Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy dose to palliate patients with local recurrence or progression of gastric cancer (GC). To this end, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that evaluated the bleeding response in patients with GC with local recurrence or progression. A meta-regression analysis between biological effective dose (BED) and bleeding response was performed, as was subgroup analysis to evaluate the outcome by BED level and radiotherapy (RT) technique. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Ten non-comparative retrospective studies and one prospective study were included. In general, RT was effective at controlling tumor bleeding, and the bleeding response rate was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.81). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a linear correlation between BED Gy 10 and bleeding response (p=0<0001). Studies using conformational RT had a significant bleeding response rate compared to those using 2D (0.79; 95%CI, 0.74-0.84 vs 0.65; 95%CI, 0.56-0.75; p=0.021). In terms of the BED level, a significant difference in BR was identified on comparing BED Gy10 ≥40 (0.79; 95%CI, 0.7-0.8), BED Gy10 30-39 (0.79, 95%CI, 0.71-0.86), and BED Gy10 <30 (0.64; 95%CI, 0.5-0.7; p=0.0001). The mean survival time was 3.31 months (95%CI, 2.73-3.9) months, and the responders had a significantly longer survival (longer by 2.5 months) compared to the non-responders (95%CI, 1.7-3.3; p<0.0001).

Palliative RT is effective at controlling bleeding due to local recurrence/progression from GC. Our findings reveal a relationship between BR and BED. BED <30 Gy 10 should not be recommended, and 3DRT should be indicated instead in order to improve the result.

Palliative; Radiotherapy; Gastric Cancer; Bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent malignant diseases worldwide, and it results in a significant proportion of cancer-related death (¹). Surgical resection is considered the cornerstone of GC treatment and the only treatment with the capacity to lead to long-term survival (²).

However, even with total gastrectomy and extending lymphadenectomy, the rate of local recurrence is high, and adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is administered with the aim of reducing recurrence (²-⁵). Local recurrence or local progression from an unresectable disease is a challenging clinical situation for several reasons. First, the majority of patients with local recurrence/progression experience pain, bleeding, and gastric outlet obstruction, which results in a reduced quality of life and a diminished clinical performance (⁶). Second, local failure of GC is difficult to salvage with chemotherapy and other treatments, and consequently, the prognosis of these patients is poor (⁶-⁸). Third, approximately 50% of patients with local recurrence have metastatic disease at the same time (⁹). In this clinical scenario, the oncologist has several treatment options, including palliative gastrectomy, surgical bypass, endoscopic intervention, palliative chemotherapy, or radiotherapy (⁶,⁷,⁹-¹²). Of these, palliative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has some advantages over others, including greater safety and the fact that it is a non-invasive technique with relatively few restraints concerning the eligibility for treatment (⁹). Besides, EBRT is effective in mitigating symptoms, and, as it acts directly on neoplastic cells, it has a reasonable probability of delaying tumor progression. Consequently, EBRT may be indicated even for patients with poor clinical performance and various grades of bleeding. Previous studies have shown that EBRT controls tumor bleeding at a rate between 50% and 91% (¹³). Although 10 fractions of 300 Gy is one of the most common radiotherapy regimes, several other radiotherapy regimes are used in clinical practice (¹³). Currently, there are doubts about which is the best schedule to palliate local symptoms as well as whether the bleeding response is a good prognostic marker for survival.

Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we evaluated the treatment outcomes of EBRT to palliate bleeding from GC due to local recurrence/progression. Ultimately, we aimed to determine the relationship between bleeding response and the RT schedule.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guideline (¹⁴). The requirement for approval from the Ethics Committee was waived. Two reviewers performed the research, selected the articles by title and abstract, and then read the full article.

Two investigators conducted a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for studies to assess the treatment outcomes of palliative radiotherapy for GC due to local recurrence or progression. We used the following terms “gastric cancer,” “stomach cancer” and “radiotherapy,” “palliative,” “bleeding,” and other synonyms. The lists containing the articles and reviews were checked, and possible related articles were tracked to complement the electronic query. Searches were performed from January 2000 up to March 2019 and were limited to publications in English.

Study selection

Only studies evaluating the treatment outcomes of GC were included. Studies that reported bleeding response according to the authors’ criteria and retrospective, prospective, non-randomized, and randomized studies were included, whereas case reports were excluded.

Patients

We included studies of patients with a diagnosis of GC who were previously treated or not treated, who had local recurrence or progression, and who were currently being treated with palliative radiotherapy because of tumor bleeding.

Intervention

We evaluated the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy. To this end, studies using any fractionation of EBRT to palliate tumor bleeding due to local recurrence or progression of GC were included. Any EBRT technique [2D, 3D, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)] was permitted.

Outcomes

The following outcomes were evaluated: bleeding response according to the authors’ definition, survival, time without bleeding, and therapeutic effectiveness. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the BED level and RT technique. The studies were stratified by BED level: BED ≥40 Gy 10, BED from 30 to 39 Gy 10, and BED <30 Gy 10. The studies were divided into two groups (2DRT or 3DRT) according to the RT technique. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the BED and bleeding response. The therapeutic effectiveness ratio was considered as the mean of time with no bleeding/the mean of overall survival time x 100. The therapeutic effectiveness ratio was calculated for each study, and the results were stratified by the BED Gy 10 level.

Clinical data

Patient data, treatment characteristics, and outcomes were retrieved for all included studies. Data on the following characteristics were retrieved: RT technique, RT schedule, time of follow up, bleeding response, and overall survival. With regard to the study characteristics, the design, sample size, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and follow-up time were assessed. Two reviewers gathered all data for all included studies using a standardized data extraction form. A third reviewer was consulted in the event of disagreement.

Methodological quality assessment

The potential for risk of bias in the studies was evaluated by two authors independently using methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), the index score utilized for methodological evaluation of non-randomized studies. The items were scored 0 points if not reported; 1 point when reported but inadequate; and 2 points when reported and adequate. The maximum MINOR score is 16 points for non-comparative studies. We considered a low risk of bias when a study fulfilled all MINORS criteria and scored >70% on the global scale. We considered a high risk of bias for all other scores. If only abstracts were available, they were automatically considered to be at high risk of bias. A consensus was reached by the two reviewers, and when there was disagreement, a third reviewer’s opinion was the decisive factor.

Data synthesis and analysis

The proportion rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the events for each evaluated outcome were calculated (¹⁵). The I² statistic was used to assess statistical heterogeneity, wherein an I² value of <25% was defined as presenting a low level of heterogeneity (¹⁶). The meta-analysis was performed using Open Meta-Analyst, a free open software.

Subgroup analyses were performed to determine whether there was a relationship between the BED and bleeding response. A meta-regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the BED and bleeding. The BED was calculated using the following formula:

$BED=nD(1+[D/\{\alpha /\beta \}\left]\right)$

The alpha/beta ratio used for GC was 10, and the estimated survival of responders and non-responders was compared. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

RESULTS

We identified eleven non-comparative retrospective studies, which included 409 patients treated with EBRT to control bleeding due to local recurrence/progression of GC (¹¹,¹⁷-²⁶). Figure 1(a). describes the search strategy and the reasons for the exclusion of some studies. Ten of the studies were retrospective (¹¹,¹⁷-²⁵), and one was prospective (²⁶); all were published between 2008 and 2019. Gastroscopy was used to confirm gastric bleeding in all patients. The most frequent histology was gastric adenocarcinoma. Regarding the radiation dose, the RT schedule delivering 30 Gy in ten fractions was the most commonly used. The median BED Gy 10 was 39, ranging from 7.2 to 50 Gy 10. 3DRT was used in six studies, 2D RT in three, and RT delivered using mixed techniques in two. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the eleven studies. Using the minor score for rating the risk of bias of studies, we stipulated a MINOR score <70% as indicating a high risk of bias. In general, pooling all studies, the mean score was 85% (85%-100%). Only one study achieved an ideal MINOR score of 100%, and this study was also the only prospective study included in our meta-analysis, as presented in Figure 1(b).

Figure 1
1(a). Flowchart according to PRISMA. 1(b). Minors score rating of each study.

Table 1
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author, year	N	RT Dose/BED	Age (median)	Metastases	Concurrent chemotherapy	RT technique
Kim et al. (17)	20	35 Gy in 14 fx 41 Gy 10	66	Yes (73%)	Yes (65%)	2DRT
Lee et al. (11)	23	30 Gy in 10 fx 39 Gy 10	69	Yes (96%)	NR	2DRT/3DRT
Hashimoto et al. (18)	19	50 Gy 10	61	NR	Yes (21%)	3DRT
Asakura et al. (19)	30	30 Gy in 10 fx 39 Gy 10	69	Yes (96%)	Yes (40%)	3DRT
Tey et al. (20)	115	30 Gy in 10 fx 39 Gy 10	70	Yes (67.8%)	No	3DRT
Chaw et al. (21)	52	8 Gy in 1 fx (75%) 20 Gy in 5 fx (25%) 14.4 Gy 10	70	Yes (44%)	NR	2DRT
Kondoh et al. (22)	17	30 Gy in 10 fx 39 Gy10	61	Yes (90%)	Yes (33%)	3DRT
Kawabata et al. (23)	18	6 Gy in 3 fx 7.2 Gy 10	69	NR	Yes (11%)	2DRT
Lee et al. (24)	42	39.6 Gy in 20 fx 36 Gy 10	69	Yes (16.7%)	Yes (83%)	2DRT/3DRT
Hiramoto et al. (25)	23	40 Gy in 20 fx 48 Gy 10	69	Yes (91%)	Yes (43%)	3DRT
Tey et al. (26)	50	36 Gy in 12 fx 46 Gy 10	70	Yes (74%)	No	3DRT

• 2DRT: Conventional radiotherapy, 3DRT: Conformational radiotherapy, BED: Biological effective dose, fx: Fractions.

Survival and bleeding response

All studies reported the survival time and bleeding response as outcomes. The eleven studies included a total of 409 patients, and the mean survival reported by all studies was 3.31 months (95%CI 2.73-3.9), with no heterogeneity (p=0.295 and I²=16%) Figure 2(a). The meta-analysis of all studies reporting the bleeding response rate was 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.81), with no heterogeneity (p=0.7 and I²=0%) Figure 2(b).

Figure 2
2(a). Mean overall survival time. 2(b). Bleeding response rate.

Meta-regression and subgroup analyses for bleeding response and survival

We performed meta-regression analysis to identify the relationship between BED Gy 10 and bleeding response. A significant relationship was observed between BED Gy 10 and bleeding response (p<0.001), as shown in Figure 3(a).

Figure 3
3(a). Meta-regression analysis between bleeding response and BED. 3(b). Subgroup analysis evaluating the mean overall survival difference between responders and non-responders.

Four studies, including 230 patients, reported the difference in survival between bleeding responders and non-responders. Combining the four studies, the mean overall survival difference between bleeding responders and non-responders was significant at 75.8 days (95%CI, 51-99; p<0.0001) Figure 3(b).

On stratifying the bleeding response according to the BED Gy 10 level, we found a significantly worse response in the subgroup of studies with a BED <30 Gy 10 (0.64; 95%CI, 0.5-0.7; p=0.001), and no significant difference between a BED level of 30-39 Gy 10 (0.79; 95%CI, 0.7-0.8) and a BED level >40 Gy10 (0.79; 95%CI, 0.7-0.8) Figure 4(a).

Figure 4
4(a). Subgroup analysis by BED level and bleeding response. 4(b). Subgroup analysis by RT technique and bleeding response.

In the subgroup analysis for the RT technique, we observed a significant difference in bleeding response between 3DRT 0.79 (95%CI, 0.74-0.84) and 2DRT 0.65 (95%CI, 0.56-0.75; p=0.021) Figure 4(b).

Time without bleeding and therapeutic effectiveness ratio

Ten studies reported the time without bleeding as an outcome. On pooling all studies, the mean time without bleeding was found to be 2.26 months (95%CI, 1.5-2.9) Figure 5(a). The therapeutic effectiveness ratio was 0.84 (95%CI, 0.78-0.90), and by stratifying the therapeutic effectiveness ratio by BED level, we observed a significant difference for BED <30 Gy 10 (p<0.001) Figure 5(b).

Figure 5
5(a). Mean time with no bleeding. 5(b). Therapeutic effective ratio by BED level.

DISCUSSION

The present meta-analysis confirms that EBRT is highly effective in stopping bleeding due to local recurrence or progression from GC, with a bleeding response rate of >75% observed by pooling the outcomes of eleven studies.

The high bleeding response rate with palliative radiotherapy is a significant finding for clinical practice, mainly for elderly and fragile patients (Table 1). In recent years, new chemotherapy regimens used to palliate patients with advanced\metastatic GC have improved the survival and quality of life of patients (⁹). However, many patients with local recurrence from GC are unfit to undergo intensive chemotherapy treatment because of their fragile condition or advanced age. Consequently, palliative RT is an excellent treatment option in this clinical situation.

The quantitative relationship between bleeding response and RT dose is an interesting finding of our study. The meta-regression analysis correlating bleeding response and BED suggests that there is a significant relationship between them and that high BED schedules can result in better bleeding response rates. This information has significant implications in daily clinical practice. Furthermore, this information is novel because a previous systematic review found a lack of dose-response comparing regimens with a BED of >39 Gy 10 versus regimens with BED<39 Gy 10 (¹³). Our data suggest that high BED regimens are capable of producing a better bleeding response and that bleeding responders have improved survival.

We also investigated the ideal BED to palliate gastric tumor bleeding. To this end, we stratified the studies into three levels according to BED Gy 10. Using this approach, the meta-regression analysis indicated a non-significant difference between BED 30-39 Gy 10 and BED ≥40 Gy 10 and a significant difference for BED <30 Gy 10. Notwithstanding, we were unable to establish the ideal cut-off for a better bleeding response; however, our results suggest that a BED >30 Gy 10 should be chosen in clinical practice.

Although the exact mechanism of hemostasis provoked by irradiation is not fully understood, we hypothesized that RT schedules with a higher BED produce extensive damage in the vascular endothelial cells, inducing embolism of vessels, platelet aggregation, and tissue factor release, and subsequently support a better hemostatic response to RT in studies using schedules with higher BEDs.

The hemostatic response to RT was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival. The median survival of responders was significantly longer than that of non-responders (47 vs 113.5 days, p<0.001). However, the exact relationship between bleeding response and survival remains unclear. The natural explanation is that tumor bleeding could provoke malnutrition, immunosuppression, and dehydration, which could limit adequate cancer treatment (⁸). Another interpretation would be that in patients with a bleeding response, a high BED has an increased local therapeutic effect on the tumor, which may translate into longer survival. In contrast, we were unable to determine whether the improvement in survival is related to a direct effect of bleeding or if the increase in survival in responders is influenced by other factors, such as chemotherapy, performance status, and the existence of metastasis. However, it is undeniable that patients who achieve a bleeding response have better survival than non-responders, independent of a direct effect or a secondary benefit from the hemostatic response. The therapeutic effectiveness ratio, calculated as the mean time without bleeding after RT and the mean overall survival, reinforces this argument. This index gives us an idea of the importance of the bleeding response over survival. Our data show that, in general, if patients achieves a bleeding response, they have an approximately 85% of chance of no further bleeding at a later stage. Besides, the therapeutic effectiveness ratio shows us that RT schedules with a BED <30 Gy 10 should not be recommended, even for patients with poor clinical performance, because of the lower therapeutic effectiveness compared to that of BED >30 Gy 10 regimens (92% vs 53%, p=0.001). It is important to note that in the subgroup of studies classified as BED <30 Gy 10 the study conducted by Kawabata et al. (²³) used a lower BED (7.2 Gy10), with the possibility of a repeated course in cases in which bleeding did not stop. Although this study has used a completely different treatment schema than that used in the other studies, the statistical difference was maintained even when removing it from analysis, which validated the outcome.

In the literature, mixed RT techniques have been used to palliate local recurrence from GC; among them, the most commonly used techniques are 2DRT and 3DRT. In general, the use of 3DRT allows visualization of the tumor and organs at risk more precisely than that on using 2DRT. Moreover, 3DRT allows us to use multiple fields to deliver a higher radiation dose to the bleeding tumor with better conformality than that on using 2DRT, while also minimizing the higher doses to surrounding organs and tissues. Our analyses detected a significant difference in the rates of bleeding response between the studies using 3DRT and those using 2DRT. Therefore, patients with a high BED schedule would be identified, and the use of 3DRT would improve the chances of success in achieving the bleeding response and, theoretically, better survival as well.

Because there is a dose-response relationship between the BED schedule and the bleeding response, the tumor burden, presence of metastatic disease, and patient performance status are important clinical data for radiation oncologists with regard to the development of personalized radiotherapy schedules. Thus, a short radiotherapy schedule with a high dose per fraction, that is, BED>30 Gy 10, seems adequate for patients who have metastatic disease with a short life expectancy and require urgent symptom control. In contrast, patients with a good performance status, oligometastatic disease, and who are clinically stable could be treated with a longer radiotherapy course, achieving a BED higher than 30 Gy10.

This study provides evidence on the relationship between treatment doses, bleeding response, RT technique, and survival to palliate local recurrence or progression from GC. However, it has some limitations. First, this study is a meta-analysis of retrospective studies that are subject to inherent bias. Second, chemotherapy use, the definition of bleeding response, and treatment techniques were heterogeneous across studies. However, these limitations do not alter any of the outcomes and interpretation derivates of our analysis.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis confirms that palliative RT is highly effective in controlling gastric bleeding due to local recurrence or progression from GC. Our data suggest a dose-response relationship between bleeding response and BED, and patients with a bleeding response seem to have better survival. Therefore, RT schedules with a high BED should be used in patients with a good performance, oligometastatic disease, and who are clinically stable. Although we did not identify the ideal BED cut-off, our data suggest that BED >30 Gy 10 should be used. Short fractionations with a high dose per fraction, giving a BED >30 Gy 10, should be reserved for patients with a poor clinical performance and in whom bleeding needs to be stopped urgently. Thus, 3DRT should be administered to all patients to maximize the chance of bleeding control and, theoretically, survival.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(8):1893-907. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437
  » https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437
• ²
  Ku GY, Ilson DH. Management of gastric cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30(6):596-602. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000115
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000115
• ³
  Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base Report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the “different disease” hypothesis. Cancer. 2000;88(4):921-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000215)88:4<921::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-S
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000215)88:4<921::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-S
• ⁴
  Fuchs CS, Niedzwiecki D, Mamon HJ, Tepper JE, Ye X, Swanson RS, et al. Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Compared With Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin After Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer: Results From CALGB 80101 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):3671-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.2130
  » https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.2130
• ⁵
  Smalley SR, Benedetti JK, Haller DG, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Ajani JA, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(19):2327-33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7136
  » https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7136
• ⁶
  Pereira J, Phan T. Management of bleeding in patients with advanced cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9(5):561-70. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-5-561
  » https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-5-561
• ⁷
  Mariette C, Bruyàre E, Messager M, Pichot-Delahaye V, Paye F, Dumont F, et al. Palliative resection for advanced gastric and junctional adenocarcinoma: which patients will benefit from surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1240-9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2687-6
  » https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2687-6
• ⁸
  Sachlova M, Majek O, Tucek S. Prognostic value of scores based on malnutrition or systemic inflammatory response in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66(8):1362-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2014.956261
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2014.956261
• ⁹
  Izuishi K, Mori H. Recent Strategies for Treating Stage IV Gastric Cancer: Roles of Palliative Gastrectomy, Chemotherapy, and Radiotherapy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016;25(1):87-94. https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.251.rv2
  » https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.251.rv2
• ¹⁰
  Valentini V, Cellini F. Radiotherapy in gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature and new perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7(10):1379-93. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.7.10.1379
  » https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.7.10.1379
• ¹¹
  Lee JA, Lim DH, Park W, Ahn YC, Huh SJ. Radiation therapy for gastric cancer bleeding. Tumori. 2009;95(6):726-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089160909500615
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/030089160909500615
• ¹²
  Mathus-Vliegen EM, Tytgat GN. Laser photocoagulation in the palliative treatment of upper digestive tract tumors. Cancer. 1986;57(2):396-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<396::AID-CNCR2820570236>3.0.CO;2-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<396::AID-CNCR2820570236>3.0.CO;2-8
• ¹³
  Tey J, Soon YY, Koh WY, Leong CN, Choo BA, Ho F, et al. Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25797-805. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15554
  » https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15554
• ¹⁴
  Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
  » https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
• ¹⁵
  Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219
• ¹⁶
  Higgins JP. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
• ¹⁷
  Kim MM, Rana V, Janjan NA, Das P, Phan AT, Delclos ME, et al. Clinical benefit of palliative radiation therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(3):421-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860701621233
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860701621233
• ¹⁸
  Hashimoto K, Mayahara H, Takashima A, Nakajima TE, Kato K, Hamaguchi T, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for hemorrhage of unresectable gastric cancer: a single institute experience. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135(8):1117-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0553-0
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0553-0
• ¹⁹
  Asakura H, Hashimoto T, Harada H, Mizumoto M, Furutani K, Hasuike N, et al. Palliative radiotherapy for bleeding from advanced gastric cancer: is a schedule of 30 Gy in 10 fractions adequate? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137(1):125-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-010-0866-z
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-010-0866-z
• ²⁰
  Tey J, Choo BA, Leong CN, Loy EY, Wong LC, Lim K, et al. Clinical outcome of palliative radiotherapy for locally advanced symptomatic gastric cancer in the modern era. Medicine. 2014;93(22):e118. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000118
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000118
• ²¹
  Chaw CL, Niblock PG, Chaw CS, Adamson DJ. The role of palliative radiotherapy for haemostasis in unresectable gastric cancer: a single-institution experience. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014;8:384. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.384
  » https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.384
• ²²
  Kondoh C, Shitara K, Nomura M, Takahari D, Ura T, Tachibana H, et al. Efficacy of palliative radiotherapy for gastric bleeding in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2015;14:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0034-y
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0034-y
• ²³
  Kawabata H, Uno K, Yasuda K, Yamashita M. Experience of Low-Dose, Short-Course Palliative Radiotherapy for Bleeding from Unresectable Gastric Cancer. J Palliat Med. 2017;20(2):177-80. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2016.0141
  » https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2016.0141
• ²⁴
  Lee YH, Lee JW, Jang HS. Palliative external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of tumor bleeding in inoperable advanced gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):541. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3508-x
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3508-x
• ²⁵
  Hiramoto S, Kikuchi A, Tetsuso H, Yoshioka A, Kohigashi Y, Maeda I. Efficacy of palliative radiotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable gastric cancer demonstrating bleeding and obstruction. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23(6):1090-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1317-0
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1317-0
• ²⁶
  Tey J, Zheng H, Soon YY, Leong CN, Koh WY, Lim K, et al. Palliative radiotherapy in symptomatic locally advanced gastric cancer: A phase II trial. Cancer Med. 2019;8(4):1447-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2021
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2021

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  02 Sept 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  19 Nov 2019
• Accepted
  27 Feb 2020