| Social |
| % of population aged 15 or more and under 65 years old |
| % of population without any type of deficiency |
| % of population with access to fixed or mobile telephone |
| % of population with access to the Internet |
| Municipal Human Development Index |
| % of private households in nutritional safety situation |
| % of households covered by the Family Health Program |
| Vaccine coverage of children up to 4 years old |
| % of population that owns a television or radio set |
| Existence of Food and Nutrition Surveillance System |
| Economic |
| % of the population with a job (18 years old or older) |
| Inverse Gini Index |
| Number of commercial and service facilities out of the areas of high risk of disasters associated to natural and technological threats/ total commercial and service facilities |
| Number of industrial facilities out of the areas of high risk of disasters associated to natural and technological threats/ total industrial facilities |
| *Ratio between the municipal budget for the municipality risk management and the necessary resources (financial capacity of the municipality to face demands) |
| (*) % of households with comprehensive insurance policies including coverage of catastrophic events |
| (*) % of business facilities with comprehensive insurance policies including coverage of catastrophic events |
| (*) % of population not facing poverty or extreme poverty situation |
| Infrastructure |
| Existence of specific budget for infrastructure works to prevent or reduce disaster damages |
| % of municipal budget destined to infrastructure works to prevent or reduce disaster damages |
| Number of public health services per thousand inhabitants |
| Number of public hospital beds per thousand inhabitants |
| Existence of periodical safety assessment of schools and health units |
| Number of psycho-social support public services per thousand inhabitants |
| Number of places in adequate conditions for temporary shelter per thousand inhabitants (religious centers, schools, sports arenas, among others) |
| % of risk areas with monitoring and alert systems integrated to the organized community |
| Extension (km) of arterial roads relative to the total municipality area |
| Number of people employed in emergency services per thousand inhabitants |
| Existence of material resources/necessary and sufficient equipment for disaster response activities (own or by inter-municipal agreements). Ex: backhoes, boats, individual protection equipment, vehicles, among others |
| Number of TV and radio broadcasters/thousand inhabitants (with previous agreement to act as a communication channel in disaster prevention and response) |
| % of households not located in subnormal agglomerations |
| % of households connected to the public water supply network |
| % of households connected to the public sewage system or with sceptic tank |
| % of households served by solid waste collection |
| % of households with electric power |
| Existence of adequate final disposition of municipal urban solid waste |
| % of households with municipal license |
| (*) Number of health professionals with university degree working in public health facilities per thousand inhabitants |
| (*) Ratio between the number of public facilities (health center units, schools and nurseries) not located in risk areas and the total existing facilities |
| (*) Existence of public institutionalized shelter, administered by qualified professionals |
| (*) Number of roads to access the municipality per 100 km² |
| (*) Existence of rainwater drainage system |
| Environmental |
| % of territory with permeable surfaces |
| % of territory without exposed soil |
| % of territory with forest cover |
| % of territory with native vegetation cover |
| % of non-built and non-degraded territory |
| Water availability higher than 2,500 m³/inhabitant/year |
| % of population not living in flood risk areas |
| % of population not living in landslide risk areas |
| % of area of non-built floodplain (residential and commercial buildings, infrastructure) |
| % of population not living in erosion risk areas |
| % of non-occupied permanent preservation areas |
| % of population not living in technological risk areas |
| % of working population not working in areas with high-risk of disasters associated to natural and technological threats |
| (*) % of population not living in areas subject to drought |
| Institutional |
| Existence of institutionalization for mutual help between nearby municipalities |
| % of municipal budget specifically destined to response (direct action and humanitarian service) |
| % of municipal budget destined to post-disaster reconstruction relative to the total resource destined to disaster management |
| Number of educational programs for response and attendance to disasters per thousand inhabitants (non-formal education for the community - organized or not) |
| Existence of continued education and training programs for disaster risk reduction in schools (formal education) |
| Existence of risk mapping of disasters associated to natural threats - with yearly updating routine |
| Existence of risk mapping of disasters associated to technological threats - with yearly updating routine |
| Existence/maintenance of risks and vulnerabilities database |
| Availability to the population of risks and vulnerabilities database |
| Existence of geotechnical map for urbanization |
| Existence of communication of the municipality with analysis and disaster monitoring centers at regional, state and national levels |
| Existence of programs of continued training on DRR for public agents acting on protection and civil defense activities |
| Existence of regular simulation programs for response to disasters associated to natural threats |
| Existence of regular simulation programs for response to technological disasters |
| Existence of list of available resources for response (with updating routine), e.g. human resources, potential shelters, equipment and volunteers (per activity) |
| Existence of inspection routines of buildings in risk areas, with preventive intervention and population evacuation if necessary |
| Existence of mechanisms for control and inspection of land use to prevent occupation in areas susceptible to disaster |
| Existence of incentives for investments in DRR destined to low-income population living in susceptible areas |
| Existence of Special Social Interest Zone (specific legislation or integral part of the Master Plan) |
| Existence of public technical advisory for elaborating and approving projects for the construction and renovation of low-income family houses |
| Existence of credit lines/subsidized financing for acquisition and construction of low-income family houses |
| Existence of Building Code (specific legislation or integral part of the master plan) |
| Existence of Building Code that includes construction in hillside areas |
| Adherence to the Resilient Cities Program by creating an institutional structure to support the program implementation involving different government sectors |
| Existence of permanent channels for sharing information between the population and the professionals involved in prevention, response and reconstruction actions |
| Existence of plan for disaster waste management (or insertion in the municipal integrated plan of solid waste management) |
| Existence of legislation for zoning or land use and occupation (specific or an integral part of the master plan) |
| Existence of Municipal Contingency Plans for the major environmental risks of the municipality |
| Existence of Municipal Contingency Plans for the major technological risks of the municipality (including transportation of hazardous products) |
| Existence of Municipal Risk Reduction Plan |
| Existence of programs destined to income generation for citizens affected by disasters |
| Existence of housing program for reallocating low-income population in risk areas (reallocation in a social interest housing project, payment of social rent, indemnity of improvements, purchase of new housing, specific financial aid, among others) |
| Existence of Municipal Protection Coordination and Civil Defense |
| Existence of fire brigade unit |
| (*) Existence of updating routine for the integrated system for disaster information |
| (*) Existence of mechanisms to ensure the continuity of public policies for risk management during government changes |
| (*) Existence of municipal policies for climate change |
| (*) Existence of programs of temporary financial aid to citizens affected by disasters |
| (*) Management of donations foreseen in the municipality contingency Plans |
| (*) Inter-sectoral practices in the municipality risk management |
| Social capital |
| Number of community organizations that are partners of the civil defense in risk management per thousand inhabitants |
| Number of civil organizations per thousand inhabitants |
| Number of non-governmental organizations of social assistance per thousand inhabitants |
| Number of communal living centers per thousand inhabitants |
| Number of communal health agents per thousand inhabitants |
Source: 
Source: elaborated by the authors.