Este estudo avaliou a expressão de torque em diferentes angulações de braquetes metálicos convencionais, autoligados ativos e passivos, com ou sem ligaduras metálicas, bem como a morfologia superficial e a composição química (%) dos braquetes. Os braquetes (prescrição Roth e slot de 0,022" x 0,028") foram fixados com cianoacrilato em cilindros acrílicos. Quinhentos segmentos de fios ortodônticos retangulares (0,019" x 0,025") foram dobrados e soldados (20 mm x 10 mm) e fixados aos braquetes com ou sem ligaduras metálicas (0,010") nos dez grupos experimentais (n=10). Os segmentos foram fixados em uma máquina de ensaio universal, e uma força vertical foi aplicada à extremidade livre do fio ortodôntico, promovendo um deslocamento de 10 mm. Os valores médios de torque (N·mm ) em ângulos de torque específicos de 0° a 25°, bem como os ângulos médios de torque (°) correspondentes a 5 N·mm e 20 N·mm, foram submetidos à ANOVA seguida do teste de Tukey (α = 0,05). O desenho e a composição química dos braquetes foram avaliados por MEV/EDS. A angulação e as medidas do slot foram determinadas utilizando o software ImageJ. Os braquetes autoligáveis passivos, com e sem ligaduras, apresentaram os menores ângulos de torque, estatisticamente inferiores ao dos outros grupos (p < 0,001). De modo geral, os clips dos braquetes são compostos predominantemente de níquel e titânio (NiTi). Braquetes autoligáveis passivos, com ou sem ligadura, apresentaram a melhor expressão de torque em 5 e 20 N·mm. As dimensões dos braquetes e dos arcos retangulares exercem maior influência na expressão do torque do que o tipo de ligadura utilizada. Clinicamente, esses achados sugerem que braquetes autoligáveis passivos podem favorecer uma expressão de torque mais precoce durante o tratamento ortodôntico.
Autoria
person Martha de Abreu Avila
person José Guilherme Neves
schoolDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
person Américo Bortolazzo Correr
schoolDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
person Milton Santamaria-Junior
person Eduardo Almada
schoolDepartment of Health, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Health, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
person Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho
schoolDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
person Ana Rosa Costa
schoolDepartment of Orthodontics, Fundação Hermínio Ometto - FHO, Araras, SP, Brazil Fundação Hermínio OmettoBrazilAraras, SP, BrazilDepartment of Orthodontics, Fundação Hermínio Ometto - FHO, Araras, SP, Brazil schoolDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Correspondence: Ana Rosa Costa, Avenida Maximiliano Baruto, 500, 13607-339 Araras, SP, Brasil. E-mail:
anarosacosta@fho.edu.br
anarosacosta@fho.edu.br
Responsible Editor
Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto
SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS
Department of Orthodontics, Fundação Hermínio Ometto - FHO, Araras, SP, Brazil Fundação Hermínio OmettoBrazilAraras, SP, BrazilDepartment of Orthodontics, Fundação Hermínio Ometto - FHO, Araras, SP, Brazil
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Department of Health, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, BrazilState University of CampinasBrazilPiracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Health, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Figuras | Tabelas
imageopen_in_new

imageFigure 1 Distribution of experimental groups. All conventional brackets were exclusively tested with metal ligatures. Ten groups were tested: (G1) RMW; (G2) BW; (G3) SLIW; (G4) SLIWt; (G5) IORW; (G6) IORWt; (G7) SLPW; (G8) SLPWt; (G9) SCW; and, (G10) SCWt. open_in_new

imageFigure 2 A. 0.019" x 0.025" rectangular archwire bent into a rectangular shape (20 mm x 10 mm) with two spot welds. B. Rectangular bracket-wire set ligated with a metal ligature. C. The set is fixed on the Instron universal testing machine. open_in_new

imageopen_in_new

imageFigure 3 Surface morphology (frontal view) of passive (SLP® and SmartClipTM), interactive (SLI® and In-Ovation® R), and conventional (Roth Max® and Balance®) self-ligating brackets at 20x magnification (SEM). open_in_new

imageFigure 4 Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) and percentage of chemical elements present in passive (SLP® and SmartClipTM) and interactive self-ligating bracket clips (In-Ovation® R and SLI®). open_in_new

imageFigure 5 Surface morphology (lateral view) of passive and interactive self-ligating brackets at 22x magnification. The white arrow indicates the bracket clip type. open_in_new

table_chartTable 1
Mean torque ± standard deviation (N·mm) at specified angles of 0° to 25° with 0.019” x 0.025” archwire for different metal bracket systems, with or without ligature.
| Groups | Torque (N·mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0o | 5° | 10° | 15° | 20° | 25° | |
| G1- Roth Max® with ligature (RMW) | 0.50 ± 0.02 aC | 1.76 ± 0.32 aC | 3.49 ± 1.08 cC | 6.05 ± 2.14 cC | 17.58 ± 3.73 cB | 31.14 ± 3.54 cA |
| G2- Balance® with ligature (BW) | 0.57 ± 0.06 aD | 3.44 ± 0.16 aCD | 4.97 ± 0.32 cCD | 7.61 ± 0.51 cC | 17.41 ± 0.75 cB | 26.38 ± 2.40 cA |
| G3- In-Ovation® R with ligature (IORW) | 0.48 ± 0.38 aD | 4.25 ± 0.50 aCD | 5.73 ± 0.42 bcCD | 9.48 ± 1.50 cC | 18.55 ± 2.00 cB | 26.43 ± 3.99 cA |
| G4- In-Ovation® R without ligature (IORWt) | 0.16 ± 0.04 aD | 0.48 ± 0.11 aD | 0.59 ± 0.13 cD | 7.08 ± 1.20 cC | 17.90 ± 0.93 cB | 29.17 ± 0.91 cA |
| G5- SLI® with ligature (SLIW) | 0.59 ± 0.12 aB | 1.64 ± 0.41 aB | 2.42 ± 0.54 cB | 3.76 ± 0.83 cB | 6.05 ± 1.64 dB | 12.67 ± 2.20 dA |
| G6- SLI® without ligature (SLIWt) | 0.15 ± 0.11 aD | 0.61 ± 0.26 aD | 3.06 ± 1.92 cD | 9.61 ± 4.73 cC | 18.45 ± 6.38 cB | 28.78 ± 7.07 cA |
| G7- SLP® with ligature (SLPW) | 0.28 ± 0.05 aA | 2.84 ± 0.14 aA | 3.78 ± 0.18 cA | 4.28 ± 0.25 cA | 4.68 ± 0.32 dA | 5.76 ± 0.87 eA |
| G8- SLP® without ligature (SLPWt) | 0.03 ± 0.01 aC | 0.13 ± 0.19 aBC | 1.19 ± 1.16 cBC | 3.47 ± 1.87 cABC | 5.78 ± 1.93 dAB | 8.34 ± 2.36 deA |
| G9- SmartClipTM with ligature (SCW) | 0.74 ± 0.20 aE | 6.37 ± 1.84 aDE | 12.08 ± 5.09 abD | 19.73 ± 8.74 bC | 30.07 ± 8.16 bB | 41.80 ± 8.25 bA |
| G10- SmartClipTM without ligature (SCWt) | 0.88 ± 0.83 aE | 5.71 ± 3.88 aE | 16.19 ± 4.60 aD | 28.74 ± 4.95 aC | 41.46 ± 5.53 aB | 51.58 ± 4.50 aA |
-
Conventional brackets - Roth Max® (Morelli) and Balance® (Dentsply GAC); Interactive self-ligating brackets - In-Ovation® R (Dentsply GAC) and SLI® (Morelli); Passive self-ligating brackets - SLP® (Morelli) (Morelli) and SmartClipTM (3M Unitek). Significant differences were detected for bracket type (p<0.000) and angle (p<0.000). The interaction between factors was significant (p < 0.001). Different lowercase letters in the column and uppercase letters in the row indicate statistically significant differences (α = 0.05).
table_chartTable 2
Mean torque angle (°) ± standard deviation required to achieve torque expression of 5 N·mm and 20 N·mm with 0.019” x 0.025” arrchwire for the different bracket groups.
| GROUPS | Torque Angle (°) | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 N·mm | 20 N·mm | |
| G1- Roth Max® with ligature (RMW) | 13.4 ± 2.6 bc | 20.8 ± 2.9 a |
| G2- Balance® with ligature (BW) | 10.2 ± 0.8 c | 21. 2 ± 0.4 a |
| G3- In-Ovation® R with ligature (IORW) | 7.0 ± 1.2 cd | 21.2 ± 1.6 a |
| G4- In-Ovation® R without ligature (IORWt) | 14.2 ± 0.4 bc | 21. 2 ± 0.4 a |
| G5- SLI® with ligature (SLIW) | 18.2 ± 2.3 ab | * |
| G6- SLI® without ligature (SLIWt) | 12.4 ± 2.9 c | 20.8 ± 2.9 a |
| G7- SLP® with ligature (SLPW) | 22.6 ± 2.3 a | * |
| G8- SLP® without ligature (SLPWt) | 18.4 ± 4.3 ab | * |
| G9- SmartClipTM with ligature (SCW) | 4.0 ± 2.9 de | 15.2 (4.4) b |
| G10- SmartClipTM without ligature (SCWt) | 4.6 ± 2.1 d | 11.6 (1.7) b |
| ukey’s test | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
-
Conventional brackets - Roth Max® (Morelli) and Balance® (Dentsply GAC); Interactive self-ligating brackets - In-Ovation® R (Dentsply GAC) and SLI® (Morelli); Passive self-ligating brackets - SLP® (Morelli) (Morelli) and SmartClipTM (3M Unitek).
-
* Requires mean angles greater than 27° (largest angle calculated with Instron formula and records) for torque expression equivalent to 20 N·mm. Values with different lower-case letters in the same column differ statistically (p < 0.05).
Como citar
location_on
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
Av. do Café, S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirão Preto SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 16) 3602-3982, Fax: (55 16) 3633-0999 -
Ribeirão Preto -
SP -
Brazil
E-mail: bdj@forp.usp.br
E-mail: bdj@forp.usp.br
rss_feed
Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Versão para download de PDF
Artigos relacionados
Lista de links para artigos relacionados. Os links abrem em nova aba.
Versões e tradução automática
Escolha a versão original do texto ou utilize um serviço de tradução automática.
Versão original do texto
Como citar
Escolha um formato para exportar ou selecione um estilo de citação. O conteúdo abaixo pode ser atualizado após a seleção.
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail