Recovery and cryopreservation of epididymal sperm is a viable alternative for preservation of genetically valuable animals. The aim of this study was to verify and to compare the effect of two commercial extenders for conventional semen on post-thawing viability of bovine epididymal sperm. For this purpose, the spermatozoa was recovered from the tail of 20 epididymis of Tabapuã bulls (Bos Taurus indicus) using retrograde flow method. After sperm recovery, the cells were centrifuged and divided for dilution with the diluents Botu-Bov(r) (BB) or Bovimix(r) (BV) for cryopreservation at -196°C. After thawing, all samples were evaluated using computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA), and by microscopic analysis for determination of integrity of plasma and acrossomal membrane and morphology. Statistical evaluation was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-test for multiple comparisons, the Tukey-Kramer test, with significance level (P<0.05). The results of the sperm movement for diluent BB and BV evaluated with CASA, showed no difference for both (P>0.05). There was also no difference between the percentage of deformed sperm, acrosome defects and the sperm with intact plasma membrane after thawing with BB or BV. We conclude that both extenders (BB and BV) are efficient and can be used for freezing sperm collected from the epididymis of bulls, showing no difference for all the parameters studied.
extender; sperm viability; epididymis; computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA)