SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

GUIVANT, Julia S.  and  MACNAGHTEN, Philip. O mito do consenso: uma perspectiva comparativa sobre governança tecnológica. Ambient. soc. [online]. 2011, vol.14, n.2, pp.89-104. ISSN 1414-753X.

    BECK, U. Risk Society: towards a new modernity. London, Sage, 1992. [ Links ]

    BECK, U. World Risk Society. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1999. [ Links ]

    BECK, U. World at Risk. Cambridge, Polity, 2008. [ Links ]

    BECK, U., GIDDENS, A. and LASH, S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge, Polity, 1994. [ Links ]

    BICKERSTAFF, K., LORENZONI, I., JONES, M. and PIDGEON, N. Locating Scientific Citizenship, The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement, Science, Technology and Human Values, 35, pp. 474-50. 2010. [ Links ]

    BRAUN, K. and KROPP, C. Beyond speaking the truth? Institutional responses to uncertainty in scientific governance, Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(6), pp. 771-782. 2010. [ Links ]

    BUCCHI, M. and NERESINI, F. Science and public participation, in Hackett, E., AMSTERDAMSKA, O., LYNCH, M. and WAJCMAN, J. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Massachusetts, MIT, pp. 449-473. 2008. [ Links ]

    CALLON, M., LASCOUMES, P. and BARTHE, Y. Agir dans un Monde Incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris, Seuil, 2001. [ Links ]

    CASSIANO, A.C. Abrindo uma Caixa-preta: um estudo de percepções sobre a ciência em ONGs ambientalistas. Florianópolis, Brasil, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2010. [ Links ]

    COLLINS, H. and EVANS, R. Rethinking Expertise, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2007. [ Links ]

    COOKE, B. and U. KOTHARI (eds.) Participation. The new tyranny? London, Zed Books, 2001. [ Links ]

    DAVIES, S., MACNAGHTEN, P. and KEARNES, M. (eds.) Reconfiguring Responsibility: Lessons for Public Policy (Part 1 of the report on Deepening Debate on Nanotechnology). Durham, Durham University, 2009. [ Links ]

    DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY. Excellence and Opportunity - A Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century. DTI, London, 2000. [ Links ]

    FELT, U. and WYNNE, B. Taking European Knowledge Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Brussels, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, 2007. [ Links ]

    GIDDENS, A. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, Polity, 1990. [ Links ]

    GIDDENS, A. Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge, Polity, 1994. [ Links ]

    GIDDENS, A. The Third Way. Cambridge, Polity, 1998. [ Links ]

    GIDDENS, A. Run-Away World: How globalization is reshaping our world. London, Profile, 1999. [ Links ]

    GUIVANT, J. A teoria da sociedade de risco de Ulrich Bech, entre o diagnóstico e a profecia, Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, v. 16, p. 95-112. 2001. [ Links ]

    GUIVANT, J. Heterogeneous and unconventional coalitions around global food risks, Integrating Brazil into the debates, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, v. 4, p. 231-245. 2002. [ Links ]

    GUIVANT, J. Governance of GMOs and the constraints for a definition of the public arena, in DASGUPTA, S. (ed.) Understanding the Global Environment. New Dehli, Pierce Education, p. 354-380. 2009 [ Links ]

    HOUSE OF LORDS. Science and Society. Third Report of the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, London, The Stationery Office, 2000. [ Links ]

    IRWIN, A. Citizen Science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. London, Routledge, 1995. [ Links ]

    IRWIN, A. The politics of talk, coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance, Social Studies of Science, v. 36, n. 2. p. 299-330. 2006. [ Links ]

    JASANOFF, S. Designs of Nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, Princeton University Press. 2005a. [ Links ]

    JASANOFF, S. Let them eat the cake', GM foods and the democratic imagination, in LEACH, M., SCOONES, I. and WYNNE, B. (eds.) Science and Citizens. Globalization and the challenge of engagement. London, Zed Books. 2005b. [ Links ]

    JOLY, P-B. and Kaufmann, A. Lost in translation? The need for 'upstream engagement' with nanotechnology on trial, Science as Culture, v. 17, n. 3, p. 225-247. 2008. [ Links ]

    LEACH, M; Scoones, I. Science and citizenship in a global context, in LEACH, M., SCOONES, I; WYNNE, B. (eds) Science and Citizens. Globalization and the challenge of engagement. London, Zed Books, 2005. [ Links ]

    LEACH, M., SCOONES, I and WYNNE, B. (eds) Science and Citizens. Globalization and the challenge of engagement. London, Zed Books, 2005. [ Links ]

    LONG, N. From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? The case for an actor-oriented sociology of development, in LONG, N. and LONG, A. (eds.) Battlefields of Knowledge. The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. London, Routledge, 1992. [ Links ]

    LONG, N. and VILLAREAL, M. The interweaving of knowledge and power in development interfaces, in SCOONES, I. and THOMPSON, J. (eds.) Beyond Farmer First. Rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London, IT Publications, 1994. [ Links ]

    MACNAGHTEN, P. and CHILVERS, J. Governing risky technology, in LANE, S., KLAUSER, F. and KEARNES, M. (eds.). Risk Research: Practices, Politics and Ethics. London, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 99-124. [ Links ]

    MACNAGHTEN, P. and GUIVANT, J. Converging citizens? nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom, Public Understanding of Science, v. 20, n. 2, p. 207-220. 2010. [ Links ]

    NUNES, D. Na indústria do átomo a beleza é inteligente, mas a participação pública é nanocidadã. Dissertação de Mestrado em Sociologia Política, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2009. [ Links ]

    OTTINGER, G. Buckets of resistance, standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology and Human Values, v. 35, n, 2, p. 244-270. 2010. [ Links ]

    ROYAL Commission of Environment and Pollution. Novel Materials in the Environment: The case of nanotechnology. 27th report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, London, The Stationery Office, 1998. [ Links ]

    ROYAL SOCIETY/ROYAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. London, Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004. [ Links ]

    SCOONES, I. and J. THOMPSON (editors). Beyond farmer first. Rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London, IT Publications, 1994. [ Links ]

    WILSDON, J. and WILLIS, R. See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London, Demos, 2004. [ Links ]

    WYNNE, B. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide., in LASH, S., SZERSZYNSKI, B. and WYNNE, B. (eds.) Risk, Environment and Modernity. London, Sage Publications, 1996. [ Links ]