Maturation of long latency auditory evoked potentials in hearing children: systematic review

Silva, Liliane Aparecida Fagundes; Magliaro, Fernanda Cristina Leite; Carvalho, Ana Claudia Martinho de; Matas, Carla Gentile

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20172016107

Table of contents previous current next

Table of contents

Systematic Review • CoDAS 29 (3) • 2017 • https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172016107 linkcopy

Maturation of long latency auditory evoked potentials in hearing children: systematic review

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Purpose To analyze how Auditory Long Latency Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) change according to age in children population through a systematic literature review.

Research strategies After formulation of the research question, a bibliographic survey was done in five data bases with the following descriptors: Electrophysiology (Eletrofisiologia), Auditory Evoked Potentials (Potenciais Evocados Auditivos), Child (Criança), Neuronal Plasticity (Plasticidade Neuronal) and Audiology (Audiologia).

Selection criteria Level 1 evidence articles, published between 1995 and 2015 in Brazilian Portuguese or English language.

Data analysis Aspects related to emergence, morphology and latency of P1, N1, P2 and N2 components were analyzed.

Results A total of 388 studies were found; however, only 21 studies contemplated the established criteria. P1 component is characterized as the most frequent component in young children, being observed around 100-150 ms, which tends to decrease as chronological age increases. The N2 component was shown to be the second most commonly observed component in children, being observed around 200-250 ms.. The other N1 and P2 components are less frequent and begin to be seen and recorded throughout the maturational process.

Conclusion The maturation of LLAEP occurs gradually, and the emergence of P1, N1, P2 and N2 components as well as their latency values are variable in childhood. P1 and N2 components are the most observed and described in pediatric population. The diversity of protocols makes the comparison between studies difficult.

Keywords
Electrophysiology; Evoked Potentials Auditory; Child; Neuronal Plasticity; Audiology

Articles Included
1. Albrecht R, Suchodoletz W, Uwer R. The development of auditory evoked dipole source activity from childhood to adulthood. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:2268-76.
2. Čeponiene R, Rinnea T, Näätänena R. Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:870-82.
3. Choudhury N, Benasich AA. Maturation of auditory evoked potentials from 6 to 48 months: Prediction to 3 and 4 year language and cognitive abilities. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:320-38.
4. Coch D, Skendzel W, Neville HJ. Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: An ERP study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2184–203.
5. Gilley PM, Sharma A, Dorman M, Martin K. Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116;648-57.
6. Jing H, Benasich AA. Brain responses to tonal changes in the first two years of life. Brain Development. 2006;28:247-56.
7. Kabel AH, Mesallam T, Ghandour HH. Follow up of P1 peak amplitude and peak latency in a group of specific language-impaired children. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73:1525-31.
8. Kihara M, Hogan AM, Newton CR, Garrashi HH, Neville BR, Haan M. Auditory and visual novelty processing in normally-developing Kenyan children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:564-76.
9. King K, Campbell J, Sharma A, Martin K, Dorman M, Langran J. The representation of voice onset time in the cortical auditory evoked potentials of young children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:2855-61.
10. Kummer P, Burger M, Schuster M, Rosanowski F, Eysholdt U, Hoppe U. Cortical auditory evoked potentials to acoustic changes in speech stimuli in children. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2007;59:273–80.
11. Kushnerenko E, Ceponiene R, Balan P, Fellman V, Huotilaine M, Näätäne R. Maturation of the auditory event-related potentials during the first year of life. Neuroreport. 2002;13(1):47-51.
12. Lippé S, Martinez-Montes E, Arcand C, Lassonde M. Electrophysiological study of auditory development. Neuroscience. 2009;164;1108–18.
13. Mahajan Y, McArthur G. Maturation of auditory event-related potentials across adolescence. Hear Res. 2012;294:82-94.
14. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: Differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 1996;17:430-7.
15. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Khosla D, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:407-20.
16. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:220-36.
17. Shafer VL, Yu YH, Wagner M. Maturation of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to speech recorded from frontocentral and temporal sites: Three months to eight years of age. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;95:77-93.
18. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee TJ, Nicol TG. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104;540-5.
19. Sussman E, Steinschneider M, Gumenyuk V, Grushko J, Lawson K. The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates. Hear Res. 2008;236:61-79.
20. Ventura LMP, Costa OA Fo, Alvarenga KF. Maturação do sistema auditivo central em crianças ouvintes normais. Pró-Fono Rev Atual Científ. 2009;21:101-6.
21. Wunderlich JL, Cone-Wesson BK, Shepherd R. Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children. Hear Res. 2006;212:185-202.

	Sharma et al. (1997)⁽¹⁴⁾	Ponton et al. (2000)⁽⁹⁾	Albrecht et al. (2000)⁽¹⁸⁾	Čeponiene et al. (2002)⁽²⁵⁾	Gilley et al. (2005)⁽¹⁰⁾	Sussman et al. (2008)⁽²⁰⁾	King et al. (2008)⁽¹⁹⁾	Kabel et al. (2009)⁽²⁶⁾	Kihara et al. (2010)⁽²⁷⁾	Mahajan e McArthur (2012)⁽²⁸⁾
2.3 to 3.9 years	-	-	-	-	-	-	126-149	-	-	-
3 years		-	-	-	95-105	-	-	-		-
4 years	-	-	-	98-114	95-105	-	-	-	89-99	-
5 years	-	79-86	91-106	-	-	-	-	-	89-99	-
6 years	87	79-86	91-106	-	-	-	-	162	91-99	-
7 years	81	73-81	94-122	-	-	-	-	-	91-99	-
8 years	79	66-70	94-122	-	-	85-114	-	113	83-102	-
9 years	81	65-68	88-113	104-124	-	76-104	-	-	83-102	-
10 years	74	64-71	88-113	-	-	79-108	-	-	74-86	71
11 years	78	60-65	80-107	-	75-82	73-93	-	-		71
12 years	74	50-65	80-107	-	75-82	-	-	-		-

	Ponton et al. (2000)⁽⁹⁾	Albrecht et al. (2000)⁽¹⁸⁾	Mahajan e McArthur (2012)⁽²⁸⁾
5 to 6 years	127-138	172-154	-
7 years	98-105	170-229	-
8 years	106-119	170-229	-
9 years	92-113	172-223	-
10 years	98-114	172-223	102-108
11 years	89-108	159-202	104-110
12 years	90-106	159-202	-

	Ponton et al. (2000)⁽⁹⁾	Sussmam et al. (2008)⁽²⁰⁾	Mahajan e McArthur (2012)⁽²⁸⁾
5 to 6 years	135-153	-	-
7 years	136-158	-	-
8 years	143-157	139	-
9 years	136-147	141-147	-
10 years	141-157	140-146	145-148
11 years	142-154	137-142	143-148
12 years	144-162	-	-

		Ponton et al. (2000)⁽⁹⁾	Ceponiene et al. (2002)⁽²⁵⁾	Sussman et al. (2008)⁽²⁰⁾	King et al. (2008)⁽²⁷⁾	Kihara et al. (2010)⁽²⁸⁾
2.3 to 3.9 years	-	-	-	238-251		-
4 years	-	295-307	-	-	231-245	-
5 years	196-218	-	-	-	231-245	-
6 years	196-218	-	-	-	228-243	-
7 years	207-214	-	-	-	228-243	-
8 years	206-221	-	224-243	-	227-246	-
9 years	208-216	285-286	232-233	-	227-246	-
10 years	218-237	-	221-232	-	220-243	240-268
11 years	218-231	-	216-226	-		241-268
12 years	222-232	-	-	-		-

location_on

Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia Al. Jaú, 684, 7º andar, 01420-002 São Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel./Fax 55 11 - 3873-4211 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@codas.org.br

rss_feed Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader