SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

FARINIUK, Luiz Fernando et al. Efficacy of five rotary systems versus manual instrumentation during endodontic retreatment. Braz. Dent. J. [online]. 2011, vol.22, n.4, pp. 294-298. ISSN 0103-6440.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000400006.

    1. Baratto-Filho F, Ferreira EL, Fariniuk LF. Efficiency of the 0.04 taper ProFile during the re-treatment of gutta-percha-filled root canals. Int Endod J 2002;35:651-654. [ Links ]

    2. Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment - case selection and technique. Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod 1988;14:607-614. [ Links ]

    3. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Schneider FH, Altenburger MJ, Hellig E. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:542-547. [ Links ]

    4. Sae-Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim BK, Lee HL. Effectiveness of ProFile .04 taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2000;26:100-104. [ Links ]

    5. Wilcox LR, Krell KV, Madison S, Rittman B. Endodontic retreatment: evaluation of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation. J Endod 1987;13:453-457. [ Links ]

    6. Tamse A, Unger U, Metzger Z, Rosenberg M. Gutta-percha solvents - a comparative study. J Endod 1986;12:337-339. [ Links ]

    7. Kosti E, Lambriandinis T, Economides N, Nofitou C. Ex vivo study pf the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer. Int Endod J 2006;39:48-54. [ Links ]

    8. Masiero AV, Barletta FB. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endod J 2005;38:2-7. [ Links ]

    9. Hülsmann M, Bluhm V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2004;37:468-476. [ Links ]

    10. Duarte MAH, Reis Só MV, Cimadon VB, Zucatto C, Vier-Pelisse FV, Kuga MC. Effectiveness of rotary or manual techniques for removing a 6 year old filling material. Braz Dent J 2010;21:148-152. [ Links ]

    11. Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instrtuments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2007;40:532-537. [ Links ]

    12. Carvalho Maciel AC, Zacaro Scelza MF. Efficacy of automated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment: na ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006;39:779-784. [ Links ]

    13. Tagger M, Tamse A, Katz A, Korzen BH. Evaluation of the apical seal produced by a hybrid root canal filling method, combining lateral condensation and thermatic compaction. J Endod 1984;10:299-303. [ Links ]

    14. Gambarini G. Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: a scanning electron microscopic evalution of a new instrumentation and irrigation technique. J Endod 1999;25:800-803. [ Links ]

    15. Fariniuk LF, Baratto-Filho F, Guerisoli DMZ, Barbizam JVB, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Modeling capacity of ENDO flash files in simulated root canals. Braz Dent J 2001;12:39-42. [ Links ]

    16. Siqueira JR JF, Araújo MCP, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Sabóia Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 1997;23:499-502. [ Links ]

    17. Ferreira JJ, Rhodes JS, Ford TR. The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using ProFiles. Int Endod J 2001;34:267-274. [ Links ]

    18. Hülsmann M, Stotz S. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 1997;30:227-233. [ Links ]

    19. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata GI, Uemura M, Toda T, Weine F. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J 2000;33:361-366. [ Links ]

    20. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Banegas G. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006;39:521-526. [ Links ]