Erratum

Manuscript: Argon plasma versus electrofulguration in the treatment of anal and perianal condylomata acuminata in patients with acquired immunodeficiency virus

Publication: Acta Cir Bras. 2017;32(6):482-491.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170060000009

On page 486 of the original publication, instead of this Table 4:

Table 4
Results from analysis on the association between effectiveness variables and CD4.

Consider this Table 4:

Table 4
Results from analysis on the association between effectiveness variables and CD4.

Erratum

Manuscript: Intestinal inflammatory and redox responses to the perioperative administration of teduglutide in rats

Publication: Acta Cir Bras. 2017;32(8):648-661.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170080000007

On page 652 of the original publication, instead of this Figure 1:

Consider this Figure 1:

Figure 1
Analysis of viability and death in cells isolated from rats’ ileum, by flow cytometry using double staining with Annexin V/Propidium iodide: at the third and seventh days after ileal resection and anastomosis in animals not submitted to teduglutide treatment (a), in the different groups of study (b) and according teduglutide administration (c).

On page 653 of the original publication, instead of this Figure 2:

Consider this Figure 2:

Figure 2
Oxidative stress evaluation in cells isolated from rats’ ileum: at the third and seventh days after ileal resection and anastomosis in animals not submitted to teduglutide treatment (a), in the different groups of study (b) and according teduglutide administration (c). Assessment was performed by flow cytometry using DCFH2-DA, DHR123 and JC-1 fluorescent probes and mercury orange to determine cytosolic peroxides level, mitochondrial reactive species generation, mitochondrial membrane potential (mψ) and cellular reduced glutathione content ([GSH]), respectively.

On page 654 of the original publication, instead of this Figure 3:

Consider this Figure 3:

Figure 3
Analysis of tissue inflammatory response in rats’ ileum by flow cytometric multiplexed bead assay: at the third and seventh days after ileal resection and anastomosis in animals not submitted to teduglutide treatment (a), in the different groups of study (b) and according teduglutide administration (c).

On page 655 of the original publication, instead of this Figure 4:

Consider this Figure 4:

Figure 4
Analysis of systemic inflammatory response by flow cytometric multiplexed bead assay: at the third and seventh days after ileal resection and anastomosis in animals not submitted to teduglutide treatment (a), in the different groups of study (b) and according teduglutide administration (c).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    2019
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia Al. Rio Claro, 179/141, 01332-010 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel./Fax: +55 11 3287-8814 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: sgolden@terra.com.br