Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Salivary molecules of bone remodeling and tissue repair after head and neck radiotherapy

Abstract

Head and neck radiotherapy causes quantitative and qualitative changes in saliva. The objective of this case-control study was to evaluate the salivary biomarkers associated with bone remodeling and tissue repair in patients submitted to radiotherapy for head and neck cancer treatment, compared with non-irradiated individuals. Total unstimulated saliva was collected for ELISA assay analysis of receptor activator for nuclear factor κ B (RANK) and its ligand (RANK-L), osteoprotegerin, matrix metalloproteinase-9/ tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and epidermal growth factor. Statistics were performed, and revealed that salivary RANK (p = 0.0304), RANK-L (p = 0.0005), matrix metalloproteinase-9/ tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (p = 0.0067), vascular endothelial growth factor (p = 0.0060), and epidermal growth factor (p < 0.0001) were reduced in patients, compared with the control group. Osteoprotegerin did not differ between the groups (p = 0.3765). Salivary biomarkers did not differ according to radiotherapy completion time (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the lower output of the salivary molecules – essential for bone remodeling and tissue repair – may disrupt tissue homeostasis and play a role in the pathogenesis of the radiotherapy-induced deleterious effects in the oral cavity.

Saliva; Radiotherapy; Bone remodeling; Mouth neoplasms; Head and neck neoplasms

Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) is frequently applied to treat head and neck cancer patients, in association with either surgery or chemotherapy.11. Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):386-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12...
Head and neck RT is associated with early and late deleterious effects on oral health, such as hyposalivation, mucositis, tissue atrophy, and osteoradionecrosis of the jaws.22. Cooper JS, Fu K, Marks J, Silverman S. Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar;31(5):1141-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00421-G
https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)004...
,33. Cheriex KC, Nijhuis TH, Mureau MA. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: a review of conservative and surgical treatment options. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 Feb;29(2):69-75. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329923
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329923...
,44. Nadella KR, Kodali RM, Guttikonda LK, Jonnalagadda A. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: clinico-therapeutic management: a literature review and update. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):891-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0762-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0762-...
,55. National Institute of Health. PDQ® Supportive and Palliative Care Editoral Board. Oral complications of chemotherapy and head/neck radiation. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2016 [cited year Month day]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/mouth-throat/oral-complications-hp-pdq
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/trea...
,66. Asikainen PJ, Dekker H, Sirviö E, Mikkonen J, Schulten EA, Bloemena E, et al. Radiation-induced changes in the microstructure of epithelial cells of the oral mucosa: a comparative light and electron microscopic study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017 Nov;46(10):1004-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12639
https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12639...

The transmembrane receptor activator for nuclear factor κ B (RANK) is expressed on osteoclast cells, and induces activation and differentiation of these cells when it binds with its ligand (RANK-L).77. Liu C, Walter TS, Huang P, Zhang S, Zhu X, Wu Y, et al. Structural and functional insights of RANKL-RANK interaction and signaling. J Immunol. 2010 15;184(12):6910-9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0904033
https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0904033...
,88. Hanada R, Hanada T, Sigl V, Schramek D, Penninger JM. RANKL/RANK-beyond bones. J Mol Med (Berl). 2011 Jul;89(7):647-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-011-0749-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-011-0749-...
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a competing ligand to RANK, and acts by inhibiting osteoclast activation.88. Hanada R, Hanada T, Sigl V, Schramek D, Penninger JM. RANKL/RANK-beyond bones. J Mol Med (Berl). 2011 Jul;89(7):647-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-011-0749-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-011-0749-...
The RANK/ RANK-L/ OPG balance is pivotal to secure proper bone remodeling.77. Liu C, Walter TS, Huang P, Zhang S, Zhu X, Wu Y, et al. Structural and functional insights of RANKL-RANK interaction and signaling. J Immunol. 2010 15;184(12):6910-9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0904033
https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0904033...
Matrix metalloproteinases are endopeptidases responsible for extracellular matrix degradation.99. Al-Dasooqi N, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Keefe DM. Matrix metalloproteinases: key regulators in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced mucositis? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;64(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0984-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0984-...
MMP-9 plays an important role in bone maintenance and remodeling, and is required for the collagen-driven migration of osteoclasts and pre-osteoclasts in the long bones.1010. Paiva KB, Granjeiro JM. Matrix metalloproteinases in bone resorption, remodeling, and repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;148:203-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05...
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2) is the natural inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases, including MMP-9.

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a major role in the proliferation, migration and activation of endothelial cells, and in promoting blood vessel permeability.1111. Upile T, Jerjes W, Kafas P, Harini S, Singh SU, Guyer M, et al. Salivary VEGF: a non-invasive angiogenic and lymphangiogenic proxy in head and neck cancer prognostication. Int Arch Med. 2009 Apr;2(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-12
https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-12...
,1212. Hu K, Olsen BR. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2016 Oct;91:30-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.0...
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a single chain polypeptide1313. Cohen S, Ushiro H, Stoscheck C, Chinkers M. A native 170,000 epidermal growth factor receptor-kinase complex from shed plasma membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem. 1982 Feb;257(3):1523-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68224-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68...
that binds to its membrane receptor (EGFR), and has mitogenic effects on most epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells.1414. Berlanga-Acosta J, Gavilondo-Cowley J, López-Saura P, González-López T, Castro-Santana MD, López-Mola E, et al. Epidermal growth factor in clinical practice - a review of its biological actions, clinical indications and safety implications. Int Wound J. 2009 Oct;6(5):331-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00622.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009...

The roles played by RANK, RANK-L, OPG, MMP-9/ TIMP-2, VEGF and EGF on hard and soft tissue homeostasis make it reasonable to hypothesize that these biomarkers are associated with the adverse effects of head and neck RT in the oral cavity, including tissue atrophy, impaired wound healing, and osteoradionecrosis. However, most of these biomarkers have never been evaluated in the saliva of irradiated patients, and little information is available regarding their clinical application for predicting, monitoring, or prognosing oral complications of head and neck RT.1515. Vidotto A, Henrique T, Raposo LS, Maniglia JV, Tajara EH. Salivary and serum proteomics in head and neck carcinomas: before and after surgery and radiotherapy. Cancer Biomark. 2010-2011-2011;8(2):95-107. https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2011-0205
https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2011-0205...
,1616. Laheij AM, Rasch CN, Brandt BW, de Soet JJ, Schipper RG, Loof A, et al. Proteins and peptides in parotid saliva of irradiated patients compared to that of healthy controls using SELDI-TOF-MS. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov;8(1):639. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1641-7
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1641-...
,1717. Russo N, Bellile E, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Liu M, Eisbruch A, Wolf GT, et al. Cytokines in saliva increase in head and neck cancer patients after treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Oct;122(4):483-490.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.05.020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.05.0...

The main goal of the current study was to assess the salivary biomarkers related to bone remodeling and tissue repair, namely RANK, RANK-L, OPG, MMP-9/ TIMP-2, VEGF, and EGF, in patients submitted to head and neck RT, compared with non-irradiated individuals. The hypothesis was that patients submitted to RT in the head and neck region would have lower output of these molecules than the controls.

Methodology

Participants: patients and controls

This is a case-control study. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (certificate number 85229518.9.0000.5149). All participants gave their written consent to be included in the research, conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

The study patients who received head and neck RT for cancer treatment were selected from the Head and Neck Cancer Patient Dental Care Clinics of the School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil, from 2018 to 2019. The following patients were included: those who had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of head and neck area; those who concluded cancer treatment that included RT of the head and neck region, either with or without chemotherapy; and those who had been previously submitted to an oral care protocol to control periodontal disease, caries, or foci of infection. Exclusion criteria comprised clinical signs of periodontitis (gingival bleeding or suppuration, teeth mobility, dental calculus); recurrent tumor; oro-nasal or oro-antral communication; human immunodeficiency virus or autoimmune diseases; an invasive dental procedure less than 30 days before saliva collection; use of anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, or anti-fungal drugs in the previous 30 days; previous or current use of bone-modifying agents, such as bisphosphonates; and uncontrolled systemic diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Patients whose salivary volume was insufficient for performing the proposed analyses were also excluded.

The control group was composed of healthy individuals, never diagnosed with any malignant neoplasm, or exposed to RT or chemotherapy. These individuals had been previously submitted to oral care to control periodontal disease, caries, and foci of infection. They were matched by gender and age with RT patients, and the same exclusion criteria applied to the control group. There was one control (patient) per case.

Saliva collection and ELISA

Saliva was collected from each patient at a single time point after RT. Patients were allocated into three subgroups according to their RT completion time at saliva collection: 1 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, 13 months or more.

Whole unstimulated saliva was collected between 2 and 4 p.m.1818. Oton-Leite AF, Silva GB, Morais MO, Silva TA, Leles CR, Valadares MC, et al. Effect of low-level laser therapy on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and salivary inflammatory mediators in head and neck cancer patients. Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Apr;47(4):296-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349...
Prostheses were removed and individuals rinsed their mouth with 5 ml of distilled water for 1 minute. The saliva produced during 5 minutes was collected in a sterile Falcon tube and placed on ice. The total volume was quantified and the saliva was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. Protease and phosphatase inhibitors (0.1 mmol / L of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 0.1 mmol/ L benzethonium chloride, 10 mmol / L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA], 0.01 mg / ml aprotinin and 0.05% Tween20) were added to the supernatant at a ratio of 1:1. The sample was stored at -80°C until analysis.

RANK, OPG, MMP-9/TIMP-2, VEGF, EGF (Duo-Set®, R&D systems; Minneapolis, USA), and RANK-L (PrepoTech; Rocky Hill, NJ, SA) concentrations were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), following the manufacturer´s instructions. Saliva was not diluted any further. The raw concentration (pg/mL) was corrected by the salivary flow (µL/min), thereby allowing the output to be expressed in pg/min.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis and comparative tests were performed using SPSS® 19.0 (IBM, Chicago, USA) and GraphPad Prism® 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) software programs. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality (n < 50), and the Wilcoxon test, to compare the salivary biomarker output between patients and matched controls. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the salivary biomarkers in patients according to the RT completion time at saliva collection, categorized as 1 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, or 13 months or more. The Spearman test was used to assess the correlation between salivary biomarkers and clinical variables (sex, age, smoking, alcohol use, tumor location, T stage, N stage, TNM staging, RT dose, RT completion time, and chemotherapy) and among the salivary biomarkers themselves. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the salivary flow and the salivary biomarkers between patients undergoing only RT and those submitted to RT plus chemotherapy. The significance for all the tests was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Thirty-one patients were potentially eligible; however eight were excluded due to insufficient saliva volume. Therefore, the final sample was composed of twenty-three patients, whose clinical and demographic data are shown in Table 1. Most of the patients were male (73.9%), with a mean age of 59.1 years. Lesions were mainly located in the oropharynx (30.4%), larynx (26.1%), and floor of the mouth (21.7%). The mean total dose of radiation was 61.5 Gy, and the mean RT completion time was 25.8 months. Ten patients received only radiotherapy (RT-only), and thirteen received radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT+CT). No patient showed any sign or symptoms of osteoradionecrosis when the saliva was collected.

Table 1
Clinical and demographic characteristics of 23 patients irradiated in the head and neck region.

Salivary output (pg/min) of RANK (p = 0.0304), RANK-L (p = 0.0005), MMP-9/ TIMP-2 (p = 0.0067), VEGF (p = 0.0060), and EGF (p < 0.0001) was reduced in RT patients (n = 23), compared with the control group. OPG did not differ between the groups (p = 0.3765) (Figure). There was no difference in salivary flow or salivary biomarkers based on RT completion time (p > 0.05). The salivary flow (µL/min) was significantly lower in RT patients (n = 23) than in the controls (p = 0.0009).

Figure 1
Comparison of salivary output (pg/ min) of the receptor activator for nuclear factor κ B (RANK) and its ligand (RANK-L), osteoprotegerin (OPG), matrix metalloproteinase-9/ tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-9/ TIMP-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF), between the controls and the patients irradiated in the head and neck region.

There was no strong correlation between salivary biomarkers and the clinical features analyzed (Spearman ρ coefficient < |0.7|). RANK-L had a strong and positive correlation with VEGF (Spearman ρ coefficient = +0.746) and EGF (Spearman ρ coefficient = +0.894). VEGF also had a strong and positive correlation with EGF (Spearman ρ coefficient = +0.792). Other associations among the salivary biomarkers showed only weak to moderate correlations (Spearman ρ coefficient < |0.7|) (Table 2).

Table 2
Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) among the salivary biomarkers in irradiated patients (n = 23).

There was no difference in salivary flow between RT-only and RT+CT patients (p = 0.598). The comparison between biomarkers in RT-only and RT+CT patients showed differences only in VEGF (p = 0.009) and MMP-9/TIMP-2 (p = 0.032), with RT+CT patients showing higher values.

Discussion

The results of the current study showed a reduction in salivary flow in the irradiated patients, compared with the controls. Salivary output of RANK, RANK-L, MMP-9/ TIMP-2, VEGF, and EGF was lower in patients submitted to RT than in the controls, whereas OPG output did not differ. The lower output of these molecules may disrupt bone remodeling and tissue repair in irradiated patients, and may supposedly play a role in the pathogenesis of late deleterious effects of RT, such as osteoradionecrosis.

This is the first study to assess RANK, RANK-L, and OPG in the saliva of head and neck irradiated patients. It is known that head and neck-irradiated patients carry a higher risk of osteoradionecrosis, whose pathogenesis is related to bone hypocelularity, hypoxia and hypovascularization.1919. Rivero JA, Shamji O, Kolokythas A. Osteoradionecrosis: a review of pathophysiology, prevention and pharmacologic management using pentoxifylline, α-tocopherol, and clodronate. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Nov;124(5):464-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.08.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.08.0...
RANK and RANK-L were reduced in the saliva of irradiated patients. This seems to indicate that the RANK/ RANK-L/ OPG axis is affected by head and neck RT, and may be an important pathway for osteoradionecrosis development. This association could not be assessed in the present study, because only two patients had a history of osteoradionecrosis. Further studies should investigate the role of RANK/ RANK-L/ OPG in osteoradionecrosis pathogenesis, and the predictive value of their salivary dosage.

Ortega et al.2020. Ortega N, Behonick D, Stickens D, Werb Z. How proteases regulate bone morphogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May;995(1):109-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03214.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003...
and Paiva et al.1010. Paiva KB, Granjeiro JM. Matrix metalloproteinases in bone resorption, remodeling, and repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;148:203-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05...
reported the role of MMP-9 in the recruitment of osteoclasts and pre-osteoclasts to promote bone resorption.1010. Paiva KB, Granjeiro JM. Matrix metalloproteinases in bone resorption, remodeling, and repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;148:203-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05...
,2020. Ortega N, Behonick D, Stickens D, Werb Z. How proteases regulate bone morphogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May;995(1):109-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03214.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003...
Nyman et al.2121. Nyman JS, Lynch CC, Perrien DS, Thiolloy S, O’Quinn EC, Patil CA, et al. Differential effects between the loss of MMP-2 and MMP-9 on structural and tissue-level properties of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jun;26(6):1252-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.326
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.326...
showed that the absence of MMP-9 led to an increase in trabecular density, and consequent bone fragility in the femur of mice, thus evidencing the participation of MMP-9 in maintaining the trabecular bone architecture. In addition, this enzyme participates in the wound healing process by degrading and remodeling the extracellular matrix.99. Al-Dasooqi N, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Keefe DM. Matrix metalloproteinases: key regulators in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced mucositis? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;64(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0984-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0984-...
Given that MMP-9 is directly related to bone metabolism and wound healing,2121. Nyman JS, Lynch CC, Perrien DS, Thiolloy S, O’Quinn EC, Patil CA, et al. Differential effects between the loss of MMP-2 and MMP-9 on structural and tissue-level properties of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jun;26(6):1252-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.326
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.326...
any reduced salivary output of MMP-9/ TIMP-2 in irradiated patients may also be associated with impaired bone remodeling and wound healing, thus making the alveolar jawbone and oral mucosa less responsive to injuries in irradiated patients. Indeed, the authors observed a significant reduction of this enzyme in irradiated patients, as previously reported by Oton-Leite et al.1818. Oton-Leite AF, Silva GB, Morais MO, Silva TA, Leles CR, Valadares MC, et al. Effect of low-level laser therapy on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and salivary inflammatory mediators in head and neck cancer patients. Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Apr;47(4):296-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349...

VEGF is mainly associated with angiogenesis and tissue repair.2222. Stegen S, Gastel N, Carmeliet G. Bringing new life to damaged bone: the importance of angiogenesis in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2015 Jan;70:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.0...
In addition, VEGF may act directly on the function of osteoblasts, by regulating their chemotaxis, proliferation, and differentiation.2222. Stegen S, Gastel N, Carmeliet G. Bringing new life to damaged bone: the importance of angiogenesis in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2015 Jan;70:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.0...
Thus, VEGF is needed for angiogenesis and osteogenesis, and is the main molecule that correlates these two processes during bone repair.2222. Stegen S, Gastel N, Carmeliet G. Bringing new life to damaged bone: the importance of angiogenesis in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2015 Jan;70:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.0...
,2323. Xu WL, Ong HS, Zhu Y, Liu SW, Liu LM, Zhou KH, et al. In Situ release of VEGF enhances osteogenesis in 3D porous scaffolds engineered with osterix-modified adipose-derived stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017 May;23(9-10):445-57. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0315
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.031...
Not surprisingly, irradiated patients had lower levels of VEGF salivary output, which correlated with EGF and RANK-L, indicating that tissue vascularization, epithelial growth and bone remodeling processes may be altered after head and neck RT.

The reduced salivary EGF in irradiated patients described herein has been previously reported.2424. Epstein JB, Emerton S, Guglietta A, Le N. Assessment of epidermal growth factor in oral secretions of patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer. Oral Oncol. 1997 Sep;33(5):359-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00009-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00...
,2525. Dumbrigue HB, Sandow PL, Nguyen KH, Humphreys-Beher MG. Salivary epidermal growth factor levels decrease in patients receiving radiation therapy to the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jun;89(6):710-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106343
https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106343...
Since most of the salivary EGF is derived from the acinar cells of the salivary glands, especially the parotid gland,2626. Ino M, Ushiro K, Ino C, Yamashita T, Kumazawa T. Kinetics of epidermal growth factor in saliva. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1993;500 sup500:126-30. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489309126195
https://doi.org/10.3109/0001648930912619...
its decrease in irradiated patients can be reasonably attributed to the RT-induced degeneration of the acinar structures. Some authors have reported a decrease in salivary EGF during RT treatment, and have correlated its decrease with a higher risk of oral mucositis during RT.1818. Oton-Leite AF, Silva GB, Morais MO, Silva TA, Leles CR, Valadares MC, et al. Effect of low-level laser therapy on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and salivary inflammatory mediators in head and neck cancer patients. Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Apr;47(4):296-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349...
,2424. Epstein JB, Emerton S, Guglietta A, Le N. Assessment of epidermal growth factor in oral secretions of patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer. Oral Oncol. 1997 Sep;33(5):359-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00009-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00...
,2525. Dumbrigue HB, Sandow PL, Nguyen KH, Humphreys-Beher MG. Salivary epidermal growth factor levels decrease in patients receiving radiation therapy to the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jun;89(6):710-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106343
https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106343...
,2727. Epstein JB, Gorsky M, Guglietta A, Le N, Sonis ST. The correlation between epidermal growth factor levels in saliva and the severity of oral mucositis during oropharyngeal radiation therapy. Cancer. 2000 Dec;89(11):2258-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11<2258::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-Z
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(200012...
,2828. Normando AG, Rocha CL, Toledo IP, Figueiredo PTS, Reis PE, Canto GL, et al. Biomarkers in the assessment of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Sep;25(9):2969-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3783-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3783-...
In the current study, the reduction in salivary EGF was seen to persist even after RT, thus highlighting that a relevant long-lasting alteration occurred in the saliva composition. This is of great importance considering the pivotal protective role of EGF in maintaining the oral mucosa. In contrast, Russo et al.1717. Russo N, Bellile E, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Liu M, Eisbruch A, Wolf GT, et al. Cytokines in saliva increase in head and neck cancer patients after treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Oct;122(4):483-490.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.05.020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.05.0...
reported a significant increase in salivary EGF and VEGF after RT, but only patients with oropharyngeal cancer were included in their study, and the biomarkers were assessed 12 months after RT.

The salivary alterations shown in the current study seem to be long-lasting RT-related side effects, since there was no difference based on RT completion time. Thus, the results seem to be unsupportive of establishing the best time after RT to perform invasive bone procedures in these patients.2929. Kuo TJ, Leung CM, Chang HS, Wu CN, Chen WL, Chen GJ, et al. Jaw osteoradionecrosis and dental extraction after head and neck radiotherapy: A nationwide population-based retrospective study in Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 2016 May;56:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.03.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2...
,3030. Wang TH, Liu CJ, Chao TF, Chen TJ, Hu YW. Risk factors for and the role of dental extractions in osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: A national-based cohort study. Head Neck. 2017 Jul;39(7):1313-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24761
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24761...
Instead, this corroborates these patients’ need for regular and special oral care after RT.55. National Institute of Health. PDQ® Supportive and Palliative Care Editoral Board. Oral complications of chemotherapy and head/neck radiation. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2016 [cited year Month day]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/mouth-throat/oral-complications-hp-pdq
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/trea...
Finally, RT with adjuvant chemotherapy did not seem to influence the salivary biomarkers to any great extent, compared with RT without chemotherapy, insofar as the differences were observed only for VEGF and MMP-9/TIMP-2. This result should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size in each group.

Some limitations can be drawn regarding this study. The occurrence of hyposalivation in the irradiated patients limits saliva sampling, and resulted in the exclusion of patients. This characteristic would limit the use of saliva as a diagnostic / predictive tool in such patients. Another limitation was the evaluation of biomarkers at a single time point after RT. Longitudinal studies evaluating the dosage of these biomarkers before, during and after RT treatment would contribute greatly toward defining this issue. Future studies should evaluate the predictive value of these biomarkers in the development, severity, and response to treatment of late complications of radiation therapy in the oral cavity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, patients submitted to head and neck radiotherapy had a reduced output of salivary molecules, which are of great importance for bone remodeling and tissue repair, namely RANK, RANK-L, MMP-9/ TIMP-2, VEGF, and EGF. The reduction in these molecules may disrupt tissue homeostasis, an issue that warrants further research to explore their role in the pathogenesis of the deleterious effects of radiotherapy in the oral cavity.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico (CNPq) [grant numbers 405585/2018-7, 302157/2017-4]; Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa UFMG/ Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (PRPq-UFMG/ PROBIC-FAPEMIG) [grant number 04/2018]; FAPEMIG [grant number APQ-01700-16]; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) [grant number Financial code 001].

References

  • 1
    Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):386-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017
  • 2
    Cooper JS, Fu K, Marks J, Silverman S. Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar;31(5):1141-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00421-G
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00421-G
  • 3
    Cheriex KC, Nijhuis TH, Mureau MA. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: a review of conservative and surgical treatment options. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 Feb;29(2):69-75. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329923
    » https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329923
  • 4
    Nadella KR, Kodali RM, Guttikonda LK, Jonnalagadda A. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: clinico-therapeutic management: a literature review and update. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):891-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0762-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0762-9
  • 5
    National Institute of Health. PDQ® Supportive and Palliative Care Editoral Board. Oral complications of chemotherapy and head/neck radiation. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2016 [cited year Month day]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/mouth-throat/oral-complications-hp-pdq
    » https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/mouth-throat/oral-complications-hp-pdq
  • 6
    Asikainen PJ, Dekker H, Sirviö E, Mikkonen J, Schulten EA, Bloemena E, et al. Radiation-induced changes in the microstructure of epithelial cells of the oral mucosa: a comparative light and electron microscopic study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017 Nov;46(10):1004-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12639
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12639
  • 7
    Liu C, Walter TS, Huang P, Zhang S, Zhu X, Wu Y, et al. Structural and functional insights of RANKL-RANK interaction and signaling. J Immunol. 2010 15;184(12):6910-9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0904033
    » https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0904033
  • 8
    Hanada R, Hanada T, Sigl V, Schramek D, Penninger JM. RANKL/RANK-beyond bones. J Mol Med (Berl). 2011 Jul;89(7):647-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-011-0749-z
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-011-0749-z
  • 9
    Al-Dasooqi N, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Keefe DM. Matrix metalloproteinases: key regulators in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced mucositis? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;64(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0984-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0984-y
  • 10
    Paiva KB, Granjeiro JM. Matrix metalloproteinases in bone resorption, remodeling, and repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;148:203-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.001
  • 11
    Upile T, Jerjes W, Kafas P, Harini S, Singh SU, Guyer M, et al. Salivary VEGF: a non-invasive angiogenic and lymphangiogenic proxy in head and neck cancer prognostication. Int Arch Med. 2009 Apr;2(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-12
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-12
  • 12
    Hu K, Olsen BR. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2016 Oct;91:30-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.013
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.013
  • 13
    Cohen S, Ushiro H, Stoscheck C, Chinkers M. A native 170,000 epidermal growth factor receptor-kinase complex from shed plasma membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem. 1982 Feb;257(3):1523-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68224-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68224-4
  • 14
    Berlanga-Acosta J, Gavilondo-Cowley J, López-Saura P, González-López T, Castro-Santana MD, López-Mola E, et al. Epidermal growth factor in clinical practice - a review of its biological actions, clinical indications and safety implications. Int Wound J. 2009 Oct;6(5):331-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00622.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00622.x
  • 15
    Vidotto A, Henrique T, Raposo LS, Maniglia JV, Tajara EH. Salivary and serum proteomics in head and neck carcinomas: before and after surgery and radiotherapy. Cancer Biomark. 2010-2011-2011;8(2):95-107. https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2011-0205
    » https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2011-0205
  • 16
    Laheij AM, Rasch CN, Brandt BW, de Soet JJ, Schipper RG, Loof A, et al. Proteins and peptides in parotid saliva of irradiated patients compared to that of healthy controls using SELDI-TOF-MS. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov;8(1):639. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1641-7
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1641-7
  • 17
    Russo N, Bellile E, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Liu M, Eisbruch A, Wolf GT, et al. Cytokines in saliva increase in head and neck cancer patients after treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Oct;122(4):483-490.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.05.020
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.05.020
  • 18
    Oton-Leite AF, Silva GB, Morais MO, Silva TA, Leles CR, Valadares MC, et al. Effect of low-level laser therapy on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and salivary inflammatory mediators in head and neck cancer patients. Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Apr;47(4):296-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22349
  • 19
    Rivero JA, Shamji O, Kolokythas A. Osteoradionecrosis: a review of pathophysiology, prevention and pharmacologic management using pentoxifylline, α-tocopherol, and clodronate. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Nov;124(5):464-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.08.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.08.004
  • 20
    Ortega N, Behonick D, Stickens D, Werb Z. How proteases regulate bone morphogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May;995(1):109-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03214.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03214.x
  • 21
    Nyman JS, Lynch CC, Perrien DS, Thiolloy S, O’Quinn EC, Patil CA, et al. Differential effects between the loss of MMP-2 and MMP-9 on structural and tissue-level properties of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jun;26(6):1252-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.326
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.326
  • 22
    Stegen S, Gastel N, Carmeliet G. Bringing new life to damaged bone: the importance of angiogenesis in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2015 Jan;70:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.017
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.017
  • 23
    Xu WL, Ong HS, Zhu Y, Liu SW, Liu LM, Zhou KH, et al. In Situ release of VEGF enhances osteogenesis in 3D porous scaffolds engineered with osterix-modified adipose-derived stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017 May;23(9-10):445-57. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0315
    » https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0315
  • 24
    Epstein JB, Emerton S, Guglietta A, Le N. Assessment of epidermal growth factor in oral secretions of patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer. Oral Oncol. 1997 Sep;33(5):359-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00009-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00009-2
  • 25
    Dumbrigue HB, Sandow PL, Nguyen KH, Humphreys-Beher MG. Salivary epidermal growth factor levels decrease in patients receiving radiation therapy to the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jun;89(6):710-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106343
    » https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106343
  • 26
    Ino M, Ushiro K, Ino C, Yamashita T, Kumazawa T. Kinetics of epidermal growth factor in saliva. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1993;500 sup500:126-30. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489309126195
    » https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489309126195
  • 27
    Epstein JB, Gorsky M, Guglietta A, Le N, Sonis ST. The correlation between epidermal growth factor levels in saliva and the severity of oral mucositis during oropharyngeal radiation therapy. Cancer. 2000 Dec;89(11):2258-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11<2258::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-Z
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11<2258::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • 28
    Normando AG, Rocha CL, Toledo IP, Figueiredo PTS, Reis PE, Canto GL, et al. Biomarkers in the assessment of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Sep;25(9):2969-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3783-8
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3783-8
  • 29
    Kuo TJ, Leung CM, Chang HS, Wu CN, Chen WL, Chen GJ, et al. Jaw osteoradionecrosis and dental extraction after head and neck radiotherapy: A nationwide population-based retrospective study in Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 2016 May;56:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.03.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.03.005
  • 30
    Wang TH, Liu CJ, Chao TF, Chen TJ, Hu YW. Risk factors for and the role of dental extractions in osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: A national-based cohort study. Head Neck. 2017 Jul;39(7):1313-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24761
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24761

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    16 June 2021
  • Date of issue
    2021

History

  • Received
    12 Oct 2020
  • Accepted
    3 Feb 2021
  • Reviewed
    2 Mar 2021
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227, 05508-000 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel. (55 11) 3044-2393/(55 11) 9-7557-1244 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: office.bor@ingroup.srv.br