackwell, p. 133-164. [ Links ]

    Traylen, H. 1994. Confronting hidden agendas: co-operative inquiry with health visitors. In: Pearson, P. (Ed.). Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage, p. 59-81. [ Links ]

    Tribble, C.; Jones, G. 1990. Concordances in the classroom: a resource book for teachers. London: Longman. [ Links ]

    Viana, V. 2008. Verbos modais em contraste: análise de corpus da escrita de universitários em inglês. 230 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) – Departamento de Letras, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. [ Links ]

    Zyngier, S. 1999. Research and practice in the teaching of literature: mapping the area. In: Encontro Nacional de Professores Universitários de Língua Inglesa, 14., 1999, Belo Horizonte. Anais do XIV ENPULI. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, p. 307-325. [ Links ]