Overview of Payments for Environmental Services scientific publications in Brazil

Guerra, Bartira Rodrigues; Verdasca, Stella; Almeida, Maria Rita Raimundo e; Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima

doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc0101r2vu27L1OA

Sumário Anterior Atual Seguinte

Sumário

Original Article • Ambient. soc. 27 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0101r2vu27L1OA linkcopy

Overview of Payments for Environmental Services scientific publications in Brazil

Panorama de publicaciones científicas sobre Pagos por Servicios Ambientales en Brasil

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

The Payment for Environmental Services (PES) has become a territorial management and nature conservation tool increasingly applied in Brazilian context. Thus, this article aimed to analyze and systematize information about the evolution of PES scientific publications in Brazil. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out. The results indicated the predominance of research focused on case studies, with geographic limits following the administrative shape and watershed, and the most studied ecosystem service was related to water. Thematic analysis contributed to a visualization of the objectives which guide current research and possible practical applications of this instrument. Therefore, it is recommended to expand rigorous, systematic, and counterfactual evaluations, as well as studies in the Pantanal, Cerrado, and Caatinga biomes.

Keywords:
Nature conservation; Economic Instruments; Payment for Environmental Services; Systematic Review; Ecosystem Services

	Type of information	Categories for data extraction
Data for Quantitative Analysis	Bibliographic data	Title
		Year
		Means of publication (journal or book)
	Geographic area of the study area of the scientific work	Biome; Watershed (WS); Administrative area (state or municipality); Country
	Research Institution(s)	Author(s)’s affiliation
	Research Institution(s)	Institution(s) location
	Approach of the scientific work	Case Study; Theoretical
	Approach of the scientific work method	Quantitative; Qualitative; Mixed
	Focus of the PES studied ^{1, 2}	Water; Carbon; Biodiversity; Landscape; Mixed; Non-specified ³
Data for Analysis by Themes	Aims and/or central subjects addressed in the scientific work	Institutional arrangement
		Effects of PES on physical-biological aspects
		Effects of PES on social-economic aspects
		Motivations
		Prioritization of areas for PES
		Valuation
		PES viability

location_on

ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade Anppas / Revista Ambiente e Sociedade - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com

rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[TFN1] Note: ¹ According to Wunder (2007).

[TFN2] ²
The classification related to the PES focus was made according to what was described by the authors of each paper.

[TFN3] ³
Documents classified as “Non-specified” were those that did not objectively describe which EcS were prioritized in the PES scheme studied or used as examples in the documents analyzed, and those not having as objects case studies or analysis of specific PES schemes.

[TFN4] Source: Elaborated by the authors.