ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD), despite being an increasingly common condition, is still a complex topic for many dentists. This study aims to validate and verify the internal consistency of an instrument developed to assess the knowledge of dentists on the main issues related to TMD.
METHODS This is research divided into three stages: observational, transversal and quantitative. Initially, a total of 10 expert/judges dental surgeons (DS) in the area of TMD and orofacial pain were invited to participate to evaluate the form and content of the instrument. In the second stage, a total of 5 DS who were also specialists validated the answers considered correct. In the third stage, internal consistency was checked in a sample of 188 DS who responded to the same questionnaire on two occasions to compare and calculate internal consistency.
RESULTS In the first stage of validation, the individual and total CVI was 1, suggesting the consistency of the instrument. In the experts' assessment, cohesion was found in the structure of the instrument, which presented a total Cronbach's alpha of 0.766, that is, substantial consistency, with the first domain, on pain and behavior, the greatest consistency with 𝞪 of 0.815. The internal consistency of the instrument carried out by 188 dental surgeons showed almost perfect consistency (𝞪 of 0.820).
CONCLUSION The general consistency of the instrument developed to assess knowledge about TMD was considered substantial. When internal consistency was verified in a sample of dental surgeons, it varied from moderate to almost perfect.
Keywords:
Dental surgeon; Instruments; Knowledge; Validation; Temporomandibular dysfunction
HIGHLIGHTS
Validated instrument shows substantial consistency in assessing dental surgeons' knowledge of TMD
The study reveals high levels of content validity and reliability in TMD questionnaire
The domain of pain and behavioral aspects showed the highest internal consistency, standing out among the evaluated topics