Training for perceptive-auditory voice analysis: scope review

Paz, Karoline Evangelista da Silva; Paiva, Maxsuel Alves Avelino de; Lima, Daviany Oliveira; Ribeiro, Vanessa Veis; Moraes, Ronei Marcos de; Lopes, Leonardo Wanderley

doi:10.1590/2317-6431-2022-2768pt

person Karoline Evangelista da Silva Paz

study idealization · selection of studies · data analysis · manuscript writing

schoolPrograma de Pós-graduação em Modelos de Decisão e Saúde, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

0000-0001-9493-6157

person Maxsuel Alves Avelino de Paiva

selection of studies · data analysis

schoolPrograma de Pós-graduação em Modelos de Decisão e Saúde, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

0000-0003-3590-917X

person Daviany Oliveira Lima

manuscript writing · review

schoolPrograma de Pós-graduação em Neurociência Cognitiva e Comportamento - PPGNeC, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB -João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

0000-0003-3230-8790

person Vanessa Veis Ribeiro

study idealization · analysis · manuscript review

schoolDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade de Brasília - UnB - Brasília (DF), Brasil.

0000-0002-3089-6085

person Ronei Marcos de Moraes

method analysis · manuscript review

schoolPrograma de Pós-graduação em Modelos de Decisão e Saúde, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

0000-0001-8436-8950

person Leonardo Wanderley Lopes

idealization · analysis · manuscript review

schoolPrograma de Pós-graduação em Modelos de Decisão e Saúde, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

0000-0001-9041-7114

Conflict of interests: No.

Authors’ contributions: KESP participated in study idealization, selection of studies, data analysis, and manuscript writing; MAAP participated in the selection of studies and data analysis; DOL participated in manuscript writing and review; VVR participated in study idealization, analysis, and manuscript review; RMM participated in method analysis and manuscript review; LWL participated in the idealization, analysis, and manuscript review.

Corresponding author: Karoline Evangelista da Silva Paz. E-mail:
fonok.evangelista@gmail.com

PAPER	MÉTODO DE TREINAMENTO	VOZES UTILIZADAS	TEMPO DE TREINAMENTO	TREINO DE HABILIDADES AUDITIVAS CENTRAIS
(¹)	Anchors and feedback Information on the case (interview, imaging examination, and clinical history)	56 natural voices Parameters: roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain, and instability	58.33 minutes (mean)	Not performed
(²)	Anchors and feedback	12 synthesized and 12 natural voices Parameters: pitch, timbre, loudness, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, tremor, and instability	Not reported	Not performed
(³)	Feedback	10 deviated natural voices. Parameter: overall degree	Not reported	Not performed
(⁸)	Anchors and feedback	20 duplicated voices, natural and synthesized, normal and deviated Parameters: roughness and breathiness	30 minutes	Not performed
(⁹)	Anchors and feedback	57 synthesized voices Parameters: Breathiness	4 hours	Not performed
(¹⁰)	Anchors and feedback	30 natural voices: 15 samples of anchor voices and 15 used as training stimuli Parameters: overall degree, roughness, and breathiness	2 hours	Not performed
(¹¹)	Auditory anchors and auditory and textual cues	36 natural voices Parameters: degree of deviation, roughness, and breathiness	15-20 minutes	Not performed
(¹²)	Lectures, anchors, and feedback.	23 natural voices in 82 presentations Parameter: resonance	2 hours	Not performed
(¹³)	Anchors and feedback	6 synthesized voices in 36 presentations Parameter: breathiness	15 minutes	Not performed
(¹⁴)	Visual anchors (spectrogram)	107 deviated natural voices Parameters: overall degree, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain	Four 20-minute sessions	Not performed
(¹⁵)	Classes, anchors, proprioception, group discussion, feedback	14 deviated natural voices + two repetitions Parameters: degree of deviation, diplophonia, pitch, strain, instability, breathiness	50 minutes	Not performed
(¹⁶)	Anchors and feedback	84 natural voices, normal and deviated. Parameter: overall degree	Not reported	Not performed
(¹⁷)	Textual and auditory anchors and feedback	30 natural voices Parameters: overall degree, roughness, a nd breathiness	Not reported	Not performed
(¹⁸)	Anchors and feedback	40 natural voices Parameters: overall degree, roughness, breathiness, strain, asthenia, pitch, and loudness	Not reported	Not performed
(¹⁹)	Anchors and feedback	Natural voices (unspecified number of voices used in training) Parameter: resonance	Not reported	Not performed
(²⁰)	APA with and without repetition of anchor stimuli	220 natural voices Parameters: roughness, breathiness, and strain	Two sessions: 1^st: 1 hour and 10 minutes 2^nd: 42 minutes	Not performed
(²¹)	Feedback. Information on the case (interview, imaging examination, and clinical history)	20 natural voices in increasing order of deviation Parameters: degree of deviation, pitch, loudness, breathiness, roughness, frequency, strain, instability	Not reported	Not performed
(²²)	Feedback	20 natural voices: two normal and 18 deviated ones Parameters: roughness and breathiness	50 minutes	Not performed
(²³)	Feedback	32 natural voices + extra voices chosen by the students (unspecified number) Parameters: overall degree, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain	Nine 15-minute sessions	Not performed
(²⁴)	Auditory- and/or visual-perceptual feedback (spectrogram)	24 natural voices Parameters: overall degree, roughness, and breathiness	2 hours divided into four 20-minute sessions	Not performed
(²⁵)	Feedback	20 natural voices Parameters: degree of deviation, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain	5 hours	Not performed
(²⁶)	Review with samples of voices with different qualities	25 natural voices Parameters: degree of deviation, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness	10-15 minutes	Not performed
(²⁷)	APA with consensus	Natural voices (unspecified number of voices used in training) Parameter: resonance	Not reported	Not performed

[1] Source: Developed by the authors, 2022

[2] Subtitle: APA = auditory-perceptual analysis

Training for perceptive-auditory voice analysis: scope review

ABSTRACT