asas
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
Acta Sci., Anim.
Sci.
1807-8672
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM
O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a influência da categoria de peso (CP) da
truta arco-íris sobre o rendimento do processamento e a composição centesimal do
peixe inteiro eviscerado e do filé. O delineamento foi inteiramente casualizado para
as variáveis do processamento (CP1 = 300 a 370 g e CP2 = 371 a
440 g) e em esquema fatorial 2 x 2 para composição centesimal (CP1 e
CP2 e formas de apresentação (filé e peixe inteiro eviscerado).
CP1 apresentou superior rendimento do peixe inteiro eviscerado (83,00%)
e cabeça (13,27%), porém inferior para vísceras (17,00%), quando comparados à
CP2. A CP não influenciou no rendimento dos músculos abdominais, filé
com pele e sem pele, porcentagem de pele e resíduos. Houve diferenças significativas
entre as CP para os teores de umidade (CP1 = 72,30% e CP2 =
71,15%) e lipídios (CP1 = 7,96% e CP2 = 9,04%). A umidade
(73,74%) e a proteína bruta (19,05%) dos filés foram superiores (p < 0,01) do que
para peixes inteiros eviscerados (69,71% e 17,81%, respectivamente). Teores de cinzas
(2,15%) e lipídios (10,48%) foram superiores (p < 0,01) para peixes inteiros em
relação aos filés (1,16% e 6,52%, respectivamente). Sugere-se o abate dos peixes com
peso entre 300 a 370 g e a apresentação em filé como mais adequada para o
consumo.
Introduction
The rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) is a temperate climate fish species which
adapted itself to rivers in mountainous regions worldwide and has most of the
requirements fish consumers demand. It is one of the most cultivated species of the
Salmonidae family since it features excellent qualities for aquiculture and sport
fishing (Tabata, 2010). Trout production in
Brazil in 2011 amounted to 3,277.2 tons, concentrated in the southern and southeastern
regions of Brazil. Entire eviscerated fish, cooled or frozen, or frozen smoked fillets
are the several forms of trout commercialization by retailers. The small trout breeders,
however, sell them as eviscerated fish, smoked fish or fish paste.
Fish meat processing is basic for the aggregation of value to the prime matter and is
greatly appreciated by consumers (Basso et al.,
2011). In the case of the fish industry, the quality of fish carcass is a
necessary factor to define the preparation process of the products and cuts (Freato et al., 2005). Further, information on the
processing yield may be of great help for fish quality control and for the tracing
system, with an increase in profits in the processing chain (Galvão et al., 2010). Studies on the effect of weight on yield,
especially with regard to the presentation forms of the product to consumers (whole
eviscerated fish, carcass, fillet) may greatly improve meat yields and profits.
Fillet and carcass yields depend on several factors, such as size, age, sex, anatomic
shape of the body, head size and weight of viscera, skin and fins. The efficiency of the
fillet machine and the expertise in handling are aspects that should be taken into
account.
Fish are a source of high quality protein, vitamins and essential minerals. They are
practically the sole source of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids such as those of
the Omega-3 series (Jabeen & Chaudhry, 2011).
Information on fish chemical composition is highly relevant for the standardization of
food products based on nutritional criteria. It provides elements for decisions on
nutritional characteristics and on the follow-up of industrial processes or research by
changes in the chemical components.
Lack of information on yield of the filleting process of the rainbow trout, highly
appreciated on the market, triggers interest in current research aiming at the analysis
of the influence of body weight on the processing yield and on the chemical composition
of the entire eviscerated fish and fillets.
Material and methods
Animals used in the experiment and filleting process
The assay was performed at Tecnotruta S.A. in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil,
and Chemical Analyses were conducted in the Laboratory of Nutrition of the Unesp
Aquiculture Center in Jaboticabal, São Paulo State, Brazil.
The trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) used in current experiment were
cultivated under an intensive system and fed on commercial ration with 42% crude
protein. Sixty-four trout, between 10 and 12 months old, were removed from the
processing chain of the abattoir Tecnotruta S.A. The fish were distributed into two
weight categories (W1 = 300 - 370 g and W2 = 371 to 440 g) to
analyze carcass yield. The chemical composition of each weight category was
undertaken with fillets (n = 8) and whole eviscerated fish (n = 9).
Fish were slaughtered by thermal shock, eviscerated mechanically, washed, packed one
by one in plastic bags and frozen at -20(C. Fish were thawed to facilitate the
removal of the spine, ribs and bones. The head, tail, fins (anal, caudal and
pectoral) were removed after complete thawing; the spine, ribs and bigger bones were
then extracted by a longitudinal cut on the ventral region, and the fillet with the
skin was exposed. The skin was removed from the fillet with a knife.
Yields (5) were calculated for total weight of fish (TWF), whole eviscerated fish
(WEF), weight of carcass (WC) or carcass without the head, viscera and fins; weight
of fillet with skin (WFWS) and without skin (WFOS), weight of abdomen muscles (WAM),
weight of the head (WH), weight of the viscera (PV), weight of crude skin (WCS) or
skin with scales, and weight of total residues (WTR) or head, viscera, crude skin,
fins, spine and bones. All yield rates were calculated according to total weight of
the specimen, from which the variables yield of carcass with head (YCH), yield of
fillet with skin (YFS) and without skin (YFWS), yield of abdominal muscles (YAM) and
yield of percentage of skin (YPS), head (YPH), viscera (YPV) and total residues (YTR)
were analyzed.
Analysis of chemical composition
Fillet and whole eviscerated fish were ground separately for the analysis of their
chemical composition (moisture, crude protein, lipids, ashes). Samples were packed in
plastic bags, tagged and frozen at -20ºC until analysis.
Samples were partially thawed, ground in a multiprocessor until a uniform pulp was
obtained. Aliquots of the pulp were dried in a buffer at 105°C for 16h until constant
weight. Crude protein, lipids and ashes from dried samples were determined according
to methodology by AOAC (2005). Crude protein
rates were evaluated by the semi-micro Kjeldahl method (Silva & Queiroz, 2002).
Experimental design
Assay was completely randomized, with two treatments (W1 = 300 - 370 g and
W2 = 371 - 440 g) and 20 replications per treatment to determine the
variables of the filleting process. A 2 x 2 factorial scheme was prepared for
chemical composition with two weight categories (W1 and W2) and
two product forms (FA1 = fillet and FA2 = whole eviscerated),
with different number of replications; the fish or fillet was the experimental
unit.
Data underwent analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were compared by tukey's test
at 5% probability, with Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 2004).
Results and discussion
Average weight of W1 category fish was 334.00 g, significantly lower (p <
0.01) than that of W2 (405.7 g). Significant differences were reported
between W1 and W2 for weight results of eviscerated fish, carcass,
fillet with or without skin, viscera, skin and total residues. However, fish weighing
between 371 and 440 g had higher rates, although weight of head and abdominal muscles
did not differ in weight among the categories evaluated (Table 1).
Weight of fish affected (p < 0.05) the variables yield of whole eviscerated fish and
percentage of head, which were higher for W1, whereas W2 indicated
higher rates for dress carcass yield and percentage of viscera (Table 2). Rates of yield of abdominal muscles, fillet with or without
skin, percentage of skin and total residues did not differ for the weight categories (p
> 0.05).
Yields for whole eviscerated fish and for fish with and without skin were higher for
fish of weight category W2 when compared to W1 fish. There was a
52 g increase for whole eviscerated fish, 41.6 g for fillet with skin and 3.45 g for
fillet without skin, with a respective yield increase of 1.76, 2.32 and 3.14% for these
commercial cuts.
There was a lower yield for whole eviscerated fish in W2 when compared to
W1, due to the fact that W2 fish had a greater viscera weight
(76.5 g) and consequently a greater visceral percentage (18.8%). On the other hand, the
yield of dressed carcass was higher for W2 (63.3%) probably due to a lower
percentage of the head (11.1%). In fact, smaller fish also had a greater head/trunk
(body) ratio and as these body parts increased, the ratio decreased.
Yield of whole eviscerated fish may also be calculated by carcass yield. Similar to what
have been reported in current paper, Brito et al.
(2014) also registered a high carcass yield in the small-sized
Loricariichthys anus, as for the pacu (Piaractus
mesopotamicus) by Basso et al. (2011).
This characteristic may be related to the evolution of the gonadal development since the
gonad size increases with the growth of the animal due to the reproductive period (Brito et al., 2014). Further, carcass yield also
depends on the animal's sex. Reidel et al. (2010)
reported that carcass yield of male jundiás (Rhamdia quelen) was higher
than that of females.
There was no significant difference between weight categories for yield of fillets with
or without skin. Fish with a small head and viscera percentage tend to have a greater
fillet yield. However, the above was not reported in current experiment, perhaps due to
the fact that W1 fish had a great head percentage than those of W2
(with a 2.16% increase), whereas viscera percentage in W2 was greater than
that in W1 (1.75% increase).
Table 1:
Mean rates for weight of entire eviscerated fish (g), weight of fillet with
and without skin (g) and weight of fillet byproducts (g) of the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
A,B- in each line, averages followed by the same letter did not differ by
tukey's test (p > 0.05) NS- not significant (p > 0.05) ** -
significant (p < 0.01).
Table 2:
Mean rates of yield in the two weight categories for the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
A,B- in each line, averages followed by the same letter did not differ by
tukey's test (p > 0.05) NS- not significant (p > 0.05) ** -
significant (p < 0.01).
Galvão et al. (2010) report fillet yield in fish
is closely related to condition factor and head proportion. Moreover, yields in farmed
fish may also be influenced by culture conditions such as feed, water temperature and
breeding structures (Borderías & Sánchez- Alonso,
2011).
Results follow those reported by Souza et al.
(1999) who found that that there was no increase in the yield of whole fish
and in fillet without skin in four weight categories of Oreochromis
niloticus. Souza and Maranhão (2001) analyzed two weight categories (300 -
400 g and 401 - 500 g) for O. niloticus and reported that there was
only a yield increase for whole eviscerated fish in the highest category. However, Souza et al. (1999) registered that there were
higher fillet yields in Clarias gariepinus for the biggest fish.
In the case of Thailand tilapia (Oreochromis spp.), average filleting
yield was 31.0%, ranging between 28.9 and 33.6%, supplemented by 36.0% for head and
viscera, 8.0% for skin, 22.0% for bone residues and 3.0% for other wastes (Pinheiro et al., 2006). Carneiro et al. (2004) detected a 29.5% rate for fillet yields in
jundiá juveniles (Rhamdia quelen), weighing between 201 and 300 g.
The coefficient of variation for the yield of whole eviscerated fish reached 3.12%, and
indicated that the variation for yield characteristics is generally less in farmed
fish.
Ventral abdominal muscles are normally non-commercial wastes but represent a section
varying between 0.79 and 4.36% in current experiment. Although there is no significant
difference of the variable between weight categories, the amount, albeit small, is
somewhat considerable, and represents an economical increase for the fish breeder or for
the fish industrial unit. In fact, muscles may be commercialized as snacks. However, in
their research on the Nile tilapia (O. niloticus), Souza and Maranhão
(2001) reported significant differences between weight categories for the ventral
abdominal muscles, with higher rates (3.17 and 3.51%) than those for the rainbow trout.
The above reveals that the weight of the muscles may be related to the species and
probable due to the lack of standardization of cuts. The high coefficient of variation
(44.62%) may be explained by the lack of standardization of cut limits. Losekan et al. (2008) showed that the yield of
abdominal muscle in jundiás (R. quelen), fed on diets with different
types of oil, was approximately 8%, a rather common feature for hide fish.
Head, fins, skin and viscera are wastes, even though the crude skin, or rather, the
byproduct of filleting, may be commercialized as prime matter for tanning. Thus, the
commercialization of the skin-less fillet is more viable as far as the skin represents a
source of alternative yield. In current assay, the percentage of crude skin ranged
between 6.1 (W2) and 6.4% (W1). Skin percentages did not differ
between the weight categories analyzed.
According to Bombardelli and Sanches (2008), the
viscera of the granulated catfish (Pterodoras granulosus), weighing
between 551 and 1000 g, are 17.7% of the entire fish. Results in current experiment with
the rainbow trout were similar to those mentioned by these authors. High percentage
rates of total residues are actually a concern within the context of environmental
pollution which may be decreased by its use as a kind of silage and thus a source of
profit and supply of prime matter for the preparation of diets in animal feed.
Comparing data between weight categories showed significant differences (p < 0.01)
and (p < 0.05), respectively for moisture and lipid percentages. Moisture was higher
in W1 and lipid percentage was higher in W2. However, there was no
significant difference for protein and ashes. With regard to the presentation of the
fish (fillet or whole eviscerated), there was a significant difference for all chemical
composition variables under analysis. Moisture and protein rates were higher (p <
0.01) in fillets when compared to those in the whole eviscerated fish. However, ash and
lipid percentages in the whole eviscerated fish were higher (p < 0.01) (Table 3). There was no interaction between weight
categories (W1 and W2) and presentation type (whole eviscerated
and fillet) for chemical composition.
Table 3:
Mean rates* of the chemical composition of fish fillet and whole
eviscerated fish in two weight categories of the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
A,B- in each line, averages followed by the same letter did not differ by
tukey's test (p > 0.05) NS- not significant (p > 0.05) ** -
significant (p < 0.01) * rates based on humid weight.
Variations in the fish's chemical composition are closely related to ration intake since
protein rates in the muscle tissue slightly increase during the feed period and
consequently fat rates have a sharp and fast increase (Boran & Karaçam, 2011). Young fish, the smallest within the species,
generally have higher moisture and lower lipid rates than adults. In current assay fish
at W2 had greater lipid and lower moisture rates. Such a difference was
expected: as the animal reaches a certain weight, growth rate decreases and fat deposits
in the carcass are intensified.
There was no significant difference in protein and ash rates for weight categories,
perhaps related to the amplitude range of each studied category or even to the amplitude
analyzed only for fish weighing between 300 and 440 g. According to Rasmussen and Ostenfeld (2000), they are actually
fish in the same development or growth period, with a small variation in protein
rates.
As regard to the presentation forms, namely, whole eviscerated fish and fish fillet,
results for moisture (69.7 and 73.7%), crude protein (17.8 and 19.1%), ashes (2.2 and
1.2%) and lipids (10.5 and 6.5%) rates were coherent to those reported by Rasmussen and Ostenfeld (2000). These authors
researched the same species, mean weight 261g, and determined moisture (70.2%), protein
(16.9%), ash (2.4%), lipids (10.1%) rates for the whole fish, whereas rates for fillets
respectively amounted to 73.8, 19.5, 1.5 and 4.9%. Tawfik (2009) reported 77.8, 20.0, 0.24 and 1.5%, respectively for moisture,
protein, lipids and ash for the Carangoides fulvoguttatus.
According to Rasmussen and Ostenfeld (2000), a
greater variation occurs in lipid contents in the fish body when compared to protein
rate. This fact may be observed in current assay since the coefficient of variation for
lipid rates was higher (15.5%) when compared to that of protein (4.1%), or rather, a
greater variability in the amount of lipids between the specimens.
The chemical composition of fish meat depends on biotic and abiotic factors related to
the species and culture, such as age, season, sex, gonadal development and diet (Burkert et al., 2008) which affected the physical and
organoleptic characteristics and shelf life of fish and derivatives (Burkert et al., 2008).
Fish are normally classified according to their fatty contents, or rather, lean fish
(fat rate less than 5%); moderately fat fish (fat rate between 5 and 10%) and fat fish
(over 10% fat) (Jabeen & Chaudhry, 2011). The
above classification is relevant since lipid rates affect significantly the productive
performance, shelf life of the products and consumer's general acceptance. The rainbow
trout was classified as moderately fat. In fact, the trout is an intermediate fish in
protein (15 - 20%) and fat (5 - 15%), with results for the same variables between 17.81,
19.05 and between 6.5 and 10.5%, respectively, for fish fillet and whole eviscerated
fish.
According to Berge and Storebakken (1991), the
capacity of accumulating fat on the carcass, coupled to diets with high fat rates may
give rise to problems in fish commercialization because of fat deposits on the bones and
fins. Further, there is a differential deposit in all the muscles with a high proportion
on the abdominal region (Helland & Grisdale-Helland,
1998). High fat rates on these parts may be undesirable if these body segments
are included in the presentation form of the product on the market (Helland & Grisdale-Helland, 1998).
Low ash percentage in the fillet (1.2%) occurs because of the reduction in fish bones
and the lack of the spine and head bones when compared to that of the whole eviscerated
fish (2.15%). According to Rasmussen and Ostenfeld
(2000), ash rates of fish range between 0.8 and 1.4%, but may exceed this
percentage due to the number of intramuscle fish bones in the fillet. The same author
reports that fresh water fish have greater fluctuations, ranging between 0.98 and 3.29%.
The chemical analysis of fresh water fish provides useful information for nutritionists
interested in sources with low fat rates and high protein quality. This is also useful
so that processing industries develop safer and quality fish products (Jabeen & Chaudhry, 2011). Further, yield rates
of several products produced by the minimum processing of different fish species are
highly relevant for industries involved in this segment of the pisciculture production
chain (Carneiro et al., 2004).
Conclusion
Results indicated that, due to the presentation form of the fish product to the
consumer, fish may be slaughtered when weighing 300 - 440 g, for fillets with or without
skin. If the whole eviscerated fish is sold, the fish should belong to W1; in
the case the carcass should be sold, the fish should belong to W2 due to its
higher yield. Fish served as fillets contain higher protein rates and lower lipid rates
and thus more appropriate for consumption. When only the lipid rates are taken into
account, W1 fish should be slaughtered due to low fat rates.
AOAC-Association Official Analytical Chemists. (2005). Official methods
of analysis. (18th ed.). Gaitherburg, Maryland, USA: AOAC.
AOAC-Association Official Analytical Chemists
2005
Official methods of analysis
18
Gaitherburg, Maryland, USA
AOAC
Basso, L., Ferreira, M. W. & Silva, A. R. (2011). Efeito do peso ao
abate nos rendimentos dos processamentos do pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Arquivos
Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 63(5), 1260-1262.
Basso
L
Ferreira
M. W
Silva
A. R
2011
Efeito do peso ao abate nos rendimentos dos processamentos do pacu
(Piaractus mesopotamicus)
Arquivos Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
63
5
1260
1262
Berge, G. M. & Storebakken, T. (1991). Effect of dietary fat level
on weight gain, digestibility, and fillet composition of Atlantic halibut.
Aquaculture, 99(3), 331-338.
Berge
G. M.
Storebakken
T
1991
Effect of dietary fat level on weight gain, digestibility, and fillet
composition of Atlantic halibut
Aquaculture
99
3
331
338
Bombardelli, R. A. & Sanches, E. A. (2008). Avaliação das
características morfométricas corporais, do rendimento de cortes e composição
centesimal da carne do armado (Pterodoras granulosus). Boletim do Instituto de Pesca,
34(2), 221-229.
Bombardelli
R. A.
Sanches
E. A
2008
Avaliação das características morfométricas corporais, do rendimento
de cortes e composição centesimal da carne do armado (Pterodoras
granulosus)
Boletim do Instituto de Pesca
34
2
221
229
Boran, G. & Karaçam, H. (2011). Seasonal changes in proximate
composition of some fish species from the Black Sea. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and
Aquatic Sciences, 11(1), 1-5.
Boran
G
Karaçam
H
2011
Seasonal changes in proximate composition of some fish species from
the Black Sea
Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
11
1
1
5
Borderías, A. J. & Sánchez-Alonso, I. (2011). First processing steps
and the quality of wild and farmed fish. Journal of Food Science, 76(1), R1-R5.
Borderías
A. J
Sánchez-Alonso
I
2011
First processing steps and the quality of wild and farmed
fish
Journal of Food Science
76
1
R1
R5
Brito, A. C. P., Rocha, C. B., Tavares, R. A., Fernandes, J. T.,
Piedras, S. R. N. & Puye, J. L. O. F. (2014). Rendimento corporal e composição
química do filé da viola (Loricariichthys anus). Ciencia Animal Brasileira, 15(1),
38-44.
Brito
A. C. P
Rocha
C. B
Tavares
R. A
Fernandes
J. T
Piedras
S. R. N
Puye
J. L. O. F
2014
Rendimento corporal e composição química do filé da viola
(Loricariichthys anus)
Ciencia Animal Brasileira
15
1
38
44
Burkert, D., Andrade, D. R. d., Sirol, R. N., Salaro, A. L., Rasguido,
J. E. d. A. & Quirino, C. R. (2008). Processing yield and chemical composition of
fillets of surubim reared in net cages. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7),
1137-1143.
Burkert
D
Andrade
D. R. d
Sirol
R. N
Salaro
A. L
Rasguido
J. E. d. A
Quirino
C. R
2008
Processing yield and chemical composition of fillets of surubim reared
in net cages
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
37
7
1137
1143
Carneiro, P. C. F., Mikos, J. D., Bendhack, F. & Ignácio, S. A.
(2004). Processamento do jundiá Rhamdia quelen: rendimento de carcaça. Revista
Acadêmica: ciências agrárias e ambientais, 2(3), 11-17.
Carneiro
P. C. F
Mikos
J. D
Bendhack
F
Ignácio
S. A
2004
Processamento do jundiá Rhamdia quelen: rendimento de
carcaça
Revista Acadêmica: ciências agrárias e ambientais
2
3
11
17
Freato, T. A., Freitas, R. T. F., Santos, V. B., Logato, P. V. R. &
Viveiros, A. T. M. (2005). Efeito do peso de abate nos rendimentos do processamento
da piracanjuba (Brycon orbignyanus, Valenciennes, 1849). Ciencia e Agrotecnologia,
29(3), 767-682.
Freato
T. A
Freitas
R. T. F
Santos
V. B
Logato
P. V. R
Viveiros
A. T. M
2005
Efeito do peso de abate nos rendimentos do processamento da
piracanjuba (Brycon orbignyanus, Valenciennes, 1849)
Ciencia e Agrotecnologia
29
3
767
682
Galvão, J. A., Margeirsson, S., Garate, C., Viðarsson, J. R. &
Oetterer, M. (2010). Traceability system in cod fishing. Food Control, 21(10),
1360-1366.
Galvão
J. A
Margeirsson
S
Garate
C
Viðarsson
J. R
Oetterer
M
2010
Traceability system in cod fishing
Food Control
21
10
1360
1366
Helland, S. J. & Grisdale-Helland, B. (1998). Growth, feed
utilization and body composition of juvenile Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus
hippoglossus) fed diets differing in the ratio between the macronutrients.,
Aquaculture 166(1), 49-56.
Helland
S. J
Grisdale-Helland
B
1998
Growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile Atlantic
halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) fed diets differing in the ratio between the
macronutrients
Aquaculture
166
1
49
56
Jabeen, F. & Chaudhry, A. S. (2011). Chemical compositions and fatty
acid profiles of three freshwater fish species. Food Chemistry, 125(3), 991-996.
Jabeen
F
Chaudhry
A. S
2011
Chemical compositions and fatty acid profiles of three freshwater fish
species
Food Chemistry
125
3
991
996
Losekan, M. E., Radünz Neto, J., Emanuelli, T., Pedrn, F. A., Lazzarin,
R., Bergamin, G. T., Corrêia, V. & Simões, R. S. (2008). Alimentação do jundiá
com dietas contendo óleos de arroz, canola ou soja. Ciencia Rural, 38(1), 225-230.
Losekan
M. E
Radünz
J
Neto
Emanuelli
T
Pedrn
F. A
Lazzarin
R
Bergamin
G. T
Corrêia
V
Simões
R. S
2008
Alimentação do jundiá com dietas contendo óleos de arroz, canola ou
soja
Ciencia Rural
38
1
225
230
Pinheiro, L. M. S., Martins, R. T., Pinheiro, L. A. S. & Pinheiro,
L. E. L. (2006). Industrial file fish processing yield of Thailand tilapia
(Oreochromis spp.). Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 58(2),
257-262.
Pinheiro
L. M. S
Martins
R. T
Pinheiro
L. A. S
Pinheiro
L. E. L
2006
Industrial file fish processing yield of Thailand tilapia (Oreochromis
spp.)
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia
58
2
257
262
Rasmussen, R. S. & Ostenfeld, T. H. (2000). Effect of growth rate on
quality traits and feed utilisation of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brook
trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)., Aquaculture 184(3), 327-337.
Rasmussen
R. S
Ostenfeld
T. H
2000
Effect of growth rate on quality traits and feed utilisation of
rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brook trout (Salvelinus
fontinalis)
Aquaculture
184
3
327
337
Reidel, A., Romagosa, E., Feiden, A., Boscolo, W. R., Coldebella, A.
& Signor, A. A. (2010). Rendimento corporal e composição química de jundiás
alimentados com diferentes níveis de proteína e energia na dieta, criados em
tanques-rede., Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39(2), 233-240.
Reidel
A
Romagosa
E
Feiden
A
Boscolo
W. R
Coldebella
A
Signor
A. A
2010
Rendimento corporal e composição química de jundiás alimentados com
diferentes níveis de proteína e energia na dieta, criados em
tanques-rede
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
39
2
233
240
SAS-Statistical Analasys System. (2004). User's guide, Version 9.1.2.
Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
SAS-Statistical Analasys System
2004
User's guide, Version 9.1.2
Cary, NC, USA
SAS Institute Inc
Silva, D. J. & Queiroz, A. C. (2002). Análise de alimentos: métodos
químicos e biológicos (3 ed.). Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil: Universdiade Federal de
Viçosa.
Silva
D. J
Queiroz
A. C
2002
Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos
3
Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil
Universdiade Federal de Viçosa
Souza, M. L. R., Macedo-Viegas, E. M. & Kronka, S. N. (1999).
Influência do método de filetagem e categorias de peso sobre rendimento de carcaça,
filé e pele da tilápia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus)., Revista Brasileira de
Zootecnia 28(1), 1-6.
Souza
M. L. R
Macedo-Viegas
E. M
Kronka
S. N
1999
Influência do método de filetagem e categorias de peso sobre
rendimento de carcaça, filé e pele da tilápia do Nilo (Oreochromis
niloticus)
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
28
1
1
6
Souza, M. L. R. & Maranhão, T. C. F. (2001). Rendimento de carcaça,
filé e subprodutos da filetagem da tilápia do Nilo, Oreochromis niloticus (L), em
função do peso corporal. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 23(4), 897-901.
Souza
M. L. R
Maranhão
T. C. F
2001
Rendimento de carcaça, filé e subprodutos da filetagem da tilápia do
Nilo, Oreochromis niloticus (L), em função do peso corporal
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
23
4
897
901
Tabata, Y. A. (2010). Biotecnologías aplicadas a truticultura. Revista
Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 21(3), 456-460.
Tabata
Y. A
2010
Biotecnologías aplicadas a truticultura
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias
21
3
456
460
Tawfik, M. S. (2009). Proximate composition and fatty acids profiles in
most common available fish species in Saudi market. Asian Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, 1(1), 50-57.
Tawfik
M. S
2009
Proximate composition and fatty acids profiles in most common
available fish species in Saudi market
Asian Journal of Clinical Nutrition
1
1
50
57
Autoria
Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Souza **Author for correspondence. E-mail: mlrsouza@uem.br
Departamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências
Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020-900, Maringá,
Paraná, Brazil.Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazilMaringá, Paraná, BrazilDepartamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências
Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020-900, Maringá,
Paraná, Brazil.
Elisabete Maria Macedo-Viegas
Centro de Aquicultura, Universidade Estadual
Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilJaboticabal, São, BrazilCentro de Aquicultura, Universidade Estadual
Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jener Alexandre Sampaio Zuanon
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Centro de Ciências
Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Universidade Federal de ViçosaBrazilViçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilDepartamento de Biologia Animal, Centro de Ciências
Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Regina Barbieri de Carvalho
Departamento de Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências
Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo,
Brazil. Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilJaboticabal, São Paulo, BrazilDepartamento de Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências
Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo,
Brazil.
Elenice Souza dos Reis Goes
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência de Alimentos,
Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná,
Brazil. Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazilMaringá, Paraná, BrazilPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciência de Alimentos,
Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná,
Brazil.
Departamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências
Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020-900, Maringá,
Paraná, Brazil.Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazilMaringá, Paraná, BrazilDepartamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências
Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020-900, Maringá,
Paraná, Brazil.
Centro de Aquicultura, Universidade Estadual
Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilJaboticabal, São, BrazilCentro de Aquicultura, Universidade Estadual
Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Centro de Ciências
Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Universidade Federal de ViçosaBrazilViçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilDepartamento de Biologia Animal, Centro de Ciências
Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Departamento de Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências
Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo,
Brazil. Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilJaboticabal, São Paulo, BrazilDepartamento de Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências
Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo,
Brazil.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência de Alimentos,
Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná,
Brazil. Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazilMaringá, Paraná, BrazilPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciência de Alimentos,
Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná,
Brazil.
Table 1:
Mean rates for weight of entire eviscerated fish (g), weight of fillet with
and without skin (g) and weight of fillet byproducts (g) of the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
Table 3:
Mean rates* of the chemical composition of fish fillet and whole
eviscerated fish in two weight categories of the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
table_chartTable 1:
Mean rates for weight of entire eviscerated fish (g), weight of fillet with
and without skin (g) and weight of fillet byproducts (g) of the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
table_chartTable 2:
Mean rates of yield in the two weight categories for the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
table_chartTable 3:
Mean rates* of the chemical composition of fish fillet and whole
eviscerated fish in two weight categories of the rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss).