|
Brummel et al. (2014)
|
Early and combined use of cognitive therapy. |
Randomized. |
(1) Yes. |
Viable and safe, even under mechanical ventilation. |
7/10 |
| (2) Cognitive Therapy (Problem-solving; multi-step task execution). |
|
Corcoran et al. (2017)
|
Early mobilization in the ICU. |
Prospective. |
(1) No. |
Viable with reduced hospitalization and ICU stay. |
5/10 |
(2) Exercises in bed; Standing up; Ambulation. |
|
Davis et al. (2013)
|
Feasibility of early mobilization in the ICU and functionality under mechanical ventilation. |
Cohort. |
(1) No. |
Viable, safe, and well-tolerated under mechanical ventilation. |
5/10 |
(2) Decubitus change, sitting on the bed and the edge of the bed; Standing up; Sitting on the chair; Walking. |
|
Deluzio et al. (2018)
|
Viability of the Cycloergometer in critical neurological patients. |
Cohort. |
(1) Yes. |
Viable, safe and does not bring physiological, neurological, or cognitive changes. |
4/10 |
| (2) Missing description. |
|
Fields et al. (2015)
|
Early mobilization and associated adverse events. |
Retrospective. |
(1) Yes. |
Safe and effective. |
4/10 |
| (2) Missing description. |
|
Hsu et al. (2020)
|
Level of recall, satisfaction, and benefits during mechanical ventilation. |
Pilot Study. |
(1) Yes. |
Compromise of factual memory. |
5/10 |
(2) Postural control; Equilibrium reaction; ROM; Sitting and standing up; Transferring to a chair and the bed; Ambulation. |
|
Jolley et al. (2015)
|
Early mobilization, mechanical ventilation, and associated care. |
Transversal. |
(1) No. |
Wide use of early mobilization in the ICU: 95.7% without mechanical ventilation; and 76.6%, under mechanical ventilation. |
5/10 |
(2) Weight transfer in the bed; Standing up; Walking; Transferring from bed to chair; and Ambulation. |
|
Jolley et al. (2017)
|
Prevalence of mobilization in ICUs and progression of mobility. |
Cohort. |
(1) No. |
Prevalence: 32% of patients in the ICU; 16% under mechanical ventilation; and 4% out of bed. |
5/10 |
(2) ROM, passive; Sitting on the bed; Sitting on the edge of the bed; Standing up; Transferring of the chair to the standing position; Walking at the same point; Ambulation. |
|
Needham et al. (2010)
|
Practices of sedation and analgesia in the ICU and functional mobilization. |
Retrospective. |
(1) No. |
Deep sedation was not necessary and there was tolerance to mechanical ventilation. Viable, safe, and reduced hospitalization. |
5/10 |
| (2) Sitting on the bed; Sitting on the edge of the bed; Transferring from bed to chair; Transferring from sitting to standing; and Ambulation. |
|
Pohlman et al. (2010)
|
Daily interruption of sedation and early mobilization. |
Retrospective. |
(1) No. |
Viable and safe right after intubation (ICU). |
5/10 |
(2) ROM (passive, assisted or active); Bed mobility; Sitting down; Standing up; Ambulation; Balance. |
|
Schweickert et al. (2009)
|
Early mobilization, interruption of sedation, and functional and psychiatric results. |
Randomized. |
(1) No. |
Safe, well-tolerated, improving functional status, reducing symptoms associated with the ICU, and increasing weaning. |
8/10 |
(2) Movements (liabilities, assisted and active); Bed mobility (weight transfer, sitting on the bed); Balance; Standing, Sitting in a chair; Ambulation. |
|
Sigler et al. (2016)
|
Implementation of an early mobilization program. |
Cohort. |
(1) No. |
Simple, progressive mobilization, with modification of the analgesic and sedation regimen. |
5/10 |
(2) Weight transfer in the bed; Sitting on the bed; ROM (passive, assisted, or active); Sitting on the edge of the bed; Standing up, turning, and sitting on a chair; Standing a few steps and sitting on a chair; Ambulation. |
|
Titsworth et al. (2012)
|
Early mobilization in the neuro-intensive care unit. |
Retrospective. |
(1) No. |
It does not harm the patient's critical condition and reduces the ICU stay. |
5/10 |
(2) Sitting on the bed; Sitting on the edge of the bed; Getting out of bed; Walking to the bathroom; Exiting the room; Exercising. |
|
Wahab et al. (2016)
|
Early mobilization in the ICU of a long-term hospital. |
Retrospective. |
(1) Yes. |
Reduction in ICU stay and hospitalization. |
5/10 |
| (2) Missing description. |
|
Witcher et al. (2015)
|
Early mobilization and sedation in neurological patients in the ICU. |
Retrospective. |
(1) No. |
Reduced sedation, increased analgesia. It did not reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation or the length of hospital stay. |
5/10 |
(2) ROM (passive and active); Sitting down; Standing up; Walking. |
|
Yataco et al. (2019)
|
Adverse mobilization events. |
Retrospective. |
(1) No. |
Safety, feasible with low rates of adverse events. |
5/10 |
(2) Transferring (from lying to sitting); Sitting on the edge of the bed; Standing up; Sitting on a chair; Ambulation. |
|
Zanni et al. (2010)
|
Physiological effects and safety of rehabilitation in the ICU. |
Cohort. |
(1) No. |
Safe, without significant physiological changes or adverse effects. |
5/10 |
(2) ROM; Muscle strength; Occupation; Bed positioning; Sitting on the bed; Sitting on the edge of the bed; Transferring from seated to standing; Ambulation; Activities. |