SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

LANGFORD, Malcolm. Judicialização dos direitos econômicos, sociais e culturais no âmbito nacional: uma análise socio-jurídica. Sur, Rev. int. direitos human. [online]. 2009, vol.6, n.11, pp. 98-133. ISSN 1806-6445.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-64452009000200006.

    ACKERMAN, E. M. 2004. Colección de análisis jurisprudencial: Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Buenos Aires: La Ley. [ Links ]

    ALBISA, C.; SCHULTZ, J. 2008. The United States: A Ragged Patchwork. In: LANGFORD, M. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 230-249. [ Links ]

    ANNAN, A. 1988. Administrative Law in a Global Era: Progress, Deregulatory Change, and the Rise of the Administrative Presidency. Cornell Law Review, v. 73, p. 1108. [ Links ]

    ARANGO, R.; LEMAITRE, J. 2002. (Org.). Jurisprudencia constitucional sobre el derecho al mí1nimo vital: Constitutional Case Law on the Minimum Conditions for a Dignified Life. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes. [ Links ]

    BADERIN, M. 2007. Economic Social and Cultural Rights in Action. Oxford: OUP. [ Links ]

    BELLAMY, R. 2008. The Democratic Constitution: Why Europeans Should Avoid American Style Constitutional Judicial Review. European Political Science, v. 7, n. 1, p. 9-20. [ Links ]

    BILCHITZ, D. 2002. Giving Socio-Economic Rights Teeth: The Minimum Core and Its Importance. South African Law Journal, v. 119, p. 484-501. [ Links ]

    ______. 2003. Towards a Reasonable Approach to the Minimum Core: Laying the Foundations for Future Socio-Economic Rights Jurisprudence. South African Journal of Human Rights, v. 19, p. 1-2. [ Links ]

    ______. 2007. Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    BYRNE, I.; HOSSAIN, S. 2008. South Asia: Economic and Social Rights Case Law of Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. In: LANGFORD, M. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 125-143. [ Links ]

    CERNIC, J. 2008. Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights: A Critical Analysis of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Hanse Law Review, v. 4, n. 1, p. 71-100. [ Links ]

    CHAYES, A. 1976. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review, v. 89, p. 1281-1316. [ Links ]

    CLARK, D.; FOX, J.; TREAKLE, K. (Org). 2003. Demanding Accountability: Civil Society Claims and the World Bank Inspection Panel. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [ Links ]

    COOMANS, F. 2006. (Org). Justiciability of Economic and Social Rights: Experiences from Domestic Systems. Antwerpen: Intersentia and Maastrict Centre for Human Rights. [ Links ]

    COURTIS. C. 2006. Socio-Economic Rights before the Courts in Argentina. In: COOMANS, F. (Org). Justiciability of Economic and Social Rights. Antwerpen: Intersentia, p. 309-354. [ Links ]

    ______. 2008. Argentina: Some promising signs. In: LANGFORD, M. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    CUNEO, I. 2005. The Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Inter-American System. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, v. 22, n. 1, p. 53-63. [ Links ]

    DENNIS, M.; STEWART, D. 2004. Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Should There Be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing and Health? American Journal of International Law, v. 98, p. 462-515. [ Links ]

    DESAI, A.; MURALIDHAR, S. 2000. Public Interest Litigation: Potential and Problems. In: KIRPAL, B.N.; DESAI, A.; SUBRAMANIUM, G.; DHAVAN, R.; RAMACHANDRAN, R. (Org.) Supreme But Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India. Nova Déli: Oxford University Press, p. 159-192. [ Links ]

    DUGARD, J. 2006. Court of First Instance? Towards a Pro-poor Jurisdiction for the South African Constitutional Court. South African Journal on Human Rights, v. 22, n. 2, p. 261. [ Links ]

    DURBACH, A. 2008. The Right to Legal Aid in Social Rights Litigation. In: LANGFORD, M. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 59-71. [ Links ]

    EIDE, A. 1995. The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living Including the Right to Food. In: ______.; KRAUSE, C.; ROSAS, A. (Org.). Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook. Dordrecht/Boston/Londres: Martinus Nijhoff, p. 89-105. [ Links ]

    EPP, C. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ Links ]

    EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE (ERRC). 2005. Desegregation Court Victory: ERRC Prevails in Court against Bulgarian Ministry of Education on School Segregation of Roma. Disponível em: www.errc.org. Último acesso em: 1 Janeiro 2006. [ Links ]

    FABRE, C. 2000. Social Rights under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    FAIRSTEIN, C. 2005. Positive Remedies: The Argentinean Experience. In: SQUIRES, J.; LANGFORD, M.; THIELE, B. (Org.). Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Sidney: UNSW Press and Australian Human Rights Centre, p. 139-151. [ Links ]

    FEELEY, M. 1992. Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors: Review of 'The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?" by Gerald N. Rosenberg. Law & Social Inquiry, v. 17, n. 4, p. 745-760. [ Links ]

    FENWICK, C. 2008. The International Labour Organisation: An Integrated Approach to Economic and Social Rights. Genebra: International Labour Organisation, p. 591-612. [ Links ]

    FREEMAN, C.; HEYDENREICH, C.; LILLYWHITE, S. 2000. Guide to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises' Complaint Procedure: lessons from past NGO complaints. OECD Watch. Disponível em: http://www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/533485. Último acesso em: 15 Outubro 2008. [ Links ]

    FULLER, L. 1979. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review, v. 92, p. 353-409. [ Links ]

    GALOWITZ, P. 2006. Right to Legal Aid and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Litigation. In: LANGFORD, M.; NOLAN, A. Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Legal Practitioners Dossier (Revised). Genebra: Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions. [ Links ]

    GARGARELLA, R. 2006. Theories of Democracy, the Judiciary and Social Rights. In: ______.; DOMINGO, P.; ROUX, T. (Eds.). Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor?. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate, p. 13-34. [ Links ]

    ______. DOMINGO, P.; ROUX, T. (Eds.). 2006. Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor?. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate. [ Links ]

    GAURI, V.; BRINKS, D. 2008. (Org.). Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    GLOPPEN, S. 2006. Courts and Social Transformation: An Analytical Framework. In: GARGARELLA, R.; DOMINGO, P.; ROUX, T. (Org.). Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor?. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate, p. 35-59. [ Links ]

    HEYWOOD, M. 2003. Contempt or compliance? The TAC case after the Constitutional Court judgment. ESR Review, v. 4, n. 4, p. 7-10. [ Links ]

    HOFFMAN, F.; BENTES, F. 2008. Accountability for Economic and Social Rights in Brazil. In: GAURI, V.; BRINKS, D. (Org). Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 100-145. [ Links ]

    HOROWITZ, Donald. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. [ Links ]

    INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS (ICJ). 2007. Kenyan and Swedish Sections. Human rights Litigation and the domestication of human rights standards in Sub Saharan Africa: vol. 1. Nairóbi: AHRAJ Case Book Series. [ Links ]

    ______. 2008. Courts and the Legal Enforcement of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Comparative experiences of justiciability Genebra: ICJ. [ Links ]

    INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION (ILO). 1996. Freedom of Association - Digest of decisions and principles of the Freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO. 5th ed. Genebra: International Labour Organisation. [ Links ]

    JAYAWICKRAMA, J. 2002. The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    JOSEPH, S. 2008. Liability of Multinational Corporations. In: LANGFORD, M. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 613-627. [ Links ]

    KING, Jeff. 2008. The Pervasiveness of Polycentricity. Public Law, p. 101-124. [ Links ]

    KYRITSIS, D. 2006. Representation and Waldron's Objection to Judicial Review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, v. 26, n. 4, p. 733-751. [ Links ]

    LANGFORD, M. 2003. Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Achievements, Challenges and Strategies. Genebra: Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions. [ Links ]

    ______. 2005. Judging Resource Availability. In: SQUIRES, J.; LANGFORD, M.; THIELE, B. (Org.). Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Sidney: UNSW Press and Australian Human Rights Centre, p. 89-108. [ Links ]

    ______.; NOLAN, A. 2006. Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Legal Practitioners Dossier (Revised). Genebra: Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions. [ Links ]

    ______. 2008a. Hungary: Social rights or market redivivus? In: ______. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 250-266. [ Links ]

    ______. 2008b. Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory. In: ______. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 1-45. [ Links ]

    ______. 2009. Closing the Gap? An Introduction to the Optional Protocol. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, v. 27, n. 1 p. 1-28. [ Links ]

    LIEBENBERG, S. 2005. Enforcing Positive Social and Economic Rights Claims: The South African Model of Reasonableness Review. In: SQUIRES, J.; LANGFORD, M.; THIELE, B. (Org.). Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Sidney: UNSW Press and Australian Human Rights Centre, p. 73 - 88. [ Links ]

    MAHON, C. 2008. Progress at the Front: The Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review, v. 8, n. 4, p. 617-646. [ Links ]

    MELISH. T. 2006. Rethinking the 'Less as More' Thesis: Supranational Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Americas. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (JILP), v. 39, p. 1. [ Links ]

    MORKA, F. 2003. Entrevista. In: LANGFORD, M. 2003. Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Achievements, Challenges and Strategies. Genebra: Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions., p. 113. [ Links ]

    MUBANGIZI J. 2006. The Constitutional Protection of Socio-Economic Rights in Selected African Countries: A Comparative Evaluation. African Journal of Legal Studies, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-19. [ Links ]

    MURALIDHAR, S. 2008. India: The expectations and challenges of judicial enforcement of social rights. In: LANGFORD, M (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 102-124. [ Links ]

    NAÇÕES UNIDAS. 1990. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 3: The Nature of States parties obligations. U.N. Doc. E/1991/23, annex III at 86. [ Links ]

    ______. 1998b. General Comment 9: The domestic application of the Covenant. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1998/24, 19th sessão. [ Links ]

    ______. 2002. Conclusions and recommendations: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Dependent Territories. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.79 (2002). UN Doc. [ Links ]

    ______. 2005. Concluding observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macao). UN Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.107 (2005). [ Links ]

    ______. 2006. Concluding Observations: Canada. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/CAN/CO/4-E/C.12/CAN/CO/5 (2006), para. 40. [ Links ]

    ______. 2009. General Comment No. 20: Non-discrimination in economic, social and cultural rights. UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/20 (2009). [ Links ]

    NOLAN, A. 2008. Ireland: The separation of powers doctrine v. socio-economic rights? In: LANGFORD, M (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 295-319. [ Links ]

    ODINDO, O. 2005. Litigation and Housing Rights in Kenya. In: SQUIRES, J.; LANGFORD, M.; THIELE, B. (Org.). Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Sidney: UNSW Press and Australian Human Rights Centre, p. 155-166. [ Links ]

    PETERS, Y. 2005. Twenty Years of Litigating for Disability Equality Rights: Has it Made a Difference? An Assessment by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities. Disponível em: http://www.ccdonline.ca/publications/20yrs/20yrs.htm#IV. Último acesso em: 13 Novembro 2008. [ Links ]

    PETERSON, L. 2009. Human Rights and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Mapping the role of human rights law within investor-state arbitration. Montreal: Rights & Democracy. [ Links ]

    PIETERSE, M. 2007. Eating Socioeconomic Rights: The Usefulness of Rights Talk in Alleviating Social Hardship Revisited. Human Rights Quarterly, v. 29, n. 3, p. 796-822. [ Links ]

    PORTER, B. 2004. Homelessness, Human Rights, Litigation and Law Reform: A View from Canada. Australian Journal for Human Rights, v. 10, n. 2. [ Links ]

    ______. 2005. The Crisis of ESC Rights and Strategies for Addressing It. In: SQUIRES, J.; LANGFORD, M.; THIELE, B. (Org.). Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Sidney: UNSW Press and Australian Human Rights Centre, p. 48-55. [ Links ]

    ROACH, K. 2008. The challenges of crafting remedies for violations of socio-economic rights. In: LANGFORD, M. (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 46-58. [ Links ]

    ______.; BUDLENDER, G. 2005. Mandatory Relief and Supervisory Jurisdiction: When is it Appropriate, Just and Equitable. South African Law Journal, v. 122, p. 325-351. [ Links ]

    ROSENBERG, G. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ Links ]

    ROUX, T. 2009. Principle and Pragmatism on the Constitutional Court of South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 7, p. 106-138. [ Links ]

    SADURSKI, W. 2005. Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. [ Links ]

    SCHEINGOLD, S. 2004. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Social Change. Ann Arbor: the University of Michigan Press. [ Links ]

    SCOTT, C.; MACKLEM, P. 1992. Constitutional Ropes of Sand or Justiciable Guarantees: Social Rights in a New South African Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, v. 141. [ Links ]

    SEPÚLVEDA, M. 2008. The Constitutional Court's role in addressing social injustice. In: LANGFORD, M (Org). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 144-162. [ Links ]

    SHANKA; MEHTA, 2008. Courts and Socio-Economic Rights in India. In: GAURI, V.; BRINKS, D. 2008. (Org.). Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, p. 146-182. [ Links ]

    SIMMONS, B. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    SOCIAL SURVEYS AFRICA; NKUZI DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION. 2005. Summary of the Key Findings from the National Evictions Survey. Disponível em: http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0001822/Nkuzi_Eviction_NES_2005.pdf. Último acesso em: 15 Outubro 2008. [ Links ]

    SUNSTEIN, C. 1993. Against Positive Rights: Why social and economic rights don't belong in the new constitutions of post-communist Europe. East European Constitutional Review, v. 2, Winter, p. 35-38. [ Links ]

    SWART, M. 2005. Left Out in the Cold? Crafting Constitutional Remedies for the Poorest of the Poor. South African Journal of Human Rights, v. 21, p. 215-240. [ Links ]

    TANG, L. 2007. "Half the Sky" but Not Half the Land: Women's Property Rights and Expropriation in Rural China. InBrief, Hakijamii Bulletin, no. 1, Set. [ Links ]

    VIERDAG, E. W. 1978. The legal nature of the rights granted by the international Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, v. IX, p. 69-105. [ Links ]

    WALDRON, J. 2006. The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, v. 115, p. 1346. [ Links ]

    WILLIAMS, L. 2005. Issues and Challenges in Addressing Poverty and Legal Rights: A Comparative United States/South African Analysis. South African Journal of Human Rights, v. 21, p. 436-472. [ Links ]

    WILSON, B. 2009. Rights Revolutions in Unlikely Places: Costa Rica and Colombia. Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 1, p. 59-85. [ Links ]

    YAMIN, A.; PARRA-VERA, O, 2000. How Do Courts Set Health Policy? The Case of the Colombian Constitutional Court. PLoS Medicine, v. 6, n. 2, p. 147-150. [ Links ]

    ÁFRICA DO SUL. 1997. Soobramoney v. Minister of Health. KwaZulu-Natal, 1997 (12) BCLR 1696. [ Links ]

    ______. 2000. Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. Grootboom and Others. 2000 (11) BCLR 1169 (CC). [ Links ]

    ______. 2001A. Minister of Public Works v. Kyalami Ridge Environmental Association. 2001 (7) BCLR 652 (CC). [ Links ]

    ______. 2001b. Nkonkobe Municipality v. Water Services South Africa (PTY) Ltd & Ors, Case No. 1277/2001 (unreported). [ Links ]

    ______. 2002. Minister of Health and Others v. Treatment Action Campaign and Others (1) 2002 10 BCLR. [ Links ]

    ______. 2004A. Khosa v. Minister of Social Development, Mahlaule v. Minister of Social Development. 2004 (6) BCLR 569 (CC). [ Links ]

    ______. 2004b. Port Elizabeth v. Various Occupiers. 2004 (12) BCLR 1268 (CC). [ Links ]

    ______. 2005a. High Court. Florence Mahlangu v. The Minister For Social Development. Case No. 25754/05 (decisão pendente). [ Links ]

    ______. 2005b. Jaftha v. Schoeman and others,Van Rooyen v. Stoltz and others. 2005 (1) BCLR 78 (CC). [ Links ]

    ______. 2005c. President of RSA and Another v. Modderklip Boerdery (Pty) Ltd and Others. 2005 (8) BCLR 786 (CC). [ Links ]

    ______. 2008. Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road, Berea Township And Or. v. City of Johannesburg and Others. Case CCT 24/07 [2008] ZACC 1. [ Links ]

    ______. 2008. High Court of Johannesburg. Blue Moonlight Properties 39 Pty (Ltd) v. The Occupiers of Saratoga Avenue and the City of Johannesburg. Julgamento não publicado, 12 de set. [ Links ]

    ______. 2009. City of Johannesburg and Others v. Lindiwe Mazibuko and Others Case. No 489/08 [2009] ZA SCA 20, Decisão de 25 de março. [ Links ]

    ALEMANHA. 1970. Federal Constitutional Court. Klauss case. 30 BVERFGE I. [ Links ]

    ______. 1972. Federal Constitutional Court. Numerus Clausus I case. 33 BVerfGE 303. [ Links ]

    ______. 1975. Federal Constitutional Court. BVERFGE 40. 121 (133). [ Links ]

    ARGENTINA. 1998. Federal Administratrive Court. Viceconte Mariela v. Estado Nacional - Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social s/amparo ley 16.986. 2 Jun. [ Links ]

    ______. 2004. Supreme Court. Aquino, Isacio v. Cargo Servicios Industriales S. A. s/accidentes ley 9688. 21 set. [ Links ]

    BANGLADESH. 2000. High Court. Bangladesh Society for the Enforcement of Human Rights and Others v. Government of Bangladesh and Others. 53 DLR (2001) 1, decided on 14 Mar. [ Links ]

    ______. 2001. Supreme Court of Bangladesh. Aino Salish Kendra and Others (ASK) v. Government and Bangladesh and Others. 19 BLD (1999) 488, decided on 29 Jul. [ Links ]

    BRASIL. 2003. Superior Court of Justice. Resp 577836. [ Links ]

    CANADA. 1989. Supreme Court. Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson. [1989] 1 SCR 1038. [ Links ]

    ______. 1997. Supreme Court. Eldridge v. British Columbia. (1997) 3 S.C.R. 324, decided on 20 Dec. [ Links ]

    ______. 1998. Ontario Human Rights Commission. Kearney v. Bramlea Ltd. (1998) 34 CHRR D/1. [ Links ]

    ______. 2001a. Supreme Court. Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General). [2001] 3 SCR 1016, decided on 20 Dec. [ Links ]

    ______. 2001b. Supreme Court. Shelter Corporation v. Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2001) 143 OAC 54. [ Links ]

    ______. 2005. Supreme Court. Chaoulli v. Quebec - Attorney General. [2005] 1 SCR 791. [ Links ]

    COLOMBIA. 1996. Constitutional Court. SU-256. [ Links ]

    ______. 1997. Constitutional Court. SU-111/97. [ Links ]

    ______. 2002. Constitutional Court. T-595/02. [ Links ]

    ______. 2004. Constitutional Court. T-025/04. [ Links ]

    COMISSÃO AFRICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS E DOS POVOS. 2001. SERAC v. Nigeria. Communication No. 155/1996. [ Links ]

    ______. 2003. Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia. Communication No. 241/2001. [ Links ]

    COMISSÃO INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS (CIDH). 2005. Maya Indigenous Communities of the Toledo District v. Belize. Report No. 40/04, Case 12.053, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.122, doc. 5 rev. 1. [ Links ]

    COMITÊ EUROPEU DE DIREITOS SOCIAIS. 1999. ICJ v. Portugal. No 1/1998. [ Links ]

    CORTE EUROPÉIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS. 1979. Airey v. Ireland. (1979) 2 EHRR 305, decided on 9 Oct. [ Links ]

    CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS. 2001. The Mayagna (Sumo) Indigenous Community of Awas Tinga v. Nicaragua. (Ser.C) No.79, Judgment on 31 Aug. [ Links ]

    ______. 2003. H.R. Five Pensioners' Case v. Peru. (Ser. C) No. 98, Judgment on Feb. 28. [ Links ]

    CORTE INTERNACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. 2004. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Israeli Occupied Territories. ICJ Reports 136. [ Links ]

    ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA. 1954. Supreme Court. Brown v. Board of Education. 347 U.S. 483 (1954). [ Links ]

    ______. 1955. Supreme Court. Brown v. Board of Education II. 349 U.S. 294 (1955) [ Links ]

    ______. 1977. New York Court of Appeals. Tucker v. Toia. 43 N.Y.2d 1, 7 (1977). [ Links ]

    ______. 1989a. Supreme Court of Texas. Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby. 777 S.W.2d 391 (Tex. 1989). [ Links ]

    ______. 1989b. Supreme Court of Kentucky. Rose v. Council for Better Education. 790 S.W.2d 186 (Ky. 1989). [ Links ]

    FILIPINAS. 1997. Supreme Court. Tatad v. Secretary of the Department of Energy. G. R. No. 124360, 5 Nov. [ Links ]

    FINLÂNDIA. 1997. Supreme Court of Finland. Employment Act Case. KKO 1997: 141, Yearbook of the Supreme Court. [ Links ]

    ______. 1999. Helsinki Court of Appeals. Child-Care Services Case. Case No. S 98/225, 28 October. [ Links ]

    ______. 2000. Supreme Administrative Court. Medical Aids Case. No. 3118, 27 Nov. [ Links ]

    FRANÇA. 1985. Court of Appeal of Versailles. Recueil Dalloz. (1985), 421. [ Links ]

    HUNGRIA. 1991. Constitutional Court. Decision 772/B/1990/AB. ABH 1991, 519 at 520. [ Links ]

    ______. 1998. Constitutional Court. Decision 32/1998 (VI.25) [ Links ]

    ______. 2000. Constitutional Court. Decision 42/2000 (XI.8). [ Links ]

    INDIA. 1980. Supreme Court. Municipal Council Ratlam v. Vardhichand and others. AIR 1980 SC 1622. [ Links ]

    ______. 1984. Supreme Court. Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India. AIR 1984 SC 802. [ Links ]

    ______. 1985. Supreme Court. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation. (1985) 3 SCC 545. [ Links ]

    ______. 1997. Supreme Court. Vishaka and others v. State of Rajasthan and others. (1997) 6 SCC 241. [ Links ]

    ______. 1998. Supreme Court. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India. (1998) 6 SCC 63. [ Links ]

    ______. 2001. Supreme Court. People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India. (2001) 5 SCALE 303. [ Links ]

    ______. 2004. Supreme Court. People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India. (2004) 8 SCALE 759. [ Links ]

    ______. 2000. Supreme Court. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India. (2000) 10 SCC 664. [ Links ]

    IRLANDA. 1989. High Court. O'Reilly [1989] I.L.R.M. 181, p. 194. [ Links ]

    ______. 2001. Supreme Court. Sinnot [2001] 2 IR 545. [ Links ]

    NAÇÕES UNIDAS. 2001. Human Rights Committee. Karel Des Fours Walderode v. the Czech Republic. (Communication No. 747/1997), Views of 30 October 2001, paragraph 8.3. [ Links ]

    ______. 2003. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. A.T. v. Hungary. 2/2003. [ Links ]

    NEPAL. 1995. Mira Dhungana v. Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs. 4 S. Ct. Bull 1 (Fagun 1-15, 2052). [ Links ]

    NIGERIA. 2005. High Court. Gbemre v. Shell Petroelum & Others. Suit No. FHC/B/C/53/05, Decision of 14 Nov. [ Links ]

    PAQUISTÃO. 1990. Supreme Court. Fazal Jan v. Roshua Din. PLD 1990 SC 661. [ Links ]

    PORTUGAL. 1984A. PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTIONAL TRIBUNAL. Decision (Acórdão) n39/84. April 11. [ Links ]

    ______. 1984B. PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTIONAL TRIBUNAL. Decision (Acórdão) n 509/2002. [ Links ]

    REINO UNIDO. 2002a. Court of Appeal. Donoghue v. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd. [2002] 3 WLR 183. [ Links ]

    ______. 2002b. Court of Appeal. R(H) v. Leonard Cheschire Foundation (A Charity). [2002] EWCA Civ 266. [ Links ]

    ______. 2008. D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic. App. No. 57325/00, 47 EUR. H.R. REP. 3 (2008). [ Links ]

    SUIÇA. 1995. Federal Court of Switzerland. V v. Einwohrnergemeine X und Regierunsgrat des Kantons Bern. BGE/ATF 121 I 367, 27 Oct. [ Links ]