| Alexander et al.19 United Kingdom |
Randomized clinical trial |
n = 24 EG: n = n/i CG: n = n/i Age: 20.58 ± 2.55 Gender: M |
EG: CWI, 10°C, for 11 min CG: PAS |
T0) Pre-Training T1) Immediately post-training T2) Immediately post-intervention T3)24hpost-intervention |
Football (Elite) |
Muscle soreness: Five-point scale, (1-5)) |
The present results suggest that cryotherapy, applied as an immediate single bout of cold-water immersion after a soccer match, effectively reduces some biochemical, functional, and perceptual markers of muscle damage. |
| Ascensão et al.12 Portugal |
Randomized clinical trial |
n = 20 EG: n = 10 CG: n = 10 Age: CG: 18.3+0.8 EG: 18.1+1.8 Gender: M |
EG: CWI, 10°C, for 10 min CG: 10 min thermoneutral water immersion, 35°C |
T0) Baseline T1) 30 min of the end T2) 24h after the match T3) 48h after the match |
Soccer (National league teams) |
Muscle pain: Scale from 0 (‘‘absence of soreness’’) to 10 (‘‘very intense soreness’’). |
Cryotherapy immediately after a soccer match effectively reduces some markers of muscle damage despite conflicting research on muscle adaptation mechanisms. |
| Coelho et al. 20 Brazil |
Randomized clinical trial |
n = 25 EG (CWI): n = 09 EG (BIO): n = 08 CG: n = 08 Age: EG (BIO): 22.63 ± 4.2 EG (CWI): 22.63 ± 3.- CG: 20.8 ± 3.2 Gender: M |
CWI: 10°C for 10 min BIO: Bioceramic CG: Seated |
T0) Baseline T1) Postmatch T2) 24h postmatch T3) 48h postmatch |
Soccer (Uviversity level) |
Perception of soreness: DOMS (0 – 10) - 0 (‘‘absence of soreness’’) to 10 (‘‘very intense soreness’’) Perceived recovery: Scale of 0 (“very poorly recovered”) and 10 (“very well recovered”) |
For 48-hour recovery of muscle damage, BIO and CWI do not provide conclusive evidence of enhancing functional and perceptual recovery after a soccer match, with BIO needing further research to be accepted as an effective recovery modality. |
| Dantas et al.21 Brazil |
Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
n = 30 EG (I): n = 10 EG (CWI): n = 10 CG: n = 10 Age: EG (IG): 31.71 ±5.43-EG (CWIG):30.28± 6.10 CG: 33.00 ± 4.84 Gender: M |
I: Immersed of temperature (29.8°C ± 0.66°C) for 10 min CWI: 10°C for 10 min CG: Rested |
T1) Immediately post-running T2) Immediately post-intervention T3) 24h post-intervention |
Street racing (recreactional) |
Perception of soreness: - VAS (0 - 100 mm) |
CWI at 10°C for 10 minutes has been widely used in clinical settings, but it is no more effective than water immersion and rest in recovering functional performance, torque and CK blood concentration in muscles damaged after 10-km street runs. |
| Getto and Golden16 USA |
Randomized clinical trial |
n = 23 EG (CWI): n = 07 CG (AR): n = 08 CG (PAS): n = 08 Age: n/i Gender: 13 M, 10 F |
CWI: 10°C for 10 min AR: Active recovery PAS: Passive recovery |
T0) Baseline T1) Postexercise T2)24h postintervention |
Football, volleyball, basketball (Collegiate athletes) |
Perception of soreness: VAS-PS: 1 - 10, with 10 indicating the most soreness. |
On the basis of our investigation, neither CWI or AR while immersed were deemed as more advantageous in the recovery of speed or power, compared with passive recovery when implemented after routine conditioning and training. |
| Nunes et al. 15 Brazil |
Randomized clinical trial |
n = 19 EG (CWI): n = 11 CG: n = 08 Age: 2.1 ± 1.6 Gender: M |
CWI: 10 °C for 10 min CG: Seated |
T0) A week before T1) Baseline T2) Post the match T3) 30min after the match T4) 24h after the match T5) 48h after the match T6) 72h after the match |
Rugby (Professional) |
Perception of soreness: DOMS (0-10) 0 (absence of soreness) to 10 (very intense soreness). Perceived recovery: VAS (0 – 10) - from 0 (very poorly recovered) and 10 (high-perceived recovery). |
A single bout of CWI accelerated recovery, especially in inflammation and neuromuscular function. The study suggests using more sensitive and specific markers to measure CWI effects, as some recovery markers in the CWI group were better than in the control group, supporting CWI for postmatch recovery in rugby players. |
| Krueger et al.14 Germany |
Randomized clinical trial |
n = 18 EG (CWI): n = 09 CG: n = 09 Age: 16.6 ± 0.6 Sex: M |
CWI: 5 to 8 °C (6.4±0.8 °C) for 5 min CG: PAS |
T1) 1 Post day T2) 2 Pre day T3) 2 Post day T4) 3 Pre day T5) 3 Post day T6) 4 Pre day T7) 4 Post day T8) 5 Pre day T9) 5 Post day |
Field hockey (Elite) |
Perception of soreness: DOMS - VAS (100-mm) - 0 (no soreness) to 100 (severe soreness.). |
Daily post-exercise CWI did not improve match performance, perceptual recovery, or biomarkers of muscle damage and metabolic load in elite youth field-hockey players. |
| Pesenti et al.13 Brazil |
Blind randomized clinical trial |
n = 28 EG (CWI): n = 07 CG (TWI): n = 07 EG (AR): n = 07 CG: n = 07 Age: of 16 and 19 Gender: M |
CWI: 10°C for 10 min TWI: 10 min AR: treadmill for 10 min CG: seated for 10 min |
T0) Baseline T1) 24h follow up T2) 48h follow up T3) 72h follow up. |
Soccer |
Perception of soreness: -NSP (0 – 10). |
No significant differences in observed variables, including DOMS, were found between interventions, indicating a need for further studies to develop effective recovery strategies for soccer players |
| Batista et al.22 Brazil |
Randomized-crossover placebo-controlled clinical trial |
n = 20 Age: 14.05±1.79 Gender: 12 M/8F EG (CWI): n = 19 PG (TWI): n = 16 CG (PAS): n = 16 |
CWI: 14 ± 1°C TWI: 27 ± 1°C (as placebo) PAS: passive recovery |
T1: Baseline T2: wash-out (1-week) T3: before and after each intervention week |
Swimming (Competitive team) |
Perceptive outcomes: (1 to 5) poor well-being, heaviness, tiredness, discomfort and pain. |
The repeated use of CWI over the course of a training week had no impact on the functional or swimming performance outcomes of adolescent competitive swimmers. The preference for CWI as TWI was similar. |