Abstracts
The impact of the side in middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke is not well established. Our aim was to analyze the differences between right (RMCA) and left middle cerebral artery (LMCA) stroke in patients submitted to intravenous thrombolysis and the influence of the affected side in the patient’s mortality after 3 months.
Method
Patients with MCA ischemic stroke submitted to intravenous thrombolysis from March 2010 to December 2011 at two Brazilian Stroke Centers were included. Differences between patients with RMCA and LMCA stroke were identified by univariate analysis.
Results
Forty-five patients with RMCA stroke and 67 with LMCA stroke were analyzed. Patients with LMCA had a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.031), although patients with RMCA more often had a previous ischemic stroke (p = 0.034). The mortality over 3 months was similar for either side (OR = 1.20 ;0.37 - 4.29, p = 0.772).
Conclusion
The side of the MCA ischemic stroke did not influence the patients mortality.
stroke; middle cerebral artery stroke; thrombolytic therapy; prognosis; mortality
O impacto do lado de acometimento da artéria cerebral média (ACM) não é bem estabelecido. Nosso objetivo é analisar as diferenças entre pacientes com acidente vascular isquêmico (AVCi) de ACM direita (ACMD) e esquerda (ACME) submetidos à trombólise endovenosa e a influência do lado acometido na mortalidade em 3 meses.
Método
Pacientes com AVCi ACMD e ACME submetidos à trombólise endovenosa entre Março de 2010 a Dezembro de 2012 em duas Unidades de AVC brasileiras foram incluídos. Diferenças entre AVCi ACMD e ACME foram identificadas pela análise univariada.
Resultados
Quarenta e cinco pacientes com AVCi de ACMD e 67 de ACME foram analisados. Pacientes com AVCi de ACME tiveram maior incidência de fibrilação atrial (p = 0,031), enquanto de ACMD maior de AVCi prévio (p = 0,034). A mortalidade em 3 meses foi similar em ambos os grupos (OR = 1,20; 0,37 -4,29, p = 0,772).
Conclusão
O lado de acometimento da ACM no AVCi não influencia na mortalidade.
acidente vascular isquêmico; artéria cerebral média; terapia trombolítica; prognóstico; mortalidade
The influence of the side of the ischemic stroke (IS) and the outcome remains
controversial; with some studies demonstrating a worse prognosis in those patients with
right MCA (RMCA) as compared to left MCA (LMCA) IS, thus suggesting a possible
laterality effect11 .Woo D, Broderick JP, Kothari RU, Lu M, Brott T, Lyden PD et al.
Does the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale favor left hemisphere
strokes? NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2355-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2355
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.235...
,22 .Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al.
Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and
acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right-
and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2002;33(4):954-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000001306...
,33 .Lyden P, Claesson L, Havstad S, Ashwood T, Lu M. Factor analysis of
the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in patients with large strokes.
Arch Neurol. 2004;61(11):1677-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.11.1677
https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.11.1...
,44 .Di Legge S, Fang J, Saposnik G, Hachinski V. The impact of lesion
side on acute stroke treatment. Neurology. 2005;65(1):81-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167608.94237.aa
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.000016760...
,55 .Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steimetz H,
Neumann-Haefelin T. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric
stroke. Lancet. 2005;366(9483):392-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67024-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67...
,66 .Di Legge S, Saposnik G, Nilanont Y, Hachinski V. Neglecting the
difference: does right or left matter in stroke outcome after thrombolysis?
Stroke. 2006;37(8):2066-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000229899.66019.62
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000022989...
,77 .Mateo I, Pinedo A, Escalza I, Garcia-Monco JC. Laterality does not
influence early mortality in MCA ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg;
2006;108(7):628-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005....
,88 .Fink JN, Frampton CM, Lyden P, Lees KR. Does hemispheric
lateralization influence functional and cardiovascular outcomes after stroke?:
an analysis of placebo-treated patients from prospective acute stroke trials.
Stroke. 2008;39(12):3335-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523365
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.52...
.
This could be related to a delay in treatment time, as well as a result of the fact that
the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) tends to favour the evaluation of
the dominant (usually left) hemisphere over the non-dominant one11 .Woo D, Broderick JP, Kothari RU, Lu M, Brott T, Lyden PD et al.
Does the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale favor left hemisphere
strokes? NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2355-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2355
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.235...
,22 .Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al.
Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and
acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right-
and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2002;33(4):954-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000001306...
,33 .Lyden P, Claesson L, Havstad S, Ashwood T, Lu M. Factor analysis of
the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in patients with large strokes.
Arch Neurol. 2004;61(11):1677-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.11.1677
https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.11.1...
,44 .Di Legge S, Fang J, Saposnik G, Hachinski V. The impact of lesion
side on acute stroke treatment. Neurology. 2005;65(1):81-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167608.94237.aa
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.000016760...
,55 .Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steimetz H,
Neumann-Haefelin T. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric
stroke. Lancet. 2005;366(9483):392-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67024-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67...
,66 .Di Legge S, Saposnik G, Nilanont Y, Hachinski V. Neglecting the
difference: does right or left matter in stroke outcome after thrombolysis?
Stroke. 2006;37(8):2066-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000229899.66019.62
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000022989...
,77 .Mateo I, Pinedo A, Escalza I, Garcia-Monco JC. Laterality does not
influence early mortality in MCA ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg;
2006;108(7):628-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005....
.
However, most recent studies could not find any differences in the outcomes comparing
either side of MCA IS77 .Mateo I, Pinedo A, Escalza I, Garcia-Monco JC. Laterality does not
influence early mortality in MCA ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg;
2006;108(7):628-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005....
,88 .Fink JN, Frampton CM, Lyden P, Lees KR. Does hemispheric
lateralization influence functional and cardiovascular outcomes after stroke?:
an analysis of placebo-treated patients from prospective acute stroke trials.
Stroke. 2008;39(12):3335-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523365
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.52...
,99 .Blondin NA, Staff I, Lee N, McCullough LD. Thrombolysis in right
versus left hemispheric stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19(4):269-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.04.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebro...
. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if there
was a relation between the affected side and the mortality in the first 3 months in
patients with MCA IS submitted to intravenous thrombolysis (IVTT).
METHOD
This is a cross-sectional and retrospective study with prospective data collection
from medical records in a computerized date registry. The study group consisted of
patients with stroke in the MCA territory, including cortical, subcortical and deep
lesions, who underwent IVTT from 1st March 2010 to 31st
December 2011 at two Brazilian Stroke Centres (Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade
Federal do Paraná in Curitiba, Paraná; and the Hospital Municipal São José in
Joinville, Santa Catarina). Stroke management, including the standardized IVTT, was
based on current guidelines1010 .The National Institute of Neurological Disorders, Stroke rt-PA
Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N
Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332...
,1111 .Sociedade Brasileira de Doenças Cerebrovasculares (SBDCV). Primeiro
consenso brasileiro para trombólise no acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico
agudo. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60(3A):675-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2002000400032
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X200200...
,1212 .Adams HP Jr, Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A et
al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a
guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke
Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention
Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care
Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of
Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for
neurologists. Circulation. 2007;115(20):e478-534. Erratum in: Circulation.
2007:116:e515.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181486
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.1...
,1313 .Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, Aichner F, Fluhmki E, Dávalos A et
al. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome
results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe
Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring STudy (SITS-MOST). Stroke.
2008;39(12):3316-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.51...
. Exclusion criteria were the following: the presence of
bilateral MCA stroke during the same admission, the presence of an infarction
outside of the MCA territory during the same admission, intra-arterial rescue
therapy, and incomplete data about the territory of infarction and the modified
Rankin score (mRS) at 3 months. Although, among all ischemic stroke subtypes,
lacunar strokes have been considered the most benign, this subtype was not excluded
because reviewed studies show that thrombolysis is an effective treatment in those
cases and the prognosis can be better or without significant trend for better or
worse outcome compared with others etiologies1010 .The National Institute of Neurological Disorders, Stroke rt-PA
Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N
Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332...
,1414 .Hsia AW, Sachdev HS, Tomlinson J, Hamilton SA, Tong DC. Efficacy of
IV tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke: does stroke subtype really
matter? Neurology. 2003;61(1):71-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000071228.56362.36
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.000007122...
,1515 .Fluri F, Hatz F, Rutgers MP, Georgiadis D, Sekoranja L, Schwegler G
et al. Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with stroke attributable to small
artery occlusion. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(8):1054-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02961.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010...
,1616 .Mustanoja S, Meretoja A, Putaala J, Viitanen V, Curtze S, Atula S
et al. Outcome by stroke etiology in patients receiving thrombolytic treatment:
descriptive subtype analysis. Stroke. 2011;42(1):102-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597534
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.59...
,1717 .Fuentes B, Martínez-Sánchez P, Alonso de Leciñana M, Egido J,
Reig-Roselló G, Díaz-Otero F et al. Efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis
according to stroke subtypes: the Madrid Stroke Network data. Eur J Neurol.
2012;19(12):1568-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03790.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012...
,1818 .Pantoni L, Fierini F, Poggesi A. Thrombolysis in acute stroke
patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(1):5-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000356796
https://doi.org/10.1159/000356796...
. The ethics committees of both hospitals had
previously evaluated and authorized the study.
Neurologists certified in the use of the NIHSS examination evaluated all of the
patients at both centres using the validated Portuguese version of the NIHSS1919 .Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF,
Mariano DC et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,
modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural
adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000177918
https://doi.org/10.1159/000177918...
. The NIHSS was stratified in
three different severity groups based on total punctuation: mild ranging from 0 to
3; moderate: 4 - 19; and severe: 20 - 4299 .Blondin NA, Staff I, Lee N, McCullough LD. Thrombolysis in right
versus left hemispheric stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19(4):269-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.04.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebro...
.
The main outcome measure was mortality during the three months after stroke onset. The other outcome variables evaluated were hemorrhagic transformation (HT), symptomatic HT (SHT), functional independency as defined as a mRS ≤ 2 on discharge, mRS ≤ 2 after three months and death during admission.
HT was defined as a hemorrhagic infarction (HI) in which a petechial bleeding inside
the infarcted area was demonstrated on control neuroimaging, but without a
space-occupying effect. A parenchymal haemorrhage (PH) was defined as a haemorrhage
with a space-occupying effect2020 .Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, Kummer R et al.
Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute
hemispheric stroke. JAMA. 1995;274(13):1017-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530130023023
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.035301...
,2121 .Larrue V, von Kummer R, del Zoppo G, Bluhmki E. Hemorrhagic
transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Potential contributing factors in the
European Cooperative. Stroke. 1997;28(5):957-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.5.957
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.5.957...
. A SHT was defined as brain imaging evidence of HT with
clinical worsening, which was indicated by an increase of at least four points in
the NIHSS score1515 .Fluri F, Hatz F, Rutgers MP, Georgiadis D, Sekoranja L, Schwegler G
et al. Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with stroke attributable to small
artery occlusion. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(8):1054-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02961.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010...
.
The statistical analyses were performed with the Statistica 8.0 software: statistical significance was assessed by either the Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney’s test for continuous variables and the χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05 value with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
During the study period, 112 MCA IS patients were analysed: 45 (40.2%) RMCAs and 67 (59.8%) LMCAs. Table 1 shows the demographic and admission variables of both groups. On the one hand patients with LMCA IS had atrial fibrillation more often when compared to the RMCA IS group (34.3% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.031), while on the other hand patients with RMCA IS were more prone to have had a history of previous IS as compared to the LMCA IS ones (6% vs. 20%, p = 0.034). Regardless of laterality, patients with a history of previous IS on admission had a lower punctuation in the NIHSS scale if compared to those without (7 ± 7 vs. 15 ± 5.8, p = 0.027).
In LMCA IS, the etiological distribution was: 14 (20.9%) had an atherothrombotic cause, 26 (38.8%) were cardioembolic, two (3%) had lacunar strokes and the remaining 25 (37.3%) had an undetermined mechanism. In RMCA IS, the etiological classification was: 14 (31.1%) were atherothrombotic, 17 (37.8%) cardioembolic, two (4.4%) lacunar and 12 (26.7%) had an undetermined cause (p = 0.529).
Both sides of unilateral MCA compromise had similar median NIHSS on admission (14 vs. 14, p = 0.456). Nevertheless, those patients that had a more severe compromise, the severe NIHSS subgroup, were more frequent in the LMCA IS group than in the RMCA IS (20 vs. 4, p = 0.009) (Table 1).
The outcome findings of each group are presented in Table 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the RMCA IS and LMCA IS groups for any of the outcome measures.
DISCUSSION
The present study failed to demonstrate that there was a difference in the mortality
after 3 months between RMCA IS and LMCA IS. However, there is still some controversy
in the literature regarding whether the side of the MCA IS can have any influence in
its prognosis. Some authors suggested that patients with RMCA IS could have a longer
symptom-to-needle time and a lower score in neurological scales because these scores
are predominantly focused on language items, therefore favouring LMCA IS, and thus
having a negative impact in the treatment and a worse outcome when compared to LMCA
IS11 .Woo D, Broderick JP, Kothari RU, Lu M, Brott T, Lyden PD et al.
Does the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale favor left hemisphere
strokes? NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2355-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2355
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.235...
,22 .Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al.
Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and
acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right-
and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2002;33(4):954-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000001306...
,44 .Di Legge S, Fang J, Saposnik G, Hachinski V. The impact of lesion
side on acute stroke treatment. Neurology. 2005;65(1):81-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167608.94237.aa
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.000016760...
,55 .Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steimetz H,
Neumann-Haefelin T. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric
stroke. Lancet. 2005;366(9483):392-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67024-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67...
,66 .Di Legge S, Saposnik G, Nilanont Y, Hachinski V. Neglecting the
difference: does right or left matter in stroke outcome after thrombolysis?
Stroke. 2006;37(8):2066-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000229899.66019.62
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000022989...
. In the present study, the symptom-to-needle time and the
median NIHSS were similar in both groups. Additionally, the LMCA IS group had a
greater number of severely compromised patients as compared to the RMCA IS group,
and this could have influenced the results obtained. Previous studies have shown
that the influence of the dominant hemisphere occurs predominantly in those patients
within the lower total punctuation of NIHSS score subgroup, because the
lateralization of hemispheric compromise has a significant influence on the cortical
items, mostly on those related to assessment of language and comprehension, an
effect which disappears in patients with greater compromise and higher scores,
becoming similar for either side22 .Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al.
Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and
acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right-
and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2002;33(4):954-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000001306...
.
It was observed that in the RMCA stroke patients with HT (n = 5), most of them had
SHT (n = 4), but this did not change the patients outcome and also it was not
statistically significant when compared to LMCA stroke patients (HT = 14, SHT = 6).
When analyzed all SHT in the current study (n = 10, 8.9%), this was similar when
compared to previous large trials1010 .The National Institute of Neurological Disorders, Stroke rt-PA
Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N
Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332...
,2020 .Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, Kummer R et al.
Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute
hemispheric stroke. JAMA. 1995;274(13):1017-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530130023023
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.035301...
and real world studies1313 .Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, Aichner F, Fluhmki E, Dávalos A et
al. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome
results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe
Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring STudy (SITS-MOST). Stroke.
2008;39(12):3316-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.51...
.
There are some limitations in the present study. First, only those patients with MCA
strokes that underwent intravenous thrombolysis were analysed; this restricted the
validation of the current data with other topographies and with non-thrombolysis
treated patients. The retrospective method excluded patients without complete data
and this could also have influenced the observed results. In addition to the
previous validation of NIHSS in the Portuguese-speaking Brazilian population1919 .Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF,
Mariano DC et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,
modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural
adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000177918
https://doi.org/10.1159/000177918...
, patients included in this study
could have different cultural and educational levels, predominantly in regards to
the language items, and this could have affected the observed results. Language
dominance with neuropsychological testing was not evaluated in the present model.
Finally, this study did not access the mortality in the different severity groups
based on NIHSS. Nevertheless, some studies suggest that the influence of the
dominant hemisphere occurs predominantly when there is lower total punctuation of
NIHSS score22 .Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al.
Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and
acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right-
and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2002;33(4):954-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.000001306...
and in our study there
is no patient with mild NIHSS in any of the groups. However, this is the first study
that includes only patients who underwent IVTT and uses a differentiated analysis of
NIHSS.
In conclusion, the side of MCA IS did not influence the patient’s outcome in the present study and therefore should not be used as a prognostic marker. Future studies should emphasize other factors that could be used to establish the prognosis of MCA IS in a more reliable manner.
References
-
1Woo D, Broderick JP, Kothari RU, Lu M, Brott T, Lyden PD et al. Does the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale favor left hemisphere strokes? NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2355-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2355
» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2355 -
2Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al. Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right- and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2002;33(4):954-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D
» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013069.24300.1D -
3Lyden P, Claesson L, Havstad S, Ashwood T, Lu M. Factor analysis of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in patients with large strokes. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(11):1677-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.11.1677
» https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.11.1677 -
4Di Legge S, Fang J, Saposnik G, Hachinski V. The impact of lesion side on acute stroke treatment. Neurology. 2005;65(1):81-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167608.94237.aa
» https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167608.94237.aa -
5Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steimetz H, Neumann-Haefelin T. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric stroke. Lancet. 2005;366(9483):392-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67024-9
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67024-9 -
6Di Legge S, Saposnik G, Nilanont Y, Hachinski V. Neglecting the difference: does right or left matter in stroke outcome after thrombolysis? Stroke. 2006;37(8):2066-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000229899.66019.62
» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000229899.66019.62 -
7Mateo I, Pinedo A, Escalza I, Garcia-Monco JC. Laterality does not influence early mortality in MCA ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2006;108(7):628-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.10.002
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.10.002 -
8Fink JN, Frampton CM, Lyden P, Lees KR. Does hemispheric lateralization influence functional and cardiovascular outcomes after stroke?: an analysis of placebo-treated patients from prospective acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3335-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523365
» https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523365 -
9Blondin NA, Staff I, Lee N, McCullough LD. Thrombolysis in right versus left hemispheric stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19(4):269-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.04.012
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.04.012 -
10The National Institute of Neurological Disorders, Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
» https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401 -
11Sociedade Brasileira de Doenças Cerebrovasculares (SBDCV). Primeiro consenso brasileiro para trombólise no acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico agudo. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60(3A):675-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2002000400032
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2002000400032 -
12Adams HP Jr, Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation. 2007;115(20):e478-534. Erratum in: Circulation. 2007:116:e515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181486
» https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181486 -
13Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, Aichner F, Fluhmki E, Dávalos A et al. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring STudy (SITS-MOST). Stroke. 2008;39(12):3316-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768
» https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768 -
14Hsia AW, Sachdev HS, Tomlinson J, Hamilton SA, Tong DC. Efficacy of IV tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke: does stroke subtype really matter? Neurology. 2003;61(1):71-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000071228.56362.36
» https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000071228.56362.36 -
15Fluri F, Hatz F, Rutgers MP, Georgiadis D, Sekoranja L, Schwegler G et al. Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with stroke attributable to small artery occlusion. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(8):1054-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02961.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02961.x -
16Mustanoja S, Meretoja A, Putaala J, Viitanen V, Curtze S, Atula S et al. Outcome by stroke etiology in patients receiving thrombolytic treatment: descriptive subtype analysis. Stroke. 2011;42(1):102-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597534
» https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597534 -
17Fuentes B, Martínez-Sánchez P, Alonso de Leciñana M, Egido J, Reig-Roselló G, Díaz-Otero F et al. Efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis according to stroke subtypes: the Madrid Stroke Network data. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(12):1568-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03790.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03790.x -
18Pantoni L, Fierini F, Poggesi A. Thrombolysis in acute stroke patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(1):5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000356796
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000356796 -
19Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF, Mariano DC et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000177918
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000177918 -
20Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, Kummer R et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. JAMA. 1995;274(13):1017-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530130023023
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530130023023 -
21Larrue V, von Kummer R, del Zoppo G, Bluhmki E. Hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Potential contributing factors in the European Cooperative. Stroke. 1997;28(5):957-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.5.957
» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.5.957
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
Aug 2015
History
-
Received
22 Oct 2014 -
Received
12 Mar 2015 -
Accepted
01 Apr 2015