Coffee industry waste-derived biochar: characterization and agricultural use evaluation according to Brazilian legislation

The agricultural use of biochar has been the focus of much research in the last decade due to the improvement of soil chemical, physical, and biological attributes. Nonetheless, Brazil still has no specific legislation for biochar, limiting its agricultural use. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the use of biochar produced from spent coffee grounds (SCG) and coffee parchment (CP) by slow pyrolysis at 700 °C according to the existing framework of the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply (MAPA) legislation for organic fertilizer, soil conditioner or plant substrate. Biochar was characterized according to normative instructions No. 17, 31, 61, 7, 5 and 35. Although not required by the addressed legislation, the semitotal content of macroand micronutrients was also determined. While CP biochar could be used as an organic fertilizer or plant substrate, SCG biochar, due to its higher Ni content and lower than required cation exchange capacity (CEC), did not meet MAPA legislation criteria to allow for its agricultural use. Future regulations can be based on the current standards, and structural attributes, such as total C content, particle size distribution, and complete macroand micronutrient determination should be included. Further research may also indicate the viability of biochar use as a soil conditioner based on a more representative set of biomasses with a higher CEC. These considerations will help to take advantage of the benefits of biochar to soil, contributing to a circular economy, which is still at a difficult stage in Brazil.


INTRODUCTION
no aggregated agricultural value and are produced in large quantities should be chosen. These criteria are met by some residues from the processing procedure for coffee beans. Brazil is the largest producer and exporter of coffee in the world, contributing, on average, to 25.4% of global coffee exportation, and its total coffee production for 2020 was 63.1 million bags of beans (Conab 2020). Coffee processing generates large quantities of residues, approximately 1.1 t•ton -1 of coffee beans (Dias et al. 2014). Consequently, Brazil has an abundance of coffee-processing-derived biomass residues, which could serve as feedstock for biochar production. Among these residues, the use of coffee parchment as a plant substrate has been reported in the literature (Soulaïmana et al. 2019), although studies related to this biomass are rare. The agricultural use of spent coffee grounds has also been reported, for example, as fertilizer (Cervera-Mata et al. 2019). Nevertheless, low agricultural efficiency or even a potential phytotoxic effect has been reported when spent coffee grounds are used in their raw form in soils (Carnier et al. 2019;Hardgrove and Livesley 2016). Thus, the conversion of these residues to biochar could be an effective alternative.
Biochar can be employed in agriculture as fertilizers (Kamau et al. 2019), mixed with mineral (NPK) fertilizers (Magalhães et al. 2018), used as soil conditioners (Silva et al. 2018), and employed as a substrate for growing plants (Dispenza et al. 2016). Martins Filho et al. (2020 and Silva et al. (2021) also demonstrated the impact of coffee waste biochar on soil attributes, which provided an increase in nutrients and improved biological activity. Beyond these agricultural uses, important environmental applications have been shown for biochar, including increasing carbon stocks in soils, mitigating the greenhouse effect (Liu et al. 2019), and remediating environments contaminated by heavy metals (Chwastowski et al. 2020;Manzano et al. 2020).
The commercialization of biochar for agricultural use has already commenced in a number of countries under various trade names and for a variety of uses (fertilizers, soil conditioner, and plant substrate). A key contributing factor to the international acceptance of biochar for use in agriculture has been the existence of specific protocols for their characterization, developed by the International Biochar Initiative (IBI 2015) and the European Biochar Certificate (EBC 2012). Both the IBI and the EBC are nongovernmental entities whose objectives are the sustainable production and appropriate agricultural utilization of biochar without risk to the environment or agricultural systems. These international protocols establish definitions for biochar materials and describe standardized testing and measurement methods for the determination of selected physicochemical properties. In addition to the IBI and EBC protocols, a book entitled Biochar: A Guide to Analytical Methods was launched in 2017, which comprises a detailed manual of analytical methods specific to biochar .
The current situation in Brazil is that for a biochar to be used directly in agriculture or commercialized, it must satisfy the directives proposed within the series of normative instructions (NIs) issued by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply (MAPA). These normative practices include soil conditioners (Brazil 2006;2008), plant substrates (Brazil 2007;2008;2016a), and organic fertilizers (Brazil;2016b;2020). Despite the great agricultural and economic potential of biochar, its unique physicochemical characteristics could preclude its adequacy to the current legislation and consequently its commercialization and safe use by various sectors of Brazilian agriculture, failing to contribute to the circular economy.
Given these considerations and the lack of studies that evaluate the agricultural use of biochar in Brazil in the legal scope, in the present work, two biochars agricultural potential produced from coffee wastes were evaluated, according to the current Brazilian legislation based on its overall characterization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
Spent coffee grounds (SCG) and coffee parchment (CP) were selected as feedstocks from the coffee industry due to their contrasting characteristics and misuse or difficult final disposal. Both materials were air dried, and their original particle size distribution was maintained. After drying, these residues were pyrolyzed under a N2 atmosphere in a reactor of continuous operation with a production capacity of 2 t·day -1 at a heating rate of 5 °C·min -1 up to 700 °C and a residence time of 1 h, followed by slow cooling to room temperature. A batch was produced for each biochar, which was homogenized, and then samples were collected for characterization without any further preparation step.
The biochar was characterized according to the requirements of the normative instructions from MAPA applicable to substrates, organic fertilizers and soil conditioners (Table 1). The NI No. 61 (Brazil 2020) specifies the guarantees and tolerances for organic fertilizers destined for agricultural use. The NI No. 61 (Brazil 2020) also classifies organic fertilizers in classes A (without sanitary waste) and B (with sanitary waste, authorized by the environmental agency), ensuring safe agricultural use. Normative instruction No. 35 (Brazil 2008) specifies the guarantees and tolerances for the soil conditioner, NI No. 5 (Brazil 2016a) includes the classification, specification, guarantees and tolerances for the plant substrate, and NI No. 7 (Brazil 2016b) specifies the maximum limits of contaminants for organic fertilizers, soil conditioner and plant substrate.  Analyses performed: moisture and pH (water) (Brazil 2017), pH (CaCl 2 ) and electrical conductivity (EC) (Brazil 2007); organic carbon (OC) and total nitrogen (N) were described by Nelson and Sommers (1996) and Brazil (2017), respectively, and cation exchange capacities (CECs) were determined according to Brazil (2007); potentially toxic metals were determined by method 3051A from U.S. EPA (2007) (Brazil 2016b), except hexavalent chromium (Cr6+), which was obtained according to Sá et al. (2021). The inert materials were determined as described by Brazil (2017), and the water holding capacity (WHC) and bulk (volumetric) density were determined according to Brazil (2008). The particle size distribution analysis was obtained as described in Brazil (2020 viable helminth eggs and Salmonella sp. in organic fertilizers, soil conditioners and plant substrates. However, given the origin of biochars (vegetable byproducts, coffee industry), these biological analyses were not performed.
All analyses were performed in triplicate, and the average and standard deviations were provided. When the same attribute was obtained by different methods, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed by the F test (p ≤ 0.05), and when significant differences were observed, the means were compared by the Tukey's test (p ≤ 0.05).

Water content, WHC and volumetric (bulk) density
The determination and reporting of the water content of a biochar is a requirement by the Brazilian NI No. 61 from MAPA, which sets a maximum water content of 40% (m/m) for simple organic fertilizers. Both biochars investigated in the present work, produced from spent coffee grounds and coffee parchment, had water contents well below 40% ( Table 2). The low water content in biochars is due to water evaporation during the pyrolysis process (Cai and Liu 2007), and such characteristics are desirable to facilitate transport and handling. The drying temperature used for the determination of the water content is related to the purposes of the norms. The Brazilian directives NI No. 61 (Brazil 2020) andNI No. 5 (Brazil 2016a) set a drying temperature standard of 65 °C to avoid N losses by volatilization during drying. This is not a problematic question for biochars since these materials are produced by pyrolysis and thus should not contain significant concentrations of nutrients in organic form that can be lost by volatilization. Table 2. Mean values for the moisture, water holding capacity and volumetric (bulk) density for the two evaluated biochars. The water holding capacity is a physicochemical parameter required by NI No. 35 from MAPA (Brazil 2006) for soil conditioner characterization, and it was determined using an applied pressure (tension) of 1.0 kPa, corresponding to a 10 cm column of water. The mean WHC values obtained were 74.3 and 151.9% (m/m) for the SCG and CP biochars, respectively (Table 2). Normative instruction No. 35 from MAPA (Brazil 2006) sets a minimum value of 60% (m/m) for the WHC of agricultural soil conditioners. Therefore, the two evaluated biochars meet this requirement to be used as soil conditioners in Brazil. It is well reported in the literature that biochar has the capacity to improve soil water retention (Chen et al. 2018), mainly because of its porous structure, which adds inter-and intrapores into the soil, increasing water storage (Liu et al. 2017). Edeh et al. (2020) reported that the addition of biochar increases the available water content by an average of 28.5% and the field capacity by 20.4% in soils. Thus, for agricultural use focused on the increase in soil water stock, WHC determination on biochar is an important attribute to consider.
Declaration of the bulk density is a requirement of NI No. 5 from MAPA (Brazil 2016a) for plant substrates. For this purpose, density is an indispensable parameter for the management of irrigation, the selection and addition rates of nutrients, and the identification of suitable containers to grow plants. Smaller containers require lower density substrates to provide the best conditions for plant root system development and consequently crop yields (Fermino and Kämpf 2012). For this purpose, although the NI does not set a limit value, CP biochar would be preferred over SCG as a plant substrate because of its significantly lower bulk density (Table 2).

Biochar agricultural use pH and EC
The determination and reporting of biochar pH are required by the Brazilian NI No. 5 and No. 61 from MAPA, and there are differences in the extraction solvent according to the methodology (Table 3). For the determination of biochar pH, 0.01 mol·L -1 CaCl 2 was used as the extraction solvent, and the pH values of the extracts were lower than that of water for both biochars. The use of an electrolyte solution, 0.01 mol·L -1 CaCl 2 , as the extractor is meant to reduce variability produced by the presence of soluble salts in the material, which consequently results in slightly more acidic pH (Sing et al. 2017). Table 3. Mean values for pH and electrical conductivity of the two evaluated biochars.  In all cases, the aqueous extracts obtained from both coffee residue biochars were alkaline. At a high pyrolysis temperature (700 °C) of biomass, some of the elements, namely carbon (C), hydrogen (H), oxygen (O), and N, are lost through the volatilization of organic compounds, so alkaline elements Na, Ca, and Mg in the biochar become concentrated and are transformed into their oxides, hydroxides, and carbonates. These, in turn, are constituents of the ash present in biochars and contribute to the alkalinity of these materials (Silva et al. 2021). Considering that Brazilian soils are predominantly acidic (Quaggio 2000), biochar alkalinity can act as lime and increase soil pH . However, to define the application of coffee residue biochars, the desired final soil pH and the biochar and soil buffering capacities should be considered, since high application rates might alkalinize the soil (Domingues et al. 2020), which causes negative effects on plant nutrition. The use of 0.01 mol·L -1 CaCl 2 as the extractor solution appears to be the most appropriate method for biochar pH determination since it reduces the effects of soluble salts and consequently minimizes the analytical error in pH determination and produces more reliable results.
The determination of EC is required by Brazilian legislation, NI No. 5, from MAPA (Brazil 2016a), but no range is defined by these protocols for soil application. High EC values may be problematic for the agricultural use of a residue, as they indicate high levels of soluble salts in the material (Huang et al. 2019) and have the potential to cause soil salinization. The range considered normal for an organic residue destined for agricultural use is between 0.64 and 6.85 dS·m -1 (Melo et al. 2008). For the aqueous extract prepared from the SCG biochar, the EC was low (0.80 dS·m -1 ) compared to CP biochar (Table 3), which displayed a much higher EC (8.91 dS·m -1 ). Nevertheless, a 1:5 ratio is not indicated for calcareous materials because of the influence of salts. Therefore, considering the alkalinity of biochar, probably caused by the concentration of salts, adopting a broader ratio (1:10 or 1:20) could be more appropriate for adapting the current legislation or for the elaboration of a specific biochar legislation.

Elemental contents and CEC
The C content is a fundamental parameter of any material of organic origin, and its determination and reporting are required by Brazilian legislation (Table 4). Brazilian legislation from MAPA is focused on organic materials for soil application, aiming to provide N to plants and improve the soil CEC, so only the determination and reporting of the organic C content is required. The minimum value for the OC content of 15% is specified for NI No. 61 from MAPA (Brazil 2020). Both SCG and CP showed OC contents above the specified minimum values and may be classified as biochar suitable for agricultural use (Table 4).  Biochar, nonetheless, differs from other organic materials, as they present higher concentrations of aromatic C, which, in conjunction with surface carboxyl groups, increase the retention of nutrients. Consequently, their application to soils improves agricultural productivity (Rehman and Razzaq 2017), and the presence of aromatic C in biochars stabilizes C and improves its persistence in soils (Sohi et al. 2010). The application of C-containing materials that are resistant to decomposition in soils leads to C sequestration, removing it from the atmospheric cycle and might help mitigate anthropogenic emissions of CO 2 (Ronsse et al. 2013). Thus, these considerations suggest that the determination of total C beyond the OC should be included in an adaptation to the current legislation or in future Brazilian legislation for the production, use and commercialization of biochars, regardless of a specific intended use.
Nitrogen is one of the most important macronutrients and is present in many of the substances essential to plant metabolism, such as amino acids, proteins, and enzymes; thus, it is vital to crop growth and development. Analyses for this element in organic fertilizers are a requirement of NI No. 61 (Brazil 2020), and for C, the focus on the analyses is on the levels of available N to plants. This normative specifies a minimum N content of 0.5% (m/m) (dry mass basis) for all types of organic fertilizer, whose limit is lower than the values found for the two evaluated biochars (Table 4), in such a way that both met the respective Brazilian legislation standards.
Although it is an important nutrient, studies have demonstrated that biochar is not an effective source of N for promoting plant growth (Chan et al. 2007) and may reduce N mineralization in soils, hence decreasing the availability of this nutrient (Dempster et al. 2012). In comparison to feedstock biomass, N loss occurs during pyrolysis, and the remaining N in biochar is recalcitrant and not readily available to plants (McBeath et al. 2015). However, the application of biochar to agricultural soils can produce modifications that are beneficial to the retention and bioavailability of N added as NH 4 + and NO 3 - (Zheng et al. 2013), as well as reduced emissions of the greenhouse gas N2O (Liu et al. 2019). The effects that the application of biochar produces on the soil and crops are characteristics not only of the original biomass and the pyrolysis conditions, but also of the properties of the soil and the local climatic conditions (Ding et al. 2016). Thus, further consideration, as part of the revision of Brazilian legislation, will need to focus on the intended agricultural use of biochar and require more data on how the N content of biochar influences its characteristics.
The determination of the CEC is required by Ni No. 35 from MAPA (Brazil 2006) for the characterization of organic materials to be used as soil conditioners in Brazil. The official experimental method from MAPA for soil conditioners, which encompasses biochar, can be found in MAPA NI No. 17 (Brazil 2007). The exchange sites in the conditioner are first saturated with H + derived from 0.5 mol·L -1 HCl, and the H + adsorbed into the exchange sites is then displaced with 0.5 mol·L -1 calcium acetate, forming acetic acid, which is determined by titration against a standardized 0.1 mol·L -1 solution of sodium hydroxide. Interest in the CEC of organic materials comes from an established direct relationship between soil productivity and soil CEC. The CEC contribution from organic materials is particularly important for the soils of tropical regions, where organic matter is responsible for up to 80% of the CEC in the soils (Pacheco and Petter 2011).
For soil conditioners, the minimum CEC required by NI No. 35 of MAPA (Brazil 2006) is 200 mmol c ·kg -1 . The CEC values obtained for the SCG and CP biochars were 41.3 and 51.8 mmol c ·kg -1 , respectively (Table 4). Thus, neither of the biochars evaluated in the present study would be approved for use in Brazil as products for the improvement of the physical or physicochemical properties of a soil. These values are close to the 55.6 mmol c ·kg -1 found by Silva et al. (2021) for coffee ground biochar but are considerably lower than the 225.4 mmol c ·kg -1 verified by the same authors for coffee husk biochar. Both biochars evaluated by Silva et al. (2021) were pyrolyzed at 560 °C, and the CEC was obtained by compulsive exchange by BaCl 2 and MgSO 4 . Andrade et al. (2015) evaluated the CEC of biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of poultry litter by both the official MAPA method and an alternative method in which NH 4 + (instead of H + ) from a solution of ammonium Biochar agricultural use acetate was utilized as the indicator cation. The adsorbed NH 4 + was subsequently displaced by ion exchange for Ca 2+ from a solution of calcium acetate and determined to be NH 3 by distillation. Changing the indicator ion from H + to NH 4 + was found to increase the result obtained for the CEC of poultry litter-derived biochar by a factor of 2.45, bringing the value closer to those reported from ammonium-based determinations for other biochars of the same origin. Graber et al. (2017) initiated attempts to develop a standard method for the determination of the CEC of biochar. In their method, the indicator ion was NH 4 + , which was loaded into the ion-exchange sites of biochar from a 1 mol·L -1 pH 7 solution of ammonium acetate, and, after washing the NH 4 + -saturated biochar with isopropanol, the adsorbed NH 4 + was subsequently displaced with KCl 2 mol·L -1 and determined to be NH 3 by distillation. In general, it has been proven difficult to obtain reproducible results for the CEC of biochar, and Graber et al. (2017) have indicated that heterogeneity, variable porosity, and hydrophobicity are some of the biochar characteristics that hinder reliable CEC determinations. Munera-Echeverri et al. (2018) continued efforts to explore and resolve the challenges in CEC determination of biochar and indicated the need for various modifications to the Graber et al. (2017) method, including pretreatment of alkaline biochar with HCl 0.05 mol·L -1 to reduce the pH to 7 and to remove soluble cations to improve reproducibility. Additional studies with a broader variety of different biochars are necessary to establish a single analytical protocol able to produce a reliable and reproducible CEC for any biochar. The challenge is great due to the variable chemical composition and complex supporting matrices of biochars. It should be stressed that the CEC is a property worth determining reliably, since it is affected by the type of feedstock biomass and the pyrolysis temperature (Andrade et al. 2015;Singh et al. 2010), and it is important to assess the potential agricultural uses of biochar. However, as reported above, it is not clear which method would offer more consistent results for a wide range of biochars.
Declaration of the CEC and CEC/OC ratio is required by NI No. 61 from MAPA (Brazil 2020) for the characterization of organic fertilizers (Table 4). The CEC/OC ratio is an indicator of the degree of maturation of organic materials (Dores- Silva et al. 2011) and might indicate the fate and stability of biochar, i.e., higher values of the CEC/OC ratio indicate greater stability.

Macro-and micronutrients
The application of biochar, which contains macro-and/or micronutrients found in agricultural soils, presents great potential for improving soil fertility and acts as a nutrient source to crops (Ding et al. 2016). Although the legislation addressed in this paper does not require the determination of macronutrient levels (in addition to N), the semitotal levels (EPA 3051a method; U.S. EPA 2007) of biochar were evaluated (Table 5). Notably, among the macronutrient results is a high level of K (~5% [m/m]) found in the CP biochar (Table 5). Considering the importance of K for plant production, the low level of K in tropical soils (Steiner and Lana 2018) and the fact that KCl (potassium chloride) is the main source of K (Prakash and Verma 2016), the application of organic materials with high levels of K, such as CP biochar, as a complement could be interesting and informative. The Ca content found for the SCG biochar is also noteworthy, as its content may be related to the formation of CaCO 3 (calcium carbonate), which, in turn, contributes to neutralizing soil acidity and makes Ca available for absorption by plants (Chintala et al. 2014;Cole et al. 2019). Table 5. Nutrients and essential elements obtained for the evaluated biochars. Given the global importance of nutrients for soil improvement and food production, the determination of macro-and micronutrients should be included in future specific legislation for biochars if their intended use is fertilizer. Although the semitotal content extracted by nitric acid may not represent the amount available to plants, this content can be used as an indicator for choosing adequate biochar (Ding et al. 2016).

Potentially toxic metals and inert materials
In addition to macronutrients, the contents of micronutrients and potentially toxic metals were evaluated in biochar. Determinations were performed for the total content of the following metallic and metalloid elements: Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Cd, Pb, Cr, Hg and As (Table 6), which are widely regulated due to the hazards they present to the health of animals and plants. When present in soil, even at low concentrations, these elements may be absorbed by roots, translocated through the plant, stored and accumulated in tissues and grains. As mentioned for alkaline cations, after pyrolysis, the metallic content is concentrated in the biochar, whose final content will vary depending on the biomass used for the production of biochar. Therefore, for the safe agricultural use of biochars, these elements must be investigated. As noted previously, there is no specific Brazilian legislation for biochar. Thus, the limits of potentially toxic elements must be in accordance with NI No. 7 from MAPA (Brazil 2016b) for agricultural use. Materials to be used as organic fertilizers and soil conditioners are distinguished from materials to be used as plant substrates in NI No. 7.
For the metals Ni, Cd, Pb, Cr, and Hg, the maximum permitted limits in plant substrates are higher than those for organic fertilizers and soil conditioners. The difference is particularly striking for Cr, where for organic fertilizers and soil conditioners, the determination required is Cr 6+ against a maximum permitted level of 2 mg·kg -1 , while for plant substrates total Cr is required, with a maximum permitted level of 500 mg·kg -1 . Hexavalent chromium compounds are water soluble and are encountered principally in effluents from the electroplating, leather tanning, and pigment industries (Dehghani et al. 2016), and they are highly toxic to plants and animals and carcinogenic to humans. However, in soils and solid organic materials, Cr occurs Biochar agricultural use predominantly as Cr 3+ compounds, whose properties include low or zero solubility in water, low mobility, and low toxicity to plants, animals, and the environment (Sousa and Santos 2018). This fact was observed for both biochars evaluated in this study, since only the SCG biochar presented a total Cr content (44.5 mg·kg -1 ), while the Cr 6+ content observed for the biochars was below the detection limit of the method (< 1.4 mg·kg -1 ), which in turn was below the limit stated by the legislation (2 mg·kg -1 ).
The Ni content of the SCG biochar (216 mg·kg -1 ) is above the maximum permitted level specified in both guidelines (for organic fertilizers and soil conditioner and for plant substrates), so that in its raw form SCG is unsuitable for agricultural use. It could, however, be mixed with other materials of low Ni content, such as CP biochar, to produce an acceptable product. In fact, Ni has been identified as an essential plant micronutrient (Liu 2001), and Ni-bearing biochar, such as SCG, may be used as a corrective for application to Ni-deficient soils. The higher metal content observed in SCG compared to PC, mainly Ni, may be related to the industrial process it was submitted to before pyrolysis as biochar. While CP is obtained in the initial stages of coffee processing (pulping), SCG is generated after grinding, extraction and drying for soluble coffee production (Blinová et al. 2017). All these processes may contribute to adding trace concentrations of metal, but a concentration effect from the original metal content from the original biomass can be expected in the final waste, which might also contribute to the higher metal content in SCG biochar.
For the other elements for which determinations were made, both evaluated biochars presented contents below the maximum permitted levels specified in any of the guidelines. Considering these results, the Brazilian-adapted legislation for biochar characterization must include guidelines for heavy metal contents in biochar for all agricultural use purposes.
Normative instruction No. 7 from MAPA (Brazil 2016a) also requires the analysis of inert materials for organic fertilizers and soil conditioners and stipulates maximum values by dry mass. The maximum permitted values are 0.5% for glass, plastics and metals (> 2 mm) and 5% for stones (> 5 mm). For both biochars, the content of these materials was not observed (Table 6), which is in accordance with the biomasses used, derived from byproducts of the coffee industry. For the safe use of biochars in agriculture, from production to application, the evaluation of inert material is an important aspect to be considered.

Particle size distribution
Several benefits of applying biochar to soils have been shown to be linked to their particle sizes. The pores within biochar particles with sizes greater than 0.25 mm have been demonstrated to play an important role in increasing the water holding capacity of soils (Liu et al. 2017). The NI No. 61 from MAPA (Brazil 2020) provides granulometric specifications for the identification of four textural classes of organic fertilizers: granular, powdered, ground, and coarsely ground. Thus, particle size analysis was performed, and the mass percentage of each class was declared (Table 7). For the SCG biochar, the majority of the particles (~ 68% m/m) were < 2 mm, while the proportion by mass with sizes below 2 mm CP biochar was approximately 20%. Soil-biochar interactions are mediated through surface contact, which is greater for smaller particles (Duarte et al. 2019), which might explain the higher WHC value for SCG biochar than CP biochar. However, small particles are more easily lost during transport and by wind when biochar is applied to and incorporated into soils (Maienza et al. 2017). R. Carnier et al.
The particle size distribution results obtained by dry sieving of the two biochars evaluated in the present study did not match any of the MAPA textural classes, and therefore, the biochar would be classified as "products without a granulometric specification" (Brazil 2020, Chapter II, subsection I). Nevertheless, in a proposal for Brazilian regulation, it is important to include a granulometric profile of biochar due its interference in the porosity, WHC, and other characteristics when applied in soil.

CONCLUSION
Coffee parchment biochar could be used as organic fertilizer and plant substrate but not as a soil conditioner due to its low CEC and SCG biochar. Due to its higher Ni content and lower than required CEC, CP biochar did not meet the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply (MAPA) legislation requirements to allow for its agricultural use.
The results obtained during this study demonstrate the need for Brazil to bring forward new and specific legislation addressing the characterization, regulation, and commercialization of biochars. Further research may also indicate the viability of biochar as a soil conditioner based on a more representative set of biomasses with a higher CEC. A future regulation can be based on current standards, but it should define all the parameters to be determined, identify reliable methodologies for their determination, and, where appropriate, set minimum or maximum acceptable values. Structural attributes such as total C content, particle size distribution, and complete macro-and micronutrient determination should be included in this protocol, and WHC must be declared when agricultural use focuses on increasing the soil water stock.
These actions will make possible the employment of biochar by Brazilian farmers in a way that is safe at all stages in the production chain, from biochar production, through field utilization, to the human and animal consumption of agricultural crops raised in biochar-amended soils.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All dataset were generated and analyzed in the current study.