Abstract
This paper aims to discuss the method of assessing graduate students in subjects of master and doctoral programs in Management. The text seeks to highlight the risk of some faculty members misusing the students' assessment process as a "sub-system of papers assembly line" that supports productivist interests, overlapping the mission of educating high level masters and PhDs. Besides the criticism, it seeks to present some possibilities of assessment, as well as to propose a debate about the best alternatives to an educational process in graduate courses.
Keywords:
Papers; Student assessment; Graduate courses in Management.
Thumbnail
