Cost analysis of materials used in Class III, IV and V composite resin restorations

Eduardo Hebling Rodolfo Luís Gonçalves Dagmar de Paula Queluz About the authors

Abstract

AIM: To assess the total cost of direct and indirect materials used in Class III, IV and V composite resin direct restorations. METHODS: The calculation of costs was based on the method of variable costing system. A list of the materials was obtained by a panel of experts and based on the excellence standards established in the literature for dental team treatment. The cost considered for each material was obtained from an average of the costs found in the regional supplier market (US$1.0=R$2.12). The repetitions were obtained from Class III, IV and V cavities in artificial pre-manufactured teeth. The cavities were classified as shallow, medium and deep. The materials were quantified for each type of preparation. Seven brands of composite resins were used and weighed on a precision scale after their insertion in each cavity. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and non-parametric Friedman's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean costs were US$7.96 (R$16.88) for Class III restoration, US$8.13 (R$17.24) for Class IV, and US$7.84 (R$16.62) for Class V. There was statistically significant difference in cost between the types of cavities and depth classification. The small cost difference among the different resin brands resulted in no statistically significant differences in the total cost of the restorations. CONCLUSIONS: The costs obtained in this survey may be used in the calculation of the final cost of restorative procedures, helping in the management of public or private dental care services.

dentistry; costs and cost analysis; dental materials; composite resins


  • 1
    Mackenzie L, Parmar D, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Direct anterior composites: a practical guide. Dent Update. 2013;40:297-9.
  • 2
    Wilson NH, Dunne SM, Gainsford ID. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 2: resin composite systems. Int Dent J. 1997;47:185-93.
  • 4
    Shim JK, Siegel JG. Modern cost management and analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Barron's Education Series; 2009. 376 p.
  • 5
    Creese AL, Packer D. Cost analysis in primary health care: a training manual for programme managers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994. 147 p.
  • 6
    Gapenski LC. Healthcare Finance: An Introduction to Accounting and Financial Management. 5th ed. Portland: Health Administration Press; 2011. 724 p.
  • 7
    Logan EM. Dentistry's business secrets: proven growth strategies for your new or existing practice. Bloomington: Authorhouse; 2011. 439 p.
  • 8
    Donaldson C. Economic evaluation in dentistry: an ethical imperative? Dent Update. 1998;25:260-4.
  • 9
    Bader J, Ismali A, Clarkson J. Evidence-based dentistry and the dental research community. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1480-3.
  • 10
    Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J. 1996;46:126-30.
  • 11
    Mjor IA, Burke FJ et al. The relative cost of different restorations in the UK. Br Dent J. 1997;182:286-9.
  • 12
    Miller CH, Palenik CJ. Infection control and management of hazardous materials for the dental team. Saint Louis: Mosby; 2010. 365 p.
  • 13
    Bonehill JA. Managing health and safety in the dental practice: a practical guide. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. 264 p.
  • 14
    Lemay CA, Cashman SB, McDonald A, Graves JR. A new approach to ensuring oral health care for people living with HIV/AIDS: the dental case manager. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E158.
  • 15
    Thomas MV, Jarboe G, Frazer RQ. Infection control in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:609-28.
  • 16
    Dalli M, Çolak H, Mustafa Hamidi M. Minimal intervention concept: a new paradigm for operative dentistry. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3:167-75.
  • 17
    Robinson S, Nixon PJ, Gahan MJ, Chan MF. Techniques for restoring worn anterior teeth with direct composite resin. Dent Update. 2008;35:551-2.
  • 18
    Marinozzi S, Corbellini G, Ottolenghi L, Ripari F, Pizzuti A, Pezzetti M, et al. From Nuremberg to bioethics: an educational project for students of dentistry and dental prosthesis. Ann Stomatol. 2013;4:138-41.
  • 19
    Likert R. A Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:1-55.
  • 20
    Siegel SC, Von Fraunhofer JA. Dental burs: what bur for which application? A survey of dental schools. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:258-63.
  • 21
    Siegel SC, Von Fraunhofer JA. Assessing the cutting efficiency of dental diamond burs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:763-72.
  • 22
    Gureckis KM, Burgess JO, Schwartz RS. Cutting effectiveness of diamond instruments subjected to cyclic sterilization methods. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:721-6.
  • 23
    Hebling E, Trentin EF. Cost analysis of materials used in composite resin direct posterior dental restorations. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2013;42:144-51.
  • 24
    Brazil. Brazilian Dentistry Council. Reference values for dental procedures. Brasília: Brazilian Dentistry Council; 2012.
  • 25
    Brazil. Health Ministry. [Operational Guidelines: pacts by life, in defense of the SUS and management]. 2nd ed. Brasilia: Health Ministry; 2006. Portuguese.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    31 Jan 2014
  • Date of issue
    Dec 2013

History

  • Received
    02 Aug 2013
  • Accepted
    25 Nov 2013
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP Avenida Limeira, 901, cep: 13414-903, Piracicaba - São Paulo / Brasil, Tel: +55 (19) 2106-5200 - Piracicaba - SP - Brazil
E-mail: brjorals@unicamp.br
Accessibility / Report Error