Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The run for a million continues: is there still space for traditional techniques beyond molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology?

Thyroid nodules are increasingly common in our daily lives and the duo “thyroid ultrasound (US) & fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)” remains the gold standard for identifying or ruling out malignancy with high accuracy ( 11. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133. ). However, we know that out of these nodules, about 25% has an undefined cytology, being named “indeterminate samples” or, according to the Bethesda’s Classification System, categories III (atypia of undetermined significance – AUS/follicular lesion of undetermined significance – FLUS) and IV (follicular neoplasm – FN/suspicious for follicular neoplasm – SFN) ( 22. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1159-65. ). About 10 years ago, the standard management for these two categories, had been a diagnostic lobectomy ( 33. Camargo R, Corigliano S, Friguglietti C, Gauna A, Harach R, Munizaga F, et al. Latin American Thyroid Society recommendations for the management of thyroid nodules. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;53(9):1167-75. ). In this way, in order to minimize the number of unnecessary surgeries, the “run for a million” had its start decreed, and many groups started to run after tools that would reduce the number of indeterminate cytology and thus differentiate benign from malignant samples before a surgical procedure becomes really necessary.

The use of frozen section was one of the first solutions to deal with the nodules with indeterminate cytology ( 44. Roach JC, Heller KS, Dubner S, Sznyter LA. The value of frozen section examinations in determining the extent of thyroid surgery in patients with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(3):263-7. ). The intention was to define intraoperatively if the surgery could be limited to a lobectomy or if total thyroidectomy or even neck dissection was needed. Real-time elastography appeared in the race when the role of some US criteria, through the use of the ACR-TIRADS classification ( 55. Cibas ES, Ali SZ; NCI Thyroid FNA Stateofthe Science Conference. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(5):658-65. ), gained more evidence in the definition of benignity or malignancy of a nodule. Also others diagnostic images as thyroid scintigraphy, in which the capturing nodule could suggest benignity ( 33. Camargo R, Corigliano S, Friguglietti C, Gauna A, Harach R, Munizaga F, et al. Latin American Thyroid Society recommendations for the management of thyroid nodules. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;53(9):1167-75. ), were suggested as possible candidates. In addition, immunocytochemistry entered this race by using CITED-1, galectin-3, HBME-1, fibronectin-1 and cytokeratin-19 as possible markers ( 66. Ferraz C. Can current molecular tests help in the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodule FNAB? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(6):576-84. ). Nevertheless, the molecular markers are the ones which intensified the contest in the beginning of the 90s and which apparently are gaining more and more advantage over the others ( 66. Ferraz C. Can current molecular tests help in the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodule FNAB? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(6):576-84. ).

Nowadays, by mentioning indeterminate nodules, the molecular tests are the ones that stand out. Currently, there are 5 commercially available tests in the world, reaching a high diagnostic potential with sensitivity of 89-94% and specificity of 68-85% ( 66. Ferraz C. Can current molecular tests help in the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodule FNAB? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(6):576-84. ). Moreover, most of them also provide prognostic information of the nodule, and thus the potential to influence a therapeutic decision. However, the lack of prospective and independent validations of the latest versions of the tests, population-specific validations and, in particular, the high cost seems to be the biggest barrier towards the finish line.

Thus, two articles in this issue of the Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism (AE&M) have aimed at highlighting two approaches that are still controversial in the literature with regard to the differentiation between benign and malignant nodules in indeterminate samples. Luo and cols . ( 77. Luo J, Chen J, Sun Y, Xu F, Wu L, Huang P. A retrospective study of reducing unnecessary thyroid biopsy for American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems 4 assessment through applying shear wave elastography. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(4):349-55. ) and Vuong and cols. ( 88. Vuong CD, Watson WB, Kwon KD, Mohan SS, Perez MN, Lee SC, Simental AA. Cost effectiveness of intraoperative pathology in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(4):356-61. ) demonstrated that both, the shear wave elastography and the use of intraoperative frozen section, respectively, are still useful and cheaper techniques, and so, brought them back to the run for a million.

Elastography is the evaluation of the tissue elasticity and its rationale is based on the increased stiffness of malignant over benign nodules similar to the hardness on physical examination. The studies about elastography on thyroid nodules are quite controversial. A meta-analysis of eight studies with a total of 639 nodules concluded that elastography has a high sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, which may be used in conjunction or even instead FNAB to select patients with thyroid nodules for surgery ( 99. Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G, Weber S, Zeuzem S, Friedrich-Rust M. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2010;20(10):1145-50. ). However, results of other studies are more controversial and suggest a more limited diagnostic value since it may depend on the pressure that each operator places on the nodule and on the depth of the nodule localization ( 1010. Bardet S, Ciappuccini R, Pellot-Barakat C, Monpeyssen H, Michels JJ, Tissier F, et al. Shear Wave Elastography in Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology: Results of a Prospective Bicentric Study. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1441-9. ). A possible solution may be the shear wave elastography (SWE), in which the speed of the waves emitted by the transducer assesses the stiffness of the nodule.

In the present study by Luo and cols. ( 77. Luo J, Chen J, Sun Y, Xu F, Wu L, Huang P. A retrospective study of reducing unnecessary thyroid biopsy for American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems 4 assessment through applying shear wave elastography. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(4):349-55. ), SWE is used as a criterion for the refinement of US lesions category ACR-TI-RADS 4. This means that before the FNAB is indicated, the nodule would pass through another “sieve”, further narrowing the biopsy indication and, consequently, reducing an invasive diagnostic approach, improving accurate diagnosis and reducing the number of unnecessary FNAB for benign thyroid nodules. An interesting approach that can, consequently, lead to a reduction in the indeterminate samples, through a reproducible technique with little operator interference.

With the increase of preoperative information through cytology, cervical US, tomography scan and even molecular markers, the role of frozen-section analysis of the thyroid has been significantly reduced in recent years. The benefit of frozen biopsy is still very contradictory because its quality depends on the pathologists’ experience in head & neck histology and the size of the tumor. In addition, one of the biggest dilemmas of the indeterminate samples is the follicular lesion because only the access of the entire capsular interface is able to differentiate benign from malignant tumors. So, the identification of capsular and vascular invasion in frozen section analysis can be very difficult and lead to false negative results. However, Vuong and cols. ( 88. Vuong CD, Watson WB, Kwon KD, Mohan SS, Perez MN, Lee SC, Simental AA. Cost effectiveness of intraoperative pathology in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(4):356-61. ) highlighted the role of intraoperative frozen biopsy, especially in the economic aspect for a possible re-approach of the thyroidectomy. In the present study, completion of thyroidectomy was avoided in 1 out of 24 patients resulting in cost-savings of $80 per patient. Therefore, in places where the access to preoperative information is limited, it seems that the use of intraoperative rapid frozen section may still be an option, due to its affordability.

Collectively, these two papers exemplify that the run for the million has not yet reached the finish line, and more, that each contender runs the way it can: either during initial stages, by helping to better select candidates who really need a more invasive approach, such as FNAB; or with tools that enhance diagnostic surgery. Therefore, it seems that the one million prize will have to be shared, as each technique will prove beneficial depending on the time of the evaluation and the specific country where it is applied, given different reality, accessibility and know-how.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133.
  • 2
    Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1159-65.
  • 3
    Camargo R, Corigliano S, Friguglietti C, Gauna A, Harach R, Munizaga F, et al. Latin American Thyroid Society recommendations for the management of thyroid nodules. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;53(9):1167-75.
  • 4
    Roach JC, Heller KS, Dubner S, Sznyter LA. The value of frozen section examinations in determining the extent of thyroid surgery in patients with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(3):263-7.
  • 5
    Cibas ES, Ali SZ; NCI Thyroid FNA Stateofthe Science Conference. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(5):658-65.
  • 6
    Ferraz C. Can current molecular tests help in the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodule FNAB? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(6):576-84.
  • 7
    Luo J, Chen J, Sun Y, Xu F, Wu L, Huang P. A retrospective study of reducing unnecessary thyroid biopsy for American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems 4 assessment through applying shear wave elastography. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(4):349-55.
  • 8
    Vuong CD, Watson WB, Kwon KD, Mohan SS, Perez MN, Lee SC, Simental AA. Cost effectiveness of intraoperative pathology in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(4):356-61.
  • 9
    Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G, Weber S, Zeuzem S, Friedrich-Rust M. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2010;20(10):1145-50.
  • 10
    Bardet S, Ciappuccini R, Pellot-Barakat C, Monpeyssen H, Michels JJ, Tissier F, et al. Shear Wave Elastography in Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology: Results of a Prospective Bicentric Study. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1441-9.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    12 Aug 2020
  • Date of issue
    Jul-Aug 2020

History

  • Received
    11 July 2020
  • Accepted
    13 July 2020
Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia Rua Botucatu, 572 - Conjuntos 81/83, 04023-061 São Paulo SP Brasil, Tel: (55 11) 5575-0311 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: aem.editorial.office@endocrino.org.br