Electrical impedance tomography to evaluate air distribution prior to extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants: a feasibility study

CLINICAL SCIENCE

Electrical impedance tomography to evaluate air distribution prior to extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants: a feasibility study

Felipe de Souza Rossi^I; Ana Cristina Zanon Yagui^I; Luciana Branco Haddad^I; Alice D'Agostini Deutsch^I,II; Celso Moura Rebello^I

^IHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento Materno-infantil, São Paulo/SP, Brazil

^IIHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto da Crianca, Departamento de Pediatria, Disciplina de Pediatria Neonatal, São Paulo/SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is used as a standard of care after extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants. A pressure of 5 cmH₂O is usually applied regardless of individual differences in lung compliance. Current methods for evaluation of lung compliance and air distribution in the lungs are thus imprecise for preterm infants. This study used electrical impedance tomography to determine the feasibility of evaluating the positive end-expiratory pressure level associated with a more homogeneous air distribution within the lungs before extubation.

METHODS: Ventilation homogeneity was defined by electrical impedance tomography as the ratio of ventilation between dependent and non-dependent lung areas. The best ventilation homogeneity was achieved when this ratio was equal to 1. Just before extubation, decremental expiratory pressure levels were applied (8, 7, 6 and 5 cmH₂0; 3 minutes each step), and the pressure that determined the best ventilation homogeneity was defined as the best positive end-expiratory pressure.

RESULTS: The best positive end-expiratory pressure value was 6.3 ± 1.1 cmH₂0, and the mean continuous positive airway pressure applied after extubation was 5.2 ± 0.4 cmH₂0 (p = 0.002). The extubation failure rate was 21.4%. X-Ray and blood gases after extubation were also checked.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that electrical impedance tomography can be safely and successfully used in patients ready for extubation to suggest the best ventilation homogeneity, which is influenced by the level of expiratory pressure applied. In this feasibility study, the best lung compliance was found with pressure levels higher than the continuous positive airway pressure levels that are usually applied for routine extubation.

Keywords: Infant; Premature; Electric Impedance; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical ventilation is crucial for the stabilization and care of extreme preterm infants. It can be applied invasively, through an endotracheal tube, or non invasive ventilation (NIV), with the use of non-invasive interfaces, which is associated with a lower morbidity rate in preterm infants (1,2). Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applied using nasal prongs is the most common type of NIV performed on extreme preterm infants (3-5).

For very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants who undergo invasive ventilation, extubation failure is unpredictable and occurs in approximately 20 to 30% of patients (6). The use of CPAP in these patients is the standard of practice that aims to reduce this complication, but different approaches and interfaces are used among hospitals (7-10).

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) provides realtime bedside information that can be used to estimate regional lung ventilation (11-14). This technique has been used to study ventilation patterns in adults and neonates, but it has not yet been used to evaluate preterm infants before extubation (15-20). Recently, differences in tidal ventilation were assessed for volume-targeted ventilation in preterm infants (14). Variations in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels and the resulting effect on air distribution in preterm infants during spontaneous assisted conventional ventilation were not previously studied.

In this study, we used EIT in VLBW during assisted mechanical ventilation immediately before extubation. This study was designed to determine the feasibility of evaluating the PEEP level associated with a more homogeneous air distribution within the lungs before extubation by using electrical impedance tomography. We used EIT to determine the PEEP level associated with the best air distribution in the lungs of these patients, which corresponds to the best ventilation homogeneity (VH) and follows the global inhomogeneity index concept previously described by Zhao et al., i.e., a ratio of 1 ventilation between the dependent and non-dependent lung (21,22).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study population

This study was performed in the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein NICU in São Paulo after approval by the institutional review board and the institution's ethics committee. Every VLBW infant (birth weight < 1,500 g), regardless of the prior respiratory disease that determined invasive ventilation, was submitted to the following ventilatory parameters before extubation: synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation plus a pressure support mode (SIMV+PS; Servo-i - Maquet Getinge Group, Sweden), FiO₂<0.35, PEEP<6 cmH₂0, and respiratory rate <15 breaths/min. Exclusion criteria included congenital malformations, intracranial hemorrhage of grades III and IV (23) and previous pneumothorax.

The patients were assigned to the routine CPAP of 5 to 6 cmH₂0 applied after tube removal at the discretion of the attending staff, as is the routine procedure at our institution. As this was a feasibility study, a convenience sample of fourteen patients was chosen.

EIT measurements and data analysis

A 16-electrode EIT belt was specially designed to fit VLBW infants who had thorax diameters as small as 17 cm. The EIT used an Enlight^® technology model DX-1800 apparatus that sampled at 50 Hz (Dixtal, São Paulo, Brazil). EIT images were continuously recorded and reconstructed based on a 3-D finite element mesh under decremental PEEP levels (8, 7, 6 and 5 cmH₂0; 3 minutes for each step). The ventilation ratio between the dependent and the non-dependent lung areas (upper/lower ratio, U/L) was continuously calculated. Because of the variability of the impedance change caused by the typical respiratory pattern of VLBW infants during spontaneous assisted breathing, as well as variability arising from the patients' movements, only stable respiratory cycles defined by at least two of the researchers were used to calculate the PEEP that promoted the best ventilation homogeneity (VH), which was considered an upper/lower ratio of 1, as previously described (Figure 1).

Preliminary outcome evaluation

Extubation failure was defined as the need for reintubation within 72 hours after tube removal. Patients were reintubated if they needed FiO₂>0.6 to maintain arterial oxygen saturation between 88-94%, PaCO₂>70 mmHg or if they presented apnea that required bag mask ventilation for stabilization.

A thorax x-ray and ABG analysis were performed six to twelve hours after extubation. Evidence for atelectasis was specifically checked in the x-ray images. Oxygen index (OI), alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (A-a), arterial/alveolar ratio (a/A) and pH and paCO₂ levels were calculated and compared.

The mean and standard deviation were used to describe data. Continuous data were analyzed using Student-t test or the Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. R statistical software (version 2.10.1) was used for all analyses. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

After the non-invasive, radiation-free and harmless EIT method was explained, one family declined to consent. Five other eligible infants were also not enrolled because they were extubated without the presence of a member of the study team at the NICU.

The demographic characteristics of the fourteen patients included in this study are shown in Table 1. The mean value and standard deviation of the body weight were 940 ± 205 g, gestational age was 28.1 ± 2.6 weeks and age at EIT evaluation was 7.5 ± 10.8 days. Extubation failure was observed in three infants (21.4%). One patient was reintubated for central apnea without evident deterioration of lung compliance. Reintubation because of respiratory distress after tube removal occurred in two patients. Both patients were ventilated for more than four weeks prior to EIT evaluation and were diagnosed as having bronchopul-monary dysplasia. The mean PEEP level determined by the EIT that resulted in the best VH was 6.3 ± 1.1 cmH₂O, which was significantly different from 5.2 ± 0.4 cmH₂O, which was the CPAP empirically applied after extubation (p = 0.002). The two patients in which extubation failed had a best PEEP = 6 cmH₂O and were extubated to a CPAP of 5 and 6 cmH₂0, respectively. Of all EIT signals collected, 70.2% of the data were considered appropriate to be analyzed. ABG analysis, oxygenation indices, the x-ray pattern and the other preliminary outcomes are presented in Table 2. No side effects, either related to the use of the EIT device in these infants, including skin lesions secondary to electrodes, or related to the infant manipulation, were found. Figure 2 corresponds to EIT images representing the loss of ventilation in the dependent zone after a PEEP reduction in one of the studied patients.

DISCUSSION

This feasibility study showed that it is possible to evaluate air distribution during spontaneous assisted ventilation in VLBW infants with the use of EIT and also determined the PEEP that results in the best VH. To our knowledge, the use of dynamic images to evaluate different PEEP levels and their effects on preterm lungs in infants receiving assisted conventional mechanical ventilation has never been reported before.

Similarly to other studies using controlled ventilation, both in adult anesthetized patients with healthy lungs and in animal models of lung injury (21,22,24), we applied an index to define a more homogeneous air distribution between lung areas. However, there is a concern that heterogeneity is a physiological phenomenon in patients who are to be extubated and who also present minimal or no lung collapse (25).

The use of EIT to describe air distribution during mechanical ventilation in preterm infants has only recently been reported, in which the age of the infant during volumetargeted ventilation (14) and the application of surfactant (26) impact the distribution of tidal ventilation.

In the small and heterogeneous population studied, the mean value of the best PEEP determined by EIT during assisted ventilation was higher than the usual pressures applied with CPAP after tube removal at our NICU. Assuming that extubation failure may be reduced if the pressures that determine the best VH are efficiently applied using non-invasive ventilation, the maintenance of a desired CPAP level is highly desired. If this is true, however, in contrast to invasive ventilation, part of the pressure may leak through the mouth, esophagus or nasal prong. The EIT can be used to evaluate breathing patterns of non-ventilated neonates (16,27), and it could also possibly be used to titrate CPAP levels in extubated patients. However, this was not explored in our protocol. Despite these limitations, our results may be used as a reference for future studies that will evaluate EIT application in preterm infants who are considered ready for extubation. Although different CPAP apparatuses were used, previous data suggest that this factor does not influence the extubation success rate (9,28,29). The extubation failure found in this small sample of patients was in agreement with previous studies (6,7,10,25,29).

Variability of the VH index during spontaneous breathing was a hallmark observed in all patients studied (Figure 1). EIT evaluation performed with the use of muscle relaxation and sedation during controlled ventilation in animals and patients does not address this variability because all of the respiratory cycles behave similarly (13,15,21,22,24,30). Previous studies evaluating neonates have also described marked impedance variations during both assisted and unassisted respirations. These studies used very short and stable EIT data to evaluate and characterize air distribution among different lung areas (14,17,31). In contrast to this concept, we collected and analyzed the largest number of cycles that were unaffected by movements or artifacts. In doing so, almost 30% of the raw data was not used for interpretation. Our strategy is more time-consuming and can be biased by individual interpretation, but may better reflect the usual respiratory pattern of the neonates. A tool capable of automatically discarding impedance variations unrelated to air movement could facilitate EIT interpretation in spontaneous breathing neonates and is highly desired.

One interesting finding was the absence of a trend favoring non-dependent ventilation at lower levels of PEEP. This was in contrast to results in previous EIT studies that utilized controlled ventilation. There are at least two explanations for this observation. First, as the neonates were considered ready for extubation, their respiratory compliance was likely close to normal, which may have minimized the effects of lung recruitment observed in sicker lungs (30,32). Second, we studied only a narrow PEEP window because we were aware of the possible deleterious effects of using very high or low PEEP for the VLBW infants. A recent study showed that spontaneous non-ventilated preterm infants tended to ventilate non-dependent areas more than dependent areas (33) whereas ventilated infants had higher ventilation in the middle third of the chest (14).

The other analyzed outcomes of atelectasis after extubation and blood gas analysis did not show differences among the patients but only represent preliminary data because the sample studied was too small for clinical inferences.

EIT is still being adapted to generate high-quality images and information in small patients. Specific algorithms for image reconstruction must be developed to allow the correct interpretation of impedance variation in these extreme patients (34,35). The electrodes also need to be gentle on the skin of VLBW infants who are particularly prone to lesions and must also have a size capable of fitting around the infants' very small thoraxes. The spatial resolution of EIT images is affected by and directly related to the number of electrodes that are used (11,36).

Mechanical ventilation, which is used worldwide to increase the survival of many neonates in need, still relies on empirical protocols. The possibility to study ventilation in real time at the bedside without radiation and without high costs using EIT in these tiny and unstable patients deserves future trials.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Marcelo Britto Passos Amato and the Experimental Pneumology Laboratory - LIM 09, University of São Paulo, for support during this study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Rossi FS and Rebello CM participated in original concept and writing of the manuscript and contributed to data acquisition. Yagui AC and Haddad LC contributed to data acquisition. Deutsch AA participated in the original concept and writing of the manuscript.

Received for publication on October 30, 2012

First review completed on November 18, 2012

Accepted for publication on November 18, 2012

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

E-mail: [e-mail]

Tel: [phone]

• 1. Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka U, Parad R, Moore M, et al. Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1194-201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.6.1194
• 2. Aly H. Is there a strategy for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):818-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3026
• 3. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet J-M, Carlin JB, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):700-8.
• 4. Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, Sahni R, Bateman D, Sanocka U, et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2005;147(3):341-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.04.062
• 5. Support Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Schriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(21):1970-9.
• 6. Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Predicting successful extubation of very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91(3):F180-3.
• 7. Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, Donn SM. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus infant flow driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009;154(5):645-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.034
• 8. De Paoli AG, Morley C, Davis PG. Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(3):F168-172, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fn.88.3.F168
• 9. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD002977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002977.pub2 Review.
• 10. Hermeto F, Martins BM, Ramos JR, Bhering CA, Sant'Anna GM. Incidence and main risk factors associated with extubation failure in newborns with birth weight ,1.250 grams. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2009;85(5):397-402, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572009000500005
• 11. Eyüboglu BM, Brown BH, Barber DC. In vivo imaging of cardiac related impedance changes. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1989;8(1):39-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.32404
• 12. Adler A, Amyot R, Guardo R, Bates JHT, Berthiaume Y. Monitoring changes in lung air and liquid volumes with electrical impedance tomography. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(5):1762-7.
• 13. Victorino JA, Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GFJ, Tucci MR, Caramez MPR, et al. Imbalances in regional lung ventilation. A validation study on electrical impedance tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(7):791-800, http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200301-133OC
• 14. Armstrong RK, Carlisle HR, Davis PG, Schlibler A, Tingay DG. Distribution of tidal ventilation during volume-targeted ventilation is variable and influenced by age in the preterm lung. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(5):839-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2157-9
• 15. Frerichs I, Hahn G, Schröeder T, Hellige G. Electrical impedance tomography in monitoring experimental lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24(8):829-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001340050673
• 16. Frerichs I, Schiffmann H, Oehler R, Dudykevych T, Hahn G, Hinz J, et al. Distribution of lung ventilation in spontaneously breathing neonates lying in different body positions. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(5):787-94.
• 17. Heinrich S, Schiffmann H, Frerichs A, Klockgether-Radke A, Frerichs I. Body and head position effects on regional lung ventilation in infants: an electrical impedance tomography study. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(9):1392-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0252-0
• 18. Wolf GK, Grychtol B, Frerichs I, van Genderingen HR, Zurakowski D, Thompson JE, et al. Regional lung volume changes in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome during a derecruitment maneuver. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(8):1972-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000275390.71601.83
• 19. Hinz J, Moerer O, Neumann P, DudykevychT, Frerichs I, Hellige G, et al. Regional pulmonary pressure volume curves in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure measured by electrical impedance tomography. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2006;50:331-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00958.x
• 20. van Veenendaal MB, Miedema M, de Jongh FH, van der Lee JH, Frerichs I, van Kaam AH. Effect of closed endotracheal suction in high-frequency ventilated premature infants measured with electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12):2130-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1663-5
• 21. Zhao Z, Möller K, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J. Evaluation of an electrical impedance tomography-based Global Inhomogeneity Index for pulmonary ventilation distribution. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(11):1900-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1589-y
• 22. Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Möller K. PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity. a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography. Critical Care. 2010;14(1):R8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860
• 23. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birthweights less than 1500 g. J Pediatr. 1978;92(4):529-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80282-0
• 24. Kunst PW, Vazquez de Anda G, Böhm SH, Faes TJ, Lachmann B, Postmus PE, et al. Monitoring of recruitment and derecruitment by electrical impedance tomography in a model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(12):3891-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200012000-00025
• 25. Costa ELV, Amato MBP. Can heterogeneity in ventilation de good? Critical Care. 2010;14(2):134, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901
• 26. Miedema M, de Jongh FH, Frerichs I, van Veenendaal MB, van Kaam AH. Changes in lung volume and ventilation during surfactant treatment in ventilated preterm infants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(1):100-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201103-0375OC
• 27. Pillow JJ, Frerichs I, Stocks J. Lung function tests in neonates and infants with chronic lung disease: global and regional ventilation inhomogeneity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41(2):105-21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20319
• 28. Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Arnold GK, Pandit PB, Habib RH. Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):304-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.2.304
• 29. Stefanescu BM, Murphy WP, Hansell BJ, Fuloria M, Morgan TM, Aschner JL. A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1031-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.5.1031
• 30. Dargaville PA, Rimensberger PC, Frerichs I. Regional tidal ventilation and compliance during a stepwise vital capacity manoeuvre. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(11):1953-61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-1995-1
• 31. Schibler A, Yuill M, Parsley C, Pham T, Gilshenan K, Dakin C. Regional ventilation distribution in non-sedated spontaneously breathing newborns and adults is not different. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009;44(9):851-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.21000
• 32. Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Caramez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, et al. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(3):268-78, http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200506-976OC
• 33. Riedel T, Kyburz M, Latzin P, Thamrin C, Frey U. Regional and overall ventilation inhomogeneities in preterm and term-born infants. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(1):144-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1299-x
• 34. Adler A, Arnold JH, Bayford R, Borsic A, Brown B, Dixon P, et al. GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images. Physiol Meas. 2009;30(6):S35-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/30/6/S03
• 35. Smallwood RH, Hampshire AR, Brown BH, Primhak RA, Marven S, Nopp P. A comparison of neonatal and adult lung impedances derived from EIT images. Physiol Meas. 1999;20(4):401-13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/307
• 36. Rahal M, Khor JM, Demosthenous A, Tizzard A, Bayford R. A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas. 2009;30(6):S73-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/30/6/S05

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  17 Apr 2013
• Date of issue
  2013

History

• Received
  30 Oct 2012
• Accepted
  18 Nov 2012
• Reviewed
  18 Nov 2012