Abstract
A methodology for ionpolymer interaction estimation is discussed in the present work. This method is based on the inversion of experimental spin echo NMR data using Hopfield neural network to retrieve transverse relaxation time distributions. The adopted model systems consist of aqueous solutions of poly (ethylene oxide), molar mass 1500, 4000 and 35000 γ mol1 and sodium nitroprusside (NP) at different concentrations. Dipolar interaction is investigated in this work through the reduction in the transverse relaxation time and increase in the area under the distribution curves of the PEO protons which presented a linear correlation with the NP concentration. Neural network results were compared with the Simplex optimization procedure and experimental NMR values. The proposed methodology is robust, stable, non restrictive in relation to the system and more efficient to handle experimental data.
Interaction ionpolymer; Illposed inverse problem; Neural network; Transverse relaxation time distribution
Ionpolymer interaction analysis: an inversion of NMR spin echo experimental data
Rita C.O. Sebastião^{I,}^{*}; João P. Braga^{I}; Luciano S. Virtuoso^{II}; Karla A.S.F. Vello^{II}; Carlos N. Pacheco^{III}; Luis H.M. da Silva^{IV}
^{I}Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Química, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, BHMG, 31270901
^{II}Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Centro de Ciências Exatas, Curso de Química, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, AlfenasMG, 37130000
^{III}Princeton University, Department of Chemistry, Princeton, 085441009, USA
^{IV}Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Departamento de Química Av., P.H. Rolfs, sn, ViçosaMG, 36370000
ABSTRACT
A methodology for ionpolymer interaction estimation is discussed in the present work. This method is based on the inversion of experimental spin echo NMR data using Hopfield neural network to retrieve transverse relaxation time distributions. The adopted model systems consist of aqueous solutions of poly (ethylene oxide), molar mass 1500, 4000 and 35000 γ mol^{1} and sodium nitroprusside (NP) at different concentrations. Dipolar interaction is investigated in this work through the reduction in the transverse relaxation time and increase in the area under the distribution curves of the PEO protons which presented a linear correlation with the NP concentration. Neural network results were compared with the Simplex optimization procedure and experimental NMR values. The proposed methodology is robust, stable, non restrictive in relation to the system and more efficient to handle experimental data.
Keywords: Interaction ionpolymer; Illposed inverse problem; Neural network; Transverse relaxation time distribution.
1. INTRODUCTION
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) relaxometry is a very useful tool for understanding chemical and physical phenomena in complex multiphase systems. In special, works in the literature confirm the transverse relaxation function is more sensitive to structural changes than the spinlattice relaxation and selfdiffusion measurements [13]. Chemical environment induces the formation of isochromats, a physical concept that means an infinitesimal ensemble with the same frequency. The spin echo decay data can be obtained by the CarrPurcellMeiboomGill  CPMG sequence pulse, which refocuses these magnetizations and acquires information on molecular dynamics throughout the transverse relaxation time, T_{2}. This important parameter can be used to indirectly measure properties of organic liquid and softsolid samples [4].
To analyze a sample through NMR relaxometry, it is crucial to obtain a reliable deconvolution of T_{2} components from the discrete and noisy decaying echo signal. This is essentially an illconditioned inverse problem [59] and needs robust mathematical treatment to be solved. Hopfield neural network, adapted to inverse problem methodology [6,7], were used in the present work to obtain T_{2} distributions from spin echo NMR experimental data [10] in aqueous solutions of poly(ethylene oxide) and sodium nitroprusside.
Natural or synthetic watersoluble polymers are widely applied in technological areas such as biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and adhesives [11,12]. This number of applications has increased considerable, and polymers are expected to be the main product demanded by industrially developed societies [13]. Nevertheless, the expansion of research needs physicochemical data of macromolecular aqueous solutions, as well as the development of models to relate experimental data with molecular interaction parameters. This is an important step for understanding more complex formulations requested by the numerous technical applications.
The establishment of a systematic and effective methodology for quantitative evaluation of ionpolymer interaction in aqueous media is proposed in this work. This methodology is not restricted to a specific system and provides a wide range of applications, such as data processing in the brain tissue for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis [8], kinetic constants inversion from absorbance measurement [14] and data processing of scattered light [1517].
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
2.1. Relaxation process in a system of two spins
Dipoledipole interaction consists in a spin particle I interacting with a magnetic field generated by another spin particle S. The Hamiltonian of this interacting pair is [18]
where n is the unitary vector in the radial direction, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio and R is the internuclear distance. This term can be considered as a perturbation in the complete Hamiltonian, H of a system within a magnetic field, B_{0}, along the z direction. In this case, the nonperturbed Hamiltonian is composed by the motion of the particles, H_{M}, and the Zeeman energies for each spin, so that
For spins of value 1/2, according to its magnetic moments, the longitudinal components of I_{Z} and S_{Z} are
From this, it can be established four eigenstates + + ; +  ;  + and   with the respective population numbers N_{++} ; N_{+} ; N_{+} and N_{}. Transitions between these eigenstates are possible through the transitions probabilities ω_{0}, ω_{1}, ω'_{1} and ω_{2} respectively, as represented in the diagram of Figure 1.
The longitudinal T_{1} relaxation time calculation was firstly carried out by Abragam and Pound [19]. In 1955, Solomon [18] has extended this methodology to transverse relaxation time calculation, T_{2} , by considering interacting pairs of like spins, nuclei in paramagnetic solution and interacting unlike spins. For this, a new basis set is defined in similarity with the equation (2) as
In this base, four states α α ; α β ; β α and β β are also established, with their occupation number N_{αα} ; N_{αβ} ; N_{βα} and N_{ββ} and transition probabilities per unit of time u_{0},u_{1},u'_{1} and u_{2} , respectively. However, these states are not eigenstates of energy and the base must be defined from its orthogonal states expansion in the eigenvectors of energy, + and  as
Additionally, although the basis set of equation (3) can be assumed, the experimentally observable quantities are the zcomponents of the macroscopic magnetizations, I_{z} and S_{z}, being proportional to
To develop this equation, one can consider the kinetic process of the eigenstates transition:
Substituting equations (5) in the derivative form of equation (4) we get:
with I_{0} and S_{0} being the equilibrium magnetization of spins I and S.
For the transverse components, I_{x} and S_{x}, in the basis set of equations (3), the calculation method is identical [18]. We have only to substitute the probabilities of transitions and the occupation numbers of the states, getting the equations
In the present work, nuclei in paramagnetic solution are studied. For this case, the relaxation process of a nuclear spin, I , when paired with an electronic spin, S, of a paramagnetic ion is a consequence of the dipoledipole interaction, H'. In contrast, for the electronic spin, this process is negligible and we have to consider = S_{0} and = 0, which causes a simple decay in equation (7), with the relaxation time:
The transition probabilities are calculated by perturbation theory in first order, as in reference [18] and the transverse relaxation time of spins in paramagnetic solutions can be described by
being r the interatomic distance and τc the rotational correlation time, or the characteristic time of a particle in solution on Brownian rotation diffusion movement.
2.2. The spin echo theory
The nuclear spin angular frequency, i.e. the Larmor frequency, is represented as [19,20],
in which γ is the magnetogyric ratio and B(r) the local magnetic field. Due to spinspin interactions, neighboring nuclei have different local fields and different frequencies. The spins can be refocused, forming an echo, by applying a hard 180^{0} pulse of radiofrequency after a hard 90^{0} pulse in relation to the total magnetization vector. This experiment was first verified by E.L. Hahn in 1949, after the initial discovery of NMR [20]. From this experiment, two important properties can be obtained: relaxation time and diffusion coefficient [21].
Decrease of coherence produces a magnetization decaying curve in each echo time, t, from which the transverse relaxation time [1923], T_{2} , can be calculated. Nevertheless, distribution of T_{2} components reflects the several spinspin relaxation processes occurring inside the matter. The concept of T_{2} distribution is useful since there will be a set of isochromats acting in the relaxations process. Under these theoretical considerations a single T_{2} component is not possible, as in equation (9), but rather its distribution. Consequently one has to deal with multiple T_{2} components, resulting in a total magnetization function [21]:
with λ_{i} = 1/T_{2i}, the decay rate for each process and P(λ_{i}) its corresponding probability.
For a continuous distribution of transverse relaxation times and the probability density function [6], f(λ) = P(λ)/dλ , this equation can be written as
in which I(t) is the signal intensity measured at the spin echo time, t, and K(t,λ) = exp(tλ) the kernel of the process. Equation (12) is a Fredholm integral equation of first order [2022] used to calculate the relaxation time distribution function by a deconvolution process. Presence of noisy in the available data for the echo signal will make the inverse calculation of f(λ) an inverse illposed problem. Therefore, one has to use robust and stable methods to solve this kind of problem. In this work, Hopfield neural network methodology was chosen [6,7].
2.3. Neural Network background
In the neural network approach, nervous impulse simulation is performed applying a transfer function, ø, in the neuron states, u. The activated values are propagated in the network during a learning time until a convergence criteria is reached. For this, an energy function is defined as [6]
with P_{cal} and P_{exp} the calculated and experimental properties, respectively.
Calculated spin echo decay curve, the P_{cal} property, is obtained from the activated neurons, ø(u), which are changed during the learning time, τ. In this case, the activated neurons in the network represent the f(λ) curve. Thus, the derivative of the energy function is written as, [24]
in which n is the number of neurons and e_{j} = Σ^{m}_{j}_{=1}(P_{cal,j}  P_{exp,j} ) . This is also the number of points retrieved in the transverse relaxation function f(λ) from the inversion process of the m experimental data.
The neural network convergence is assured by the error function decreasing with the learning time. For this, two conditions in the algorithm have to be imposed. The first one is establish
transforming (14) in
The transfer function as an increasing function of the neuron states, i.e. > 0, which will imply < 0, is the second condition to be assumed.
As the learning process is carried out, several solutions are possible to be found. Nevertheless, this neural network approach, as a consequence of the decreasing error, provides the one which best reproduces the experimental property.
Solution of Hopfield differential equations were obtained by integrating equations (15) using a fourth order RungeKutta method [25]. From an initial guess, the stopping condition of the integration process occurs if the error function reaches the minimum value, i.e. = 0.
3. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
To determine experimentally the relationship between the transverse relaxation time and interaction of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and sodium nitroprusside (NP) inD_{2}O, samples containing different compositions of mixtures of these three components were prepared according to Table 1.
The poly(ethylene oxide), PEO (average molecular mass of 1500, 4000 and 35000 γ mol^{1}), were obtained from Sigma (USA). The Merck (Germany) salt, Na_{2}[Fe(CN)_{5}(NO)] (99.0%) was of analytical grade and used without any further purification. Aqueous solutions of the polymer and nitroprusside (NP) were prepared in the concentrations of 10 %(w/w) in polymer and in the range of 0.00 to 0.75% (w/w) in NP. The samples were kept at 20 ^{°}C for 3 days before the measurements. The spin echo experimental data were obtained on a Bruker 400 MHz NMR spectrometer with the CPMG sequence pulse.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The assumption of transverse relaxation time distribution as a property to characterize the PEONP interaction is made in the present work. An specific enthalpic interaction among poly(ethylene oxide) segments and [Fe(CN)_{5}NO]^{2} anion has been demonstrated, using FTIR measurements and phase partitioning behavior in Aqueous Two Phase Systems. [26] The initial dipoledipole interaction between the PEO protons is perturbed by salt addition. Since the NP salt contains Fe (III), the electronnucleus dipolar interaction is a more effective mechanism, causing a reduction in relaxation time of the PEO protons, as can be seen in equation (9). Thus, changes in transverse relaxation time distributions of PEO protons in aqueous medium and ionic different concentrations were verified.
Four sets of experiments were performed with mixtures composed of polymers with different molecular weights (PEO 1500, 4000 and 35000 γ mol^{}1) in fixed concentration of approximately 10.00% w/w and sodium nitroprusside at different concentrations (0.00, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75% w/w), as described in Table 1.
The relaxation time distribution is obtained by numerical integration of activated neuron states, equation (15), which requires an initial condition to be solved. In this work, Inverse Laplace Transform (ILT) [21] is used as initial guess for the neural network inputs. Although the ILT is used in a routine way to invert NMR echo data, its results can be considerable improved. As shown in references [6,7,21] the neural network has the property of reduce the residual error in an optimization problem. Therefore, one may use the ILT as a first approximation to obtain better results, with lower residual errors. This will provide additional and more accurate results for the experimentalists.
To check the consistency of the computational method, simulated data is given to the network together with an exact initial guess; in this case activated neuron states is constant in the learning time, showing the methodology is appropriate to invert the data. Stability of the Hopfield neural network method was tested against errors in the simulated data. For errors up to 30% this approach was able to return results in fair agreement with the original data, showing the robustness of this inversion process to handle experimental error.
Using experimental spin echo decay curve, one can observes in Table 2, the maximum of T_{2} distribution curves obtained from the Hopfield neural network procedure. From these results it is verified that as the concentration of NP increases, the value of T_{2,max} decreases. This can be attributed to the increased strength of ionpolymer interaction, as described in equation (9).
Distribution functions calculated by the neural network for the PEO 1500 system with 0%, 0.2566%, 0.4999% and 0.7595% NP is presented in Figure 2. Peak distributions are appropriately described by a set of 32 neurons, which corresponds also the base size. Residual error is smaller if a multiple components of T_{2} is adopted, as can be confirmed in Table 3. This also indicates equation (12) is appropriate to describe this problem, contrary to individual analysis of the components.
Integrals over the distributions are proportional to the number of spins in similar dynamic behavior [21,27]. In Table 2 it is also presented the area under the distributions of all systems. One can verify the area is directly proportional to NP concentration. This can be attributed to the extension of the ionpolymer interaction, once larger NP concentration affects an equally larger number of PEO protons. Figures 3 and 4 show linear correlations among NP mass concentration and T_{2} parameter and the area under the distribution functions, respectively. Table 4 shows the correlation index to this assumption.
According to Brereton et.al. [2,3], the problem formulation with Polyethylene melts at low molecular weights ( < 1700 γ mol^{1}) is relatively simple since the spin echo decay curve shows a singleexponential behavior from which T_{2} can be assigned. At higher molecular weights the NMR decay curve is non exponential and clearly reflects a more complex dynamics. The present study confirms that the refined treatment could reflect not only the polydispersity effects but also the differential dipolar interaction resulting from the anisotropic motion of the polymer chains on the NMR time scale.
In summary, the results presented in Table 2 and Figure 3 and 4 show two general tendencies: One is related to the direct correlation of NP concentration increase with the relaxation time decrease, which reflects an increasing strength of the interaction. The second is related to the increase in the area under the distribution curves according to the increase of the NP concentration, which reflects the larger number of spins involved in the interaction, i.e. characterize a greater interaction extension.
The experimental echo decay curves were also analyzed by the simplex optimization method. This method is analogue to one usually adopted by the NMR equipments, which treats the problem as an adjustment of the experimental data by one exponential curve [28,29]. The experimental and simplex results obtained are shown in Table 2. At this point one can also note the better residual error results of the neural network methodology in comparison with the simplex algorithm, as presented in Table 3.
5. CONCLUSION
The combination of the inverse problem methodology and intermolecular forces analysis was applied to ionpolymer interaction estimation using experimental NMR spin echo data. The adopted model systems consist of aqueous solutions of poly (ethylene oxide) and sodium nitroprusside (NP) at different concentrations.
This inversion methodology provides T_{2} distributions of the components, which reflects the several spin relaxation processes occurring inside the matter. Under these theoretical considerations, the obtained results show smaller residual errors in comparison with the simplex optimization procedure and experimental NMR equipment software. This fact is important to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.
The system responses also allow a linear correlation among the nitroprusside concentration and the transverse relaxation time, together with the PEO protons amount in the similar dynamic behavior. This linear correlation is proposed here as a quantitative approach for ionpolymer interaction estimation in aqueous solutions. Finally, the PEO molecular weight dependence in the transverse relaxation time and the area under the distribution curves shows the angular correlation is an individual characteristic of each material, as verified for the response of all sample sets.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by PRPq, Fapemig and CNPq.
(Received on 20 July, 2010)
* Electronic address: ritacos@ufmg.br
 [1] S. Ghosh, K.M. Keener, Y. Pan. J. Magn. Reson. 191, 226 (2008).
 [2] M. G. Brereton. Macromolecules 23, 1119 (1990).
 [3] M. G. Brereton, I. M. Ward, N. Boden, P. Wright. Macromolecules 24, 2068 (1991).
 [4] R.I. Chelcea,; R. Fechete, E. Culea, D.E. Demco, B.Blümich. J. Magn. Reson. 196, 178 (2009).
 [5] Hadamard, J.; Le probleme de Cauchy et les equations aux derivees partielles lineaires hyperboliques, Hermann: CityplaceParis, 1932.
 [6] Hopfield, J.J.; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 8110, 3088 (1984).
 [7] Hopfield, J.J.; Tank, D.W.; Biol. Cybern. 52, 141 (1985).
 [8] R.C.O. Sebastião, C.N. Pacheco, J.P.Braga, D.PilóVeloso. J. Magn. Reson. 182, 22 (2006).
 [9] R.C.O. Sebastião, J.P.Braga, C.N. Pacheco. Ann. Magn. Reson. 4, 12, 17 (2005).
 [10] K.P. Withall. J. Magn. Reson. 84, 134 (1999).
 [11] S. J. Huang, T. A. Seery, G. Swift. J. Macromol. Sci. Pure A 7, 36 (1999).
 [12] J. H. Guo, G. W. Skinner, W. W. Harcum, P. E. Barnum. Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today 6, 254 (1998).
 [13] F. Lo, J. Petchonka, J. Hanly. J. Chem. Eng. Prog. 55, 7 (1993).
 [14] N.H.T. Lemes, E. Borges, J.P. Braga, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 96, 84 (2009).
 [15] L.S. Virtuoso, R. C. O.Sebastião, J.P. Braga, L.H.M. Da Silva. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 106 2731 (2006).
 [16] R.C.O. Sebastião, N.H.T. Lemes, L.S. Virtuoso, J.P. Braga. Chem. Phys. Lett. 378, 406 (2003).
 [17] E. Borges, N.H.T.Lemes, J.P. Braga. Chem. Phys. Lett. 423, 357 (2006).
 [18] I. Solomon. Phys. Rev. 992, 559 (1955).
 [19] A. Abragam, The principles of nuclear magnetism, Oxford Press, Oxford, 2004.
 [20] E.L. Hahn. Phys.Rev. 804, 580 (1950)
 [21] R.C.O. Sebastião, J.P. Braga. J. Magn. Reson. 1771, 146 (2005).
 [22] K.P. Withall. J. Magn. Reson. 93, 221 (1991).
 [23] R.J.S. Brown. J. Magn. Reson. 132, 65 (1998).
 [24] Vemuri, V.; Jang, G. S.; J. Franklin Inst. 329, 241(1992).
 [25] Forsythe, G.E.; Malcolm, M.A.; Moler, C.B.; Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, Englewood Clifs: New Jersey, 1977.
 [26] L.H.M. Da Silva, M.C.H. Silva, K.R. Francisco, M.V.C. Cardoso, L.A. Minim, J.S.R. Coimbra. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 11669 (2008).
 [27] V.C. Viterbo, R.C.O. Sebastião, J.P. Braga, W. F. Magalhães. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 16, 93 (2005).
 [28] Levenberg , K.; Quart. Appl. Math 2, 164 (1944).
 [29] Marquardt, D.; SIAM J. Appl. Math. 11, 431(1963).
Publication Dates

Publication in this collection
03 Jan 2011 
Date of issue
Dec 2010
History

Received
20 July 2010