SATI-Q Registry: 20 years of experience with quality benchmarking in intensive care units

INTRODUCTION

Intensive care units (ICUs) concentrate patients with high clinical complexity who require advanced and costly diagnostic and treatment techniques along with significant resource utilization. The main objective of ICUs is to provide critically ill patients with safe, comprehensive, evidence-based and efficient care. Standardized benchmarking focused on monitoring quality indicators is essential for identifying and promoting opportunities for improvement.(¹,²)

The first global quality benchmarking (QB) registries arose from the need to optimize ICU performance.(³) In line with these initiatives, the SATI-Q Registry was established in Argentina in 2002, supported by the Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva (SATI). This manuscript outlines the evolution of the SATI-Q Registry, highlighting its achievements and challenges with respect to enhancing ICU performance across Argentina.

THE SATI-Q REGISTRY

The SATI-Q Registry was created in Argentina on the basis of the National Programme for Quality Assurance in Medical Care as a voluntary participation programme. The goal was to generate a multicenter network of prospective and permanent registries of quality indicators.(⁴,⁵) This framework enables ICUs to evaluate and compare their performance with other local or international units.(⁶) The primary objective of the registry is to improve critical care patient care quality through initiatives informed by local data.

The SATI-Q includes ICUs nationwide and encompasses various levels of complexity and infrastructure. The participating units use the freely provided SATI-Q software to monitor predefined quality indicators established by the SATI Management Committee in a standardized format. Since 2019, ICUs have also been able to participate via an interoperable format.

Participating centers prospectively record admission sources and diagnoses of patients admitted to the ICU and pediatric ICU, severity of illness (APACHE II and Pediatric Index of Mortality [PIM] 3), intensity of care received (therapeutic intervention scoring system [TISS] score), the use of invasive devices and risk-adjusted outcomes (vital status at discharge). The following quality indicators form the basis for the QB reports: rates of device-associated infections (ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection), surgical site infection, self-extubations, pressure ulcer rates, fall rates, and accidental nasogastric tube dislodgement rates.

The data are submitted annually in encrypted, anonymized form via SATI-Q software or through interoperable formats such as electronic data interchange documents (EDSs) or fast health care interoperability resources (FHIRs) in accordance with health level (HL) 7 standards.(⁷)

The data collected are then used to create a consolidated database, thus producing publicly available annual general reports and confidential comparative reports for each unit and enabling ICUs to benchmark their performance against other participating units.(⁶)

SATI-Q REPORTS

The first QB report was published in 2003 and was based on data recorded by 28 adult ICUs. In 2005, the first report for pediatric ICUs was published. Currently, 128 adult and pediatric ICUs participate in the programme, representing institutions across Argentina with public, private and social security funding. Figure 1 shows the number of adult ICUs, pediatric ICUs and annual records analyzed since 2003, highlighting the expansion of the registry and its database growth. The registry currently comprises more than 284,000 deidentified records of hospitalizations in adult ICUs and 94,770 in pediatric ICUs in Argentina. The latest report (2023) analyzed 22,350 adult ICU discharges and 7,990 pediatric ICU discharges. The participating units and their locations are described in tables 1S and 2S and figure 1S (Supplementary Material); the 2023 reports are also detailed in the Supplementary Material.

Figure 1
Number of intensive care units, pediatric intensive care units and admissions from 2003 to 2023.

In line with the Programme's data policy, annual general reports are publicly accessible on the SATI-Q website,(⁸) allowing users to track the evolution of monitored indicators.

Additionally, since 2019, the SATI-Q has been a member of the LOGIC Consortium (Linking of Global Intensive Care), an international QB network that provides annually updated aggregate data from the National Registries and networks that make up the consortium.(⁹) Thus, ICUs that participate in the SATI-Q registry can compare their performance with international standards.

Figures 2S to 9S (Supplementary Material) present trends in the key SATI-Q quality indicators over time. The main patient's characteristics and outcomes in the ICUs included in the last LOGIC report (2023) compared with the SATI-Q data are presented in table 3S (Supplementary Material).

SATI-Q: ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES

The information provided by the QB reports enables institutions to benchmark their performance against national and international standards. With data representing ICUs from diverse regions, complexities and funding, the reports offer a comprehensive overview of intensive care medicine in Argentina. Participation allows ICUs to assess their results in real time, supporting local improvement initiatives. Over time, these reports have highlighted key trends, such as reduced infection rates and declining pediatric ICU mortality. Although changes in critical care outcomes are likely to be multifactorial and heterogeneous, participation in multicenter QB programmes is recommended as a highly effective strategy for driving improvements in critical care.(¹⁰)

Despite these recognized benefits, the SATI-Q is a voluntary registry, and thus, participation can easily be compromised by human and technologic resource constraints. An example of these constraints is the decrease in the number of ICUs and patients included during 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, when the health care system was overloaded (Figure 1).

In addition to monitoring quality indicators, the SATI-Q has laid the foundation for a collaborative, voluntary data collection network that supports clinical research to increase critical care quality. Successful experiences of this potential include multicenter pediatric validation studies of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM 2 and PIM 3) risk score in Argentina and later in Latin America, among others.(¹¹–¹⁴)

SATI-Q also collaborates with leading groups such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computational Physiology Laboratory. As part of the Global Open-Source Severity Illness Score (GOSSIS) Consortium, the SATI-Q contributes to the development of prognostic scores for adult ICU mortality.(¹⁵)

With a database of more than 240,000 ICU admission records, applying artificial intelligence to the SATI-Q Registry presents significant opportunities to enhance critical care. AI-powered analysis can uncover hidden patterns, predict outcomes, and identify key risk factors. Machine learning algorithms have the potential to refine prognostic models and optimize resource allocation, such as accurately predicting length of stay, ultimately improving the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of critical care delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The SATI-Q is a consolidated registry that was established more than 20 years ago. This registry generates quality benchmarking reports, thus enabling intensive care units to assess their performance over time and compare it with other local and international institutions. The registry has also fostered a collaborative research network with the potential to support epidemiological studies to advance the care of critically ill adult and pediatric patients. Efforts are currently focused on enhancing the interoperability of SATI-Q software to facilitate integration with the national health information system, maximizing data quality and the use of information for decision-making and management. Undoubtedly, the development and maintenance of an intensive care unit inpatient registry provides valuable information for improving the quality of care and constitutes an open challenge for critical care teams at both the local and regional levels.

• Publisher's note

REFERENCES

• ¹ Camp RC. Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee (WI): American Society for Quality Control & Quality Resources; 1989. p. 10.
• ² Craig A, Rivenburg P. Benchmarking. In: Graham N, editor. Quality in healthcare: theory, application and evolution. Maryland, USA: Aspen publishers; 1995. pp. 210-22.
• ³ Mathai AS. Benchmarking critical care processes: reaching standards of excellence! Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18(5):265-6.
• ⁴ Argentina. Ministerio de Salud. Garantía de Calidad de la Atención Médica. Programa Nacional de Garantía de Calidad em la Atención Médica. [Accessed 2025 Jan 19]. Available in https://www.argentina.gob.ar/salud/calidadatencionmedica
  » https://www.argentina.gob.ar/salud/calidadatencionmedica
• ⁵ Argentina. Ministerio de Salud. Sistema Argentino de Información Juridica (SAIJ). Programa Nacional de Garantía de Calidad de la Atención Médica. Resolución 896/17 de 11 de julio de 2017; Boletín Oficial (13 July 2017). [Accessed 19 January 2025]. Available in http://www.saij.gob.ar/programa-nacional-garantia-calidad-atencion-medica-nv17444-2017-07-11/123456789-0abc-444-71ti-lpssedadevon?
  » http://www.saij.gob.ar/programa-nacional-garantia-calidad-atencion-medica-nv17444-2017-07-11/123456789-0abc-444-71ti-lpssedadevon?
• ⁶ Fernández AL, Arias López MP. SATI-Q: 20 años de historia, evolución y perspectivas hacia el futuro. JAIIO. 2023;9(5):120-3. Available from: https://publicaciones.sadio.org.ar/index.php/JAIIO/article/view/704
  » https://publicaciones.sadio.org.ar/index.php/JAIIO/article/view/704
• ⁷ HL7 International. About HL7. Health Level Seven International; 2007-2025 [Accessed 22 Feb 2025] Available in https://www.hl7.org/about/index.cfm?ref=nav
  » https://www.hl7.org/about/index.cfm?ref=nav
• ⁸ SATI-Q. Programa de Calidad para Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Informes. Buenos Aires: SATI; 2020 [Accessed 19 Jan. 2025] Available in https://www.satiq.net.ar/informes
  » https://www.satiq.net.ar/informes
• ⁹ Dongelmans DA, Pilcher D, Beane A, Soares M, Del Pilar Arias Lopez M, Fernandez A, et al. Linking of global intensive care (LOGIC): an international benchmarking in critical care initiative. J Crit Care. 2020;60:305-10.
• ¹⁰ Salluh JI, Soares M, Keegan MT. Understanding intensive care unit benchmarking. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(11):1703-7.
• ¹¹ Arias López MD, Boada N, Fernández A, Fernández AL, Ratto ME, Siaba Serrate A, et al.; Members of VALIDARPIM3 Argentine Group. Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 Score in PICUs in Argentina: a prospective, national multicenter study, Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(12):e653-61.
• ¹² Fernández AL, Arias Lopez MP, Ratto ME, Saligari S, Siaba Serrate A, et al. Validación del índice pediátrico de mortalidad 2 (PIM2) en Argentina: un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, observacional. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2015;113(3):221-8.
• ¹³ Arias López MP, Fernández AL, Ratto ME, Saligari L, Serrate AS, Ko IJ, et al.; ValidarPIM2 Latin American Group. Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 as a predictor of death risk in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Latin America: a prospective, multicenter study. J Crit Care. 2015;30(6):1324-30.
• ¹⁴ González G, Arias-Lopez MP, Bordogna A, Palacio G, Siaba Serrate A, Fernández A, et al.; SATI-Q Pediatric Group. Condiciones socioeconómicas más bajas se asocian con tasas de sepsis infantil más altas pero con resultados similares. Andes Pediatr. 2023;94(2):187-99.
• ¹⁵ Raffa JD, Johnson AE, O’Brien Z, Pollard TJ, Mark RG, Celi LA, et al. The Global Open Source Severity of Illness Score (GOSSIS). Crit Care Med. 2022;50(7):1040-50.

Edited by

• Responsible Editor:
  Antonio Paulo Nassar Jr https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-7445

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Aug 2025
• Date of issue
  2025

History

• Received
  25 Jan 2025
• Accepted
  19 Mar 2025