Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

A brief assessment of the influence of Animal Science in the Impact Factor of the AABC

Although the importance that has been given to a journal´s Impact Factor (IF) has been questioned for some time (e.g., Kaldas et al. 2021KALDAS M, MICHAEL S, HANNA J & YOUSEF GM. 2021. Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space. Journal of Investigative Medicine 68(1): 83-87. DOI 10.1136/jim-2019-001009.), including exposing several problematic situations (e.g., Siler & Larivière 2022SILER K & LARIVIÈRE V. 2022. Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation. Research Policy 51(10). DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608.), the fact is that this index is firmly established among researchers (e.g., Bradshaw & Brook 2016BRADSHAW CJA & BROOK BW. 2016. How to Rank Journals. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149852. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0149852.), affecting the entire publication industry.

As the sole broad multidisciplinary periodical edited in Brazil, the Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, Kellner 2023KELLNER AWA. 2023. The 2022 Impact Factor of at the AABC. An Acad Bras Cienc 95: e2023953. DOI 10.1590/0001-376520232023953.) is well aware of the problems of how the IF affects different areas of science. For this reason, changes were introduced in order to develop specific fields that might contribute to improving bibliometric indexes of the journal. One such changes was the division of some broader areas into more specific fields, in an attempt to attract the interest of researchers (e.g., Kellner 2022KELLNER AWA. 2022. The Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences. An Acad Bras Cienc 94: e20220372. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202220220372). Among these is Agrarian Sciences, which was subdivided into four areas: Animal Science (AnSci), Crop Science (CrSci), Soil Science (SoiSci), and Forestry Science (FoSci). By far, most manuscripts received since this change was implemented (2021), fall under AnSci. Here I make a brief assessment of the contribution to the Impact Factor for 2023 of the AABC (AABC IF-2023) recently disclosed (Clarivate 2024CLARIVATE. 2024. First time Journal Citation Reports. https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results. Accessed 25/August/2024.
https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results...
) considering the articles allocated to AnSci.

According to Clarivate (2024)CLARIVATE. 2024. First time Journal Citation Reports. https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results. Accessed 25/August/2024.
https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results...
, a total of 848 citable items were published in 2021 and 2022, a number that is at odds with the actual quantity of articles (863 – excluding editorials, letters, and forewords) that the AABC published in this period. This indicates that 15 papers were not considered in the calculation of the AABC JCR-2023. The missing article problem (MAP) is unfortunately not new for the AABC (e.g., Kellner 2020KELLNER AWA. 2020. Development of Agrarian Sciences at the AABC with comments on impact and performance evaluations. An Acad Bras Cienc 92: e202092S1. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202092S1.), and apparently has been repeated this year (Kellner in prep.).

Table I
Citations and indexes referring to Animal Science (AnSci) articles published in 2021 and 2022 by the Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences that were considered in the 2023 Impact Factor.

In 2021, the AABC published 424 papers, 34 (8%) of which covering AnSci. In the following year (2022), this number showed a considerable increase, with 63 (14.4%) of the 439 published papers referring to this field. Of the 34 published manuscripts in 2021, only 33 were retrieved by the JCR-2023. The article by Felix & Freitas (2021)FELIX JA & FREITAS BM. 2021. Richness and distribution of the meliponine fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in the State of Ceará, Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 93: e20190767. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202120190767. was not included for unknown reasons and is another example of MAP. All 63 articles published in 2022 were found in the JCR-2023, resulting in a total of 96 papers in AnSci that were considered by the calculation of the AABC IF-2023 (Table I). Based on the information presented in the JCR-2023, AnSci contributed with 11.32% of the total number of papers published by the AABC in this two-year period.

Of the 96 papers considered here, 45 (21 from 2021 + 24 from 2022) were cited at least once and 16 (8 from 2021 + 8 from 2022) at least twice in 2023, resulting in an Article Citation Factor (ACF – see Kellner 2020KELLNER AWA. 2020. Development of Agrarian Sciences at the AABC with comments on impact and performance evaluations. An Acad Bras Cienc 92: e202092S1. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202092S1.) of 0.4688 and 0.1667, respectively (Table I). This means that 41 (12 from 2021 + 39 from 2022) did not get any citation in 2023 and therefore did not contribute positively to the AABC IF-2023. Only 16 out of 96 published papers were cited twice in 2023.

When analyzed more closely, most papers without citations focus on animal production (also referred to as Zootechnics). Those with more citations tend to be broader contributions, including biogeography and aspects dealing with endangered animals.

As pointed out, the AABC IF-2023 is 1.1. If only AnSci contributions would be considered, the IF would be 1.370, which is comparatively higher than expected for the low number of articles that were cited (expressed by the ACF). One paper, however, stands out in the number of citations and was, according to the JCR-2023, the most cited article published by the AABC in the two years under analysis: Morrone et al (2022)MORRONE JJ, ESCALANTE T, RODRÍGUEZ-TAPIA G, CARMONA A, ARANA M & MERCADO-GÓMEZ JD. 2022. Biogeographic regionalization of the Neotropical region: New map and shapefile. An Acad Bras Cienc 94: e20211167. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202220211167. was cited 58 times, and is clearly an outlier. If this article is excluded, AnSci IF-2023 would be much lower (0.7789) than the AABC IF-2023. More comparative data is presented in Table I.

The take home message from this brief analysis is that there is much room for improvement regarding AnSci relative to the AABC IF.

REFERENCES

  • BRADSHAW CJA & BROOK BW. 2016. How to Rank Journals. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149852. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0149852.
  • CLARIVATE. 2024. First time Journal Citation Reports. https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results Accessed 25/August/2024.
    » https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results
  • FELIX JA & FREITAS BM. 2021. Richness and distribution of the meliponine fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in the State of Ceará, Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 93: e20190767. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202120190767.
  • KALDAS M, MICHAEL S, HANNA J & YOUSEF GM. 2021. Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space. Journal of Investigative Medicine 68(1): 83-87. DOI 10.1136/jim-2019-001009.
  • KELLNER AWA. 2020. Development of Agrarian Sciences at the AABC with comments on impact and performance evaluations. An Acad Bras Cienc 92: e202092S1. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202092S1.
  • KELLNER AWA. 2022. The Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences. An Acad Bras Cienc 94: e20220372. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202220220372
  • KELLNER AWA. 2023. The 2022 Impact Factor of at the AABC. An Acad Bras Cienc 95: e2023953. DOI 10.1590/0001-376520232023953.
  • MORRONE JJ, ESCALANTE T, RODRÍGUEZ-TAPIA G, CARMONA A, ARANA M & MERCADO-GÓMEZ JD. 2022. Biogeographic regionalization of the Neotropical region: New map and shapefile. An Acad Bras Cienc 94: e20211167. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202220211167.
  • SILER K & LARIVIÈRE V. 2022. Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation. Research Policy 51(10). DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    06 Sept 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024
Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br