Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

HOW TO PERFORM LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY USING THE CLOCKWISE TECHNIQUE

COMO REALIZAR A PANCREATECTOMIA DISTAL LAPAROSCÓPICA USANDO A CLOCKWISE TECHNIQUE

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic pancreatectomy is currently a widely used approach for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas.

AIMS:

This study aimed to describe how to perform a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using The Clockwise Technique.

METHODS:

An 18-year-old female patient presented with a well-defined tumor in the pancreatic body with 4 cm in diameter that suggested a diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor (Frantz’s tumor). The patient was recommended for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy by using The Clockwise Technique.

RESULTS:

The clockwise, caudal-to-cephalic approach appears to have other significant technical advantages that facilitate the performance of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS:

A laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy performed using The Clockwise Technique provides satisfactory outcomes.

HEADINGS:
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Laparoscopy; Pancreatectomy

RESUMO - RACIONAL:

A pancreatectomia laparoscópica está se tornando uma abordagem amplamente usada para lesões benignas e malignas do pâncreas.

OBJETIVOS:

Descrever como realizar a pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica usando a Clockwise Technique.

MÉTODOS:

Paciente feminina com 18 anos de idade, apresentando tumor bem definido no corpo pancreático com 4 cm de diâmetro que sugeria o diagnóstico de tumor sólido pseudopapilar (tumor de Frantz). O paciente foi considerado para pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica pela Clockwise Technique.

RESULTADOS:

A Clockwise Technique parece apresentar outras vantagens técnicas significativas que facilitam a realização do procedimento.

CONCLUSÕES:

A pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica foi realizada com a clockwise technique, obtendo-se resultados satisfatórios.

DESCRITORES:
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos; Laparoscopia; Pancreatectomia

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery is currently a widely used approach for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas22. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic approach to distal and subtotal pancreatectomy: a clockwise technique. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2643-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1618-0
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is a well-accepted approach to left-sided pancreatic resections and has proven advantages compared its open counterpart and is becoming more frequently performed around the world33. Asbun HJ, van Hilst J, Tsamalaidze L, Kawaguchi Y, Sanford D, Pereira L, et al. Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
.

Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies comparing LPD and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) have suggested superior short-term outcomes and benefits for patients, including less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, less morbidity, and reduced time to functional recovery for LPD compared to ODP55. Jin T, Altaf K, Xiong JJ, Huang W, Javed MA, Mai G, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(11):711-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00531.x
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/...
,66. Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):904-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2016-3
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
,77. Van Hilst J, Korrel M, de Rooij T, Lof S, Busch OR, Groot Koerkamp B, et al. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(5):719-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.003
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
. These reviews were recently demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial44. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):2-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/...
. However, the oncological safety in terms of resection margins, adequate lymphadenectomy, and survival after LPD in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains controversial, and there has been necessary randomized trial to confirm the oncological safety88. Van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):10-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/...
.

The objective of this study was to describe how to perform an LDP using The Clockwise Technique.

METHODS

An 18-year-old female patient presented with abdominal pain in the upper quadrants. An abdominal ultrasound, a diffusion-weighted imaging, and pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed the presence of a well-defined tumor arising from the pancreatic body with a greater diameter of 4 cm, suggesting the diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor (Frantz’s tumor). The patient was recommended for LDP, using a clockwise technique (Figure 1A and B). Postoperative course was uneventful. Length of hospital stay was 4 days. Final pathology and immunohistochemistry demonstrated a solid pseudopapillary tumor with negative surgical margins.

Figure 1 -
(A) Mobilization of the splenic flexure of the colon. (B) Identification of normal pancreatic neck and visualization of tumor in the body of the pancreas.

RESULTS

The operation is initiated with the patient in a modified right lateral decubitus position that would allow for rotation to the left or right during the procedure. The surgeon stands to the right of the operating table. The ports are placed as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 -
Trocar and patient position in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

The clockwise, caudal-to-cephalic approach appears to have other significant technical advantages that facilitate the performance of the procedure. The procedure is performed through the following steps (Figure 3):

  • Step 1: Mobilization of the splenic flexure of the colon and exposure of the pancreas.

  • Step 2: Dissection along the inferior edge of the pancreas and choosing the site for pancreatic division.

  • Step 3: Pancreatic parenchymal division and ligation of the splenic vein and artery.

  • Step 4: Dissection along the superior edge of the pancreas.

  • Step 5: Mobilization of the spleen and specimen removal.

Figure 3 -
Five steps of The Clockwise Technique for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

The total operative time was 300 min with no transfusion. The surgical specimen was removed through a small suprapubic incision, and the abdominal cavity was drained with a closed-suction drain. Recovery was uneventful and patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. Postoperative MRI showed no evidence of the disease 12 months after the procedure.

DISCUSSION

The Clockwise Technique consists of a systematized approach, aiming to facilitate the surgical procedure in a uniform method and well-defined steps22. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic approach to distal and subtotal pancreatectomy: a clockwise technique. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2643-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1618-0
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
,33. Asbun HJ, van Hilst J, Tsamalaidze L, Kawaguchi Y, Sanford D, Pereira L, et al. Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
,66. Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):904-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2016-3
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
. This technique appears to offer a reproducible approach to LPD and has been easily assimilated into routine practice.

LPD is a safe and effective method for surgical approach of the pancreas and has significant advantages compared to ODP. The advantages of The Clockwise Technique in the laparoscopic approach to pancreatic lesions were initially described in 201122. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic approach to distal and subtotal pancreatectomy: a clockwise technique. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2643-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1618-0
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
. Asbun et al reported a series of 260 patients who underwent DPL using The Clockwise Technique and observed a very low conversion rate (5%), reserved for situations in which the surgeon had difficulty with the anatomy, being mainly early and in the curve of learning33. Asbun HJ, van Hilst J, Tsamalaidze L, Kawaguchi Y, Sanford D, Pereira L, et al. Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
. Furthermore, although 87% of resections were related to neoplastic processes, blood loss, transfusion requirements, incidence of pancreatic fistulas, morbidity, and length of hospital stay were lower in LDP compared to ODP. In addition, efficacy of LPD was also observed in lymph node dissection, and long-term survival similar to ODP22. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic approach to distal and subtotal pancreatectomy: a clockwise technique. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2643-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1618-0
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
,33. Asbun HJ, van Hilst J, Tsamalaidze L, Kawaguchi Y, Sanford D, Pereira L, et al. Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
.

Abu et al.11. Abu Hilal M, Richardson JRC, de Rooij T, Dimovska E, Al-Saati H, Besselink MG. Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3830-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/...
described the results of laparoscopic left pancreatosplenectomy exclusively for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma performed across two sites in the United Kingdom and the Netherland. Primary outcomes were resection margin and lymph node retrieval. Secondary end points were preoperative outcomes, including postoperative pancreatic fistula. Based on the results in 135 patients evaluated in this study, it was reported that a standardized laparoscopic approach to pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the left pancreas can be adopted safely and the results of this study can be reproduced across multiple sites using the same technique.

CONCLUSION

LPD was performed using The Clockwise Technique, and this systematic approach demonstrated this technique as a reproducible, safe method with low complication rates and, as a consequence, lower morbidity and mortality to the management of lesions on the left side of the pancreas.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Abu Hilal M, Richardson JRC, de Rooij T, Dimovska E, Al-Saati H, Besselink MG. Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3830-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9
  • 2
    Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic approach to distal and subtotal pancreatectomy: a clockwise technique. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2643-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1618-0
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1618-0
  • 3
    Asbun HJ, van Hilst J, Tsamalaidze L, Kawaguchi Y, Sanford D, Pereira L, et al. Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3
  • 4
    de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):2-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979
  • 5
    Jin T, Altaf K, Xiong JJ, Huang W, Javed MA, Mai G, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(11):711-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00531.x
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00531.x
  • 6
    Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):904-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2016-3
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2016-3
  • 7
    Van Hilst J, Korrel M, de Rooij T, Lof S, Busch OR, Groot Koerkamp B, et al. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(5):719-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.003
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.003
  • 8
    Van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):10-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561
  • 1
    How to cite this article: Costa AC, Spalding D, Cunha-Filho GA, Santana MB, Pai M, Jiao LR, et al. How to perform laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using The Clockwise Technique. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022:35;e1683. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020220002e1683
  • Financial source: None

Central Message

  • Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic (LPD) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) have suggested superior short-term outcomes and benefits for patients, including less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, less morbidity, and reduced time to functional recovery for LPD compared to ODP.

Perspectives

  • Laparoscopic pancreatectomy is increasingly performed worldwide. In this article, we demonstrate the description of The Clockwise Technique used in the resection of lesions on the left side of the pancreas. This approach is safe, feasible, and easily reproducible.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    16 Sept 2022
  • Date of issue
    2022

History

  • Received
    16 Dec 2021
  • Accepted
    07 Feb 2022
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva Av. Brigadeiro Luiz Antonio, 278 - 6° - Salas 10 e 11, 01318-901 São Paulo/SP Brasil, Tel.: (11) 3288-8174/3289-0741 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistaabcd@gmail.com