Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Persistence of S-metolachlor in the soil as affected by moisture content

Abstract

Background:

Several factors may affect herbicide fate in the soil, including soil moisture which can affect herbicide availability and degradation and mixture with other degradable herbicides.

Objective:

The objectives of this research were to evaluate the effects of soil moisture content and association with glyphosate on S-metolachlor persistence in lowland soil.

Methods:

Greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2011 and repeated in 2012 using a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement (3×3×5) with four replications. Factor A included three soil moisture contents (air-dried, water holding capacity, and saturated), and factor B included two herbicide combinations (S-metolachlor; S-metolachlor + glyphosate) plus an untreated check. Factor C included five intervals between application and sowing of the bioindicator species (rice): 150, 120, 90, 60, and 30 days before sowing. Herbicide injury, height in rice plants, and herbicide concentration in soil was evaluated.

Results:

S-metolachlor concentration and injury to rice were higher under dry soil conditions regardless of application timing. In contrast, rice injury was significantly lower in the soil saturated condition. The association with glyphosate did not affect S-metolachlor persistence in lowland soil.

Conclusion:

These results indicate that S-metolachlor exhibits shorter persistence under saturated soil conditions; and indicated that drought periods following S-metolachlor applications may increase carryover to sensitive crops planted in rotation.

Keywords:
Carryover; Chloroacetamide; Crop Rotation; Rice Paddy

1. Introduction

Crop rotation is an important tool for integrated weedy rice management in paddy fields (Avila et al., 2021Avila LA, Noldin JA, Mariot CHP, Massoni PFS, Fipke MV, Gehrke VR et al. Status of weedy rice (Oryza spp.) infestation and management practices in southern Brazil. Weed Sci. 2021;69(5):536-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2021.24
https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2021.24...
) and soybeans is a good alternative in these areas (Junkes et al., 2022Junkes GV, Avila LA, Kemmerich M, Gehrke VR, Fipke MV, Camargo ER. Imidazolinone herbicide dissipation in rice fields as affected by intermittent and continuous irrigation. Adv Weed Sci. 2022;40:1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:00006
https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022...
). Among the herbicides used in soybeans S-metolachlor is an selective herbicide (Adegas et al., 2022Adegas FS, Correia NM, Silva AF, Concenço G, Gazziero DLP, Dalazen G. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean and corn in Brazil: past, present, and future. Adv Weed Sci. 2022;40:1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:seventy-five004
https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022...
) and efficient to control weedy rice in pre-emergence or early-post emergence in tank mixture with glyphosate (Zemolin et al., 2014Zemolin CR, Avila LA de, Agostinetto D, Cassol GV, Bastiani M, Pestana R. Red rice control and soybean tolerance to S-metolachlor in association with glyphosate. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;5(13):2040-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.513219
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.513219...
; Bertucci et al., 2019Bertucci MB, Fogleman M, Norsworthy JK. Efficacy of fall-applied residual herbicides on weedy rice control in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Technol. 2019;33(3):441-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24...
).

S-metolachlor is a nonionic herbicide with residual activity in soil, controlling annual grasses and small-seeded broadleaf weeds and can be applied in preemergence (PRE), or early postemergence (EPOST) of tolerant crops (Szarka et al., 2022Szarka AZ, Grant S, Ghosh S, Hollingshead S, Mayer LC, Williams AP et al. S-Metolachlor volatilization from plants within a flux chamber. ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2022;2(5):980-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.2c00124
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.2c0...
). Its mode of action is based on the inhibition of very-long-chain fatty acids, interrupting shoot development in susceptible plants (Hwang et al., 2023Hwang JI, Norsworthy JK, Carvalho-Moore P, Barber LT, Butts TR, McElroy JS. Exploratory analysis on herbicide metabolism and very-long-chain fatty acid production in metolachlor-resistant palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.). J Agric Food Chem. 2023;71(15). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00196
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00196...
). S-metolachlor has moderate water solubility (480 mg L−1 at 25°C) and soil organic carbon sorption coefficient (Koc) of 200 ml g−1 with adsorption positively correlated with organic matter and clay content (Shaner, 2014Shaner DL, editor. Herbicide handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence: Weed Science Society of America; 2014.).

S-metolachlor’s half-life in soil ranges from 2.5 to 289 days (Rice et al., 2002Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Coats JR. Degradation and persistence of metolachlor in soil: Effects of concentration, soil moisture, soil depth, and sterilization. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21(12):2640-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216...
). Thus, there is a concern that S-metolachlor may carryover to sensitive crops, including rice planted in rotation. Herbicide persistence and carryover in soil may be affected by several factors such as physicochemical properties of molecule, soil characteristics, environmental conditions (Price, Price, 2020Price KJ, Li X, Price A. Cover crop response to residual herbicides in peanut-cotton rotation. Weed Technol. 2020;34(4):534-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.5
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.5...
), association between herbicides (Nunes and Vidal, 2008Nunes AL, Vidal RA. Persistência do herbicida S-metolachlor associado ao glyphosate ou paraquat em plantio direto. Planta Daninha. 2008;26(2):385-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000200015
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-8358200800...
) or even interactions between these factors. Among soil characteristics, moisture content influences herbicide availability in the soil solution, microbial activity, and other dissipation processes (Gehrke et al., 2021Gehrke VR, Fipke MV, Avila LA, Camargo ER. Understanding the opportunities to mitigate carryover of imidazolinone herbicides in lowland rice. Agriculture. 2021;11(4):1-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040299
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040...
). For example, under drought conditions, herbicide concentration in the soil solution is reduced due to an increase in adsorption to the soil particles reducing herbicide availability to biodegradation. In contrast, microbial activity can be impaired under low O2 availability such as flooded conditions (Gehrke et al., 2021Gehrke VR, Fipke MV, Avila LA, Camargo ER. Understanding the opportunities to mitigate carryover of imidazolinone herbicides in lowland rice. Agriculture. 2021;11(4):1-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040299
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040...
).

The persistence of residual herbicides in soil may be also affected by association with glyphosate. This hypothesis has been proposed that some microorganism use glyphosate as an additional nutrient source, increasing microbial biomass and activity, which typically results in greater mineralization of the residual herbicide (Nunes, Vidal, 2008Nunes AL, Vidal RA. Persistência do herbicida S-metolachlor associado ao glyphosate ou paraquat em plantio direto. Planta Daninha. 2008;26(2):385-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000200015
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-8358200800...
). Laboratory experiments showed that the association of fluometuron with glyphosate increased fluometuron mineralization and dissipation compared to fluometuron applied alone (Lancaster et al., 2008Lancaster SH, Haney RL, Senseman SA, Kenerley CM, Hons FM. Microbial degradation of fluometuron is influenced by Roundup WeatherMAX. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(18):8588-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w...
).

Several studies have reported S-metolachlor carryover and persistence in aerobic conditions. However, limited information is available concerning its persistence in poor drained areas such as lowland rice soils. Moreover, additional research is needed to determine whether glyphosate influences S-metolachlor dissipation in soil. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of moisture content and association with glyphosate on S-metolachlor dissipation in lowland soil.

2. Material and Methods

The study was carried out in greenhouse conditions at the Weed Science Research Group (CEHERB), at Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil (31°48’03"S 52°24’40"W). The experimental design was a randomized complete block in a factorial arrangement with four replications. Experiments were conducted in 2011 and repeated in 2012. Factor A included three soil moisture contents: air-dried (-100 kPa), water holding capacity (-33 kPa) and saturated conditions (0 kPa). Factor B were herbicide treatments: S-metolachlor at 1920 g a.i. ha−1 (Dual GoldTM, 960 g L−1); S-metolachlor at 1920 g a.i. ha−1 + glyphosate at 1860 g a.e. ha−1 (Roundup Original DITM, 370 g L−1, diammonium salt); and an untreated check. Factor C included five herbicide application timings (150, 120, 90, 60, and 30 days before rice sowing (DBS), which was used as a bioindicator crop). The rice crop was chosen as a bioindicator crop because it is a plant sensitive to S-metolachlor (Zhang et al., 2000Zhang W, Webster EP, Braverman MP. Effect of rotational crop herbicides on water- and dry-seeded Oryza sativa. Weed Sci. 2000;48(6):755-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0755:EORCHO]2.0.CO;2
https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)0...
). Soil water-holding capacity was determined using the chamber pressure method (Richards, 1965Richards LA. Physical condition of water in soil. In: American Society of Agronomy – ASA, editor. Methods of soil analysis: part 1 physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1965. p. 128-52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c8
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c...
) and moisture content was kept during the whole experiment by weighting each pot daily and replacing the amount of water needed to keep the soil moisture at the desired level. Herbicide rates used in the experiment were defined according to the labeled rate.

The soil used in the experiment was a sandy-loam collected from a rice paddy field without herbicide application for the past five growing seasons. Soil physicochemical properties are presented in Table 1. The experimental units were 2.0 L plastic pots filled with 1.2 kg of air-dried soil previously sieved in a 2 mm-mesh sieve. Prior to implementing the soil-moisture, moisture content was determined, and it was discounted from the total needed to reach the desired moisture content for each treatment. Herbicide were applied using a CO2-backpack sprayer coupled to a three-nozzle boom (Teejet XR11002) spaced at 50 cm and calibrated to deliver 150 L ha−1 of spray solution at 172 kPa.

Table 1
Physicochemical properties of soil used in the experimental

Moisture contents were adjusted immediately after herbicides applications and monitored daily by weighing the pots during the experimental period (Figure 1). Also, monthly average air temperature was recorded (Figure 2). The bioassay was performed using the rice variety IRGA 417 after herbicide application in the intervals of each treatment. Rice sowing was performed under a pre-germinated system. Soil was flooded one day prior to rice planting to standardize the moisture content between treatments.

Figure 1
Experiment scheme on cultivar IRGA 417 during 2011 and repeated in 2012
Figure 2
Monthly air temperature (maximum, mean and minimum) recorded from July to December in 2011 (A) and 2012 (B)

Herbicide injury to rice plants was estimated visually by grading from 0 to 100% where 0 = no herbicide injury symptoms and 100 = death of the rice plants (Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência de Plantas Daninhas, 1995Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência de Plantas Daninhas – SBCPD. [Procedures for installation, evaluation and analysis of herbicide experiments]. Londrina: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência de Plantas Daninhas; 1995. Portuguese.). Plant height was determined by measuring the length (cm) from the soil surface to the flag-leaf tip. Shoot dry matter was obtained by harvesting the rice plants near the soil surface. All the evaluations were performed at 28 days after the bioindicator crop establishment (DAE). Data were expressed based on a percent of untreated-check.

In 2011, soil samples were collected after 28 DAE to determine the herbicide concentration (mg kg−1) remaining in soil. Samples were analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) at the Laboratory of Pesticide Residues Analysis (LARP) at the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. The UHPLC-MS/MS system from Waters (USA) was equipped with Acquity binary pump and MS triple quadrupole Xevo TQ with electrospray ionization (ESI) source, opered in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. Neat pesticide standards of the compounds in study were from LGC (Wesel, Germany) with purity greater than 98%. Sample preparation was based on the method described by Martins et al. (2014)Martins GL, Friggi CA, Prestes OD, Vicari MC, Friggi DA, Adaime MB et al. Simultaneous LC-MS/MS determination of imidazolinone herbicides together with other multiclass pesticide residues in soil. Clean. 2014;42(10):1441-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300140
https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300140...
.

Data were tested for the assumptions of ANOVA, testing normality Shapiro Wilk test, homogeneity using Hartley’s test and error independence checked graphically, were compared using statistical program R Core Team using ExpDes.pt package (Ferreira et al., 2014Ferreira EB, Cavalcanti PP, Nogueira DA. ExpDes: an R Package for ANOVA and experimental designs. Appl Math. 2014;5:2952-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.519280.
https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.519280...
). Because of a lack of homogeneity of variances between data sets, data were not combined and are presented separately by years. All variables evaluated were transformed to root square equation √(x+0.5) and then subjected to ANOVA (p≤0.05). Ninety-five percentage confidence intervals were used to compare means between treatments. The graphics were performed using PRISM (GraphPad SoftwareTM, Boston, MA).

3. Results and Discussion

The association with glyphosate did not affect S-metolachlor persistence in this study (data not presented). However, an interaction between soil moisture content and application timing was observed for all variables evaluated. Greater herbicide injury occurred in dry soil condition with no rice establishment observed regardless of S-metolachlor application timing (Figure 3), demonstrating that even application of S-metolachlor 150 days prior to rice sowing did affect rice establishment. In 2011, under water holding capacity conditions, rice establishment was observed in the treatment at 90 days before rice seeding (DBS), however, injury was still similar to the injury observed in plants under dry soil condition. The lowest injuries were observed in the treatment with saturated soil from 90, 120, and 150 DBS (Figure 3A). However, the levels of injury were close to 80%.

Figure 3
Rice injury (%) at 28 days after plant establishment under three soil moisture contents (air-dried, water holding capacity and satured) and five application timings of S-metolachlor (150, 120, 90, 60, and 30 days before rice seeding) in season 2011 (A) and 2012 (B). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of four replications (n=4)

In 2012, there were differences in treatments under water holding capacity and soil saturated (Figure 3B). In the water holding capacity treatment, the levels of injury in the rice plants reduced as the time of herbicide application increased, being in the times 90, 120, and 150 DBS, with 32, 30 and 42%, respectively. In saturated soil, rice plants had the lowest injuries, presenting 59% injury at 60 DBS, and showing no injuries at 90, 120, and 150 DBS. In general, herbicide injury in water holding capacity and saturated soil were lower in 2012 than 2011 (Figures 3A, and 3B).

Results have shown that under field conditions, in the application of S-metolachlor in the fall-winter season, with saturated soil condition, weedy-rice injury of 44 and 84% was verified in the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons, respectively (Bertucci et al., 2019Bertucci MB, Fogleman M, Norsworthy JK. Efficacy of fall-applied residual herbicides on weedy rice control in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Technol. 2019;33(3):441-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24...
). The residual period of S-metolachlor was 149 days in 2016–2017 and 155 days in 2018–19 in saturated soil conditions, demonstrating carryover effect of S-metolachlor in this soil condition (Bertucci et al., 2019Bertucci MB, Fogleman M, Norsworthy JK. Efficacy of fall-applied residual herbicides on weedy rice control in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Technol. 2019;33(3):441-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24...
). In another study of field conditions, injury of rice plants from 9 to 30% was verified in the 2010–11 and 2011–12 season (Lawrence et al., 2018Lawrence BH, Bond JA, Edwards HM, Golden BR, Montgomery GB, Eubank TW et al. Effect of fall-applied residual herbicides on rice growth and yield. Weed Technol. 2018;32(5):526-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41...
). In this study, the residual period of S-metolachlor was 185 and 190 days (2010-11 and 2011–12 seasons, respectively), and soil moisture was close to the water holding capacity condition (Lawrence et al., 2018Lawrence BH, Bond JA, Edwards HM, Golden BR, Montgomery GB, Eubank TW et al. Effect of fall-applied residual herbicides on rice growth and yield. Weed Technol. 2018;32(5):526-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41...
). The data corroborate the results seen in this study in 2017 (Figure 3A), and demonstrate that there is variability in the soil herbicide residual, similar to the results of 2018 (Figure 3B). Environmental effects, such as temperature, may explain the difference found between the 2017 and 2018 harvests, where the average temperature was 16.4 and 18.3 °C (Figure 2).

Regarding plant height, there was no plant emergence at 30 DBS (2011 and 2012) and 60 DBS (2011) for all treatments (Figure 4). The behavior of plant height was similar to the injury variable, with the water holding capacity. Treatment presenting the smallest heights at 90, 120, and 150 DBS in relation to the treatment with saturated soil. In 2012, the plants in the treatment in saturated soil, presented heights like the treatments without herbicide at 90, 120, and 150 DBS. Corroborating with the results of this work, it was verified that the application of S-metolachlor (1420 or 2840 g a.i. ha−1) at 185 – 190 days after application in conditions of soil moisture close to water holding capacity, led to a reduction in height of 10% rice plants compared to non-treated plants (Lawrence et al., 2018Lawrence BH, Bond JA, Edwards HM, Golden BR, Montgomery GB, Eubank TW et al. Effect of fall-applied residual herbicides on rice growth and yield. Weed Technol. 2018;32(5):526-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41...
). This result was similar to those found in the 2012 season (Figure 4B), wherein the water holding capacity and soil saturated treatments, the reduction in height was approximately 10% at 90, 120, and 150 DBS.

Figure 4
Rice plant height (%) at 28 days after plant establishment under three soil moisture contents (air-dried, water holding capacity and satured) and five application timing of S-metolachlor (150, 120, 90, 60, and 30 days before rice seeding) in season 2011 (A) and 2012 (B). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of four replications (n=4)

S-metolachlor persistence was shorter in soil with greater moisture content (Figure 5). The concentration of S-metolachlor in drained soil did not vary over time, with an average concentration of 0.2 mg kg−1. These values corroborate with the results visualized in the other variables (Figure 3, and 4), where there was no emergence of rice plants. Under water holding capacity conditions, there is a reduction in S-metolachlor concentration levels, with an average concentration of 0.093 mg kg−1 in the periods of 30, 60, and 90 DBS, and an average concentration of 0.02 mg kg−1 at 120 and 150 DBS. The levels of the S-metolachlor herbicide explain the other analyzed variables (Figure 3-5), where there is no emergence of plants at 30 and 60 DBS, demonstrating that this herbicide concentration is still toxic for rice plants. Already at 120, and 150 DBS in the water holding capacity condition, despite the S-metolachlor concentration, there is already plant establishment.

Figure 5
S-metolachlor concentration (mg kg−1) in lowland soil collected 28 days after plant establishment under three soil moisture contents (air-dried, water holding capacity and satured) and five application timings of S-metolachlor (150, 120, 90, 60, and 30 days before rice seeding) in season 2011. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of four replications (n=4)

In saturated soil conditions, the lowest concentrations of S-metolachlor were verified in relation to the other soil moisture treatments. At 30 and 60 DBS the average concentration of S-metolachlor was 0.05 mg kg−1, an herbicide concentration sufficient to inhibit the emergence of rice plants (Figure 3). At 90, 120, and 150 DBS the concentration of S-metolachlor was 0.02 mg kg−1, a condition that allowed the establishment of plants, but with an injury level still close to 80%.

As S-metolachlor has moderate water solubility, the greater moisture content in saturated soil may have contributed to enhance S-metolachlor availability to microbial degradation and other dissipation processes. Research found that halogenated chemicals, such as S-metolachlor might be degraded by reductive dehalogenation under low oxygen conditions, involving a cometabolic process responsible to disrupt the C-Cl binding (Scheunert et al., 1992Scheunert I, Mansour M, Andreux F. Binding of organic pollutants to soil organic matter. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 1992;46(1-3):189-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319208027009
https://doi.org/10.1080/0306731920802700...
). As a rule, the products of this reaction exhibit lower toxicity and are easily degraded (Mikesell, Boyd, 1986Mikesell MD, Boyd SA. Complete reductive dechlorination and mineralization of pentachlorophenol by anaerobic microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986;52(4):861-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.52.4.861-865.1986
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.52.4.861-865...
).

The formation of bound residues of herbicide in soil might occur after the reductive dehalogenation process. In general, the formation rates of bound residues increase as the chloride content in the molecule decreases (Scheunert et al., 1985Scheunert I, Topp E, Schmitzer J, Klein W, Korte F. Formation and fate of bound residues of [14C]benzene and [14C]chlorobenzenes in soil and plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1985;9(2):159-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(85)90018-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(85)900...
). Evaluating S-metolachlor degradation and persistence, (Rice et al., 2002Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Coats JR. Degradation and persistence of metolachlor in soil: Effects of concentration, soil moisture, soil depth, and sterilization. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21(12):2640-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216...
) reported higher bound residues formation in saturated soil. Similar results were observed to dimethenamid herbicide in anaerobic condition, which approximately 50% was incorporated to the soil under bound residues form (Crawford et al., 2002Crawford JJ, Sims GK, Simmons FW, Wax LM, Freedman DL. Dissipation of the herbicide [14C]dimethenamid under anaerobic conditions in flooded soil microcosms. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(6):1483-91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010612i
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010612i...
).

Soil moisture influences the residual effect of S-metolachlor in the soil and consequently its carryover effect on rice plants. In saturated soil conditions in the field, the establishment of weedy rice plants was 58% in relation to nontreated plants, while in the field condition of soil without irrigation it was 24% in relation to nontreated plants with S-metolachlor (1,440 g ai ha−1) (Oliveira Neto et al., 2020Oliveira Neto AM, Guerra N, Noldin JA. Off-season management with herbicides as an alternative to reduce weed infestation in paddy rice production systems. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100082
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-8358202038...
).

S-metolachlor injury to rice was higher in the dry soil conditions. A reduction in soil moisture content causes an increase in herbicide adsorption, decreasing its availability to biodegradation (Christoffoleti et al., 2008Christoffoleti PJ, Ovejero RFL, Damin V, Carvalho SJP, Nicolai M. Comportamento dos herbicidas aplicados ao solo na cultura da cana-de-açúcar. Piracicaba: Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz da Universidade de São Paulo; 2008.). In addition, microbial activity may be reduced or even impaired in soils with low moisture content since microorganisms need water to keep their vital functions. In contrast, when water was added to the experimental units to standardize the soil moisture content and allow rice sowing, the herbicide adsorbed to the soil might have been desorbed to the soil solution, increasing injury potential to rice.

According to rice injury results, S-metolachlor persistence in soil was shorter in 2012 than 2011. Rice recovery started at 60 DBS in 2012 instead of 90 DBS in 2011. This reduction may have resulted from a faster degradation process caused by higher temperatures observed in 2012 compared to 2011 (Figure 2). Higher temperatures increase cyanobacteria and bacteria activity enhancing the ability to degrade chloride compounds, such as S-metolachlor. Thus, a stimulus on soil microorganism population might have contributed to faster dissipation and consequently shorter S-metolachlor persistence in 2012.

4. Conclusions

S-metolachlor exhibits shorter persistence under saturated soil conditions and it has no risk of carryover under these conditions. But under dry conditions, S-metolachlor showed to be very persistence with low degradation in the 150 days of the experiment. These results show us that during regular years with regular precipitation S-metolachlor carryover may not occur, but in years with low precipitation, with dry periods after S-metolachlor applications may increase herbicide persistence and the risk of carryover to sensitive crops planted in rotation.

  • Funding
    This research was funded by CAPES - financing code 001 for Marcus Vinícius Fipke; by CNPq for the Research Fellowship of Luis Antonio de Avila/N.Proc. 310830/2019-2 and for the Universal grant Universal 2018 - CNPq N.Proc. 426714/2018-0.

References

  • Adegas FS, Correia NM, Silva AF, Concenço G, Gazziero DLP, Dalazen G. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean and corn in Brazil: past, present, and future. Adv Weed Sci. 2022;40:1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:seventy-five004
    » https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:seventy-five004
  • Avila LA, Noldin JA, Mariot CHP, Massoni PFS, Fipke MV, Gehrke VR et al. Status of weedy rice (Oryza spp.) infestation and management practices in southern Brazil. Weed Sci. 2021;69(5):536-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2021.24
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2021.24
  • Bertucci MB, Fogleman M, Norsworthy JK. Efficacy of fall-applied residual herbicides on weedy rice control in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Technol. 2019;33(3):441-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.24
  • Christoffoleti PJ, Ovejero RFL, Damin V, Carvalho SJP, Nicolai M. Comportamento dos herbicidas aplicados ao solo na cultura da cana-de-açúcar. Piracicaba: Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz da Universidade de São Paulo; 2008.
  • Crawford JJ, Sims GK, Simmons FW, Wax LM, Freedman DL. Dissipation of the herbicide [14C]dimethenamid under anaerobic conditions in flooded soil microcosms. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(6):1483-91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010612i
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010612i
  • Ferreira EB, Cavalcanti PP, Nogueira DA. ExpDes: an R Package for ANOVA and experimental designs. Appl Math. 2014;5:2952-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.519280
    » https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.519280
  • Gehrke VR, Fipke MV, Avila LA, Camargo ER. Understanding the opportunities to mitigate carryover of imidazolinone herbicides in lowland rice. Agriculture. 2021;11(4):1-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040299
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040299
  • Hwang JI, Norsworthy JK, Carvalho-Moore P, Barber LT, Butts TR, McElroy JS. Exploratory analysis on herbicide metabolism and very-long-chain fatty acid production in metolachlor-resistant palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.). J Agric Food Chem. 2023;71(15). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00196
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00196
  • Junkes GV, Avila LA, Kemmerich M, Gehrke VR, Fipke MV, Camargo ER. Imidazolinone herbicide dissipation in rice fields as affected by intermittent and continuous irrigation. Adv Weed Sci. 2022;40:1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:00006
    » https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:00006
  • Lancaster SH, Haney RL, Senseman SA, Kenerley CM, Hons FM. Microbial degradation of fluometuron is influenced by Roundup WeatherMAX. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(18):8588-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
  • Lawrence BH, Bond JA, Edwards HM, Golden BR, Montgomery GB, Eubank TW et al. Effect of fall-applied residual herbicides on rice growth and yield. Weed Technol. 2018;32(5):526-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.41
  • Martins GL, Friggi CA, Prestes OD, Vicari MC, Friggi DA, Adaime MB et al. Simultaneous LC-MS/MS determination of imidazolinone herbicides together with other multiclass pesticide residues in soil. Clean. 2014;42(10):1441-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300140
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300140
  • Mikesell MD, Boyd SA. Complete reductive dechlorination and mineralization of pentachlorophenol by anaerobic microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986;52(4):861-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.52.4.861-865.1986
    » https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.52.4.861-865.1986
  • Nunes AL, Vidal RA. Persistência do herbicida S-metolachlor associado ao glyphosate ou paraquat em plantio direto. Planta Daninha. 2008;26(2):385-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000200015
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000200015
  • Oliveira Neto AM, Guerra N, Noldin JA. Off-season management with herbicides as an alternative to reduce weed infestation in paddy rice production systems. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100082
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100082
  • Price KJ, Li X, Price A. Cover crop response to residual herbicides in peanut-cotton rotation. Weed Technol. 2020;34(4):534-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.5
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.5
  • Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Coats JR. Degradation and persistence of metolachlor in soil: Effects of concentration, soil moisture, soil depth, and sterilization. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21(12):2640-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
  • Richards LA. Physical condition of water in soil. In: American Society of Agronomy – ASA, editor. Methods of soil analysis: part 1 physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1965. p. 128-52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c8
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c8
  • Scheunert I, Mansour M, Andreux F. Binding of organic pollutants to soil organic matter. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 1992;46(1-3):189-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319208027009
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319208027009
  • Scheunert I, Topp E, Schmitzer J, Klein W, Korte F. Formation and fate of bound residues of [14C]benzene and [14C]chlorobenzenes in soil and plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1985;9(2):159-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(85)90018-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(85)90018-1
  • Shaner DL, editor. Herbicide handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence: Weed Science Society of America; 2014.
  • Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência de Plantas Daninhas – SBCPD. [Procedures for installation, evaluation and analysis of herbicide experiments]. Londrina: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência de Plantas Daninhas; 1995. Portuguese.
  • Szarka AZ, Grant S, Ghosh S, Hollingshead S, Mayer LC, Williams AP et al. S-Metolachlor volatilization from plants within a flux chamber. ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2022;2(5):980-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.2c00124
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.2c00124
  • Zemolin CR, Avila LA de, Agostinetto D, Cassol GV, Bastiani M, Pestana R. Red rice control and soybean tolerance to S-metolachlor in association with glyphosate. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;5(13):2040-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.513219
    » https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.513219
  • Zhang W, Webster EP, Braverman MP. Effect of rotational crop herbicides on water- and dry-seeded Oryza sativa Weed Sci. 2000;48(6):755-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0755:EORCHO]2.0.CO;2
    » https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0755:EORCHO]2.0.CO;2

Edited by

Editor in Chief: Anderson Luis Nunes
Associate Editor: Kassio Ferreira Mendes

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    20 May 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    22 Aug 2023
  • Accepted
    19 Mar 2024
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas - SBCPD Rua Santa Catarina, 50, sala 1302 , 86010-470 - Londrina - Paraná / Brasil , +55 (51) 3308-6006 - Londrina - PR - Brazil
E-mail: sbcpd@sbcpd.org