Performance, metabolic efficiency and egg quality in Japanese quails fed with acidulated soybean soapstock and lecithin for a prolonged period

BAVARESCO, CAROLINE; SILVA, SUELEN N.; DIAS, RENATA C.; LOPES, DÉBORA C.N.; XAVIER, EDUARDO G.; ROLL, VICTOR F.B.

doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020180620

person CAROLINE BAVARESCO

schoolUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Av. Eliseu Maciel, Campus Universitário, s/n, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil

0000-0003-4052-4813

person SUELEN N. SILVA

schoolUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Av. Eliseu Maciel, Campus Universitário, s/n, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil

0000-0002-3072-7900

person RENATA C. DIAS

schoolUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Av. Eliseu Maciel, Campus Universitário, s/n, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil

0000-0001-9420-2233

person DÉBORA C.N. LOPES

schoolUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Av. Eliseu Maciel, Campus Universitário, s/n, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil

0000-0001-7059-6362

person EDUARDO G. XAVIER

schoolUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Av. Eliseu Maciel, Campus Universitário, s/n, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil

0000-0002-1154-0366

person VICTOR F.B. ROLL

schoolUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Av. Eliseu Maciel, Campus Universitário, s/n, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil

0000-0002-4928-0299

Correspondence to: Caroline Bavaresco E-mail: carolinebavaresco@hotmail.com

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Project developed by the master’s degree student Caroline Bavaresco together with her advisor, Victor Roll. Student responsible for the organization of all experimental stages, data tabulation, interpretation of statistical analysis and writing the article. Suelen Silva and Renata Dias are graduate students, assisted in field activities, laboratory analysis and article writing. Débora Lopes and Eduardo Xavier are co-advisors, assisted in the formulation of experimental diets, Xavier assisted in field activities and both, in monitoring the results obtained and in correcting the article.

Ingredient (kg)	Diets⁹
	T1	T2	T3	T4	T5	T6	T7	T8
Maize	42.60	40.68	32.37	30.36	41.50	39.53	30.08	28.14
SBM (45%)¹	35.70	36.00	37.55	37.66	35.83	36.20	37.98	38.33
Inert ²	6.35	6.97	10.71	11.36	7.31	7.92	12.62	13.21
PVM ³,⁴	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00
Limestone	4.50	4.50	4.40	4.45	4.50	4.50	4.45	4.45
Dicalcium phosphate	1.17	1.17	1.30	1.20	1.17	1.17	1.20	1.20
BHT ⁵	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20
DL- metionine	0.37	0.37	0.38	0.38	0.37	0.37	0.38	0.38
L- lysine	0.11	0.11	0.09	0.09	0.12	0.11	0.09	0.09
ASS⁶	4.00	4.00	8.00	8.00	-	-	-	-
DSO⁷	-	-	-	-	4.00	4.00	8.00	8.00
LEC⁸	-	1.00	-	1.00	-	1.00	-	1.00
Total	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0
Calculated analysis
AME_n (kcal/kg)	2800	2800	2800	2800	2800	2800	2800	2800
Crude protein (%)	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Calcium (%)	3.10	3.10	3.09	3.09	3.10	3.10	3.09	3.09
Av¹⁰. Phosphorus(%)	0.32	0.33	0.32	0.33	0.32	0.33	0.32	0.33
Av. Met+Cy(%)¹¹	0.88	0.88	0.88	0.88	0.88	0.88	0.88	0.88
Av.lysine (%)	1.08	1.08	1.10	1.10	1.09	1.09	1.10	1.10
Av. threonine (%)	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.67
Sodium (%)	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.19

Treatments	Eggweight (g)	Eggproduction (%)	Feed intake (g/day)	Egg mass (g.bird^-1.d¹)	FCR (g.g^-1)	Bodyweight (g)
T1	12.01±0.15	88.32±2.72	30.30±0.52	10.59±0.27	2.89±0.10	174.48±1.85
T2	11.54±0.20	91.58±1.44	28.59±0.75	10.65±0.21	2.82±0.05	175.55±2.66
T3	11.63±0.19	90.89±1.65	27.67±0.53	10.56±0.18	2.66±0.06	176.75±1.97
T4	12.00±0.11	91.68±1.09	28.93±0.38	11.00±0.16	2.65±0.04	179.00±2.83
T5	11.57±0.22	90.37±1.51	28.60±0.65	10.46±0.25	2.77±0.07	179.84±3.03
T6	11.72±0.21	91.25±1.41	28.86±0.34	10.67±0.18	2.73±0.03	176.77±2.06
T7	11.45±0.15	93.11±0.76	28.11±0.43	10.65±0.13	2.65±0.04	181.09±2.23
T8	11.76±0.16	88.46±1.65	29.36±0.46	10.30±0.19	2.90±0.06	180.15±2.27
Factors
ASS	11.79±0.59	90.61±6.27	28.87±2.10	10.69±0.71	2.75±0.24	176.44±8.10
DSO	11.62±0.63	90.79±4.91	28.73±1.68	10.52±0.66	2.76±0.19	179.46±8.28
4%	11.70±0.68	90.37±6.33	29.08±2.08	10.59±0.77	2.80±0.23	176.65±8.43
8%	11.71±0.55	91.03±4.81	28.51±1.66	10.62±0.60	2.71±0.20	179.24±8.03
0%	11.66±0.63	90.67±6.27	28.66±2.06	10.56±0.72	2.74±0.25	178.03±8.18
1%	11.75±0.60	90.74±4.91	28.93±1.72	10.65±0.66	2.77±0.18	177.86±8.48
Effects	p value
Oil	0.17	0.87	0.70	0.20	0.84	0.07
Level	0.98	0.56	0.12	0.78	0.04	0.13
Lecithin	0.47	0.95	0.47	0.53	0.42	0.91
Oil*Level	0.75	0.55	0.12	0.38	<0.01	0.87
Oil*Lecithin	0.26	0.09	0.18	0.27	0.09	0.28
Level*Lecithin	0.04	0.08	<0.01	0.74	0.04	0.62
OilLevelLecithin	0.17	0.50	0.18	0.09	0.16	0.89

Treatments	Relative weights (% of the egg)				Yolk color		Haugh Unit	Shell thickness (mm)
	Albumen	Yolk	Shell		Yolk color		Haugh Unit	Shell thickness (mm)
T1	59.18±0.47	32.43±0.40	8.39±0.11		4.65±0.09		91.91±0.44	0.263±0.004
T2	59.58±0.56	31.84±0.49	8.58±0.12		4.90±0.10		91.97±0.41	0.267±0.005
T3	59.56±0.38	31.77±0.41	8.67±0.08		4.76±0.08		92.11±0.30	0.268±0.002
T4	59.47±0.32	31.91±0.33	8.62±0.10		4.79±0.11		91.34±0.40	0.268±0.003
T5	59.56±0.43	31.68±0.47	8.76±0.11		4.70±0.09		91.56±0.50	0.273±0.005
T6	59.76±0.41	31.63±0.31	8.61±0.15		4.64±0.09		91.23±0.43	0.274±0.005
T7	59.72±0.37	31.52±0.36	8.76±0.12		4.18±0.08		90.38±0.69	0.269±0.004
T8	59.14±0.26	31.96±0.25	8.90±0.10		4.06±0.08		91.35±0.43	0.277±0.005
Factors
ASS	59.45±1.49	31.99±1.39	8.56±0.35b		4.77±0.33		91.83±1.34a	0.266±0.01b
DSO	59.55±1.27	31.70±1.20	8.75±0.41a		4.39±0.40		91.13±1.80b	0.273±0.01a
4%	59.68±1.59	31.72±1.45	8.60±0.42		4.72±0.33		91.66±1.52	0.269±0.01
8%	59.47±1.15	31.80±1.15	8.73±0.34		4.44±0.45		91.29±1.71	0.270±0.01
0%	59.50±1.40	31.86±1.42	8.64±0.37		4.57±0.37		91.48±1.80	0.268±0.01
1%	59.48±1.37	31.83±1.19	8.68±0.41		4.59±0.46		91.47±1.43	0.271±0.01
Effects	p value
Oil	0.73	0.28		0.01		<0.0001	0.03	0.02
Level	0.87	0.70		0.06		<0.0001	0.26	0.64
Lecithin	0.94	0.95		0.63		0.70	0.96	0.30
Oil*Level	0.53	0.48		0.97		<0.0001	0.62	0.53
Oil*Lecithin	0.54	0.44		0.62		0.08	0.30	0.75
Level*Lecithin	0.28	0.26		0.95		0.29	0.72	0.77
OilLevelLecithin	0.80	0.82		0.08		0.54	0.10	0.39

[tfnI] ¹Soybean meal; ²Sand; ³Vitamin and mineral premix ⁴Composition per kg of product: vitamin A, 207 000 IU; vitamin D3, 43 200 IU; vitamin E, 540 mg; vitamin K3 ,51.5mg; vitaminB1, 40 mg; vitamin B2, 120 mg; vitamin B6, 54 mg; vitamin B12, 430 mg; niacin, 840 mg; folic acid, 16.7 mg; pantothenic acid, 204.6 mg; choline, 42 mg; biotin, 1.4 mg; methionine, 11 g; manganese, 1485 mg; zinc, 1535 mg; iron, 1695 mg; copper, 244 mg; iodine, 29 mg; selenium, 3.2 mg; zinc bacitracin, 600 mg; BHT, 700 mg; calcium, 197.5 g; cobalt, 5.1 mg; fluorine (maximum), 400 mg; phosphorus, 50 g; sodium, 36 g. ⁵Butylated hydroxytoluene. ⁶Acidulated soybean soapstock oil; ⁷Degummed soybean oil; ⁸Lecithin; ⁹Diets: T1: 4% ASS; T2: 4% ASS+1% LEC; T3: 8% ASS; T4: 8% ASS+1% LEC; T5: 4% DSO; T6:4% DSO+1% LEC; T7: 8% DSO; T8: 8% DSO + 1% LEC. ¹⁰Available; ¹¹ methionine + cystine.

Performance, metabolic efficiency and egg quality in Japanese quails fed with acidulated soybean soapstock and lecithin for a prolonged period

Abstract