| Al-Zahrani et al.10 Saudi Arabia |
To test the accuracy of CPS in predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with advanced cancer. |
Chuang PS |
61 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Alfaro-Campos and Vargas-Bermúdez11 Costa Rica |
To determine the validity of the Palliative Prognosis Index (PaP Score) in cancer patients referred to Costa Rica’s National Center for Pain Control and Palliative Care. |
PaP |
100 |
Observational descriptive study (case series). |
Arai et al.12 Japan |
To investigate the association between changes in PPI over time and survival of terminal cancer patients in a PC unit (PCU). |
PPI |
374 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
Baik et al.13 New York |
To determine how the PPS tool was used to estimate end-of-life survival. |
PPS |
- |
Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Chen et al.14 Taiwan |
To develop a short-term prognostic prediction method that included objective factors such as medical history, vital signs, and blood tests for use in patients with advanced cancer. |
Objective Palliative Performance Score (OPPS) |
234 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Cheng et al.15 Taiwan |
To evaluate the practical usefulness of the palliative prognostic index (PPI) as a prognostic tool used by specialist nurses in a hospice visit in Taiwan. |
PPI |
623 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Chou et al.16 Taiwan |
To analyze the applications of PPI, CCI and GPS as prognostic tools in terminal patients with hematological diseases under PC. |
PPI/mGPS |
217 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Méndez et al.17 Spain |
To comment on the errors related to prognostic prediction through the PaP scale. |
PaP |
- |
Opinion article. |
| Naylor et al.18 Brazil |
To estimate the survival time of patients referred to the PC unit of the National Cancer Institute (INCA), using the Palliative Program Prognostic Score (PaP). |
PaP |
250 |
Prospective cohort study. |
| Ohno et al.19 Japan |
To evaluate the accuracy of the Palliative Prognosis Index (PPI) and the prognostic model developed in hospitalized patients under the care of a hematologist. |
PPI |
14 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
Olajide et al.20 USA |
It explores the application of PPS for its predictive ability related to survival time. |
PPS |
261 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Peng et al.21 Taiwan |
To evaluate the usefulness of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale assessments on days 1 and 8 of PC, as well as the change in scale between these assessments, as prognostic tools for terminally ill cancer patients. |
ECOG-PS |
2392 |
Prospective cohort study. |
| Pirovano et al.22 Italy |
To Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors and integrate them into a score. |
PaP |
519 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Simmons et al.6 UK |
To examine progress in the development and validation of prognostic scales. |
GPS/B12/CPR Index / PiPS/PPI/PaP/ D-PaP |
- |
Systematic review. |
| Sonoda et al.23 Japan |
To clarify the predictive value of PPI and PaPS in PC consultations for patients with advanced AC in an intensive care hospital in Japan. |
PPI/PaP |
PI: 247 P a P : 187 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
Stone et al.24 United Kingdom |
Description and critical review of various prognostic scales. |
PaP/PPI/Chuang PS |
- |
Narrative review. |
Subramaniam et al.25 UK |
To examine the accuracy and evaluate the PPI as a prognostic tool for patients hospitalized with cancer in the United Kingdom. |
PPI |
272 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Suh et al.26 South Korea |
To develop a new prognostic scale for terminal patients. |
OPS |
209 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Inomata et al. 27 Japan |
To evaluate the usability of PPI for predicting short-term survival in patients with lung cancer and to compare its efficacy in patients with small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. |
PPI |
84 |
Observational descriptive study (case series). |
| Jansen et al.28 Netherlands |
To determine the usability of the PPS in determining the terminal phase. |
PPS |
78 |
Observational descriptive study (case series). |
Oh et al.29 South Korea |
To examine the association between changes in PPS and survival of patients with terminal cancer. |
PPS |
606 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Hung et al.30 Taiwan |
To evaluate the usefulness of sequential PPI measures at admission and week 1 (D8) of hospitalization, the change in PPI score between the two measures, and the combination of initial PPI and change in terminal cancer patients in a PC consulting team service. |
PPI |
2392 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Tarumi et al.31 Canada |
To validate the PaP and evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the clinical tools used and the diagnosis of delirium in a population (cancer and non-cancer) referred for consultation in a PC service. |
PaP/PPS |
958 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Trejo-Ayala et al.32 Mexico |
To establish whether PPI, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) or other factors are predictors of survival of patients in PC. |
PPI |
32 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
Arias et al.33 Spain |
To determine the predictive capacity of PPSv2 in patients with advanced cancer and determine the characteristics and survival in a cohort of patients admitted to a PCU. |
2 PPSv2 |
157 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Yoon et al.34 South Korea |
To evaluate the usability of OPS in a population independent of Korea and identify other prognostic factors associated with life expectancy with OPS. |
OPS |
104 |
Observational descriptive study (case series). |
Yoon et al.35 South Korea |
Prospective validation of OPS for patients hospitalized with cancer in South Korea in a multicenter study. |
OPS |
217 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Yoon et al.36 South Korea |
To compare the accuracy between 4 prognostic scores in life expectancy prediction. |
PaP/D-PaP/ PPI/OPS |
94 |
Observational descriptive study (case series). |
Kim et al.37 South Korea |
To provide important information related to the treatment of terminal cancer patients by examining clinical parameters associated with survival time and analyzing survival times using prognostic scores. |
PPS/PPI/PaP |
415 |
Observational descriptive study (case series). |
Krishnan et al.38 USA |
Discuss data informing prognosis in patients with incurable solid tumors, advanced, including physician’s assessment of life expectancy, prognostic factors and prognostic models in this population group. |
KPS/PaP/PPI |
1500 |
Systematic review. |
López-Nogales39 USA |
To establish by the work team of the PC clinic a treatment and follow-up plan, according to the needs of the patients, which implies scheduling or reprogramming the number of consultations or home visits, as well as establishing a basis for the management of agony, emergencies at home, which leads to a better attention of the patient/family binomial. In addition, to provide an answer to the sick person and their family that is satisfactory about the course and future of their illness, in the face of the classic question “how long do I have to live?”, which allows them to adjust their resources and time to prepare themselves in the face of imminent death. |
PaP |
128 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Ermacora et al.40 Italy |
To verify the accuracy of the PSC in predicting the survival of patients within 30 days, to evaluate the agreement between two different and experienced oncologists and a nurse in estimating the prognosis and between the estimated and actual survival and to test the role of laboratory results, along with clinical and social factors in predicting survival. |
PaP/OPS/PPI |
334 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Farinholt et al.41 USA |
To compare the prognostic accuracy of PSC and PPI in patients with advanced cancer. |
PPI |
215 |
Cross-sectional study. |
| Mei et al.42 Singapore |
To prospectively evaluate the prognostic value of PPS in predicting survival in patients with advanced cancer; |
PPS |
296 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Morita et al43 Japan |
To develop a scoring system for valid prognostic forecasting. |
PPI |
450 |
Retrospective cohort study. |
| Morita et al.44 Japan43
|
To establish whether clinicians’ prediction of survival can be improved using PPI and in which situations physicians have poorly estimated the patient’s prognosis. |
PPI |
258 |
Prospective cohort study; |
| García et al.45 Spain |
To review of published papers on prognostic scales in advanced cancer between 1993 and 2013. |
|
- |
Narrative Review. |
| Glare et al.46 Australia |
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of PaP in patients with advanced cancer under the care of the oncologist. |
PaP |
100 |
Prospective cohort study. |
| Hiratsuka et al.3 Japan3
|
To develop a functional prognostic scoring system for patients with advanced cancer. |
FPPI |
1896 |
Prospective cohort study. |
Hui et al.47 USA |
To provide an updated view of prognostic models in advanced cancer and highlight the value of prognostic calculators. |
PPS/PaP/PPI/OPS/ PiPS/ GPS/other models |
- |
Narrative review. |