Tonn et al. (1980)2222. Tonn EM, Ryge G, Chambers DW. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child. 1980 Nov-Dec;47(6):405-13.
|
United States |
SM |
CII |
NR (3,2-8,9) |
210 |
24/4 |
27.6 |
CR (Epoxydent, Lee Pharmaceutical Corp., South El Monte, CA, USA) |
1 |
Abs |
CR-13/105 |
USPHS |
AM (Optaloy, L.D. Caulk Co., Milford, DE, USA) |
AM – 6/105 |
Oldenburg et al. (1987)2323. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF Jr, Dilley DC. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children. Dent Mater. 1987 Aug;3(4):182-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80031-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80...
|
United States |
SM |
CI-II |
41 (NR) |
152 |
24/6 |
6 |
CR (Caulk H-l 20, L.D. Caulk Co., Milford, DE, USA) |
NR |
Abs |
CR-2/91 |
USPHS |
AM (Sybralloy, Kerr Manufacturing Co., Romulus, Ml, USA) |
AM-4/61 |
Barr-Agholme et al. (1991)2424. Barr-Agholme M, Odén A, Dahllöf G, Modeér T. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater. 1991 Oct;7(4):230-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80020-X
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80...
|
Sweden |
SM |
CII |
43 (6.4) |
119 |
24/12 |
13.9 |
CR (Scotchbond* + P30, 3M Co, St Paul, MN, USA) |
2 |
Rel |
CR – 6/52 |
USPHS |
AM (Dispers alloy Lee Pharmaceutical Corp., South El Monte, CA, USA) |
AM-11/34 |
Welbury et al. (1991)2525. Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J. 1991 Mar;170(5):177-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807465
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807465...
|
England |
SM |
CI-II |
76 (7-8) |
238 |
60/6 |
16.8 |
GIC (Ketac-Fil, ESPE Gmbh, Seefeld, Оberbay, West Germany) |
2 |
Rel |
GIC-39/119 |
USPHS |
AM (Amalcap, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) |
AM-24/119 |
Hse and Wei (1997)1616. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Aug;128(8):1088-96. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0366
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.19...
|
Japan |
PG |
CI-II |
36 (4-7) |
118 |
12/6 |
0 |
CR (Prisma Universal Bond 3* + Prisma TPH, L.D. Caulk Co., Dentsply, Milford, DE, USA) |
1 |
Abs |
CR – 1 /59 |
USPHS |
CP (Dyract, L.D. Caulk Co., Dentsply, Milford, DE, USA) |
CP-1/59 |
Marks et al. (1999)1717. Marks LA, Amerongen WE, Kreulen CM, Weerheijm KL, Martens LC. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results. ASDC J Dent Child. 1999 Jan-Feb;66(1):23-9.
|
Netherlands |
PG |
CII |
52 (6.9) |
114 |
12/6 |
22 |
CP (Dyract, L.D. Caulk Co., Dentsply, Milford, DE, USA) |
3 |
Abs |
CP-9/53 |
USPHS |
AM (Tytin, Kerr Manufacturing Co., Romulus, Ml, USA) |
AM-4/61 |
Welbury et al. (2000)2626. Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J. 2000 Jul;189(2):93-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800693a•
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800693a•...
|
England |
SM |
CI-II |
29 (4-9) |
112 |
42/6 |
10.7 |
CP (Prime and Bond 2.1* + Dyract, Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) |
2 |
Rel |
CP – 3/56 |
USPHS |
GIC (Chemfil Superior, Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) |
GIC – 12/56 |
Dutta et al. (2001)1818. Dutta BN, Gauba K, Tewari A, Chawla HS. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2001 Sep;19(3):118-22.
|
India |
PG |
CII |
120 (4-9) |
480 |
12/4 |
18.7 |
RMGIC (Fuji-Il LC, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) |
1 |
NR |
RMGIC-61/360 |
USPHS |
AM (Sollla, NOVA, DPI, India) |
AM-34/120 |
Duggal et al. (2002)2727. Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J. 2002 Sep;193(6):339-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801560
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801560...
|
UK |
SM |
CII |
78 (4-7) |
156 |
24/6 |
23.1 |
CP (Dyract, Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) |
3 |
Rel |
CP-22/78 |
USPHS |
AM (Contour, Kerr Manufacturing Co., Romulus, Ml, USA) |
AM-26/78 |
Hübel and Mejàre (2003)2121. Hübel S, Mejàre I. Conventional versus resin-modified glassionomer cement for Class 11 restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Jan;13(1):2-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00416.xPMID:12542617
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003...
|
Sweden |
Majority SM |
CII |
40 (4-7) |
115 |
36/6 |
1.7 |
RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M Co, St Paul, MN, USA) |
1 |
Rel |
RMGIC-2/53 |
USPHS |
GIC (Fuji II, GC Europe N.V Leuven, Belgium) |
GIC – 11/62 |
Kavvadia et al. (2004)2828. Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Pediatr Dent. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):245-50.
|
Greece |
SM |
CII |
75 (6-9) |
150 |
24/6 |
24.1 |
CP (Clicker* + F2000, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) |
2 |
NR |
CP – 1/75 |
USPHS |
AM (Dispers alloy, Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) |
AM – 1/75 |
Andersson-Wenckert and Sunnegardh-Grönberg (2006)1919. Andersson-Wenckert I, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Nov;64(6):334-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350600788245
https://doi.org/10.1080/0001635060078824...
|
Sweden |
PG |
CII |
57 (5-11) |
132 |
24/12 |
24 |
CR (Excite* + Tetric Flow, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) |
5 |
Rel |
CR – 9/66 |
USPHS |
RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) |
RMGIC – 7/66 |
Pascon et al. (2006)2929. Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM et al. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):381-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08....
|
Brazil |
SM |
CI-II |
30 (4-9) |
79 |
24/6 |
25 |
CR (Heliobond* + Heliomolar, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) |
2 |
Abs |
CR – 5/27 |
USPHS |
CP (Single Bond*+ F2000, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA - AND - Prime and Bond NT*+ Dyract, Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) |
CP-14/52 |
Alves dos Santos et al. (2010)1414. Santos MPA, Luiz RR, Maia LC. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results. J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):451-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02....
|
Brazil |
SM |
CI-II |
48 (3-9) |
141 |
48/12 |
11.3 |
CR (Prime and Bond NT* + TPH Spectrum, Dentsply, Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) |
2 |
Abs |
CR – 11/44 |
USPHS |
RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) |
RMGIC-12/46 |
CP (Stae* + Freedom, SD, Bayswater, Victoria, Australia) |
CP-8/51 |
Casagrande et al. (2013)2020. Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F et al. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
|
Brazil |
PG |
CI-II |
66 (5-9) |
132 |
18/6 |
7.6 |
CR (Adper Single Bond 2* + Filtek Z350-AND-P90 System Adhesive* + Filtek P90, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) |
NR |
Abs |
CR-12/94 |
USPHS |
RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA |
RMGIC-5/38 |
Sengul and Gurbuz (2015)1515. Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of restorative materials in primary teeth class II lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(4):315-21. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.315
https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.4....
|
Turkey |
PG |
CII |
41(5-7) |
146 |
24/3 |
0 |
CR (Prime and Bond NT* (Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) + Valux Plus, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) |
1 |
Abs |
CR – 9/40 |
FDI |
RMGIC (Fuji II LC, GC Corporation Tokyo, Japan) |
RMGIC −9/32 |
CP (Prime and Bond NT* + Dyract AR Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) |
CP – 12/36 |
Bektas Donmez et al. (2016)3030. Bektas Donmez S, Uysal S, Dolgun A, Turgut MD. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;17(3):202-12.
|
Turkey |
SM |
CII |
31(4-7) |
93 |
18/6 |
7.5 |
CR (XP BOND* + Esthet-X HD, Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) |
1 |
Abs |
CR-4/31 |
FDI |
RMGIC (Photac-fil Quick, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) |
RMGIC-2/31 |
CP (XP BOND* + Dyract eXtra, Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) |
CP-1/31 |