Abstract
Participatory institutions have been created in contemporary democracies to encourage the participation of citizens in discussions and the formulation and oversight of public policies. However, studies have indicated difficulties related to the inclusion of certain social groups, even in established institutions. What explains non-participation in institutions that aim to broaden its scope? In addition to the lack of personal incentives and the costs associated with participation, we argue that two other political determinants contribute to this absence: skepticism and polarization. Our findings indicate that skepticism is associated with non-participation but is contingent on the context, while affective polarization is significantly related to non-participation in participatory institutions.
Keywords
skepticism; affective polarization; non-participation; participatory institutions; association networks
Thumbnail
Source: elaborated by the authors. The graph presents the results for the independent variables of the multiple regressions, measuring the relationship between skepticism, ideological polarization (on cultural and economic issues), affective polarization towards candidates and non-participation in participatory institutions in the complete model (Model 2), which considers the effect of the control variables. The estimators, standard errors and significance of the control variables have been omitted for clarity. The results of these variables can be seen in