| Ajzenman et al.(12) |
To determine whether equine therapy (horseback riding) increased the functionality and participation of children with ASD. |
6 children, from 5 to 12 years old |
- Eight-camera video motion capture system (Cortex® software) |
Animal Assisted Intervention (Equine Therapy): |
12 sessions 45 min, 1x/week 12 weeks |
Occupational Therapist and Occupational Therapy Assistant |
Postural sway decreased significantly after the intervention. |
| - 50 cm x 50 cm three-dimensional force platform |
Progression strategy based on five domains (motor control, communication, cognition, social skills and interactive play), ranging from participation in basic to advanced activities. |
|
Positions on the horse: sitting forward (mounted), prone, supine, mounted backwards, sitting sideways, kneeling, quadrupedal and standing. The participant had to follow complex instructions through changes of position, obstacle courses and tasks/games (e.g. starting from the activity of simply holding the ball to playing a basic game of catch with the therapist and progressing to playing ball with another colleague). |
| Casey et al.(13) |
To evaluate the effects of a highly structured therapeutic skating intervention on motor results and functional capacity in two boys with ASD. |
2 children, from 7 to 10 years |
- Pediatric Balance Scale |
Therapeutic Skating: |
Phase I: 30 sessions, 60 min, 3x/week (10 weeks) |
Physiotherapist and skating coaches |
There was an improvement in balance, motor behavior and functional capacity in the post-tests, whose gains remained above pre-test levels in the follow-up stage. |
| - Flamingo test (dynamic) |
Phase I (ice rink - sports complex): warm-up stage with gradual increase in speed; exertion stage with continuous moderate to vigorous physical activity; relaxation. The participants trained separately with skating coaches in a 1:3 ratio. |
|
- Floor to Stand
|
Phase II: took place in the same ice rink, but incorporated into an inclusive community “free skating” environment. The rink included individuals with and without ASD in order to promote social integration. Participants with ASD were encouraged to skate and wear full field hockey equipment during the intervention. |
|
|
- Timed Up and Go (TUG)
|
|
|
|
|
- Timed Test of Climbing and Descending Steps |
|
Phase II: 9 sessions, 60 min, 3x/week (3 weeks) 13 weeks |
|
|
- Timed Up and Down Stairs Test |
|
|
|
- Six-minute walk test |
|
|
| Reinert et al.(14) |
To determine the feasibility of posturography for monitoring acute changes in postural control induced by a Sensory Integration therapeutic intervention. The secondary objective was to identify which posturography result parameters, test conditions and data analysis methods could be most useful in identifying post-intervention changes. |
10 children, aged 6 to 10 |
- Posturographic platform (BP505, Bertec® Corp.) |
Sensory Integration Therapy - Vestibular Balance: |
1 session (single), 10 min, 1 day |
Occupational Therapist |
All the participants showed a reduction in the average speed of sway in the eyes-open condition on the flat surface after the intervention. Posturography can be useful for assessing physiological responses to the Sensory Integration intervention with vestibular balance. |
|
- Functional Range Test |
TEA: single protocol - on the vestibular swing, each subject had to participate in a throwing game, engage in make-believe games, reach and place puzzle pieces on the floor and interact socially, while the researcher controlled the movement of the swing (initially in a simple way, progressing to being rotated). DT: were not trained. |
| ASD group (n=5) |
- Bilateral Coordination subtest of the Test Bruininks-Oseretsky of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP-2) |
|
| DT Group (n=5) |
|
|
|
| Najafabadi et al.(5) |
To evaluate the effectiveness of a selected group of exercises known as Sports, Play and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK) on the motor and behavioral skills of children with ASD. |
28 children, aged 5 to 12 |
- Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP-2) |
SPARK program: |
36 sessions, 40 min, 3x/week 12 weeks |
Physical Educator and Psychologist supervision |
The SPARK program significantly improved static and dynamic balance, bilateral coordination and social interaction. |
|
Treatment: session divided into 3 parts - 10 min warm-up; 20 min activities according to treatment objectives (stability and movement); 10 min cool-down. Fitness activities - aerobic dance, running games and skipping rope. Physical fitness activities - sports such as soccer, basketball, games frisbee and kickball. Control: only performed routine tasks. |
| Treatment Group (n=12) |
|
| Control Group (n=14) |
|
|
| Nuntanee and Daranee(15) |
To create a motorized elephant-assisted therapy program and examine its effect on improving balance control in individuals with ASD. |
20 subjects, aged 8 to 19 |
- Swaymeter Test (Physiological Profile Assessment subtest) |
Motorized elephant-assisted therapy: |
8 sessions, 90 min, 2x/week |
Occupational Therapist |
The pre-test control and experimental groups did not differ in balance control, but in the post-test, the postural sway of the experimental group was significantly different from that of the control group in the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. |
|
- Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP-2) |
Experimental: 2 motorized elephants were used in 4 activities: 10 min introduction; 20 min washing and drying the elephant with a towel; 20 min riding and controlling the elephant to the correct direction after a command; 30 min playing a game with colleagues; 10 min closing and putting away materials. Control: no intervention. |
| Experimental Group (n=10) |
|
|
|
| Control Group (n=10) |
|
|
4 weeks |
| Caldani et al.(7) |
To explore the effect of a short postural rehabilitation training program on postural abilities in children with ASD. |
20 children, average age 11 years and 7 months |
- Postural stability (Equilibre Multitest System, |
Rehabilitation training protocol for postural control: |
1 session (single), 6 min, |
Medical |
In the first recording, postural instability was similar in the two groups of children with ASD despite the viewing conditions. In the second recording, immediately after training, there was an improvement in postural control related to a mixed effect of the training/rehabilitation, but also of the test-retest. |
|
Framiral®)
|
G1, “Buoy” exercise: the participant had to stand on the platform Framiral and look at a screen (340 cm × 170 cm) 2.5 m away, on which a buoy (130 cm × 130 cm) in the sea was projected. Body movements were expressed by a green dot on the buoy and the objective was to move your body at specific points on the buoy while avoiding swimming in the sea. Crowd” exercise: consisted of passers-by walking down the street towards the participant with an average speed varying from 0.5mm/s to 1.5mm/s. The participant had to move their body to avoid hitting the passers-by. G2: were not trained. |
|
(ENT) |
| G1 (n=10) |
|
|
1 day |
|
| G2 (n=10) |
|
|
|
|
| Mahmoodifar and Sotoodeh(16) |
To investigate the effects of anodic tDCS combined with selective motor training on the balance of children with ASD. |
18 subjects, aged 6 to 14 |
- Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2): EC subscale (1 static and 2 dynamic tests) |
TDCS combined with motor training: |
10 sessions, 20 min |
Trained therapist (Physical Education Department) |
Both anodic CBT combined with motor training and simulated CBT combined with motor training had significant impacts on balance. However, participants who received real eCBT and motor training performed significantly better than those who received simulated eCBT and motor training. |
|
Experimental: anodic CBT (1.5 mA over the left primary motor cortex) combined with motor training (jumping; jumping on a hula hoop; walking on a 5 cm × 2 m board on tiptoe; walking with one foot in front of the other). Control: 20 s simulated tDCS at the beginning of each session, providing 1.5 mA of stimulation, but immediately interrupted. |
|
| Experimental Group (n=9) |
|
Not available |
| Control Group (n=9) |
|
|
| Ansari et al.(6) |
To compare the effect of a land exercise program and swimming on balance skills in children with autism. |
30 subjects, aged 8 to 14 |
- Stork test (static) |
Aquatic exercises and techniques:kata
|
20 sessions, 60 min 2x/week: 30 min (up to 2nd week); 45 min (3rd to 4th week); and 60 min (5th to 10th week) |
Swimming coaches; |
Both interventions had a significant effect on balance skills (p < 0.001). Interestingly, a greater improvement in balance performance was found in the technique groupKata . |
|
- Heel-to-toe walking test (dynamic) |
Water exercises group: 5 min warm-up (walking, running, jumping jacks, arm/leg movements); 15 min orientation training (sagittal, transverse and longitudinal rotation); 20 min basic swimming (breathing, floating and stroke skills); 15 min free swimming (group activities and playing with toys); 5 min cool-down. Techniques GroupKata: blocking, punching, hurricanrana and kicking movements with explosive speed against an imaginary opponent. Control Group: no intervention |
|
Kata coaches; |
| 2 Experiment Groups (n=10 each) |
|
|
10 weeks |
chief researcher |
| 1 Control Group (n=10) |
|
|
|
|
| Roșca et al.(4) |
To analyze the evolution of postural stability after physiotherapeutic exercises based on balance training in subjects with ASD. |
28 subjects, aged 8 to 14 |
- RSscan pressure and force platform |
Physical activity protocol: |
72 sessions, 30 min, 3x/week |
Physiotherapist |
The application of the program based on physical exercises led to a significant improvement in the balance parameters of the participants, under complex evaluation conditions. |
| List of 6 exercises: breathing and stabilization; walking on a narrow gym bench (4x); standing on one leg - 10 s each (6x); standing on one leg, with the other leg in front, to the side and behind without touching the ground (6x); jumping from one leg to the other while using circles on the ground to mark (4x); walking on a balance board (with/without support). |
|
|
24 weeks |
| Araujo et al.(17)** |
Determine |
30 children, aged 3 to 8 |
- Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) |
TDCS combined with neurofunctional motor training: |
10 sessions, 20 minutes, 5x/week |
Physiotherapist |
The authors believe that the three intervention groups will show improvements in motor skills, mobility and functional balance. The effect size is expected to be greater in the experimental groups compared to the control group. It is also believed that the effects obtained in the experimental groups will be maintained in the follow-up assessments four and eight weeks after the end of the interventions. |
| whether anodic tDCS on the primary motor cortex and cerebellum can improve |
|
- Pediatric Balance Scale |
Experimental group 1: anodic tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) on the primary motor cortex combined with neurofunctional motor training. Experimental group 2: anodic tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) on the cerebellar region combined with neurofunctional motor training. Control group: simulated tDCS (gradual intensity of 1 mA during the initial 30s) combined with neurofunctional motor training. |
|
| the effects of gait training and postural control on motor skills, mobility, functionality |
Experimental Group 1 (n=not available) |
- Timed Up and Go (TUG)
|
Neurofunctional motor training: immediately at the start of CBTCT with gait and postural control training (10 min each). Gait: the child should walk on the treadmill, with the maximum training speed being that at which they can maintain adequate foot support at initial contact and throughout the support phase of the gait cycle - gradual increase in the initial 2 min and gradual reduction in the final 2 min. Postural control: a circuit of 4 individually selected exercises, based on the MABC-2 (balance and aim subscale) and the child's performance, which will be performed for 40 seconds with a 20-s rest interval (e.g. balancing on one foot; walking on tiptoe). A total of 2 complete circuits with a 2-minute rest between circuits. |
2 weeks |
| balance, cortical excitability, cognitive aspects and behavioral aspects in children |
Experimental Group 2 (n=not available) |
|
|
|
| with ASD. |
Control (n=not available) |
|
|
|
| Ben Hassen et al.(18) |
To investigate the effectiveness of psychomotor training on postural control in children with ASD. |
30 children, average age 8 years and 6 months |
- Stabilometric platform (Posture Win, Techno Concept®) |
Psychomotor training: |
18 sessions, 45 min, 2x week |
Not available |
Psychomotor training significantly improved postural control in the orthostatic position in different conditions when compared to the control group, in all the parameters assessed. |
|
The program consisted of 4 stages: 5 min warm-up, 15 min of activity on the trampoline followed by 20 min of psychomotor exercises in the form of a circuit, and finally 5 min of warm-down and stretching. Balance activities, cognitive stimulation games, fine and gross motor exercises and jumping and sensory integration activities (e.g. transferring bottles of different colors from side A to side B while following an obstacle course, moving up and down when necessary). |
|
| Experimental group (n=16) |
|
9 weeks |
| Control group (n= 14) |
|
|
| Jabouille et al.(8) |
To investigate the effect of balance rehabilitation on postural control in conditions of low and increased cognitive load in two children with ASD. |
2 children (10 years and 5 months old; 7 years and 3 months old) |
- Posturographic platform: Single task: OA/OF; Double task: recognition of |
Own protocol: |
8 sessions, 40 min, 2x/week |
Physiotherapist |
The program resulted in a 30% to 96% improvement in postural control parameters in the single-task condition for both participants. In the dual-task condition, participant 1 progressed in all conditions, while participant 2 progressed in 3 of the 5 conditions. |
| Emotions (images representing a neutral condition, sadness, anger, happiness and fear) |
Balance exercises, jumping and stabilization situations, associated with cognitive-motor tasks (Wii® Balance Board): |
| First 30 min: 4 dual-task exercises; final 10 min: balance exercises on Wii® (average of 3 different games per session). |
4 weeks |