A new genus and species of Neotropical Hybosorinae Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera: Hybosoridae)

: Among the 26 Hybosorinae genera, seven are present exclusively in the Neotropical region. However, Hybosorinae from the New World have been less studied. One new genus and new species collected in Brazil is herein described to this subfamily. The genus is recognizable by the following combination of characters: labium with semicircular mentum; mandibles with lateral projection excavated, separated in the middle by longitudinal carina, inner side sheltering the labrum; antennae with nine antenomeres; scutellar shield with strong punctures at the proximal half; elytra with single rows formed by punctures; and protibia without well-defi ned denticles.


INTRODUCTION
Hybosorinae Erichson, 1847 is the second most diverse subfamily of Hybosoridae Erichson, 1847. They group 26 described genera (Ocampo & Ballerio 2006, Ocampo 2010, Frolov et al. 2017) until now. The species of this subfamily could have necrophagous, coprophagous, mycophagous and/or xylophagous habits. They could also live in association with termites or ants and usually have the habit of burying themselves (Jameson 2002, Casari & Ide 2012, Ocampo 2006. The Hybosorinae were recognized by the presence of a 3-articulated antennal club with the club basal antennomer cupuliform, mandibles protruding beyond the apex of labrum, elytra punctate and asymmetrical male genitalia (Ocampo 2006).
During an extensive analysis of Coilodes Westwood, 1846, the most diverse Hybosorinae genus in the New World (Ocampo & Ballerio 2006), more than 1.300 specimens from all species (including the type material) were studied. A different species from Cuiabá, Mato Grosso (Brazil) that does not belong to Coilodes was found among them. This species has been carefully analyzed and despite the fact that it has some similarities with Coilodes, neither does it have the diagnostic characters of it nor of any other genus of Hybosorinae. In addition, it has a unique character combination. Thus, this species belongs to a new genus in Hybosorinae. Therefore, this work aimed to describe a new genus and a new species of Hybosorinae collected in the Neotropical Region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three pinned and dry adult specimens provided by the Entomology Sector of UFMT Zoological Collection, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil (CEMT) were analyzed in the Laboratório de Sistemática e Bioecologia de Coleoptera, Department of Zoology, Universidade Federal do Paraná.
The morphological study of the material was made with stereomicroscope ZEISS SteREO Discovery.V20. In order to obtain photographs, a stereomicroscope Leica M205C with coupled digital camera Leica DMC 2900 was used. In addition, the Leica LAS Multifocus software was used to self-assembly. To the plate confection, CorelDRAW ® and Corel PHOTO-PAINT ® Home & Student 2018 were used.
Due to the convex shape of the body, the length measurements refer to the sum of the head (frons and Clypeus), pronotum and elytra length and the width refer to the largest distance between the outer margins of the elytra. The terminology used for descriptions follows Grebennikov et al. (2004), Ocampo (2006, Bai et al. (2015) and Ballerio & Grebennikov (2016).
The labels of the examined material were transcribed from top to bottom, and left to right. The data of each label was between double quotes (" ") and each line was separated by a backslash (\). Additional details are between brackets ([ ]). When there were more than one label to a specimen, they were separated by a vertical bar (|).

Description
Body surface with sparse and weak punctures. Labrum subrectangular and flat with irregular margins. Mandibles strongly produced laterally, angulated anteriorly. Labium with mentum semicircular. Antenna 9-articulated, antennal club rounded 3-articulated, basal antennomer cupuliform. Pronotum uniformly convex with smooth margins. Scutellar shield subtriangular, surface with strong punctures in proximal half (the region covered by the pronotum). Elytra with single longitudinal rows of thick punctures, elytral disc glabrous; external margins with large sparse setae. Protibia without denticles. Abdomen with five ventrites with decumbent setae. http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:CD9923A3-5CD4-4896-A9EB-1B58E64FED81 Diagnosis Frolovius, gen. nov. is similar to Coilodes Westwood, 1846 and different from the other Hybosorinae by the following character combination: labrum flat, mandible without dentiform projection, antennal club rounded, pronotum with smooth margin, elytral punctures weak and not very dense, elytra with sparse bristles on the lateral margin. It is distinguished [Coilodes characteristics between brackets for comparison] by the presence of labium with semicircular mentum (

Geographic distribution
Only one species known collected in Mato Grosso, Brazil.

Etymology
Noun in the genitive singular. Frolovius gen. nov. is nominated after Andrey Frolov, collector of all specimens known so far and who first recognized its originality. The gender is masculine.  produced; lateral margin smooth with setae at the basal half; dorsally excavated, with strong longitudinal carina medially, inner region sheltering the labrum. Labium with mentum semicircular; superior and lateral margins rounded and inferior arched; disc strigulate, large setae; labial palps with three palpomeres; basal and second palpomeres subglobose; distal palpomere barrel-shaped, length equivalent to the sum of the previous two. Maxilla subtriangular; large setae throughout surface; maxillary palp with four palpomeres; basal palpomere curved; second and third palpomeres longer than wide; distal palpomere barrel-shaped, length equivalent to the sum of the previous three. Antenna 9-articulated; large and erect setae in basal antennomere (scape); antennal club 3-articulated; club with basal antennomere cupuliform, pubescent distally, sparse, small setae on its base. Pronotum (Fig.  1e): uniformly convex; posterior margin as wide as the anterior one; anterior margin straight, angles subacute; posterior margin rounded, angles obtuse; lateral margin convex; sparse punctures; setae absent. Scutellar shield: subtriangular, twice as long as wide; apex punctate; punctures absent in distal half surface and strong punctures in proximal half surface (in the region covered by the pronotum). Elytra: single longitudinal rows of thick punctures, complete sutural striae formed by punctures; elytral disc glabrous; external margins with large setae on the base decreasing in size towards the apex; elytral epipleuron complete, wider at the apex; posterior margin of elytra covering the pygidium. Venter (Fig. 1b): hypomeral surface strigulate, setose; prosternum (Figs. 1b and d), midlength elevated, anterior margin straight and jagged, meso-and metaventrite smooth. Legs: procoxa conical; disc smooth. Protrochanter, joint with the procoxa rounded, distally angled. Profemur, disc smooth, sparse setae. Protibia inner margin convex; disc with large setae; single spur; external margin, two well-defined teeth next to apex and small tooth below the other two. Protarsi, tarsal insertion beneath the protibial second tooth. Meso-and metathoracic legs smooth. Meso-and metatrocanther subtriagular. Meso-and metatibia with erect setae; apex weakly expanded; pair of spurs with pointed apex; both on inner margin; same size of the protibial spur. Tarsi, five tarsomeres twice longer than wide, distal tarsomere twice as wide as the previous; simple and curved tarsal claws. Abdomen: five ventrites with decumbent setae.
However, this decision related to Hybosorinae needs to be taken very carefully, because many genera present sexual dimorphism, although subtle in the known cases (Westwood 1846, Ocampo 2010, Frolov et al. 2017). Therefore, this genus was proposed only after thorough morphological and bibliographical analysis of all Hybosorinae genera. This analysis showed that neither Hybosorinae extant genera has the same character combination presented here. About the character cited as diagnostic, the mandibles laterally well produced with an angulation in the anterior margin is known in Hybosorinae. In some genera, the mandible could be produced vertically with dentiform projections, as it occurs in Taisia, Aporolaus Bates, 1887 and Dicraeodon Erichson, 1847; or poorly laterally produced with external margin evenly curved as it occurs in Apalonychus Westwood, 1845 (Basílio et al. In Press).
Another evidence that corroborates this decision was observed in a preliminary phylogenetic analysis based on morphological evidence. That study recovered Frolovius gen. nov. as the sister group of the Neotropical genus Coilodes in a separate branch from the other Neotropical genera (Basílio et al. In Press). The morphological difference between Coilodes and Frolovius gen. nov., on the other hand, cannot be considered as a sexual dimorphism, for the reason that the females of all Coilodes species were analyzed and all presented the same dimorphism, different from Frolovius gen. nov. diagnostic characters presented here.
This genus cannot be considered any other New World Hybosorinae known genera either, because although the differences with Coilodes (more related genus), Frolovius gen. nov. presents evident differences from the other genera, such as labrum with margin flat and irregular, but not serrated (elevated on Apalonychus and strongly serrated on Hybosorus MacLeay, 1819); mandible without dentiform projection (with dentiform projection in Aporolaus, Dicraeodon and Taisia); antennal club rounded (elongated in Apalonhychus); Pronotum margin smooth (distinctly serrated in Taisia); elytral punctures weak and not dense (strong and dense in all other New Word Hybosorinae genera, except in Coilodes); elytral margin with sparse bristles (dense in Apalonychus, Metachaetodus Preudhomme de Borre, 1886 and Taisia; and very dense in Aporolaus). All of those evidences strengthen the decision to describe Frolovius as a new genus.