Temporal ordering and reading competence of words and pseudowords: a preliminary study

Souza, Cintia Alves de; Escarce, Andrezza Gonzalez; Lemos, Stela Maris Aguiar

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Brief Communication • CoDAS 30 (2) • 2018 • https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182017102 copy

Temporal ordering and reading competence of words and pseudowords: a preliminary study

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Analyze the association of simple and complex auditory temporal ordering skills with reading competence tasks in students.

Methods

Pilot phase of a cross-sectional study conducted with a non-probabilistic sample of 22 schoolchildren aged eight to ten years. Instruments for evaluation of reading competence tasks and simple and complex auditory temporal ordering abilities were used.

Results

Most participants obtained adequate results in the tests of simple auditory temporal ordering (SATO) and reading competence (RC), but inadequate results in the test of complex auditory temporal ordering (CATO). The association of reading competence with temporal processing showed no statistical significance.

Conclusion

The study evidenced the importance to conduct more robust studies on the theme and the viability of data collection in the school scenario.

Keywords
Academic Institutions; Auditory Perception; Understanding; Reading; Language; Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences

WPRC	Simple auditory temporal ordering			Simple auditory temporal ordering
	SMVS		p-value	SMNVS		p-value
	Adequate	Inadequate		Adequate	Inadequate
	N (%)	N (%)		N (%)	N (%)
SP			1			1
Altered	1 (4.5%)	0 (0.0%)		1 (4.5%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	14 (63.7%)	7 (31.8%)		14 (63.7%)	7 (31.8%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
SNW			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)
Altered	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
CRW			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)
Altered	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
VNP			1			0.32
Altered	1 (4.5%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.5%)
Normal	14 (63.7%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	6 (27.3%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
CIW			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)
Altered	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
PNW			0.33			1
Altered	3 (13.6%)	3 (13.6%)		4 (18.2%)	2 (9.1%)
Normal	12 (54.6%)	4 (18.2%)		11 (50.0%)	5 (22.7%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
PH			1			1
Altered	1 (4.5%)	1 (4.5%)		1 (4.5%)	1 (4.5%)
Normal	14 (63.7%)	6 (27.3%)		14 (63.7%)	6 (27.3%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)
TOTAL			1			0.31
Altered	1 (4.5%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.5%)
Normal	14 (63.7%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	6 (27.3%)
Total	15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)		15 (68.2%)	7 (31.8%)

WPRC	Complex auditory temporal ordering					p-value	Complex auditory temporal ordering					p-value
	FPT-3		p-value	FPT-4			DPT-3		p-value	DPT-4
	Adequate	Inadequate		Adequate	Inadequate		Adequate	Inadequate		Adequate	Inadequate
	N (%)	N (%)		N (%)	N (%)		N (%)	N (%)		N (%)	N (%)
SP			1.00			0.47			1.00			0.43
Altered	0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		1 (4.8%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	18 (85.7%)		7 (33.3%)	13 (61.9%)		3 (14.3%)	17 (80.9%)		8 (38.0%)	12 (57.2%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
SNW			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)
Altered	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
CRW			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)
Altered	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
VNP			0.74			1.00			1.00			0.38
Altered	0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	18 (85.7%)		7 (33.3%)	13 (61.9%)		3 (14.3%)	17 (80.9%)		9 (42.8%)	11 (52.4%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
CIW			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)			^* * It was not possible to perform correlation analysis because all the students presented normal results according to the reference criteria for age group and schooling (10)
Altered	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)		0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
PNW			0.91			1.00			0.84			0.66
Altered	0 (0.0%)	6 (28.6%)		2 (9.5%)	4 (19.0%)		1 (4.8%)	5 (23.8%)		2 (9.5%)	4 (19.1%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	13 (61.9%)		5 (23.8%)	10 (47.7%)		2 (9.5%)	13 (61.9%)		7 (33.3%)	8 (38.1%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
PH			1.00			1.00			0.55			0.49
Altered	0 (0.0%)	2 (9.5%)		1 (4.8%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	2 (9.5%)		0 (0.0%)	2 (9.5%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	17 (81.0%)		6 (28.5%)	13 (61.9%)		3 (14.3%)	16 (76.2%)		9 (42.8%)	10 (47.7%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)
TOTAL			0.74			1.00			0.67			1.00
Altered	0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)		0 (0.0%)	1 (4.8%)
Normal	2 (9.5%)	18 (85.7%)		7 (33.3%)	13 (61.9%)		3 (14.3%)	17 (80.9%)		9 (42.8%)	11 (52.4%)
Total	2 (9.5%)	19 (90.5%)		7 (33.3%)	14 (66.7%)		3 (14.3%)	18 (85.7%)		9 (42.8%)	12 (57.2%)

Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia Al. Jaú, 684, 7º andar, 01420-002 São Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel./Fax 55 11 - 3873-4211 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@codas.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Conflict of interests: nothing to declare.