Antifungal and anti-biofilm effect of the calcium channel blocker verapamil on non-albicans Candida species

Abstract

Candida is a human fungal pathogen that causes a wide range of diseases. Candida albicans is the main etiologic agent in these diseases; however, infections can be caused by non-albicans Candida species. Virulence factors such as biofilm production, which protect the fungus from host immunity and anti-fungal drugs, are important for the infection. Therefore, available antifungal drugs for candidiasis treatment are limited and the investigation of new and effective drugs is needed. Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker with an inhibitory effect on hyphae development, adhesion, and colonization of C. albicans. In this study, we investigated the effect of verapamil on cell viability and its antifungal and anti-biofilm activity in non-albicans Candida species. Verapamil was not toxic to keratinocyte cells; moreover, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata were susceptible to verapamil with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1250 μM; in addition, this drug displayed fungistatic effect at the evaluated concentrations. After treatment with verapamil, reduced viability, biomass, and mitochondrial activity were observed in biofilms of the non-albicans Candida species C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. These findings highlight the importance of the study of verapamil as an alternative treatment for infections caused by non-albicans Candida species.

Key words
Verapamil; antifungal activity; biofilm; Candida non-albicans; drug repurposing

INTRODUCTION

In the last decade, an increase in the incidence of Candida spp. infections was observed; this was found to be associated with an increase in the number of immunocompromised patients (Quindós et al. 2018, Salehi et al. 2019, Walsh et al. 2019). Candida species are common human fungal pathogens that cause a wide range of clinical diseases, ranging from superficial infections to life-threatening systemic disease (Lin et al. 2018, Meletiadis et al. 2017, Pfaller & Diekema 2007). Candida albicans is the most common species responsible for causing infections worldwide; however, there has been an increase in the incidence of infections caused by non-albicans Candida species (Alim et al. 2018, Santolaya et al. 2019, Silva et al. 2012). Candida albicans represents 50-82% of the Candida spp. isolates, while among non-albicans species C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis correspond to the 9.4-19%, 2-3%, and 1-2%, respectively (Dos Santos Abrantes et al. 2014, Thompson et al. 2010).

The use of steroid drugs or broad-spectrum antibiotics, as well as smoking, carrying prostheses, and possessing a compromised immune system are risk factors for the production of a microenvironment that favors the overgrowth of Candida spp. This may trigger oral candidiasis, which is the most prevalent opportunistic fungal infection affecting the oral mucosa (Singh et al. 2014). Oral candidiasis is mainly caused by overgrowth of C. albicans; however, non-albicans species have been isolated as well in samples of oropharyngeal candidiasis (Patel et al. 2012, Singh et al. 2014). Oral candidiasis associated with Candida spp. can be classified as pseudomembranous, erythematous, nodular, or plaque-like. Depending on the host’s immune system, oral candidiasis may become systemic by spreading into the bloodstream or gastrointestinal tract, leading to a serious infection that can cause the death of the individual (Akpan & Morgan 2002, Niimi et al. 2010).

One of the most studied Candida spp. virulence factors are biofilms, i.e., sessile communities of microbes found either attached to a surface or buried firmly in an extracellular matrix (ECM), which is a complex and highly polar mixture of biomolecules including proteins, polysaccharides, nucleic acids, and lipids (Overhage et al. 2008)

The biofilm matrices of Candida species have a strong network of exopolymers, providing protection against host and environmental factors, such as the immune system and antimicrobial drugs. Although biofilm matrices do not inhibit the diffusion of antibiotics, they restrict antibiotic entry into the biofilm. Matrix components like exopolymers hinder the diffusion of drugs into the cells of the biofilm by binding to them, making the fungi refractory to antifungals (Al-Fattani & Douglas 2004, Dominguez et al. 2018, Rodrigues et al. 2017). This property of biofilms leads to persistent biofilm infections, despite treatment with antibiotics, predisposing the organism to develop resistance against these drugs (genetic resistance) (Ciofu et al. 2017).

In addition, the biofilm formation allows microorganisms to resist hostile environmental conditions such as starvation and desiccation, and causes a wide range of chronic diseases. Consequently, biofilms are a major source of persistent nosocomial infections in immunosuppressed patients (Davies 2003, Singh et al. 2000) who come in contact with medical devices, such as catheters, cardiac pacemakers, joint prosthesis, dentures, prosthetic heart valves, and contact lenses (Piozzi et al. 2004, Wu et al. 2015), that are known to provide an ideal surface for the attachment of microorganisms. Saliva contains molecules that reduce the adhesion of microorganisms, but in contrast also produces salivary proteins that have been shown to act as microbial receptors, thus facilitating the formation of biofilms in the oral cavity (Junqueira 2012).

Consequently, the treatment and effective elimination of fungal biofilms has become a challenge (Roy et al. 2018). Earlier studies showed that elimination of biofilms requires higher concentrations of antimicrobials than the conventional dose (Bjarnsholt et al. 2009, Brandl et al. 2008, Hoyle & Costerton 1991, Parsek & Singh 2003, Rasmussen & Givskov 2006, Wu et al. 2015). The effect of antifungal drugs on biofilms depends on the class on the antifungal, as well as on the antifungal susceptibility of the species and the isolate (Taff et al. 2013). Recent studies demonstrated that fluconazole can reduce biomass and cell number in Candida spp. biofilms from fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant C. albicans and C. glabrata isolates, albeit in a high concentration (from 40 µg/mL to 1,280 µg/mL, depending on the isolate) corresponding to five times the previously reported Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Panariello et al. (2018). Furthermore, amphotericin B in liposomal or deoxycholate formulation was active against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis biofilms when administered in a concentration between four and eight times greater than the reported MIC concentration (2-8 mg/L). In addition, C. glabrata was the least susceptible yeast species to both evaluated formulations (Rodrigues & Henriques 2017). Finally, echinocandins represent the first choice in the treatment of biofilm-related Candida spp. infections (Almirante et al. 2017); however, lack of effectiveness of echinocandin drugs against C. parapsilosis biofilm has been reported (Thomaz et al. 2020). Therefore, the search for alternative drugs that could disperse and eliminate biofilms is warranted.

Drug repurposing consists of investigating new uses for already approved drugs to treat another disease (Ashburn & Thor 2004). This strategy could be used as an alternative to de novo drug development to treat fungal diseases. Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker that is widely used in the treatment of angina and hypertension (Fahie & Cassagnol 2020). This compound has an inhibitory effect on hyphae development, adhesion, and colonization of C. albicans (Yu et al. 2013, 2014a, b). Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the antifungal activity of verapamil against non-albicans Candida species as well as the effect of verapamil on biofilm formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Compounds and antifungals

The calcium channel blocker verapamil (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and the antifungal amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) were used in this study. Stock solutions were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and subsequently diluted in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI 1640) medium. The maximum DMSO concentration in the final medium was 5%.

Evaluation of cell viability (in vitro cytotoxicity) using resazurin

Evaluation of cell viability was performed using the resazurin method. For this assay, the HaCaT cell line (human keratinocytes) was purchased from the Rio de Janeiro Cell Bank (BCRJ) and was maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2% antibiotics (100 μg/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin). HaCaT cells were seeded at a concentration of 10⁶ cells/mL in a 96-well microplate and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO₂. Cells were treated with verapamil concentrations ranging from 2.4 to 1250 μM for 24 h. Resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) was used to measure cell viability as described earlier (Pavan et al. 2010). According to ISO 10993-5 (2009), drug concentrations provoking a >30% reduction in cell viability are considered cytotoxic.

Microorganisms and culture conditions

Candida krusei ATCC 6258, C. parapsilosis ATCC 90018, and C. glabrata ATCC 9030 obtained from the Laboratory of Microbiology of the Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos/UNESP were used for the experiments. Sabouraud dextrose (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) medium was used to culture the yeasts by shaking at 150 rpm at an incubation temperature of 37 °C for 24 h.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Susceptibility assays were performed according to the guidelines of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST 2017). RPMI 1640 medium with L-glutamine and sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M 4-Morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and supplemented with 2% glucose was used for the assays. Candida spp. cells were suspended at a concentration of 0.5-2.5 × 10⁵ cells/mL. Verapamil was applied at a concentration ranging between 2.4 and 1250 μM, while amphotericin B at a concentration between 0.016 and 8 μg/mL was used as a control. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and readings were measured using spectrophotometry (530 nm).

Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC)

After 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, an aliquot of the samples used for the susceptibility assay was removed from the 96-well plates and plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India). After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, presence or absence of growth at each concentration was verified. The minimum fungicidal concentration is the lowest concentration at which no fungal growth is observed.

Verapamil effect on Candida spp. biofilm

Candida spp. biofilm formation

Biofilm formation was assessed according to the method of Thein et al (2006). In the assay, 100 μL aliquots of a 10⁸ cells/mL suspension of Candida spp. in RPMI medium supplemented with 2% glucose were deposed in wells of 96-well plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C with agitation at 75 rpm for 90 min for the pre-adhesion stage. Following this, wells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove non-adherent yeasts. Subsequently, 100 μL of RPMI medium was added to the wells, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C with agitation at 75 rpm for 24 h. The culture medium was changed after 24 h of incubation. Biofilms formed after 48 h were treated with the addition of verapamil at the MIC (1250 μM); moreover, because of the higher concentration of other compounds needed for biofilm eradication described in the literature, a five-times MIC (6250 μM) was used. Subsequently, these plates were incubated for 24 h and analyzed to determine total biomass, biofilm viability, and any reduction in the biofilm formed.

Biofilm viability by CFU assay

After 24 h of treatment, the wells containing biofilm were washed three times with PBS. Subsequently, the biofilm was disrupted in the wells using an ultrasonic homogenizer (Sonics Vibra Cell, Connecticut, USA) at 50 W for 20 s. Suspensions were serially diluted in PBS and diluted samples were plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and colonies were quantified as colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

Quantification of total biomass using crystal violet

The quantification of biofilm biomass was performed using a method described by Peeters et al (2008). Biofilms were washed with PBS and fixed with absolute ethanol for 15 min. Ethanol was then removed and the biofilm was dried at room temperature for 16 h. 100 μL of a 0.5% crystal violet solution was added to each well. After 20 min, excess dye was removed, and the wells containing biofilm were washed three times with PBS. Following this, 100 μL of absolute ethanol was added to dilute the dye. The absorbance of samples was read at 570 nm, and the results were expressed as percent decrease. Candida biofilm formed (after 48 h) without treatment with the drug, whose absorbance values represented 100% of the biomass, was used as the control for this experiment.

Quantification of biofilm metabolic activity (XTT assay)

Candida spp. biofilm viability was determined through a tetrazolium salt (XTT) assay. Biofilms were formed as described above. After biofilm formation and drug treatment, each of the wells was inoculated with 158 μL of PBS, 40 μL of XTT (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and 2 μL of menadione (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). After 3 h of incubation in the dark at 37 °C, 100 μL of solution was transferred from each well to another plate and its absorbance was recorded at 490 nm.

Biofilm analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Biofilms formed on acrylic resin disks were fixed with 1 mL of 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 3 h. After this period, the specimens were washed with ethanol at concentrations of 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, and 100% alcohol. Acrylic resin disks were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for complete drying. The acrylic resin disks were then removed from the bottom of the plate with the help of sterile forceps, transferred to aluminum stubs, and covered with gold for 160 s at 40 mA. After metallization, the biofilms were analyzed using an Inspect S50 scanning electron microscope 170 (FEI, Czech Republic) at the Institute of Science and Technology (ICT/Unesp), operating at 15 kV in increments of 2.000x.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Dunn’s or Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to analyze biofilm viability (CFU/mL counts), biomass (crystal violet), and metabolic activity (XTT assay), using the GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

RESULTS

Susceptibility of non-albicans Candida species to verapamil

The evaluation of the antifungal activity of verapamil showed that this drug was active against C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata with a MIC of 1250 µM. Moreover, an MCF assay demonstrated that verapamil displayed fungistatic activity at the evaluated concentration, able to growth in all evaluated concentrations (Table I).

Table I
Susceptibility of non-albicans Candida species to verapamil: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC) of verapamil.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)			Minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC)
	Verapamil (µM)	Amphotericin B (µg/mL)	Verapamil (µM)
C. krusei	1250	1.0	fungistatic
C. parapsilosis	1250	0.5	fungistatic
C. glabrata	1250	0.5	fungistatic

In vitro cytotoxicity of verapamil on keratinocytes

Keratinocytes are cells present in the skin and oral mucosa (Turabelidze et al. 2014). Therefore, we evaluated verapamil cytotoxicity on HaCaT keratinocytes. We observed a 20% reduction in cell viability at higher concentrations (625 and 1250 μM, Figure 1). These results establish that verapamil is not toxic for keratinocytes, since according to ISO 10993-5 (2009) standards, only compounds provoking a reduction in cell viability of more than 30% are considered cytotoxic.

Figure 1
Verapamil cytotoxicity on a human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell line was tested using the resazurin method. Viability is presented as percent control of untreated cells in the absence or presence of varying verapamil concentrations (μM). Error bars represent the standard deviation of five biological replicates.

Evaluation of verapamil effect on non-albicans Candida spp. biofilms

Quantification of the effect of verapamil on biofilm viability

Since verapamil displayed antifungal activity against non-albicans Candida species, its activity against biofilms was further investigated. Firstly, the effect of verapamil on Candida spp. biofilm viability was assessed using CFU assay (Fig. 2). The treatment of C. krusei biofilm with verapamil at MIC (1250 μM) and five times the MIC (6250 μM) triggered a reduction in CFU/mL of 12% (1.7 x 10⁸ ± 1.8 x10⁷) and 28% (5.8 x 10⁶ ± 1.2 x 10⁶), (Fig. 2a). respectively. The same treatments of C. parapsilosis biofilm induced a reduction in CFU/mL of 14% (6.0 x 10⁶ ± 1.5 x 10⁶) and 26% (640000 ± 175879) respectively (Fig. 2b), while for C. glabrata biofilm the reduction amounted to 12% (6.4 x10⁶ ± 1.2 x 10⁶) and 20% (1.3 x 10⁶ ± 127366), respectively (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2
Biofilm viability of non-albicans Candida species after treatment with verapamil at the MIC and five times the MIC. (a) C. krusei; (b) C. parapsilosis; (c) C. glabrata. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences with untreated biofilm (control) as shown by ANOVA (p < 0.05). Error bars represent the SEM (standard error of the mean) of eight biological replicates.

Evaluation of biomass reduction in the biofilm of non-albicans Candida spp. after treatment with verapamil

The effect of verapamil on biofilm biomass was evaluated using a violet crystal assay (Fig. 3). In this assay verapamil concentrations equivalent to the MIC (1250 μM) and five times the MIC (6250 μM) were also used. For C. krusei, the percent reduction in biomass was 53% (1.708 ± 0.2238) and 74% (0.9549 ± 0.1176) after treatment with the MIC and five times the MIC of verapamil, respectively (Fig. 3a). For C. glabrata, the percent reduction in biomass was 8% (5.747 ± 0.9715) and 47% (3.325 ± 0.6224) at the MIC and five times the MIC of verapamil, respectively (Fig. 3b). Finally, for C. parapsilosis, the biomass reduction at the MIC and five times the MIC of verapamil was 10% (4.373 ± 0.9002) and 72% (1.347 ± 0.2370), respectively (Fig. 3c). Statistically significant reductions in biomass were observed after treatment with both the MIC and five times the MIC of verapamil for C. krusei and with five times the MIC of verapamil for C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis.

Figure 3
Evaluation of biomass reduction in biofilms of non-albicans Candida species after treatment with verapamil at the MIC and five times the MIC. (a) C. krusei; (b) C. parapsilosis; (c) C. glabrata. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences with untreated biofilm (control) as shown by ANOVA (p < 0.05). Error bars represent the SEM (standard error of the mean) of 10 biological replicates.

Quantification of the effect of verapamil on the metabolic activity of Candida biofilm

Following the demonstration that verapamil treatment could reduce biofilm viability and biomass, its effect on the metabolic activity of biofilm was also investigated using XTT assay. Candida glabrata was the species that displayed the highest reduction of metabolic activity upon verapamil treatment, namely of 14% (2.308 ± 0.03517) and 89% (0.3001 ± 0.02388) when the MIC and five times the MIC of verapamil was used, respectively (Fig. 4c). Next, C. parapsilosis biofilm showed a percent reduction in metabolic activity of 39% (0.7888 ± 0.1135) and 43% (0.7434 ± 0.05242) upon the same treatments (Fig. 4b).; finally, verapamil-treated biofilm of C. krusei showed a 17% (0.8849 ± 0.05705) and 55% (0.4805 ± 0.04616) reduction in metabolic activity when compared to the control (Fig. 4a). These results corroborate our previous results relative to biofilm viability.

Figure 4
Metabolic activity of biofilms of non-albicans Candida species after treatment with verapamil at the MIC and five times the MIC. (a) C. krusei; (b) C. parapsilosis; (c) C. glabrata. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences with untreated biofilm (control) as shown by ANOVA (p < 0.05). Error bars represent the SEM (standard error of the mean) of 10 biological replicates.

Biofilm analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Once the activity of verapamil against biofilms of non-albicans Candida species was observed, the effect of treatment with this calcium channel blocker on biofilm constitution was visualized using SEM. A drastic reduction of biofilm was apparent when comparing untreated C. krusei (Fig. 5a), C. parapsilosis (Fig. 5d), and C. glabrata (Fig 5g) with their verapamil-treated counterparts at the MIC (Fig. 5b, e, and h) and five times the MIC (Fig. 5c, f, and i). These data corroborated our previous results on the effect of verapamil on biofilm.

Figure 5
Analysis of non-albicans Candida biofilm by scanning electron microscopy. The figure sequence shows C. krusei biofilm without treatment (a); after treatment with verapamil at the MIC (b) and five times the MIC (c); C. parapsilosis biofilm without treatment (d); after treatment with verapamil at the MIC (e) and five times the MIC (f); and C. glabrata biofilm without treatment (g); after treatment with verapamil at the MIC (h) and five times the MIC (i).

DISCUSSION

Drug repurposing is considered a promising approach for the treatment of fungal diseases (Afeltra & Verweij 2003). This strategy allows cost reduction and accelerates the development of new drugs because the toxicology and pharmacology of the drug has been established (Afeltra & Verweij 2003, Katragkou et al. 2016, Krajewska-Kułak & Niczyporuk 1993, Yu et al. 2014a). Drug repurposing has been successfully used in the search for candidates to treat infections caused by C. albicans, C. auris, and Cryptococcus neoformans (Butts et al. 2013, de Oliveira et al. 2019, Siles et al. 2013, Wiederhold et al. 2017).

Calcium is an important factor for signal transduction mechanisms supporting the adaptation and survival of different fungi. Moreover, calcineurin plays an important role in the regulation of calcium homeostasis. In Candida spp. calcineurin is required for morphogenesis, azole tolerance, membrane stress, cell wall integrity, survival in serum, and virulence (Chen et al. 2012, Juvvadi et al. 2014, Liu et al. 2015, Sanglard et al. 2003). A recent report demonstrated that the calcium pump Spf1 participates in the development of C. albicans biofilm, indicating at the calcium homeostasis system as a potential target for biofilm eradication (Yu et al. 2012).

In this study, we first determined the susceptibility of non-albicans Candida species to verapamil as well as the MIC value of this drug. Verapamil was effective against Candida krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis at the same MIC (1250 µM) and displayed fungistatic effect at the evaluated concentrations. Considering the development of a verapamil-based product with topical use (e.g. a mouthwash or cream), we then evaluated verapamil-induced cytotoxicity in the HaCaT cell line (human keratinocytes). We observed a 20% loss of cell viability at higher doses (625 and 1250 μM) of verapamil; however, a reduction in viability below 30% is acceptable in cytotoxicity testing according to ISO 10993 -5 (2009). A limitation of this study lies in the fact that the cytotoxicity of verapamil at five times the MIC (6250 μM or 2.841 mg/ml) was not evaluated. However, verapamil toxicity is well established, with the oral LD50 (median lethal dose) being 150 mg/kg in rats and 163 mg/kg in mice (National Center For Biotechnology Information 2020), which is much higher concentrations than the evaluated. Subsequently, the effect of verapamil on biofilm viability was evaluated. A concentration-dependent inhibitory effect of verapamil was observed. Next, verapamil was also found to effectively reduce biofilm biomass, as shown by crystal violet assay. Finally, SEM images confirmed the reduction of biofilms after treatment with verapamil at both concentrations.

Verapamil treatment of C. albicans results in increased sensitivity to oxidative stress, production of reactive oxygen species, and mitochondrial dysfunction, processes leading to toxicity for C. albicans. In addition, calcium channel blockage also triggers hyphae and biofilm inhibition (Brand et al. 2007, Yu et al. 2014a). Our results from the XTT assay, that evaluated cellular metabolic activity by mitochondrial activity, are consistent with the literature. Indeed, after treatment of biofilms with verapamil, a reduction in metabolic activity of all studied species was observed, with C. glabrata being the species displaying the highest reduction of metabolic activity when treated with five times the MIC of verapamil (Yu et al. 2014a).

An important virulence mechanism in Candida spp. is filamentation, during which cells change their shape and pattern of growth to adhere to and penetrate the host tissues (Ribeiro et al. 2017, Vila et al. 2017, Yue et al. 2018). Filamentation occurs because of changes in environmental conditions, including high temperatures, nutrient limitation, and exposure to serum (Azadmanesh et al. 2017). Filamentous growth of C. albicans is tightly connected to biofilm formation because this process is necessary for adherence to surfaces (Woolford et al. 2016). The C. albicans gene HWP1 encodes an adhesin associated with hyphal development and adhesion (de Barros et al. 2017). Verapamil treatment is reported to be most effective during these processes and to reduce yeast filamentation and adhesion to polystyrene probes and buccal epithelial cells (Yu et al. 2014a). The upregulation of HWP1 in C. albicans was also observed during verapamil treatment of C. albicans biofilms; however, the expression of the ALS3 gene, encoding a protein with an important role in adhesion and biofilm formation, did not change (Liu & Filler 2011, Yu et al. 2013). It is important to highlight that biofilm formation ability and its characteristics vary among laboratory reference Candida spp. strains; this could explain the reduced formation of hyphae observed in SEM images of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis (Alnuaimi et al. 2013).

In addition, verapamil has been reported to inhibit biofilm formation by C. albicans in synergy with fluconazole or tunicamycin, thus improving the effect of these antifungal drugs on biofilms (Yu et al. 2013). In contrast, a combination of verapamil and fluconazole (FLZ) did not display any inhibitory effect against FLZ-resistant C. glabrata isolates and could not enhance the effect of FLZ on C. glabrata isolates (Alnajjar et al. 2018). Different calcium channel blockers, such as verapamil hydrochloride, cinnarizine, nifedipine, and nimodipine, were effective against clinical isolates of C. albicans, with verapamil hydrochloride showing the strongest antifungal activity as compared to other compounds (Krajewska-Kułak & Niczyporuk 1993). However, only a few reports that study the effects of verapamil on non-albicans Candida species exist, which focus on the use of verapamil as an efflux blocker acting in synergy with other antifungals (Alnajjar et al. 2018, Pinto e Silva et al. 2009, Yu et al. 2013), and not on this drug alone.

In this study, we demonstrated that verapamil possesses antifungal and anti-biofilm activity against non-albicans Candida species, such as C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. This drug reduced biofilm growth, viability, and metabolic activity for all tested species. These findings are important for consideration of verapamil as a possible alternative treatment for infections caused by non-albicans Candida species. However, further studies are necessary to describe the activity and possible applications of this compound.

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

This work was supported by the following Brazilian organization: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

• AFELTRA J & VERWEIJ PE. 2003. Antifungal activity of nonantifungal drugs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22: 397-407.
• AKPAN A & MORGAN R. 2002. Oral candidiasis. Postgrad Med J 78: 455-459.
• AL-FATTANI MA & DOUGLAS LJ. 2004. Penetration of Candida biofilms by antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48: 3291-3297.
• ALIM D, SIRCAIK S & PANWAR SL. 2018. The Significance of Lipids to Biofilm Formation in. J Fungi (Basel) 4.
• ALMIRANTE B, GARNACHO-MONTERO J, MASEDA E, CANDEL FJ, GRAU S, GUINEA J, MORENO I, MUNOZ P & RUIZ-SANTANA S. 2017. Candidemia and invasive candidiasis approach in critically ill patients: role of the echinocandins. Rev Esp Quimioter 0: 355-367.
• ALNAJJAR LM, BULATOVA NR & DARWISH RM. 2018. Evaluation of four calcium channel blockers as fluconazole resistance inhibitors in Candida glabrata. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 14: 185-189.
• ALNUAIMI AD, O’BRIEN-SIMPSON NM, REYNOLDS EC & MCCULLOUGH MJ. 2013. Clinical isolates and laboratory reference Candida species and strains have varying abilities to form biofilms. FEMS Yeast Res 13: 689-699.
• ASHBURN TT & THOR KB. 2004. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 673-683.
• AZADMANESH J, GOWEN AM, CREGER PE, SCHAFER ND & BLANKENSHIP JR. 2017. Filamentation Involves Two Overlapping, but Distinct, Programs of Filamentation in the Pathogenic Fungus. G3 (Bethesda) 11(7): 3797-3808.
• BJARNSHOLT T, JENSEN P, FIANDACA MJ, PEDERSEN J, HANSEN CR, ANDERSEN CB, PRESSLER T, GIVSKOV M & HØIBY N. 2009. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 44: 547-558.
• BRAND A, SHANKS S, DUNCAN VM, YANG M, MACKENZIE K & GOW NA. 2007. Hyphal orientation of Candida albicans is regulated by a calcium-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol 20(17): 347-352.
• BRANDL K, PLITAS G, MIHU CN, UBEDA C, JIA T, FLEISHER M, SCHNABL B, DEMATTEO RP & PAMER EG. 2008. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci exploit antibiotic-induced innate immune deficits. Nature 455: 804-807.
• BUTTS A, DIDONE L, KOSELNY K, BAXTER BK, CHABRIER-ROSELLO Y, WELLINGTON M & KRYSAN DJ. 2013. A repurposing approach identifies off-patent drugs with fungicidal cryptococcal activity, a common structural chemotype, and pharmacological properties relevant to the treatment of cryptococcosis. Eukaryot Cell 12: 278-287.
• CHEN YL ET AL. 2012. Convergent Evolution of Calcineurin Pathway Roles in Thermotolerance and Virulence in Candida glabrata. G3 (Bethesda) 2: 675-691.
• CIOFU O, ROJO-MOLINERO E, MACIÀ MD & OLIVER A. 2017. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS 125: 304-319.
• DAVIES D. 2003. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2: 114-122.
• DE BARROS PP, FREIRE F, ROSSONI RD, JUNQUEIRA JC & JORGE AOC. 2017. Candida krusei and Candida glabrata reduce the filamentation of Candida albicans by downregulating expression of HWP1 gene. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 62: 317-323.
• DE OLIVEIRA HC, MONTEIRO MC, ROSSI SA, PEMAN J, RUIZ-GAITAN A, MENDES-GIANNINI MJS, MELLADO E & ZARAGOZA O. 2019. Identification of Off-Patent Compounds That Present Antifungal Activity Against the Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9: 83.
• DOMINGUEZ E, ZARNOWSKI R, SANCHEZ H, COVELLI AS, WESTLER WM, AZADI P, NETT J, MITCHELL AP & ANDES DR. 2018. Conservation and Divergence in the MBio 04;9.
• DOS SANTOS ABRANTES PM, MCARTHUR CP & AFRICA CW. 2014. Multi-drug resistant oral Candida species isolated from HIV-positive patients in South Africa and Cameroon. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79: 222-227.
• EUCAST. 2017. Definitive document E. DEF7.3.1. Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for yeasts. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
• FAHIE S & CASSAGNOL M. 2020. VERAPAMIL [Updated 2020 Mar 31]. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538495/
  » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538495/
• HOYLE BD & COSTERTON JW. 1991. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms. Prog Drug Res 37: 91-105.
• ISO 10993-5. 2009. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Part 5: Tests for in Vitro Cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization.
• JUNQUEIRA JC. 2012. Models hosts for the study of oral candidiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol 710: 95-105.
• JUVVADI PR, LAMOTH F & STEINBACH WJ. 2014. Calcineurin as a Multifunctional Regulator: Unraveling Novel Functions in Fungal Stress Responses, Hyphal Growth, Drug Resistance, and Pathogenesis. Fungal Biol Rev 28: 56-69.
• KATRAGKOU A, ROILIDES E & WALSH TJ. 2016. Can repurposing of existing drugs provide more effective therapies for invasive fungal infections? Expert Opin Pharmacother 17: 1179-1182.
• KRAJEWSKA-KUŁAK E & NICZYPORUK W. 1993. Effects of the combination of ketoconazole and calcium channel antagonists against Candida albicans in vitro. Arzneimittelforschung 43: 782-783.
• LIN S ET AL. 2018. Candidemia in Adults at a Tertiary Hospital in China: Clinical Characteristics, Species Distribution, Resistance, and Outcomes. Mycopathologia. Mar.
• LIU S, HOU Y, LIU W, LU C, WANG W & SUN S. 2015. Components of the calcium-calcineurin signaling pathway in fungal cells and their potential as antifungal targets. Eukaryot Cell 14: 324-334.
• LIU Y & FILLER SG. 2011. Candida albicans Als3, a multifunctional adhesin and invasin. Eukaryot Cell 10: 168-173.
• MELETIADIS J, CURFS-BREUKER I, MEIS JF & MOUTON JW. 2017. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates with the EUCAST Methodology, a New Method for ECOFF Determination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 24(61).
• NATIONAL CENTER FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY INFORMATION. 2020. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 2520, Verapamil. Retrieved November 12, 2020 from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Verapamil
  » https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Verapamil
• NIIMI M, FIRTH NA & CANNON RD. 2010. Antifungal drug resistance of oral fungi. Odontology 98: 15-25.
• OVERHAGE J, CAMPISANO A, BAINS M, TORFS EC, REHM BH & HANCOCK RE. 2008. Human host defense peptide LL-37 prevents bacterial biofilm formation. Infect Immun 76: 4176-4182.
• PANARIELLO BHD, KLEIN MI, MIMA EGO & PAVARINA AC. 2018. Fluconazole impacts the extracellular matrix of fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms. J Oral Microbiol 10: 1476644.
• PARSEK MR & SINGH PK. 2003. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol 57: 677-701.
• PATEL PK ET AL. 2012. The Changing Epidemiology of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in Patients with HIV/AIDS in the Era of Antiretroviral Therapy. AIDS Res Treat 2012: 262471.
• PAVAN FR, DA S MAIA PI, LEITE SR, DEFLON VM, BATISTA AA, SATO DN, FRANZBLAU SG & LEITE CQ. 2010. Thiosemicarbazones, semicarbazones, dithiocarbazates and hydrazide/hydrazones: anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity and cytotoxicity. Eur J Med Chem 45: 1898-1905.
• PEETERS E, NELIS HJ & COENYE T. 2008. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. J Microbiol Methods 72: 157-165.
• PFALLER MA & DIEKEMA DJ. 2007. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Ver 20: 133-163.
• PINTO E SILVA AT, COSTA-DE-OLIVEIRA S, SILVA-DIAS A, PINA-VAZ C & RODRIGUES AG. 2009. Dynamics of in vitro acquisition of resistance by Candida parapsilosis to different azoles. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 626-633.
• PIOZZI A, FRANCOLINI I, OCCHIAPERTI L, DI ROSA R, RUGGERI V & DONELLI G. 2004. Polyurethanes loaded with antibiotics: influence of polymer-antibiotic interactions on in vitro activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Chemother 16: 446-452.
• QUINDÓS G, MARCOS-ARIAS C, SAN-MILLÁN R, MATEO E & ERASO E. 2018. The continuous changes in the aetiology and epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: from familiar Candida albicans to multiresistant Candida auris. Int Microbiol 21: 107-119.
• RASMUSSEN TB & GIVSKOV M. 2006. Quorum sensing inhibitors: a bargain of effects. Microbiology 152: 895-904.
• RIBEIRO FC, DE BARROS PP, ROSSONI RD, JUNQUEIRA JC & JORGE AO. 2017. Lactobacillus rhamnosus inhibits Candida albicans virulence factors in vitro and modulates immune system in Galleria mellonella. J Appl Microbiol 122: 201-211.
• RODRIGUES CF & HENRIQUES M. 2017. Liposomal and Deoxycholate Amphotericin B Formulations: Effectiveness against Biofilm Infections of Candida spp. Pathogens 1(6).
• RODRIGUES CF, RODRIGUES ME, SILVA S & HENRIQUES M. 2017. Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? J Fungi (Basel) 3.
• ROY R, TIWARI M, DONELLI G & TIWARI V. 2018. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence 01(9):522-554.
• SALEHI M, GHOMI Z, MIRSHAHI R, DEHGHAN MANSHADI SA & REZAHOSSEINI O. 2019. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Candidemia in a Referral Center in Tehran. Caspian J Intern Med 10: 73-79.
• SANGLARD D, ISCHER F, MARCHETTI O, ENTENZA J & BILLE J. 2003. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Molecular Microbiol 48: 959-976.
• SANTOLAYA ME ET AL. 2019. A prospective, multi-center study of Candida bloodstream infections in Chile. PLoS One 4: e0212924.
• SILES SA, SRINIVASAN A, PIERCE CG, LOPEZ-RIBOT JL & RAMASUBRAMANIAN AK. 2013. High-throughput screening of a collection of known pharmacologically active small compounds for identification of Candida albicans biofilm inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 3681-3687.
• SILVA S, NEGRI M, HENRIQUES M, OLIVEIRA R, WILLIAMS DW & AZEREDO J. 2012. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36: 288-305.
• SINGH A, VERMA R, MURARI A & AGRAWAL A. 2014. Oral candidiasis: An overview. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 18: S81-85.
• SINGH PK, SCHAEFER AL, PARSEK MR, MONINGER TO, WELSH MJ & GREENBERG EP. 2000. Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms. Nature 407: 762-764.
• TAFF HT, MITCHELL KF, EDWARD JA & ANDES DR. 2013. Mechanisms of Candida biofilm drug resistance. Future Microbiol 8: 1325-1337.
• THEIN ZM, SAMARANAYAKE YH & SAMARANAYAKE LP. 2006. Effect of oral bacteria on growth and survival of Candida albicans biofilms. Arch Oral Biol 51: 672-680.
• THOMAZ DY, MELHEM MSC, DE ALMEIDA JUNIOR JN, BENARD G & DEL NEGRO GMB. 2020. Lack of efficacy of echinocandins against high metabolic activity biofilms of Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates. Braz J Microbiol 51: 1129-1133
• THOMPSON GR 3RD, PATEL PK, KIRKPATRICK WR, WESTBROOK SD, BERG D, ERLANDSEN J, REDDING SW & PATTERSON TF. 2010. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in the era of antiretroviral therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109: 488-495.
• TURABELIDZE A, GUO S, CHUNG AY, CHEN L, DAI Y, MARUCHA PT & DIPIETRO LA. 2014. Intrinsic differences between oral and skin keratinocytes. PLoS One 9: e101480.
• VILA T, ROMO JA, PIERCE CG, MCHARDY SF, SAVILLE SP & LOPEZ-RIBOT JL. 2017. Targeting Candida albicans filamentation for antifungal drug development. Virulence 02(8): 150-158.
• WALSH TJ, KATRAGKOU A, CHEN T, SALVATORE CM & ROILIDES E. 2019. Invasive Candidiasis in Infants and Children: Recent Advances in Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. J Fungi (Basel) 5.
• WIEDERHOLD NP, PATTERSON TF, SRINIVASAN A, CHATURVEDI AK, FOTHERGILL AW, WORMLEY FL, RAMASUBRAMANIAN AK & LOPEZ-RIBOT JL. 2017. Repurposing auranofin as an antifungal: In vitro activity against a variety of medically important fungi. Virulence 17(8): 138-142.
• WOOLFORD CA, LAGREE K, XU W, ALEYNIKOV T, ADHIKARI H, SANCHEZ H, CULLEN PJ, LANNI F, ANDES DR & MITCHELL AP. 2016. Bypass of Candida albicans Filamentation/Biofilm Regulators through Diminished Expression of Protein Kinase Cak1. PLoS Genet 12: e1006487.
• WU H, MOSER C, WANG HZ, HØIBY N & SONG ZJ. 2015. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections. Int J Oral Sci 7: 1-7.
• YU Q, DING X, XU N, CHENG X, QIAN K, ZHANG B, XING L & LI M. 2013. In vitro activity of verapamil alone and in combination with fluconazole or tunicamycin against Candida albicans biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 41: 179-182.
• YU Q, WANG H, XU N, CHENG X, WANG Y, ZHANG B, XING L & LI M. 2012. Spf1 strongly influences calcium homeostasis, hyphal development, biofilm formation and virulence in Candida albicans. Microbiology 158: 2272-2282.
• YU Q, DING X, ZHANG B, XU N, JIA C, MAO J, XING L & LI M. 2014a. Inhibitory effect of verapamil on Candida albicans hyphal development, adhesion and gastrointestinal colonization. FEMS Yeast Res 14: 633-641.
• YU Q, XIAO C, ZHANG K, JIA C, DING X, ZHANG B & WANG Y, LI M. 2014b. The calcium channel blocker verapamil inhibits oxidative stress response in Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 177: 167-177.
• YUE H, BING J, ZHENG Q, ZHANG Y, HU T, DU H, WANG H & HUANG G. 2018. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 188.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  11 Dec 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  7 May 2020
• Accepted
  7 Oct 2020