Misogyny in Brazilian Federal Government Agencies for Science and High-Education

ARÊAS DA SILVA, ROBERTA PEIXOTO; ANDRÉA NODARI, CAROLINA; CARDOSO, MANOEL; SANTANA, ADEMIR E.; BARBOSA, MARCIA C.

doi:10.1590/0001-3765202120201389

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

SOCIAL SCIENCES • An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 93 (suppl 3) • 2021 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201389 copy

Misogyny in Brazilian Federal Government Agencies for Science and High-Education

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

The transformation of women’s role in society has been systematically studied. Numerous authors point out that among the factors of extreme relevance to this fact, the main is the increased presence of women in the formal job market. Researches also reveal that the increase in quantity is not reflected equally in all productive sectors nor the egalitarian occupation of high hierarchical positions. The present study aimed to analyze how the presence of women, especially in leadership positions, has evolved at the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Postgraduate Education (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) over the last 20 years. For these analyzes, surveys were conducted in the people management systems of the Brazilian Federal Public Administration. The initial hypothesis was that female attendance had increased in both the total number of female servants and in management and auxiliary positions, known as DAS in Brazil; however, evidence shows that women reduced overall agency presence, especially in the number of female Analysts occupying DAS positions. These results indicate that the misogyny observed in the academic sphere of the Brazilian National Postgraduate and Science, Technology, and Innovation systems are replicated in the politic-bureaucratic sphere that manages and sponsors these systems.

Key words
gender; women; science; agencies

Year	Percentage	Percentage	Total Number	Total Number	Budget
	Women Analysts	Women Assistants	Analysts	Assistants	Billion Reais
1999	0.70	0.56	82	50	-
2000	0.70	0.56	80	50	0.452
2001	0.70	0.57	81	51	0.514
2002	0.66	0.57	100	51	0.478
2003	0.68	0.54	96	50	-
2004	0.67	0.56	101	48	0.579
2005	0.66	0.57	100	47	0.671
2006	0.67	0.57	97	47	0.742
2007	0.66	0.58	95	45	0.814
2008	0.58	0.59	178	44	1.260
2009	0.59	0.48	219	122	1.659
2010	0.61	0.47	221	117	2.010
2011	0.60	0.45	211	104	2.703
2012	0.61	0.45	204	96	3.522
2013	0.61	0.47	265	156	4.772
2014	0.60	0.48	260	139	5.337
2015	0.60	0.47	252	139	7.016
2016	0.60	0.45	250	132	5.899
2017	0.61	0.45	239	130	4.682
2018	0.60	0.45	234	127	3.837

Year	DAS Analyst	DAS Assistant	DAS Not Staff	DAS Analyst	DAS Assistant	DAS Not Staff
	Women (%)	Women (%)	Women (%)	Total	Total	Total
1999	0.71	0.30	0.54	17	10	26
2000	0.84	0.30	0.54	19	10	24
2001	0.80	0.30	0.55	20	10	22
2002	0.75	0.22	0.55	24	9	20
2003	0.75	0.25	0.60	28	12	10
2004	0.69	0.43	0.45	29	14	11
2005	0.68	0.36	0.50	28	14	12
2006	0.66	0.43	0.14	29	14	7
2007	0.61	0.43	0.33	31	14	9
2008	0.72	0.45	0.49	32	11	37
2009	0.74	0.44	0.55	35	9	40
2010	0.71	0.36	0.51	41	11	37
2011	0.68	0.42	0.47	40	12	34
2012	0.62	0.58	0.41	58	12	27
2013	0.59	0.50	0.52	59	14	27
2014	0.57	0.54	0.59	65	13	27
2015	0.57	0.54	0.48	65	13	23
2016	0.55	0.54	0.57	65	13	21
2017	0.55	0.43	0.59	66	14	22
2018	0.49	0.41	0.60	65	17	20

Year	Pecentage	Percentage	Total	Total
	Women Analysts	Women Assistants	Women Analysts	Number Assistants
1999	0.51	0.46	428	757
2000	0.50	0.52	307	399
2001	0.50	0.52	309	431
2002	0.48	0.52	379	414
2003	0.49	0.53	385	387
2004	0.48	0.51	449	439
2005	0.48	0.52	442	424
2006	0.48	0.52	435	431
2007	0.48	0.51	425	426
2008	0.49	0.51	416	414
2009	0.50	0.56	383	297
2010	0.50	0.54	359	279
2011	0.50	0.55	376	313
2012	0.50	0.54	374	320
2013	0.49	0.53	351	289
2014	0.50	0.52	323	261
2015	0.48	0.52	308	242
2016	0.49	0.50	290	222
2017	0.48	0.47	264	195
2018	0.49	0.47	253	175

Year	Percentage	Percentage	Percentage	Total Number	Total Number	Total Number
	Women Analysts	Women Assistants	Women Non Staff	Analysts	Assistants	Non Staff
1999	0.49	0.45	0.44	86	42	34
2000	0.49	0.48	0.40	63	25	5
2001	0.48	0.48	0.33	62	27	3
2002	0.49	0.54	1.00	65	26	1
2003	0.46	0.48	1.00	59	31	2
2004	0.43	0.48	0.75	60	27	4
2005	0.45	0.46	0.67	64	24	3
2006	0.48	0.54	0.50	64	26	4
2007	0.46	0.56	1.00	68	25	1
2008	0.47	0.54	0.00	66	26	0
2009	0.42	0.57	0.00	67	23	0
2010	0.41	0.48	0.00	66	25	0
2011	0.44	0.42	0.67	63	26	3
2012	0.43	0.43	0.50	65	28	2
2013	0.42	0.42	1.00	65	26	2
2014	0.44	0.44	0.67	64	27	3
2015	0.47	0.39	0.50	64	28	6
2016	0.48	0.41	0.20	56	27	5
2017	0.43	0.36	0.33	84	28	3
2018	0.55	0.40	0.33	69	30	3

Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Correspondence to: Roberta Peixoto Arêas da Silva E-mail: roberta.silva@capes.gov.br