PURPOSE: To compare the cardiopulmonary effects and the quality of anesthesia of the extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: Sixteen female dogs, were sedated with intramuscular acepromazine (0.05mg kg-1), followed by anesthetic induction with intravenous propofol (4mg kg-1), to perform the lumbosacral puncture. The animals were randomly assigned to two treatments: T-F (n=8) extradural administration of fentanyl (5µg kg-1), T-M (n=8) extradural administration of methadone (0.3mg kg-1). In both treatment groups, opioids were combined with lidocaine, in order to make up a final volume of 0.4mL kg-1. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic arterial blood pressure (SABP), intra-operative anesthetic supplementation, blood gases and adverse effects were investigated. RESULTS: HR, arterial pH and blood gases did not differ between treatments at any time point. RR and SABP decreased after epidural anesthesia, but the values were in terms of the physiological range of dogs. Intra-operative anesthetic supplementation was required in 50% and 62.5% of the fentanyl and methadone treated dogs, respectively. CONCLUSION: The extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine allowed cardiopulmonary stability, however sufficient sensitive blockade was not provided in 100% of the dogs.
Anesthesia, Epidural; Analgesics, Opioid; Lidocaine; Fentanyl; Methadone; Dogs
9 - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Extradural anesthesia with lidocaine combined with fentanyl or methadone to ovariohisterectomy in dogs1 1 Research performed at Veterinary Hospital, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Oeste Paulista University (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil.
Miriely Steim DinizI; Gláucia Prada KanashiroII; Camila Angela BernardiII; Gabriel Montoro NicácioIII; Renata Navarro CassuIV
IVMD, Resident, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Scholl of Veterinary Medicine, Oeste Paulista University (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil. Acquisition of data, helped with technical procedures, collection and processing of study informations, manuscript writing
IIMaster, Full Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Scholl of Veterinary Medicine, UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil. Helped with technical procedures, collection and processing of study informations
IIIFull Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Scholl of Veterinary Medicine, UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil. Helped with technical procedures
IVPhD, Full Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Scholl of Veterinary Medicine, UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil. Mentor. Responsible for intellectual and scientific content of the study; statistical analysis; critical revision
PURPOSE: To compare the cardiopulmonary effects and the quality of anesthesia of the extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
METHODS: Sixteen female dogs, were sedated with intramuscular acepromazine (0.05mg kg-1), followed by anesthetic induction with intravenous propofol (4mg kg-1), to perform the lumbosacral puncture. The animals were randomly assigned to two treatments: T-F (n=8) extradural administration of fentanyl (5µg kg-1), T-M (n=8) extradural administration of methadone (0.3mg kg-1). In both treatment groups, opioids were combined with lidocaine, in order to make up a final volume of 0.4mL kg-1. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic arterial blood pressure (SABP), intra-operative anesthetic supplementation, blood gases and adverse effects were investigated.
RESULTS: HR, arterial pH and blood gases did not differ between treatments at any time point. RR and SABP decreased after epidural anesthesia, but the values were in terms of the physiological range of dogs. Intra-operative anesthetic supplementation was required in 50% and 62.5% of the fentanyl and methadone treated dogs, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine allowed cardiopulmonary stability, however sufficient sensitive blockade was not provided in 100% of the dogs.
Key words: Anesthesia, Epidural. Analgesics, Opioid. Lidocaine. Fentanyl. Methadone. Dogs.
One of the most common elective surgical procedures performed in dogs is ovariohysterectomy (OHE). The procedure is normally carried under general anesthesia. Alternatively, extradural anesthesia is an attractive and inexpensive method for retro umbilical surgical procedures. Unlike other anesthetic techniques, extradural anesthesia produces minimal cardiovascular and respiratory depression1.
In dogs have been reported maximal spread of anesthetic blockade until to fourth or sixth lumbar vertebra following lumbosacral extradural lidocaine2-4 which is usually unsatisfactory to OHE, because the ovarian pedicle is innervated by third and fourth lumbar afferent nerves5.
Thus, some studies have proposed the extradural administration of an opioide in combination with lidocaine in an attempt to spread the sensory blockade, optimizing the anesthesia to lower abdominal surgical procedures in dogs6-9.
Morphine administered extradurally in combination with lidocaine provided safe and satisfactory anesthesia for performing OHE in 100% of the dogs, so that general supplemental anesthesia was not required9. Similar results were showed with extradural butorphanol plus lidocaine for dogs undergoing OHE7. In both studies, minimal adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and cardiopulmonary depression were reported.
However, despite these favorable results, there are relatively few studies about extradural anesthesia as a single technique for surgical procedures in dogs. The majority of the studies have focused on the effects of the extradural in combination with general anesthesia10-14.
The objective of the present investigation was to compare the cardiopulmonary effects and the quality of extradural anesthesia with lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or methadone in bitches undergoing OHE.
This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Research Ethical Committee (protocol number 358), and permission for the participation of each dog was obtained from the owner. Sixteen healthy adult, crossbreed, female dogs, which weighed 4.5 to 15 kg were evaluated. Animals undergoing elective OHE were selected for this study using a physical examination and laboratory tests (complete blood cell count, urea, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase).
After withdrawal of food and water for 12 and three hours, respectively, all dogs were sedated with 0.05mg kg-1 of acepromazine maleate (Acepran 0.2%, Univet, Sao Paulo, Brazil) administered intramuscular (IM). Twenty minutes after sedation, anesthesia was induced with 4 to 5mg kg-1 intravenously (IV) propofol (Propovan, Cristalia, Itapira, Brazil), to perform the lumbosacral puncture.
All dogs were prepared for extradural (ED) injection analgesia: hair in the lumbosacral area was clipped, and the dogs were placed in sternal recumbency. Each was randomly assigned to receive 5µg kg-1 of fentanyl (Fentanest, Cristalia, Itapira, Brazil) (T-F, n=8) or 0.3mg kg-1 of methadone (Metadon, Cristalia, Itapira, Brazil) (T-M, n=8) by the extradural route. In both treatments, the drugs were given in combination with lidocaine (Xilestesin 2% com vasoconstritor, Cristalia, Itapira, Brazil) to produce a total volume of 0.4mL kg-1. ED injection was performed at the lumbosacral (L7-S1) space. Correct spinal needle placement was confirmed by a lack of resistance to injection3. The drugs were injected over a two minutes period.
Following the ED injection, the animals were maintained in sternal recumbency for 20 minutes, for the uniform distribution of the drugs in the epidural space and due to the latency period of the opioids and lidocaine. After this period, the anesthetic blockade was confirmed by absence of flexor-pinch reflex of pelvic limbs, once the dogs were already aware due to the short central depression induced by propofol. Thereafter, the animals were positioned in dorsal recumbency on a surgical bed for the OHE. All animals underwent routine OHE through a 2 -to 3- cm midline incision by the same experienced surgeon.
Ringer's lactate solution (10mL kg-1 h-1) was infused IV using a peristaltic infusion pump (ST1000, Samtronic, Sao Paulo, Brazil) throughout the surgical procedure.
During the anesthetic procedure, oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO2%) and heart rate (HR) were continuously measured with pulse oximeter (VAMOS plus, Dräger, Sao Paulo, Brazil), with the sensor on the vulva. Systolic arterial blood pressure (SABP) was measured by noninvasive method using a Doppler ultrasonic (Doppler 841-A, Parks Medical Electronics, Las Vegas, EUA), with the width cuff about 40% of the circumference of the antebrachium. Respiratory rate (RR) was measured by observation of the thoracic movements for one minute. Measurements were made before premedication (Baseline), 15 minutes after premedication administration, five minutes and every ten minutes after the start of surgery.
Arterial blood samples were collected into heparinized syringes from the femoral artery, by puncture. All arterial blood gas samples were stored on ice and analyzed immediately on as automated blood gas analyzer (Cobasp, modelo 121, Roche-Macromed, Sao Paulo, Brazil). Samples were corrected for body temperature. Arterial blood pH, carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), arterial hemoglobin saturation (SaO2), arterial bicarbonate concentration (HCO3-1) were determined before the pre-anesthetic medication was administered (Basaline), at the time of the ovarian pedicle clamping (IO), and at the end of the surgery (After OHE).
Supplemental anesthesia was provided with a propofol (5mg kg-1) bolus if extradural anesthesia was unsatisfactory. Any dog showing signs of discomfort, based on an increase in heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure >20% of the baseline values18, as well as sudden voluntary movements of the forelimbs or head. The total number of propofol doses and their intervals were recorded.
Duration of surgery and the post-anesthetic recovery were recorded as well as the occurrence of adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting and excitement.
Data were recorded as mean±SD. The data analyzed using an analysis of variance with the F test followed by Tukey's test using Graphpad software. Differences between treatments at each time point, differences in time for each treatment, and the interaction between treatment and time were investigated. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
There were no differences (p>0.05) between the groups in terms of body weight (9±5 and 9.2±2.5 kg for the T-F and T-M groups, respectively) and surgical time (21±3 and 22±2 minutes for the T-F and T-M groups, respectively).
Systolic arterial blood pressure did not change between treatment groups, except at five minutes after the start of the surgery, when this parameter was lower in T-F in comparison with T-M (Table 1).
Respiratory rate was not significantly different between treatment groups at any time after extradural administration. However, lower RR was observed at five, ten and 20 minutes after the start of OHE when compared with the baseline values in both groups (Table 1).
There was no significant difference in requirement for supplemental intra-operative anesthesia between treatment groups. Four of the eight dogs (50%) in the fentanyl group required propofol during the ovarian manipulation, compared with five (62.5%) in the methadone group.
Undesirable side effects were not observed in any of the dogs.
The current study confirms previous reports in dogs, which have shown minimal cardiovascular changes after lidocaine in combination with different opioids administered by extradural route4,7,8.
Opioid-induced cardiovascular depression is dose and administration route dependent15. The incidence of adverse effects is lower after extradural administration when compared with parenteral opioids12,13. In the current study, mild reduction was observed in systolic blood pressure after extradural injection in the both treatment groups, however hypotension (SABP<90mmHg) was not observed. This result supports the findings of Bosmans et al.14 that reported reduction in blood pressure after ED methadone administration in dogs, however clinical values were maintained. Leibetseder et al.13 showed moderate hypotension after ED methadone (0,3mg kg-1) in combination with an isoflurane concentration of 1.0% in dogs, but median arterial blood pressure increased with surgical stimulation to values within the normal range. Similar results have been reported following ED fentanyl plus local anesthetic, with minimal cardiovascular changes in dogs undergoing elective OHE6,16,17. In addition, the premedication may have contributed to the reduction of blood pressure due to blockade of α1- receptors by acepromazine maleate18. Moreover, the cardiovascular effects of propofol are well documented. It transiently depresses arterial pressure and myocardial contractility similar to the thiobarbiturates19. Thus, both the administration of a bolus of propofol at the time of epidural needle placement and the additional doses required during the surgery may reduce the blood pressure.
In dogs, respiratory function is not impaired following extradural anesthesia, unless local anesthetic produce motor blockade of the phrenic nerve at cervical vertebra1. However, the use of epidural opioids, particularly morphine, has been associated with respiratory depression, mainly in people15. The mechanism of respiratory depression after epidural morphine seems to be related to morphine's low lipid solubility. In comparison with hydrophilic drugs, the rapid uptake of extradural lipophilic compounds reduces their capacity to cause late respiratory depression20. Leibetseder et al.13 reported pronounced respiratory depression following methadone intravenous administration, while extradural methadone did not affect respiratory pattern in dogs. Similarly, previous publications have shown minimal changes in respiratory rate and blood gases following epidural fentanyl combined with lidocaine in dogs6,8,16,17, which is in agreement with the results of the current study. All dogs had significantly lower respiratory rate following epidural injection, however, bradypnea was not observed. Additionally, arterial pH and blood gases remained within the physiological range, suggesting that both treatments did not impair the ventilatory status.
Lidocaine has a rapid onset of action. Approximately 1mL of 2% lidocaine per 4.5kg of body weight will completely anesthetize the pelvic limbs and posterior abdomen within ten to 15 min after administration1,2. Similarly, the more lipophilic opioids such as methadone and fentanyl are able to cross the meninges quite rapidly, resulting in a short onset of action15. In human beings, the onset time of effect of ED methadone and fentanyl is about ten to 20 minutes20. Thus, in the current study, the surgery was started only 20 minutes after ED injection, when the anesthetic blockade was confirmed by absence of flexor-pinch reflex of pelvic limbs. However, despite the absence of the toe reflexes be associated with surgical anesthesia1, supplemental propofol was required in 50% and 62.5% in fentanyl and methadone treated dogs, respectively. This result suggests that cranial dispersion of the drugs injected into epidural space was insufficient to reach the cranial lumbar dermatomes, impairing the ovarian manipulation. In dogs, the spread of sensitivity blockade to the upper third lumbar vertebra was showed just in 50% of the dogs following ED methadone plus lidocaine4. Similarly, in 40% of the dogs anesthetized with ED fentanyl in combination with lidocaine was necessary supplemental anesthesia during the ovarian clamping8.
Both treatments provided satisfactory post-anesthetic recovery. No adverse effects were observed in the current study, which is in agreement with previous results reported in dogs following extradural opioids in combination with local anesthetics4,6-8.
The extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine provides cardiopulmonary stability to dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. However, sensitivity blockade was not sufficient to ovarian manipulation in 100% of the dogs.
Received: March 20, 2013
Review: May 21, 2013
Accepted: June 18, 2013
Conflict of interest: none
Financial source: none
- 1. Torske KE, Dyson DH. Epidural analgesia and anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2000;30:860-3.
- 2. Cruz ML, Luna SPL, Clark RM. Epidural anaesthesia using lignocaine, bupivacaine or a mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine in dogs. J Vet Anaesth. 1997;24:30-3.
- 3. Gasparini SS, Luna SPL, Cassu RN, Uiechi E, Crocci AJ. Epidural anaesthesia using ropivacaine, lidocaine or the combination of lidocaine and xylazine in dogs. Cardiorespiratory and analgesic effects. Cienc Rural. 2007;37:418-24.
- 4. Monteiro ER, Dossi RJO, Antunes AP, Campagnol D, Bettini CM, Choma JC. Effects of methadone or neostigmine in combination with lidocaine for epidural anesthesia in dogs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2008; 60:1439-46.
- 5. Bailey CS, Kitchell RL, Haghighi SS, Johnson RD. Spinal nerve root origins of the cutaneous nerves of the canine pelvic limb. Am J Vet Res. 1988;49:115-9.
- 6. Aminkov BY. Comparison between lidocaine alone and fentanyl with lidocaine for epidural anaesthesia in dogs. Rev Med Vet. 1996;147:819-24.
- 7. Ishiy HM, Luna SPL, Gonçalves RC. Uso da lidocaína isolada ou associada à quetamina ou ao butorfanol, em anestesia epidural em cadelas submetidas à ovariosalpingohisterectomia. Rev Bras Cienc Vet, 2002;9:134-6.
- 8. Cassu RN, Melchert A, Silva APG, Reis AM, Meirelles CC. Lidocaína com vasoconstrictor isolada e associada ao fentanil via peridural em cães. Cienc Rural. 2010;40(3):580-6.
- 9. Tamanho RB, Oleskovicz N, Moraes AN, Flôres FN, Dallabrida AL, Regalin D, Carneiro R, Pacheco AD, Rosa AC. Anestesia epidural cranial com lidocaína e morfina para campanhas de castração em cães. Cienc Rural. 2010;40(1):115-22.
- 10. Troncy E, Junot S, Keroack S, Sammut V, Pibarot P, Genevois JP, Cuvelliez S. Results of preemptive epidural administration of morphine with or without bupivacaine in dogs and cats undergoing surgery: 265 cases (1997-1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221:666-72.
- 11. Aprea F, Cherubini GB, Palus V, Vettorato E, Corletto F. Effect of extradurally administered morphine on postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing surgery for thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;241:754-9.
- 12. Valverde A, Dyson DH, McDonell WN. Use of epidural morphine in the dog for pain relief. Vet Comp Traumatol. 1989;2:558.
- 13. Leibetseder EN, Mosing M, Jones RS. A comparison of extradural and intravenous methadone on intraoperative isoflurane and postoperative analgesia requirements in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006;33:128-36.
- 14. Bosmans T, Schauvliege S, Gasthuys F, Duchateau L, Marcilla MG, Gadeyne C, Polis I. Cardiovascular effects of epidural administration of methadone, ropivacaine 0.75% and their combination in isoflurane anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011;3:146-57.
- 15. Cousins MJ, Mather LE. Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids. Anesthesiology. 1984;61:276-310.
- 16. Almeida TF, Fantoni DT, Mastrocinque S, Tatarunas AC, Imagawa VH. Epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine, bupivacaine and fentanyl, or bupivacaine and sufentanil during intravenous administration of propofol for ovariohysterectomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;230:45-51.
- 17. Cassu RN, Stevanin H, Kanashiro C, Menezes LMB, Laposy CB. Epidural anesthesia with lidocaine alone and in combination with fentanyl for ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2008;60:825-31.
- 18. Brock N. Acepromazine revisited. Can Vet J. 1994;35:458-9.
- 19. Ilkiw JE, Pascoe PJ, Haskins SC. Cardiopulmonary and respiratory effects of propofol administration to hypovolemic dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1992;53:2323-7.
- 20. Torda TA, Pybus D. A comparison of four opiates for epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1982;54:2915.
Renata Navarro CassuFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária-UNOESTEDepartamento de Cirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária19067-175 Presidente Prudente SP BrazilTel.: (55 18)3229-2077
Research performed at Veterinary Hospital, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Oeste Paulista University (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil.
Publication in this collection
01 July 2013
Date of issue
20 Mar 2013
18 June 2013
21 May 2013