Seed bank composition in a secondary forest in the Lower Delta of the Paraná River (Argentina)

ARTICLES

Seed bank composition in a secondary forest in the Lower Delta of the Paraná River (Argentina)

Fábio Kalesnik^I,*; Horacio Sirolli^I; Marta Collantes^II

^IUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Laboratorio de Ecología Ambiental y Regional, Buenos Aires, Argentina

^IIMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Área Botánica, Laboratorio de pastizales, Buenos Aires, Argentina

ABSTRACT

The native forests once occupying the coastal levees of the Lower Delta islands of the Paraná River (in Argentina) have been replaced by commercial forests. Many of those forests have been abandoned, resulting in secondary forest formation that is subject to numerous invasive exotic species. A priori observations suggest that successional trends do not lead to recovery of the original forest. The aim of the present study was to analyze the role of invasive exotic species in these environments and the likelihood of recovery of the original forest cover. Therefore, we examined the composition of the seed bank and of the standing vegetation, as well as the population structure of tree species. Secondary forests are described as being in an intermediate successional stage, with few exotic species (mainly trees) but with a high abundance of standing vegetation and seed banks. These exotic species will likely continue to successfully predominate in different forest strata over the next stages. Because of the low density of native tree species, it is difficult to predict their future persistence. In conclusion, ecological restoration strategies will be needed in order to increase native tree species richness and biodiversity of the forests in the Lower Delta of the Paraná River.

Key words: Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), invasive species, post-abandonment regeneration, riparian forest, seedling emergence

Introduction

Seed banks contain viable propagules stored above or below the soil (Thompson & Grime, 1979). Several studies have analyzed the importance of different environmental factors, as well as the size and composition of soil seed banks, in various ecosystems (Bakker 1989; Bertiller 1992; Albrecht & Pilgram 1997; Jalili et al. 2003). The role that seed banks play in secondary successions has been studied since the mid-20th century, and it is considered a key factor to ensure the regeneration of plant cover following disturbances (Baker 1989; Chapman & Chapman 1999; Luzuriaga et al. 2005). In the last few decades, there has been growing interest in soil seed bank composition in forest ecosystems (Milber 1995; Holmes & Cowling 1997; Vallés et al. 2005), because of the potential of seed banks to restore original forests (Onaindia & Amezaga 2000; Urretavizcaya & Defoseé 2004), as well as their strong influence on the composition and diversity of ecosystems after the commercial harvesting of timber (Roberts 1981; Kalesnik 2001; Decocq et al. 2004).

The degree of association between the composition of seed banks and that of the standing vegetation can be used to predict the recovery trends of plant communities (Holmes & Cowling 1997; Albrecht & Pilgram 1997; Decocq et al. 2004). In mature forests, the composition of the seed bank usually differs from that of the canopy vegetation (Arévalo & Fernández-Palacios 2000), the seed banks exhibiting a higher proportion of early successional or pioneer species (Hanlon et al. 1998; Arévalo & Fernández-Palacios 2000) than of mature forest species (Fenner 1985), because most shade-tolerant species do not develop persistent seed banks (Onaindia & Amezaga 2000).

Ecosystem restoration potential has also been studied solely by analyzing seed bank composition (Middleton 2003; Decocq et al. 2004). Seed banks in areas subjected to anthropic modifications can be composed almost entirely of invasive exotic species, decreasing the chance that native species will recover. For instance, the seed banks of mature deciduous forests subjected to management are composed mainly of exotic species, which constitute over 80% of the total seed density (Leck 1989).

In the study area of this work (island levees of the Lower Delta of the Paraná River), the original forest vegetation had been almost entirely replaced by commercial forests of willow and poplar (Burkart 1957; Kalesnik 2001; Vallés et al. 2005). In the last few decades, many of those forests were abandoned because of socioeconomic difficulties affecting the region (Kalesnik & Malvárez 2003; Vallés et al. 2005). Despite the fact that certain areas have long been abandoned (for over 30 years), the original forest has not been able to recover. Instead, a mixed secondary forest dominated by invasive exotic species has spontaneously developed. Many of these species have been introduced for ornamental purposes, such as the Asian species Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), as well as the European elm-leaf blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius). These species often coexist with low densities of native tree species seedlings and saplings, such as laurel (Nectandra falcifolia; Kalesnik 2001), "canelón" (Rapanea lorentziana; Kalesnik & Malvárez 2003) and Mexican olive (Blepharocalyx tweediei; Kalesnik et al. 2009). This secondary forest can be considered a "neo-ecosystem", a term coined by Morello et al. (2000) to characterize semi-natural open or wooded areas where dominant invasive exotic species are accompanied by native species.

The main goal of the present study was to analyze the role of invasive exotic species in levee forests of the Lower Delta and the likelihood of recovery of the original forest, locally referred to as the Monte Blanco forest. The seed bank composition was estimated by differentiating between invasive exotic species and native species. Regeneration trajectories for the recovery of communities were defined by analyzing the similarities between the seed bank and the standing vegetation species.

Our main hypothesis was that the invasive process, occurring in the Lower Delta of the Paraná River at a regional level, is evidenced by the seed bank composition of secondary forests. As a consequence, the dominance of invasive exotic species would continue and the probability of recovery of the original Monte Blanco native species would be low.

Materials and methods

Study area: the Buenos Aires Province Lower Delta

The Lower Delta islands are located along the final stretch of the Paraná River Delta, at the point where the Paraná River divides into two main distributaries, Paraná Guazú and Paraná de las Palmas (Figure 1). The area extends from the city of Ibicuy (59º20'W; 33º42'S) to the mouths of the Paraná Guazú (58º24'W; 34ºS) and Luján Rivers (58º32'W; 34º26'S) at the Río de la Plata. The islands form a growing delta over the Río de La Plata estuary (Iriondo & Scotta 1979; Parker & Marcolini 1992) covering a total area of 2,071.06 km² (Latinoconsult 1972).

The temperate climate is characterized by rainfall throughout the year and an average temperature above 22ºC during the warmest month. The average annual temperature is approximately 17ºC, ranging from 6ºC to 30ºC (Servicio Meteorológico Nacional 1980). The hydrological regime of the area is influenced by the Paraná and Uruguay Rivers and the Río de la Plata estuary (Latinoconsult 1972; Mujica 1979). However, the Paraná River regime is determined mainly by tropical and subtropical rainfall in its upper basin, exhibiting seasonal variations in water levels, which begin rising in September and reach peak levels in March (DNCP 1983).

The main hydromorphic soil types in the levees are humic and subhumic gley soils, as well as new alluvial soils (Bonfils 1962). According to the United States Department of Agriculture soil taxonomy, these soil types correspond to poorly developed mollisols under an aquic regime.

Sampling was performed in a secondary forest located on the banks of the Carabelas River (Figure 1). The site is an open Salicaceae forest that has not been logged for 20 years and in which the original vegetation has been replaced by exotic tree species and, to a lesser extent, by native species. Although our data were obtained during 2001, it should be noted that subsequent studies have not shown any variation from these data (Kalesnik et al. 2009).

Sampling design and data collection

Seed bank

Four 10 × 10 m plots were randomly set at the site in February of 1999. Forty circular soil core samples (10 cm in diameter and 5 cm in depth) were collected from the topsoil layer, ten samples from each plot (two from each corner and two from the center of the plot). The soil core samples were collected by inserting a PVC tube into the ground. The samples were immediately stored into plastic bags and labeled. Seedling emergence and direct seed counts were both used to determine seed bank structure and composition. For each plot, one corner sample and one center sample were used for each method, yielding a total sampled surface area of 1570 cm².

Seedling emergence

Twenty soil samples were cold stratified by storing them at 5ºC for two weeks, in order to break the typical dormancy of many temperate climate seeds (Schneider & Sharitz 1986; Houle & Phillips 1988). In March, the samples were allowed to germinate in plastic trays inside a greenhouse. The trays contained inert sand (2.0 cm under the samples and 0.5 cm over) to maintain humidity conditions. Soil samples were spread over the trays to maximize the likelihood of seedling emergence. We also assembled four control trays containing only inert sand. The trays were rotated twice a week, by row and by column, in order to homogenize the environmental variables in the greenhouse. For each tray, the emerging seedlings were counted and then transferred to plastic pots outdoors for identification.

Direct seed count

The remaining 20 samples were sifted twice, after which the seeds were counted. Large plant fragments were discarded during the first sifting. Seeds were then separated by species using a 1-mm mesh sieve. This technique was performed mainly to identify L. sinense seeds, the principal invasive species in the area (Kalesnik et al. 2009), which do not germinate using the previous method (Vallés et al. 2005) and whose quantification was assumed to be of importance for this study.

Standing vegetation

Species cover was estimated for each 10 × 10 m plot using a modified Braun Blanquet scale (Mueller-Dombois & Ellemberg 1974). Species identification and origin were established according to the nomenclature devised by Cabrera (1963-1968), Burkart (1957, 1979, 1987) and Cabrera & Dawson (1944). The life-form types used were based on Barkman (1988).

The numbers of individuals of each tree species for each pre-determined age class were counted. Age class distribution considered three groups: adults (diameter at breast height > 5 cm), saplings (diameter at breast height < 5 cm, height >1.30 m) and seedlings (height < 1.30 m). Saplings and seedlings were sampled in a smaller 2 × 2 m plot at the center of the larger (10 × 10 m) plot.

Patterns in the population structure and spatial distribution of the tree species-frequent reproducers; recent incorporation or recent invaders; and nomadic or relictual individuals-were identified on the basis of previous data (Knight 1975; Saxena & Singh 1984). The future composition of the secondary forest was predicted based on the relative density of seedlings, saplings and adult trees found in the standing vegetation. Relative tree species density in the seed bank was also taken into account for the predictive analysis.

Data analysis

Seed bank

Seed bank species richness was calculated as the sum of species identified on the basis of the seedling emergence and direct seed count techniques. Similarly, in our comparative analysis of seed density in the bank and seed bank species richness for each life-form type and origin, we used both methods.

Standing vegetation - Total species richness, as well as species richness discriminated by life form and origin, was estimated as the sum of the species identified during sampling. Average species cover was estimated by determining the arithmetic mean for all plots. For comparative analysis, the cover for each life form and origin was calculated as the sum of all species belonging to the respective group and normalized to 100%.

Seed bank and standing vegetation comparison

Similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation composition in the secondary forest was estimated by the qualitative Sørensen similarity index (Magurran 1988). Similarity was also analyzed for each life-form type using the same index, although we considered species only according to their life form. For both analyses, calculation of the similarity index took into account the total number of species identified in all four plots.

Tree species density

Relative densities of tree species identified in the seed bank and in the secondary forest structure were analyzed in order to determine the possible future composition of the canopy. Thus, it is possible to study whether dominant species in each forest stratum are likely to sustain their dominance over time or if they will be replaced by other species. For the comparison between native and exotic species, total density was calculated as the sum of standing vegetation, seedling emergence and seed count in the seed bank.

Statistical analysis

The data did not meet the normality assumption and therefore required square-root transformation [y = √(x + 0.5)]. Because the data distribution was still non-normal after this transformation, a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was performed for all variables to compare native and exotic origins. The XLSTAT software, version 7.5.2 (Addinsoft, Paris, France) was used for all analyses.

Results

Seed bank

From the 1570 cm² of secondary forest soil sampled, a total of 369 seeds were germinated, corresponding to 52 different species and equivalent to 2349 germinated seeds/m² (Table 1). Although L. sinense seeds did not germinate in any of the samples, high densities of that species where found in all samples by direct count, totaling 197 seeds (1254 seeds/m²). If the results of both methods are considered, the species richness in the seed bank was 53 species: five tree species (three of which were exotic); 47 herbaceous species-38 broadleaf (four exotic), seven graminoid (two exotic); and two equisetoid (both native); and one native creeper species. On average, 28.8 species germinated per plot, with an average density of 3603 seeds/m², including L. sinense seeds quantified by direct count (Table 2).

As can be seen in Table 2, the number of native species was significantly higher than was that of exotic species (p=0.019). However, seed density did not differ by species origin (p>0.05). All types of native herbaceous species outnumbered the exotic species (p<0.05) and their seed density was similarly higher (p<0.05). Among these, Solanum deltaicum showed the highest number of germinated seeds. Tree species and broadleaf herbaceous species accounted for the majority of seeds in the bank. Although species richness did not vary by species origin (p>0.05), the density of exotic tree species was significantly greater than was that of native tree species (p=0.020), particularly due to L. sinense. Creeper species showed the lowest richness and seed density values and did not vary by species origin (p>0.05). No seedling emergence was observed in the four control trays.

Comparison between standing vegetation and seed bank

The total species richness in standing vegetation was 40 species (Table 1): ten tree species (five of which were exotic); two shrub species (one exotic); 24 herbaceous species-17 broadleaf (one exotic), one native equisetoid, and six graminoid (five native); and four creepers (three native).

On average, 18.5 species were found per plot (Table 3). Although native species outnumbered exotic species (p=0.019), the latter showed a higher mean cover value (p=0.021). Among the broadleaf herbaceous species, number and cover were higher for native species than for exotic species (p=0.018 for both). For the remaining life-form types, the number of species did not differ by origin. Nevertheless, the mean cover was higher for exotic trees (predominantly L. sinense and Fraxinus sp.) and creepers (predominantly Lonicera japonica) than for their native counterparts (p=0.021 for both).

For all species in the seed bank and standing vegetation, the Sørensen similarity index was 38.7%. When differentiating between life forms, we found that similarity was 0% for shrubs and creepers, 29% for broadleaf species, 53.3% for trees, 66.7% for equiseta, to 76.9% for graminoid species.

Seed density was higher for exotic tree species than for native tree species (p=0.020), mainly because 96.6% of the seeds were of L. sinense, compared with only 1.5% for native tree species. Among seedlings and saplings, relative density was also dominated by L. sinense with a significant smaller proportion of native tree species (p=0.046). When considering adults, the density of exotic tree species was significantly higher than for native species (p=0.050), once again because of L. sinense dominating the middle stratum of the forest (Table 4).

By integrating the previous results and analyzing the population structure patterns of the different tree species, Fraxinus sp. can be regarded as a frequent reproducer, seedlings and saplings outnumbering adults (Table 4). Seeds of Fraxinus sp. were also found in the seed bank, which suggests continued dominance of the canopy of the secondary forest by this species.

The remaining tree species composing the canopy, both exotic and native, showed a relictual pattern, with no seedlings or saplings found in the population structure. The only exceptions were Morus alba (exotic) and Sapium haematospermum (native), which were identified in the seed bank (Table 4).

With regards to species in the middle stratum of the secondary forest, L. sinense corresponded to a frequent reproducer that has a relatively higher proportion of seedlings and saplings than of adult plants. This short tree species (3-5 m) showed a distinctive high density for all population stages considered and is therefore likely to dominate the middle stratum of the forest in the future.

Discussion

The present work represents the first description of the type of seed banks that species of this secondary forest can develop, allowing a better understanding of the role of exotic species in such environments. Particularly, L. sinense can develop transient or type II seed banks during the winter months (Thompson and Grime, 1979), with germination occurring only in the spring. Our sample collection period (February 1999, which is fall in the southern hemisphere) and the fact that seeds of this species lose viability relatively quickly is in agreement with the aforementioned assumption.

Contrarily, Fraxinus sp. forms seed banks classified as type III (sensu Thompson & Grime 1979), also known as type B (sensu Nakagoshi 1985), in which seeds germinate immediately after being released during the fall. A small fraction of seeds permanently incorporate into the seed bank, which would account for the results of our seed emergence analysis. Fraxinus sp. also show traits of the Fagus type, as defined by Nakagoshi (1985), which is a shade-tolerant, deciduous tree species with large seeds and type A or B seed banks (types II or III according to Thompson & Grime 1979).

The occurrence of R. ulmifolius in the seed bank was noteworthy, despite being absent from the standing vegetation. This case is compatible with persistent seed bank types (type IV according to Thompson & Grime 1979), in which a low proportion of seeds germinate upon being dispersed and the remaining vast majority are incorporated into the seed bank. This strategy is typical of dominant species in disturbed environments (Thompson 1998). In analyzing successional trends, Nakagoshi (1985) described the Rubus type as a functional group composed of shade-intolerant shrubs with a short life-span and seed dispersal by birds. In the event of disturbances (e.g., weeding), R. ulmifolius can germinate and invade forests.

In the forest studied, the species similarity of the seed bank and standing vegetation (38.7%) was similar to that reported by Hopfensperger (2007) for temperate and tropical forests (31% on average for both). This degree of similarity represents an intermediate successional state, because mature forests usually consist of small seed banks composed of species absent from the standing vegetation (Nakagoshi 1985; Thompson 1998).

The exotic tree species, acting as invasive species in the secondary forest, showed a population structure that is compatible with a frequent reproducer pattern and a prominent presence in the seed bank. The results of our seed bank analysis underscore the notion that exotic species will continue to dominate all strata of the secondary forest in future generations. The colonization success of Ligustrum species is most likely attributable to seed dispersal by birds, as reported by Montaldo (1993) for similar regions.

When we compared our results with those obtained by other authors (Gunther et al. 1984; Schneider & Sharitz 1986; McGraw 1987; Titus 1988; Goodson et al. 2002; Nicol et al. 2003; Leck & Schütz 2005; Richter & Stromberg 2005), we found that the species richness of the seed bank in the secondary forest we studied here was high (53 species), particularly in broadleaf herbaceous life forms. Our seed bank also showed a high estimated seed density (3603 seeds/m²), not only due to the herbaceous species but also due to trees. Although tree species richness in the seed bank was low, we observed considerable tree seed density (1299 seeds/m²), mainly due to three exotic tree species.

The invasive nature of exotic species was not reflected in the total seed bank richness, because native species outnumbered exotic species, mainly because of a high proportion of native herbaceous species. This notwithstanding, the high abundance of exotic tree seeds compensated for the total seed densities when we discriminated between species by their origin.

In summary, the secondary forests in the study area showed a low number of exotic species, mainly trees, but there was high species abundance, in standing vegetation as well as in soil seed banks. One explanation for this scenario is the ubiquity of L. sinense. This species can be responsible for severely reducing species richness and tree regeneration (Merrian & Feil 2002), because of shading and allelopathic effects, a high degree of phenotypic plasticity and its strong tendency toward asexual reproduction (Grove & Clarkson 2005; Pokwinski 2008). The significantly low density of tree species native to the original forests, both in standing vegetation and seed banks, will likely lead to their disappearance from those forests. Even the few native species composing the canopy exhibited a relictual pattern and are therefore not expected to be components of the canopy in the future.

The secondary succession observed in these abandoned commercial forests can be considered a natural and spontaneous passive restoration process (Rey Benayas & Camacho Cruz 2004) that will not result in the regeneration of the original Monte Blanco forest. Therefore, strategies focused on active forest restoration measures (Maestre et al. 2001; Rey Benayas 2005) are needed in order to increase biological diversity and native tree species richness in the secondary forests of the Lower Delta.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript. This study was partially funded by the University of Buenos Aires School of Exact and Natural Sciences and by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) program Man and the Biosphere (MAB).

Submitted: 15 December, 2011

Accepted: 3 October, 2012

• Albrecht, H. & Pilgram, M. 1997. The weed seed bank of soil in a landscape segment in southern Bavaria. Plant Ecology 131:31-43.
• Arévalo, J. & Fernández-Palacios, J. 2000. Seed banks analysis of tree species in two stands of the Tenerife laurel forest (Canary Islands). Forest Ecology and Management 130:177-185.
• Bakker, H. 1989. Some aspects of the natural history of seed banks. Pp 9-21. In: Leck, M.; Parker, T. & Simpsom, R. (Eds.) Ecology of soil seed banks San Diego, Academic Press.
• Barkman, J. 1988. New systems of plants growth forms and phenological plant types. Pp. 9-44. In: Werger, M.A.J.; van der Aart, P.J.M.; During H.J. & Verhoeven J.T.A. (Eds.) Plant form and vegetation structure The Hague, SPB Academic Publishing B.V.
• Bertiller, M. 1992. Seasonal variation in the seed bank of a Patagonian grassland in relation to grazing and topography. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:47-54.
• Bonetto, A. 1986. The Paraná River system. Pp. 541-554. In: Davies, B.R. & Walker, K.F. (Eds.) The ecology of river systems Dr. Junk Publ. Dordrecht.
• Bonfils, C. 1962. Los suelos del Delta del Río Paraná. Factores generadores, clasificación y uso. Revista Investigación Agrícola (INTA) 16(3):257-270.
• Burkart, A. 1957. Ojeada sinóptica sobre la vegetación del Delta del Río Paraná. Darwiniana 11:457-561.
• Burkart, A. 1979. Flora ilustrada de Entre Ríos (ARGENTINA). Parte V. Buenos Aires, Colección Científica INTA.
• Burkart, A. 1987. Flora ilustrada de Entre Ríos (ARGENTINA). Tomo VI, Parte III Buenos Aires, Colección Científica INTA.
• Cabrera, A.L. (Ed.) 1963-1968. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. INTA. Tomo IV, Partes 1-6 Buenos Aires, Colección Científica INTA.
• Cabrera, A.L. & Dawson, G. 1944. La Selva Marginal de Punta Lara, en la Rivera Argentina del Río de La Plata. Revista del Museo de La Plata (nueva serie), Sección Botánica 5:267-382.
• Chapman, C. & Chapman, L. 1999. Forest Restoration in Abandoned Agricultural Land: a Case Study from East Africa. Conservation Biology 13(6):1301-1311.
• Decocq, G.; Bertille, V.; Toussaint, B.; Hendoux, F.; Saguez R. & Bardat, J. 2004. Soil seed bank composition and diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:2485-2509.
• DNCP - Dirección Nacional de Construcciones Portuarias y Vías Navegables. 1983. Anuario Hidrográfico (1976-80) Buenos Aires, Secretaría de Intereses Marítimos. Ministerio de Economía.
• Fenner, M. 1985. Seed Ecology London, Chapman & May.
• Goodson, J.; Gurnell, A.; Angold, P. & Morrissey, I. 2002. Riparian seed banks along the lower River Dove, UK: their structure and ecological implications. Geomorphology 47:45-60.
• Grove, B.E. & Clarkson, B.D. 2005. An Ecological Study of Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) in the Waikato Region CBER Contract Report No. 41 Prepared for Environment Waikato Regional Council, New Zealand, University of Waikato.
• Gunther, P.P.; Casagrande, D.J. & Cherney, R.R. 1984. The viability and fate of seeds as a function of depth in the peats of Okefenokee Swamp. Pp. 168-179. In: Cohen, A.D.; Casagrande, D.J.; Andrejko, M.J. & Best, G.R. (Eds.) The Okefenokee Swamp: Its Natural History, Geology, and Geochemistry Los Alamos, Wetland Surveys.
• Hanlon, T.J.; Williams, C.E. & Moriarity, W. 1998. Species composition of soil seed banks of Allegheny Plateau riparian forest. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125:199-215.
• Holmes, P. & Cowling, R. 1997. The effects of invasions by Acacia saligna on the guild structure and regeneration capabilities of South African fynbos shrublands. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:317-332.
• Hopfensperger, K.N. 2007. A review of similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation across ecosystems. Oikos 116:1438-1448.
• Houle, G. & Phillips, D. 1988. The soil seed bank of granite outcrop plant communities. Oikos 52:87-93.
• Iriondo, M. & Scotta, E. 1979. The Evolution of the Paraná River Delta Pp 405-418. Proceedings of the 1978 International Symposium on Coastal Evolution in the Quaternary. Sao Paulo.
• Jalili, A.; Hamzeh`ee, B.; Asri Y.; Shirvany, A.; Yazdani, S.; Khoshnevis, M.; Zarrinkamar, F.; Ghahramani, M.; Safavi, R.; Shaw, S.; Hodgson, J.; Thompson, K.; Akbarzadeh, M. & Pakparvar, M. 2003. Soil seed banks in the Arasbaran Protected Area of Iran and their significance for conservation management. Biological Conservation 109:425-431.
• Kalesnik, F.A.; Aceñolaza, P.; Hurtado, M.; & Giménez, J. 2009. Relationship between vegetation of the levee neo-ecosystems and environmental heterogeneity in the Lower Delta of the Paraná River, Argentina. Water and Environment Journal 25:88-98.
• Kalesnik, F.A. & Malvárez, A.I. 2003. Las especies invasoras exóticas en los sistemas de Humedales. El caso del Delta Inferior del Río Paraná. INSUGEO, Miscelánea 12:5-12.
• Kalesnik, F.A. 2001. Relación entre las comunidades vegetales de los neoecosistemas de albardon y la heterogeneidad ambiental del bajo delta del Rio Paraná. Tendencias sucesionales y proyección sobre la composición futura. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
• Kandus, P. 1997. Análisis de patrones de vegetación a escala regional en el Bajo Delta Bonaerense del Río Paraná (Argentina) Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
• Knight, D.H. 1975. A Phytociological Analysis of Species-Rich Tropical Forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monographs 45(3):259-284.
• Latinoconsult, 1972. Estudio integral para el desarrollo del Delta del Paraná bonaerense Buenos Aires, Ministerio de Economía. Direc.de proyecto. Tomo III.
• Leck, M.A. 1989. Wetland Seed Banks. Pp 283-308. In: Leck, M.A.; Parker, T. & Simpsom, R. (Eds.). Ecology of soil seed banks San Diego, Academic Press.
• Leck, M.A. & Schütz, W. 2005. Regeneration of Cyperaceae, with particular reference to seed ecology and seed banks. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 7:95-133.
• Luzuriaga, A.; Escudero, A.; Olano, J. & Loidi, J. 2005. Regenerative role of seed banks following an intense soil disturbance. Acta Oecologica 27:57-66.
• Maestre F.T.; Bautista S.; Cortina J. & Bellot J. 2001. Potential for using facilitation by grasses to establish shrubs on a semiarid degraded steppe. Ecological Applications 11:1641-1655.
• Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement London, Chapman and Hall.
• Mc Graw, J. 1987. Seed bank properties of an Appalachian sphagnum bog and a model of the depth distribution of viable seeds. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:2028-2035.
• Merrian, R.W. & Feil, E., 2002. The potential impact of an introduced shrub on native plant diversity and forest regeneration. Biological Invasions 4:369-373.
• Middleton, B. 2003. Soil seed banks and the potencial restoration of forested wetlands after farming. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:1025-1034.
• Milberg, P. 1995. Soil seed bank after eighteen years of succession from grassland to forest. Oikos 72:3-13.
• Montaldo, N. 1993. Dispersión por aves y éxito reproductivo de dos especies de Ligustrum en un relicto de la selva subtropical en Argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 66:75-85.
• Morello, J.; Buzai, G.; Baxendale, C.; Matteucci, S.; Rodriguez, A.; Godagnone, R. & Casas, R. 2000. "Urbanización y consumo de tierra fértil". Ciencia Hoy 10(55):50-61.
• Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellemberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology New York, J.Wiley eds.
• Mujica, F. 1979. Estudio ecológico y socioeconómico del Delta Entrerriano. Parte I. Ecología Pananá, Entre Ríos, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria.
• Nakagoshi, N. 1985. Buried viable seeds in temperate forest. Pp 551-570. In White, J. (Ed.) The population structure of vegetation Dr. Junk Publ. Dordrecht., NL.
• Nicol, J.; Ganf, G. & Pelton, G. 2003. Seed banks of a southern Australian wetland: the influence of water regime on the final floristic composition. Plant Ecology 168:191-205.
• Onaindia M. & Amezaga I. 2000. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of native woodland and coniferous plantations in northern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 126(2):163-172.
• Parker G. & Marcolini, S. 1992. Geomorfología del Delta del Paraná y su extensión hacia el Río de la Plata. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 47(2):243-249.
• Pokwinski, S.W. 2008. Invasive characteristics of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) in a bay swamp in the fall line hills of East-Central Alabama Alabama, Master of Science Thesis, Auburn University.
• Rey Benayas, J.M. 2005. Restoring Forets After Land Abandonment. Pp. 356-360. In Mansourian, S.; Vallauri, D. & Dudley, N. (Eds.) Forest Restoration in Landscapes: Beyond Planting Trees New York, Springer.
• Rey Benayas, J.M. & Camacho Cruz, A. 2004. Perfomance of Quercus ilex saplings planted in abandoned Mediterranean cropland after long-term interruption of their management. Forest Ecology and Management 194:223-233.
• Richter, R. & Stromberg, J.C. 2005. Soil seed banks of two montane riparian areas: implications for restoration. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:993-1016.
• Roberts, H.A. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Advances in Applied Biology 6:1-55.
• Saxena, A.K. & Singh, J.S. 1984. Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetatio 58:61-69.
• Schneider, R. & Sharitz, R. 1986. Seed bank dynamic in a southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73:1022-1030.
• Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, 1980. Estadísticas climatológicas Serie B, Nº 6. Fuerza Aérea Buenos Aires.
• Summerfield, M.A. 1991. Global geomorphology: an introduction to the study of landforms Wiley, Longman Scientific and Technical.
• Thompson, K. & Grime, J. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67:893-921.
• Thompson, K. 1998. The functional Ecology of Seed Banks. Pp 231-251. In: Fenner (Ed.). Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities Wallingford, CAB International.
• Titus, J. 1988. Soil seed bank of a hardwood floodplain swamp in Florida. Castanea 72:201-210.
• Urretavizcaya, M. & Defossé, G. 2004. Soil seed bank of Austrocedrus chilensis (D. Don) Pic. Serm. et Bizarri related to different degrees of fire disturbance in two sites of southern Patagonia, Argentina. Forest Ecology and Management 187:361-372.
• Vallés, L.; Kalesnik, F.A. & Malvárez, A.I. 2005. Los parches relictuales de Monte Blanco del área núcleo de la Reserva de Biosfera MAB-UNESCO "Delta del Paraná". In: Peteán, J. & Cappato, J. (Eds.). Humedales Fluviales de América del Sur. Hacia un manejo sustentable Buenos Aires, Fundación Proteger.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  08 May 2013
• Date of issue
  Mar 2013

History

• Received
  15 Dec 2011
• Accepted
  03 Oct 2012