Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

A survey on dental undergraduates' knowledge of oral radiology

Abstract

Dentists' incorrect behavior with regards to Oral Radiology, as reported in the literature, has been related to inadequate training of undergraduates. AIM: This study assessed dental undergraduates' knowledge of Oral Radiology. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 30 questions pertaining to three domains - General Principles, Radiobiology/Radioprotection and Technique/Interpretation - was used as data collection instrument. A total of 195 students answered the questionnaires. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between second-, third- and fourth-year students (p>0.05) when the whole questionnaire and the General Principles domain (p>0.05) were considered. The Technique/Interpretation domain presented a borderline statistical significance level (p=0.051), with more correct answers attributed to second-year students. A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was seen for the Radiobiology/Radioprotection domain, in which the fourth-year students performed better. CONCLUSIONS: Dental undergraduates' knowledge of Oral Radiology did not increase or decrease significantly comparing the undergraduate years. However, with the exception of the Technique/Interpretation domain, students of more advanced undergraduate years answered more correctly the questions. Nevertheless, the Technique/Interpretation domain should be reinforced throughout the undergraduate course.

dental education; radiology; dental radiography; radiation protection; questionnaires


  • 1
    Aps JK. Flemish general dental practitioners' knowledge of dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39: 113-8.
  • 2
    Jacobs R, Vanderstappen M, Bogaerts R, Gijbels F. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33: 334-9.
  • 3
    Shahab S, Kavosi A, Nazarinia H, Mehralizadeh S, Mohammadpour M, Emami M. Compliance of Iranian dentists with safety standards of oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 41: 159-64.
  • 4
    Svenson B, Söderfeldt B, Gröndahl HG. Attitudes of Swedish dentists to the choice of dental X-ray film and collimator for oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25: 157-61.
  • 5
    Svenson B, Söderfeldt B, Gröndahl HG. Analysis of dentists' attitudes towards risks in oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25: 151-6.
  • 6
    Tosoni GM, Campos DM, Silva MR. Frequency and quality management of intraoral radiographic examinations in private dental practices. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2003; 32: 25-9.
  • 7
    Melo MF, Melo SL. Radioprotection in dentistry offices. Cienc Saude Colet. 2008; 13(Suppl 2): 2163-70.
  • 8
    Neves FS, Vasconcelos TV, Bastos LC, Góes LA, Freitas DQ. Attitudes of dentists in relation to radiological protection, according to Brazilian law. Rev Odontol Bras Central. 2010; 19: 301-5.
  • 9
    Hendricson WD, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, Chmar JE, Cole JR, George MC et al. Educational strategies associated with development of problem-solving, critical thinking, and self-directed learning. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70: 925-36.
  • 10
    Brazil. Ministry of Education. National Council of Education. Resolution CNE/CES. Board of Higher Education. National Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Dentistry. Official Federal Gazette; 2002 Mar 4.
  • 11
    Haden NK, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, Chmar JE, Cole JR, George MC et al. The dental education environment. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70: 1265-70.
  • 12
    Linjawi AI, Walmsley AD, Hill KB. Online discussion boards in dental education: potential and challenges. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012; 16: e3 - 9.
  • 13
    Ferreira NP, Batista MJ, Sousa MLR, Cury JA. Validation of the Questionnaire about Knowledge Cariology [in portuguese]; 2012 [in press].
  • 14
    Ruprecht A. The status of oral and maxillofacial radiology worldwide in 2007. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38: 98-103.
  • 15
    Olapiriyakul K, Scher JM. A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. Internet Higher Educ. 2006; 9: 287-301.
  • 16
    Handal B, Groenlund C, Gerzina T. Dentistry students' perceptions of learning management systems. Eur J Dent Educ. 2010; 14: 50-4.
  • 17
    Neuhaus KW, Schegg R, Krastl G, Amato M, Weiger R, Walter C. Integrate learning in dentistry: baseline data and first evaluation at the Dental School of Basel. Eur J Dent Educ. 2008; 12: 163-9.
  • 18
    Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K, Spreckelsen C. Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009; 14: 725-38.
  • 19
    Kavadella A, Tsiklakis K, Vougiouklakis G, Lionarakis A. Evaluation of a blended learning course for teaching oral radiology to undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012; 16: e88-95.
  • 20
    Kumar V, Gadbury-Amyot CC. A case-based and team-based learning model in oral and maxillofacial radiology. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76: 330-7.
  • 21
    Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Tsitrou E, Cannavina G. A blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: follow-up evaluation. J Dent Educ. 2008; 72: 1048-57.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    19 July 2013
  • Date of issue
    June 2013

History

  • Received
    25 Feb 2013
  • Accepted
    11 June 2013
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP Avenida Limeira, 901, cep: 13414-903, Piracicaba - São Paulo / Brasil, Tel: +55 (19) 2106-5200 - Piracicaba - SP - Brazil
E-mail: brjorals@unicamp.br