Workers oral health: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Adults and elderly usually present an expressive tooth loss in household epidemiologic studies. Few studies were found to report oral health conditions in economically active adults. AIM: To describe the oral health status of adult workers in an extended range age (20-64 years old) of a supermarket chain. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in a company in the state of São Paulo. A total of 386 workers aged 20 to 64 years old were examined following the guidelines recommended by the World Health Organization (1997) with respect to caries, treatment needs for caries, and need and use of dental prostheses. Age was stratified into groups for analysis. A descriptive analysis was performed and tooth loss rate was calculated. Kruskal Walis and Tukey's tests were used for the evaluation of differences in DMTF and chi-square test was used for treatment needs. RESULTS:The mean DMFT was 14.6 (± 8.3), and differences were found among the 3 groups, mainly due to missing teeth. DMFT was 10.8 (±6.95) in the 20-34year-old group, 19.6 (±6.13) in the 35-44-year-old group and 22.1(±7.32) in the 45-64-yearold group. Significant differences in tooth loss rate were observed between the age groups (tooth loss rate ranged from 18% to 81%). Among the adults, 53.5% had treatment needs for caries. CONCLUSIONS: The younger adult workers in this study showed better oral conditions and an increase in tooth loss was observed in the older individuals. Considering common risk approach, dentistry should work together with health promotion for the studied population of workers in order to meet the oral treatment needs and prevent new tooth losses.

adults; occupational health; epidemiology; oral health

• ¹
  Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century – the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003; 31 (suppl.1): 3-24.
• ²
  Marcenes W, Kasseabaum NJ, Barnabé E, Flaxman A, Naghavi M, Lopez A, et al. Global Burden of oral conditions in 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. J Dent Res. 2013; 92: 592-7.
• ³
  Ministry of Health of Brazil. Epidemiological Survey of Oral Health: Brazil, Urban Zone (in Portuguese). Brasília: Centro de Documentação do Ministério da Saúde 1988, 137p. (Série C: estudos e projetos, 4).
• ⁴
  Ministry of Health of Brazil. SB Brasil 2003: Oral Health Conditions in the Brazilian Population 2002/2003: Main results. Brasília: Ministry of Health, 2004. 68 p.
• ⁵
  Ministry of Health of Brazil. SB Brasil 2010: Oral Health Conditions in the Brazilian Population 2010/2011: Main results. (in Portuguese) Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2012. 92 p. (Série C. Projetos, Programas e Relatórios)._2010.pdf.
• ⁶
  Narvai PC & Frazão P. Oral Health in Brazil: More than the roof of the mouth (in Portuguese), Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz, 148 p.
• ⁷
  Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Accessed in January 11, 2009. Available from www.ibge.gov.br
  » link
• ⁸
  World Health Organization, Oral heath surveys: basic methods. 4th Ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
• ⁹
  São Paulo State Health Department. University of São Paulo. Oral Health Conditions in the State of São Paulo em 2002 (in Portuguese). São Paulo: Oral Health Center - 22. Secretary of Health of State of São Paulo, 80p.
• ¹⁰
  World Health Organization. Basic methods. Geneve: World Health Organization; 1987.
• ¹¹
  Frias AC, Antunes JLF, Narvai PC. Precision and validity of epidemiological surveys of oral health: dental caries in the city of São Paulo in 2002 (in Portuguese). Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2004; 7: 144-54.
• ¹²
  Dunning JM, Klein H. Saving teeth among home office employees of the metropolitan life insurance company. J Am Dent Assoc. 1944; 31:1632-42.
• ¹³
  White DA, Tsakos G, Pitts NB, Fuller E, Douglas GVA, Murray GG, et al. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: Common oral health conditions and their impact on the population. Br Dent J. 2012; 213: 567-72.
• ¹⁴
  Elani HW, Harper S, Allison PJ, Bedos C, Kaufman JS. Socio-economic inequalities and oral health in Canada and the United States. J Dent Res. 2012; 91: 865-70.
• ¹⁵
  Watt RG. Emerging theories into the social determinants of health: implications for oral health promotion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002; 30: 241-7.
• ¹⁶
  Silva DD, Rihs LB, Sousa MRL. Factors associated to the maintenance of teeth in adults in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Reports in Public Health. 2009; 25: 2407-18.
• ¹⁷
  Batista MJ, Rihs LB, Sousa MLR. Risk indicators for tooth loss in adult workers. Braz Oral Res. 2012; 26: 390-6.
• ¹⁸
  Antunes JLF, Narvai PC. Dental health policies in Brazil and their impact on health inequalities. Rev Saude Publica. 2010, 44: 360-5.
• ¹⁹
  Lacerda JT, Simionato EM, Peres KG, Peres MA, Traebert J, Marcenes W. Dental pain as the reason for visiting a dentist in a Brazilian adult population. Rev Saude Publica. 2004; 38:453-8.
• ²⁰
  Elderton RJ. Preventive (Evidence-Based) approach to quality general dental care. Med Princ Pract. 2003; 12(Suppl 1): 12-21.
• ²¹
  Doughan B, Kassak K. Oral health status and treatment needs of 35-44year olds adults in Lebanon. Int Dent J. 2000; 50: 395-9.
• ²²
  Featherstone JDB, Singh S, Curtis DA. Caries risk assessment and management for the prosthodontic patient. J Prosthod. 2011; 20: 2-9.
• ²³
  Hodbell M, Petersen PE, Clarkson J, Johnson N. Global goals for oral health 2020. Int Dent J, 2003; 53: 285-8.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  28 Oct 2013
• Date of issue
  Sept 2013

History

• Received
  28 Apr 2013
• Accepted
  31 July 2013