Abstract
The current study was planned to pyramid Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) resistance with null KTI and null Lox2 in soybean, with a purview to create food grade soybean genotypes which can sustain under heavy disease pressure of north Indian plains. Hence, a cross was made between NRCSL 3 (R) x NRC 142 (S, null KTI + null Lox2). F2 and subsequent F5, was screened using newly developed functional KASP markers for both traits. The markers were validated on a panel of F1 hybrids (derived from 3 different crosses) as well as wild type and double null parents. Using the markers, a total of 15 double null lines i.e., null KTI + null Lox2; having YMD resistance were identified. Two of these outyielded the best check and parent NRCSL 3 in terms of economic yield. This is the first report of pyramiding of YMD resistance with null KTI and null Lox2.
Keywords:
Marker assisted pyramiding; null KTI; null Lox2; Yellow mosaic disease (YMD); soybean
INTRODUCTION
Soybean, an oilseed legume, is a highly valuable crop grown throughout the world. It ranks first as an oilseed crop in the world. In terms of production, Brazil overtook USA in 2019-20, and is currently the global front-runner; producing approximately 39% of the world’s harvest. Other than Brazil, US, Argentina and China are the leaders of soybean production. India is ranked at fifth position worldwide in soybean production (USDA 2024). World production of soybean during 2023 was 422.3 million metric tons (mt) from an area of 143.3 million hectares and productivity was estimated to be 2.95 ton per hectare (USDA 2024). In India, it occupies about 12.8 million hectares with a production of 12.2 million tonnes (USDA 2024). The Central part of India (lat 21° 6’ N; long 26° 30’ N) is the hub of soybean production. Under Indian conditions main season of soybean cultivation is from June to October (rainy/kharif season).
Soybean has versatile end uses including its use as human food, animal feed and industrial purposes ranging from cosmetics to tyres. On an average, soybean contains 40% protein, 20% oil and is rich in lysine and vitamins A, B and D. Its oil comprises 85% unsaturated fatty acids (Anderson and Wolf 1995). Apart from the basic nutrients, soybean seeds contain certain nutraceutical components i.e., isoflavones, lecithin, tocopherols, saponins etc., that are known to reduce the risk of certain diseases (atherosclerosis, breast cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis etc.) (Anderson and Wolf 1995). Because of all these benefits, soybean has been crowned as Golden bean, yellow jewelry, great treasure beans and miracle beans (Friedman and Brandon 2001).
The use of soybean as food is restricted primarily to China, Taiwan, Japan and Korea. In India, less than 10% of the soybean produced is further processed into soy foods. Presence of antinutritional factors in soybean seed is the key reason behind low acceptance of soy-based foods. The Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (KTI) (20kDa) is the main trypsin inhibitor as well as the primary antinutritional compound (Clemente et al. 2013). These protease inhibitors, depending upon the genotype, comprise around 8-25% of the protein present in seed, and have been associated with adverse effects like inhibition of growth and anomalies in pancreas viz., hyperplasia and hypertrophy in mammals (Liener 1995). The KTI, with about 80% of the trypsin inhibitor activity, is the main culprit of ill effects of soy food and needs to be inactivated before soy food consumption. Along with the KTI and some other components, the off/beany flavour accompanying soy foods is a key factor for repugnance of the bean in daily food chart. This off/beany flavour arises when linoleic and α-linolenic acids are oxidized by the native lipoxygenase enzymes. This reaction produces hydroperoxides which are further acted upon by hydroperoxide lyases, releasing volatile compounds (aldehyde and ketone) responsible for off/beany flavour associated with the soy products (Baysal and Demirdoven 2007). There are three isoforms of seed lipoxygenase enzyme in soybean i.e., lipoxygenase-1, -2 and -3. Amongst the three lipoxygenases enzymes, lipoxygenase-2 (Lox2) has been found to be mainly responsible for n-hexanal (aldehyde) production, which is the primary source of beany flavour (Nishiba et al. 1995). Thus, Lox2 gene is the major driver of off/beany flavour in soy foods. Heat treatment is a commonly used method of inactivation of these enzymes; however, it is a cost ineffective solution, accounting for substantial part of the total processing costs (Kumar et al. 2015). Also, antinutrient residual activity of some level remains; dependent upon the treatment time and temperature (Friedman and Brandon 2001). More importantly, thermal treatment of 20 minutes which inactivates ~90% of the inhibitor results in 20% decline in protein solubility (Anderson 1992). Genetic elimination of KTI and Lox2 enzymes will lead to development of food grade varieties with lower energy requirement and thus leading to reduced cost of processing. The genotypes which lack KTI and Lox2 will certainly attract processors and consumers alike.
DNA based markers have improved the efficiency and accuracy of breeding programmes since their advent. These markers have been used for a long period for transfer of desirable traits by tagging the genomic locations responsible for the phenotype in question. While the task of phenotyping (or biochemical analyses) is lengthy and/or stage specific, DNA based markers are free from these limitations, and thus are preferred whenever available. Gel based markers specific to the null alleles of both the KTI (Moraes et al. 2006) as well as Lox2 (Shin et al. 2012) have been used in some studies. However, these are dominant markers and fail to distinguish between homozygous and heterozygous individuals, which reduces their efficacy particularly for marker assisted breeding. Single nucleotide changes, associated with the trait of interest can be converted into Kompetitive Allelic Specific PCR (KASP) markers. Low cost, high specificity and high throughput have led to KASPs being the marker of choice of the current era (Esuma et al. 2022).
North-West part of India is a potential area for expansion of soybean. Particularly, Punjab state is a latent hotspot for soybean-based cottage industry viz., Tofu and soya-milk production. However, the progress so far has been hindered by lack of suitable high yielding and food grade varieties along with Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD), a major constraint in soybean production. YMD is transmitted by whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and the disease can cause upto 100 per cent losses depending upon cultivar and the crop stage of incidence (Wrather et al.1997).
NRC 142 [Pedigree: (JS 97-52 × PI 596540) × PI 542044] is a food grade variety which has null alleles for KTI and Lox2. Also, it has stable yields across multiple environments in India and has been recommended for Central zone and South zone. However, it is susceptible to YMD and therefore is not suitable for North Indian conditions particularly Punjab, where high incidence of YMD is reported. Another variety NRCSL 3 [Pedigree: SL 958 × NRC 94], was recommended in 2024 for North plain zone of India as a high yielding variety with resistance against YMD. These genotypes were chosen as donors for marker assisted pyramiding of null KTI and null Lox2 along with phenotypic screening for YMD resistance. KASP markers were developed for the marker assisted selection of null genotypes. Segregating populations (F2, F2:3 and F5) developed from cross of NRCSL3 × NRC 142 were used for pyramiding of null KTI and null Lox2 with YMD resistance. Hence, the current study aimed at identification of agronomically superior; YMD resistant; double null genotypes to develop a food grade soybean variety.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Experimental materials
The current study was executed at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab, India). Field and offseason experiments were carried out at experimental field area of Pulses Section, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics (lat 30° 54' 42.926" N, long 75° 47' 11.663" E). Genotyping experiments were performed in labs of School of Agricultural Biotechnology. The cross between NRCSL 3 (♀, resistant against YMD) and NRC 142 (♂, null KTI, null Lox2) was made during kharif season of 2020. 15 F1s obtained from the aforementioned cross were grown in offseason nursery during winter 2020-21. F2 population of 1573 plants, derived from these F1s was raised in kharif 2021, further F2:3 population was planted in kharif season of 2022 and from this population, 181 single plant selections (SPS) were made based on agronomic desirability. All of these 181 SPS were advanced in an offseason nursery (F4 generation) during winter 2022-23 and F5 progenies were planted in kharif 2023. These progenies were labeled as per the respective F2 number, with “20-3” (Year of the cross - cross number) as the prefix. Besides the aforementioned cross, a panel of F1s derived from NRCSL 3 × NRC 142 (8 F1s), SL 955 × NRC 142 (10 F1s) and PS 1347 × NRC 142 (10 F1s) was used to validate the KASP markers developed in the current study. Two non-null (wild type for KTI and Lox2) genotypes PS 1670 and SL 958, and the parents of the above crosses were also included in the panel as controls.
DNA extraction, quantification and dilution
DNA was extracted from the 1573 F2 plants, validation panel and 173 F5 progenies (as a composite sample from 5 tagged plants) using the CTAB method. Agilent Biotek Take3 spectrophotometer was used to determine the DNA quantity. After giving RNAse treatment, agarose gel-based quantification was performed to ensure that RNA was eliminated. The working solutions of DNA were prepared having final concentration of 35-50 ng/µl in nuclease free water.
Development of KASP markers for KTI and Lox2
KASP markers were developed for both the genes by using prior reports for determining SNP sites. The mutation in the KTI gene leading to null KTI (kti) was described by Jofuku et al. in 1989. The SNP site has been validated via conventional primers by Moraes et al. (2006). In the KTI gene (Glyma.08g341500), G has been converted into T at base position 481 and was used to design the primers given in Table 1. Due to a deletion at bases 486 and 487, primers were designed only in the forward direction. Primer KKKtiF2 amplifies the null allele, while KKKtiF1 anneals with the wild type.
In the null Lox2 allele (Glyma.13g347500), the protein sequence differs from the wild-type in the substitution of glutamine (Gln) for the histidine (His) residue at position 532. These results were validated by Reinprecht et al. (2011) and Shin et al. (2012) in different materials. Hence the SNP site (T→A) was used to design primers in both orientations i.e., both forward and reverse primer sets were designed (Table 1). Primers KKLox2-1-R2 and KKLox2-2-F2 were designed to amplify the null allele. BLASTn against soybean genome was used to confirm in silico specificity of the markers. The primers were designed using Primer3 (Untergasser et al. 2012) and marker synthesis was outsourced from BarcodeBioSciences.
KASP genotyping for KTI and Lox2
KASP genotyping was carried out using a Veriti 384-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems) in a reaction volume of 4 µL. Each reaction comprised 2 µL of genomic DNA at a concentration of 50 ng µL-1, 1.946 µL of 2× low ROX KASP master mix (LGC, Middlesex, UK), and 0.056 µL of primer mix. The PCR protocol included initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 minutes, followed by touchdown cycling: 10 cycles of 95 °C for 20 seconds, 66 °C (with a 0.6 °C decrease per cycle) for 25 seconds, and 72 °C for 15 seconds. This was followed by 35 additional cycles of 95 °C for 10 seconds, 60 °C for 1 minute, and 72 °C for 15 seconds, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes. After amplification, the plates were read using an Infinite M200Pro plate reader (Tecan Group Ltd.), and allele calls were assigned using KlusterCaller software (LGC, Middlesex, UK).
Agronomic traits and disease reaction of progenies
The 181 F5 progenies were sown in an augmented design during kharif 2023 along with 5 check genotypes viz., SL 958, SL 955, SL 1074, NRCSL 3 and SL 979. Five random plants taken from each progeny were tagged for recording agronomic data on days to flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), biological yield (g plant-1), economic yield (g plant-1), harvest index (%), and hundred seed weight (g). PAU, Ludhiana is the hot spot for YMD incidence. Infector rows using susceptible check JS 335 were planted at regular intervals to ensure sufficient disease pressure. The YMD reaction of progenies was recorded during the first fortnight of August, on per plot basis. Briefly, per cent disease incidence (PDI) was calculated taking percentage of diseased/total plants; severity grade (SG) and corresponding response values (RS) were given based on cumulative disease scores of the plot. Coefficient of infection was calculated as product of PDI x RS and was used thereon to assign disease reaction (DR) to the genotypes, as per the scale given by Singh and Singh (2000).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A cross was made between NRCSL 3 × NRC 142 to pyramid the desirable attributes from both the genotypes. Choice of NRC 142 as pollinator was made due to its susceptible nature and the problems in seed production associated with it. The F2 population grown during kharif 2021 was used to plant F2:3 rows during kharif 2022. Genetic removal of KTI and Lox2 is futile, unless the genotype has improved fitness and good yield. Hence, the F2:3 was evaluated for agronomic desirability and out of the large population 181 plants were selected as Single Plant Selections. F4 population comprising of these 181 SPS were grown in an offseason nursery. The F5 was grown under field conditions during kharif 2023 in an augmented design to evaluate the performance of the SPS vis-à-vis checks and parents. DNA of those F2 plants, which were predecessors of SPS in F2:3 was used for genotyping for null alleles of KTI and Lox2. A number of F2 plants were heterozygous for these genes, hence, SPS were advanced from F2:3 to F5 via selfing, to benefit from increased homozygosity owing to additional rounds of selfing. These were then screened genotypically and phenotypically in F5 to identify pyramided lines having the null alleles of KTI and Lox2 along with YMD resistance.
Genotyping of parents using KASPs
The designed KASP markers were first amplified using parental genotypes in replication and Non-Template Control (NTC). As evident from the KASP assay, markers KKKTi and KKLox2-2 were able to distinguish between parental genotypes very efficiently and nice clusters at different axes were observed. The plot of fluorescence reads for KKLox2-1 revealed spurious amplification as both the genotypes were intermingled in the plot; thus, rendering the marker non-informative and useless.
Genotyping of experimental material using KASP markers
Validation of the newly developed markers was done using the validation panel of 51 genotypes. The markers were able to distinguish between homozygous parents (null and non-null) and heterozygous hybrids (Figure 1). The two non-null controls, SL 958 and PS 1670, have also been distinguished clearly and plotted along non-null parents NRCSL 3, SL 955 and PS 1347, as red dots. Blue dots represent the double null parent NRC 142, while green dots represent the heterozygous F1 hybrids from the three different crosses. The validation clearly defined that the markers were fit to genotype F2 and F5 populations.
KASP genotyping of the validation panel. Blue and red dots represent homozygous plants, green dots represent heterozygous plants and black dots represent NTC. KK: homozygous for wild type KTI, Kk: heterozygous for KTI, kk: homozygous for null KTI, LL: homozygous for wild type Lox2, Ll: heterozygous for Lox2, ll: homozygous for null Lox2. A: Amplification of KKKti; B: Amplification of KKLox2-2.
After validation, the markers were used to screen DNA of 181 F2 plants, which had been selected as SPS from plant to progeny rows in F2:3. The KASP assay on F2 and F5 have been depicted pictorially in Figure 2. Out of 181 F2 individuals, for KTI, data of 157 could be generated as 24 plants did not amplify any allele. Out of 157 remaining, 35 were null homozygous for KTI while 27 were wildtype homozygous and 95 were heterozygous. Similarly, data for Lox2 gene was generated for 169 plants only; 51 were homozygous for null Lox2, while 35 were homozygous wild type, and 83 were heterozygotes. Considering the data of both genes together, 9 F2 plants were homozygous double null; 43 were double heterozygous; and 8 were double homozygous for the wild type allele.
KASP assay using KTI and Lox2 markers. Blue and red dots represent homozygous plants, green dots represent heterozygous plants and black dots represent NTC. KK: homozygous for wild type KTI, Kk: heterozygous for KTI, kk: homozygous for null KTI, LL: homozygous for wild type Lox2, Ll: heterozygous for Lox2, ll: homozygous for null Lox2. A: Genotyping of F2 using KKKti, B: Genotyping of F2 using KKLox2-2, C: Genotyping of F5 using KKKti, D: Genotyping of F5 using KKLox2-2.
The population was advanced (by selfing) to select homozygous for null alleles for both the genes in F5 generation. Eight genotypes confirmed to be wild type for both the alleles in F2 were removed from genotyping step for F5 population. After genotyping of 173 F5 progenies, 48 were ktikti, while 66 were lox2lox2. 49 and 44 genotypes were heterozygous for KTI and Lox2, respectively. A total of 19 F5 progenies were found out to be homozygous double null, i.e., null alleles for both Lox2 and KTI were present.
Disease reaction of the double null progenies
The disease reaction of double null progenies was assessed from the data of F5 population grown in kharif 2023. Eight of these 19 progenies were highly resistant against YMD, while four were in the resistant category. Three progenies were moderately resistant, while four were highly susceptible against the disease. Hence, a total of 15 lines were identified which had YMD resistance pyramided with null KTI and null Lox2. The 8 highly resistant progenies can be used as genetic stocks to pyramid these 3 genes, viz., YMD resistance gene, null KTI and null Lox2 with other desirable attributes and yield traits and have potential to be released as varieties.
Agronomic performance of double null YMD resistant progenies
To compare the agronomic performance, all the 181 F5 progenies were grown in augmented design along with parents and five checks. The double null and resistant (DNR) progenies were compared with check genotypes for yield and other agronomic traits. The adjusted means of the DNR progenies and checks along with least significant interval (LSI) have been given in Table 2. A perusal of the Table 2, reveals two things; first, the DNR progenies exhibited ample variation for all the traits and second, DNR progenies out-performing the best check were identified for different characters. Twelve out of the 15 DNR progenies were significantly different than best check SL 958 for days to flowering; Progenies 20-3-755 and 20-3-1440 were the earliest DNRs to flower (46.5 days). Similarly, for days to maturity, all the 15 progenies were significantly different than the best check; the progeny 20-3-373 was the earliest maturing DNR taking 115.8 days to maturity. In terms of plant height, 3 of the progenies were statistically shorter than the shortest check SL 979 (86.5 cm); while 5 progenies were statistically taller than SL 979. The progenies 20-3-1017 and 20-3-1387 were shortest and tallest amongst the DNRs having respective heights of 71.9 cm and 107.53 cm.
NRCSL 3 was the best check for biological yield per plant, economic yield per plant, harvest index (%) as well as 100-seed weight. Four progenies were statistically superior than NRCSL 3 for biological yield per plant while two progenies were found to be superior for economic yield per plant. The progeny 20-3-761 had highest biological yield (127.4 g) and economic yield (47.4 g) per plant. The progeny 20-3-755 (42.49 %) was best among the 5 DNRs having significantly higher harvest index than the check. Only a single progeny, 20-3-1374, had significantly higher 100-seed weight (14.9 g) than NRCSL 3. Economic yield is the primary trait of importance for the growers. Hence, an elaborate comparison of DNR progenies with respect to economic yield has been done. Out of the 15 DNR progenies, 12 were at par or better than the best check. The progenies 20-3-644 and 20-3-761 statistically out-did NRCSL 3 for economic yield per plant.
The KTI and Lox2 are the main hindrances in popularisation of the soybean as human food. They are directly responsible for increased costs of processing. A double null genotype will be appealing to processors as well as households which favour multigrain flours. In India, PI 542044, an accession imported from US, has been widely used as source of the null KTI allele. MAS has been used to transfer the null allele into DS 9712 (Talukdar et al. 2014), JS 97-52 (Kumar et al. 2015), DS 9814 (Maranna et al. 2016), SL 525 (Dhaliwal et al. 2021) and Phule Agrani, P. Kimya, and P. Sangam (Pawale et al. 2021). The converted genotypes are either susceptible to YMD or their agronomic performance is not satisfactory. Additionally, two null KTI genotypes NRC 101 and NRC 102 have been developed but are susceptible to YMD. Similarly, US accession PI 086023 has been used to introgress null Lox2 allele into cultivar Samrat (Kumar et al. 2013); while, JS 97-52 has been converted to null Lox2 by transferring null allele from PI 596540 (Kumar et al. 2021). Genotypes NRC 109, NRC 110 and NRC 132 have been developed as null Lox2 lines, but these too are susceptible against YMD. A double null genotype, NRC 142, has also been developed by Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore; but is highly susceptible to YMD as is evident from data generated in the current study. Importance of YMD resistance cannot be over emphasized in the northern plain zone, since diseased plants are severely hindered from achieving their genetic potential. Thus, YMD resistance is pivotal for a secure crop under North-west India.
Marker assisted selection in conjunction with phenotypic selection was used to pyramid disease resistance with these two desirable null alleles. The earlier reported and utilized markers are gel based SSRs and allele specific dominant markers. SSR markers are highly recognized and were the markers of choice for a long period (Zhong et al. 2021). However, their use is limited across populations when the parents do not exhibit polymorphism for the marker under use. Moreover, being flanking markers, some chances of recombinations and false positives remain, particularly in large populations such as ours. Allele specific markers earlier reported, though are based on effective mutation sites, are dominant markers and thus repeated or supplemented (via SSRs) genotyping is required.
KASP are the marker system of new era and offer many advantages over earlier marker systems such as cost efficiency, simplicity, gel-free etc (Esuma et al. 2022). As for our study KASPs combined the pros of allele specific markers with SSRs, since these were codominant and based on the active site of mutation leaving no room for error. We have successfully created co-dominant KASP markers for that effect and a total of 15 YMD resistant, double null (null KTI and null Lox2) F5 progenies have been identified using the KASP markers from a cross of NRCSL 3 × NRC 142. These progenies will serve as an important breeding and genetic stock to transfer the 3 traits viz., null KTI, null Lox2 and YMD resistance. KASP markers for KTI gene have been developed and validated by Rosso et al. (2021) in using a different donor, while this is the first report for developing KASPs for Lox2 gene. This is also the first report of development of pyramided genotypes for these three traits.
CONCLUSION
We have successfully created co-dominant KASP markers for KTI and Lox2 genes. These markers were utilized for pyramiding YMD resistance with null KTI and null Lox2. 15 progenies were identified which had YMD resistance pyramided with null KTI and null Lox2. Two of these outyielded the best check and parent NRCSL 3 in terms of economic yield. This is the first report for genotypes having YMD resistance, pyramided with null KTI and null Lox2. Also, this is the first report of functional KASP markers for Lox2, and KTI in the respective donors.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Authors express thanks to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for the award of fellowship to Kamalpreet Singh Mandahal. We gratefully acknowledge Dr Hina Goyal and Dr Sheetal Thapar for their invaluable assistance in grammatical revision of manuscript.
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Anderson RL1992 Effects of steaming on soybean proteins and trypsin inhibitors. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 69:1170-1176
- Anderson RL, Wolf WJ1995 Compositional changes in trypsin inhibitors, phytic acid, saponins, and isoflavones related to soybean processing. The Journal of Nutrition 125:581-585
- Baysal T, Demirdoven A2007 Lipoxygenase in fruits and vegetables: A review. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 40:491-496
- Clemente A, Marin-Manzano MC, Arques MC, Domoney C2013 Bowman-birk inhibitors from legumes: Utilisation in disease prevention and therapy. In Hernández-Ledesma B and Hsieh CC (eds) Bioactive peptides in health and disease. IntechOpen, Berlin, p. 23-44
- Dhaliwal SK, Dhillon SK, Gill BS, Sirari A, Rani A, Dhillon R2021 Combining the null Kunitz trypsin inhibitor and yellow mosaic disease resistance in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 57:19-25
- Esuma W, Eyoo O, Gwandu F, Mukasa S, Alicai T, Ozimati A, Nuwamanya E, Rabbi I, Kawuki R2022 Validation of KASP markers associated with cassava mosaic disease resistance, storage root dry matter and provitamin A carotenoid contents in Ugandan cassava germplasm. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1017275
- Friedman M, Brandon DL2001 Nutritional and health benefits of soy proteins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49:1069-1086
- Jofuku KD, Schipper RD, Goldberg RB1989 A frameshift mutation prevents Kunitz trypsin inhibitor mRNA accumulation in soybean embryos. Plant Cell 1:427-435
- Kumar V, Rani A, Rawal R2021 First Indian soybean variety free from off-flavour generating lipoxygenase-2 gene identified for release for commercial cultivation. National Academy Science Letters 44:477-480
- Kumar V, Rani A, Rawal R, Husain SM2013 Lipoxygenase-2-free Indian soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes. Current Science 104:586
- Kumar V, Rani A, Rawal R, Mouraya V2015 Marker assisted accelerated introgression of null allele of kunitz trypsin inhibitor in soybean. Breeding Science 65:447-452
- Liener IE1995 Possible adverse effects of soybean anticarcinogens. The Journal of Nutrition 125:744-750
- Maranna S, Verma K, Talukdar A, Lal SK, Kumar A, Mukherjee K2016 Introgression of null allele of kunitz trypsin inhibitor through Marker assisted backcross breeding in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). BMC Genetics 17:106
- Moraes RMA, Soares TCB, Colombo LR, Salla MFS, Barros JGA, Piovesan ND, Barros EG, Moreira MA2006 Assisted selection by specific DNA markers for genetic elimination of the kunitz trypsin inhibitor and lectin in soybean seeds. Euphytica 149:221-226
- Nishiba Y, Furuta S, Hajika M1995 Hexanal accumulation and DETBA value in homogenate of soybean seeds lacking 2 or 3 lipoxygenase isozymes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43:738-741
- Pawale ST, Bhise RS, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP, Kale AA, Naik RM2021 Incorporation of a null allele of Kunitz trypsin inhibitor through molecular backcross breeding in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill.]. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 81:594-597
- Reinprecht Y, Luk-Labey SY, Yu K, Poysa VW, Rajcan I, Ablett GR2011 Molecular basis of seed lipoxygenase null traits in soybean line OX948. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122:1247-1264
- Rosso ML, Shang C, Song Q, Escamilla D, Gillenwater J, Zhang B2021 Development of breeder-friendly KASP markers for low concentration of kunitz trypsin inhibitor in soybean seeds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:2675
- Shin JH, Van K, Kim KD, Lee YH, Jun TH, Lee SH2012 Molecular sequence variation of the lipoxygenase-2 gene in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124:613-622
- Singh AK, Singh KP2000 Screening for disease incidence of YVMV in okra treated with gamma rays and EMS. Vegetable Science 27:72-75
- Talukdar A, Shivakumar M, Verma K, Kumar A, Mukherjee K, Lal SK2014 Genetic elimination of Kunitz trypsin inhibitors (KTI) from DS9712, an Indian soybean variety. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 74:608-611
- Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG2012 Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40:115
-
USDA - United States Department of Agriculture2024 Production statistics of Soybean in world and India. Available at Available at https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/advQuery Accessed on May 24, 2024.
» https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/advQuery - Wrather JA, Anderson T, Arsyad D, Gai J, Ploper L, Porta-Puglia A1997 Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10 soybean producing countries in 1994. Plant Disease 81:107-110
- Zhong Y, Cheng Y, Ruan M, Ye Q, Wang R, Yao Z, Zhou G, Liu J, Yu J, Wan H2021 High-throughput SSR marker development and the analysis of genetic diversity in Capsicum frutescens. Horticulturae 7:187-195
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
07 Nov 2025 -
Date of issue
2025
History
-
Received
27 Feb 2025 -
Accepted
11 May 2025 -
Published
11 June 2025




