Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Effect of ventilation on systemic blood flow evaluated by echodopplercardiography

Abstract

Systemic blood flow (Q) was measured by echodopplercardiography in 5 normal young adult males during apnea, eupnea and tachypnea. Measurements were made in a recumbent posture at 3-min intervals. Tachypnea was attained by doubling the respiratory frequency at eupnea at a constant tidal volume. An open glottis was maintained during apnea at the resting respiratory level. The Q values were positively correlated with the respiratory frequency, decreasing from eupnea to apnea and increasing from eupnea to tachypnea (P<0.05). These data demonstrate that echodopplercardiography, a better qualified tool for this purpose, confirms the positive and progressive effects of ventilation on systemic blood flow, as suggested by previous studies based on diverse technical approaches

ventilation and circulation; apnea and systemic blood flow; tachypnea and systemic blood flow; cardiac output


Braz J Med Biol Res, May 1997, Volume 30(5) 689-691 (Short Communication)

Effect of ventilation on systemic blood flow evaluated by echodopplercardiography

M. Rigatto and A.F.F. Pinotti

Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

Text

References

Correspondence and Footnotes Correspondence and Footnotes Correspondence and Footnotes

Abstract

Systemic blood flow (Q) was measured by echodopplercardiography in 5 normal young adult males during apnea, eupnea and tachypnea. Measurements were made in a recumbent posture at 3-min intervals. Tachypnea was attained by doubling the respiratory frequency at eupnea at a constant tidal volume. An open glottis was maintained during apnea at the resting respiratory level. The Q values were positively correlated with the respiratory frequency, decreasing from eupnea to apnea and increasing from eupnea to tachypnea (P<0.05). These data demonstrate that echodopplercardiography, a better qualified tool for this purpose, confirms the positive and progressive effects of ventilation on systemic blood flow, as suggested by previous studies based on diverse technical approaches.

Key words: ventilation and circulation, apnea and systemic blood flow, tachypnea and systemic blood flow, cardiac output

The objective of the present study was to analyze the effect of varying rates of breathing on systemic blood flow as measured by echodopplercardiography. An increase in systemic blood flow (Q) by ventilation has been suggested or documented by different methods for measuring cardiac output (1-10). The echodopplercardiographic method to measure Q has not yet been employed. This method has interesting qualifications for this purpose: it does not interfere with breathing or the ventilatory airways, as the Fick principle and the foreign gas methods do, it is not limited in time by blood pulmonary recirculation, as the foreign gas methods are, it is not an invasive method, as the Fick and the dilution methods are, it is more reliable than the transthoracic electrical impedance method, and it can be utilized during apnea, when the Fick and the foreign gas methods cannot.

Five normal resting adult males, ranging in age from 24 to 37 years (mean, 31.8), 167 to 185 cm in height (mean, 176.8) and 72 to 86 kg in weight (mean, 78.6), were studied in a recumbent posture at eupnea, tachypnea and apnea. Tidal volume was kept constant from eupnea to tachypnea. Apnea was held for 30 s at functional residual levels with an open glottis. Ventilation was monitored with a respiration monitoring system (No. 120-0162-0001, Echo Ultrasound, Reedsville, PA). Systemic blood flow was measured by bidimensional echodopplercardiographic (HP - Sonos 1000, Hewlett Packard, Andover, MS) determination of the diameters of the left ventricle outflow, allowing the calculation of the cross-sectional area of the aortic annulus, and the beat-by-beat integration of the blood flow velocity profile at this level. The multiplication of the aortic cross-sectional area by the integrated flow led to the beat-by-beat ventricular stroke volume. The mean stroke volume of 10 successive heart beats was then multiplied by the mean heart rate during this period to produce cardiac output (systemic blood flow) (11). An electrocardiographic tracing was recorded during each run. A 3-min interval was allowed between runs.

Considering the non-invasive, routine diagnostic techniques used in the study, no restriction was raised to it by the Hospital Ethics Committee. Oral informed consent was obtained from each subject.

For the whole series, the respiratory frequency (RF) was 13.4 ± 1.6 mpm (mean ± SEM) at eupnea and 24.0 ± 3.6 mpm at tachypnea. Heart rate (HR) was 61.8 ± 4.5 bpm at apnea, 64.0 ± 4.9 at eupnea and 70.6 ± 5.3 at tachypnea. Stroke volume was 76.1 ± 1.3 ml at apnea, 81.5 ± 4.7 at eupnea and 81.6 ± 4.3 at tachypnea. Systemic blood flow (cardiac output; Q) was 4.64 ± 0.17 l/min at apnea, 5.15 ± 0.15 at eupnea and 5.67 ± 0.14 at tachypnea (Table 1).

Figure 1 shows a positive correlation between systemic blood flow and respiratory frequency. When RF was reduced from eupnea to apnea, Q was reduced by 10%. By doubling RF from eupnea to tachypnea, Q was increased by a similar magnitude. The positive correlation between ventilation and systemic blood flow, as shown in the present study by echodopplercardiography, is in agreement with previous studies (5-10) in which other methods for the determination of cardiac output were used, including the only other study which considered changes from eupnea to apnea (9).

Figure 1
- Changes of systemic blood flow (Q) with respiratory frequency (RF) at apnea, eupnea and tachypnea measured by echodopplercardiography. Each line drawing corresponds to one subject.

Address for correspondence: M. Rigatto, Caixa Postal 5051, 90041-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Presented at the XI Annual Meeting of the Federação de Sociedades de Biologia Experimental, Caxambu, MG, Brasil, August 21-24, 1996. Research supported by CNPq (No. 305361/76-CL) and FAPERGS (No. 93.0319.6). Received April 19, 1996. Accepted March 7, 1997.

  • 1. Armitage GH & Arnott WM (1949). Effect of voluntary hyperpnea on pulmonary blood flow. Journal of Physiology, 109: 64-69.
  • 2. Baxter IGM & Pearce JM (1951). Simultaneous measurements of pulmonary arterial flow and pressure using condenser manometers. Journal of Physiology, 115: 410-429.
  • 3. Bevegĺrd S, Jonsson B, Karlöf I & Aström H (1967). Circulatory effects of increased ventilation at rest in recumbent and head-up tilted position. Acta Medica Scandinavica, 472 (Suppl): 59-67.
  • 4. Jager SDE (1879). Über den Blutstrom in den Lungen. Archive für die Gesamte Physiologie, 20: 426-508.
  • 5. Krogh A & Lindhard J (1912). Measurements of the blood flow through the lungs of man. Skandinavian Archives of Physiology, 27: 100-125.
  • 6. Macklin CC (1945). Length and width changes in the pulmonary arterial system of rabbits in passing from the stage of expiration to that of collapse as revealed by roentgenography. Diseases of the Chest, 11: 590-595.
  • 7. Rigatto M, Turino GM & Fishman AP (1961). Determination of the pulmonary capillary blood flow in man. Circulation Research, 9: 945-962.
  • 8. Rigatto M (1967). Mass spectrometry in the study of pulmonary circulation. Bulletin de Physio-Pathologie Respiratoire, 3: 473-486.
  • 9. Rigatto M, Fuller H & Inman M (1993). Apnea, tachypnea and systemic blood flow. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 61 (Suppl II): 2: 39 (Abstract).
  • 10. Thompson Jr HK, Berry JN & McIntosch HD (1962). Circulatory responses to hyperventilation and exercise in normal subjects. American Heart Journal, 63: 106-114.
  • 11. Lewis JF, Lawrence CK, Nelson JG, Limacher MC & Quinones MA (1984). Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation, 70: 425-431.
  • Correspondence and Footnotes

  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      13 Oct 1998
    • Date of issue
      May 1997

    History

    • Accepted
      07 Mar 1997
    • Received
      19 Apr 1996
    Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto SP Brazil, Tel. / Fax: +55 16 3315-9120 - Ribeirão Preto - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: bjournal@terra.com.br