| Morel T et al., 201312 |
Uncertainty about the clinical and economic performance of new orphan drugs in the real world (difficulty in recruiting a sufficient number of patients, generally heterogeneous population, clinical trials based on substitute outcomes, without randomization, and inclusion of control arms); little knowledge about the natural history of the disease; relatively high treatment costs, generating great budgetary uncertainty and/or financial risk if treatment does not work as expected |
Managed entry agreements: (1) performance-based risk-sharing schemes, which may be: a) 'performance-linked reimbursement' schemes; or (b) 'coverage with evidence development'; (2) finance-based arrangements, which may adopt: a) patient-level perspective; or b) population-level perspective |
| Gibson SG, Lemmens T, 201413 |
Uncertainties regarding clinical evidence (effectiveness/safety) due to limitations of clinical studies; and a high cost per therapy |
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements, where product performance will be tracked in a defined population over a specific period and the continuation or level of reimbursement is based on the health and economic outcomes that have been achieved. Can manage utilization by linking reimbursement to various performance measures: reimbursement may depend on the clinical decision-making process (e.g., only patients who test positive for a particular biomarker will be covered); other schemes may focus on final or intermediate clinical points to determine reimbursement or involve outcome guarantees where the manufacturer receives a lower payment for patients who do not respond to therapy. |
| Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZUD, 201514 |
High costs and insufficient evidence limit orphan drugs from meeting traditional health technology assessment criteria, especially cost-effectiveness |
Two types of Managed Entry Agreements: (1) Performance-based schemes (2) Finance-based arrangements (different models, including cost cap, utilization cap, and free and/or discounted initiation) |
| Degtiar I., 201715 |
Uncertainties regarding efficacy and safety and often high prices |
Managed entry agreements with national results registries |
| Bae EY, 201916 |
High treatment cost and uncertainties of treatment effect |
There are four types of risk sharing in Korea: reimbursement of the difference between the listed price and the contracted price; mixing of conditional treatments based on response and reimbursement; global spending limit; and spending limit per patient. |
| Van Wilder P, Pirson M, Dupont A, 201917 |
Increasing expenditure on health plans (annual increase of around 25 million euros); drugs with high prices; relative effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness uncertainties; low willingness to pay for health plans |
Managed entry schemes |
| Atikeler EK, Leufkens HGM, Goettsch W, 202018 |
Very high prices for orphan drugs |
Alternative access agreements |
| Biglia LV et al., 202119 |
Scarcity of adequate scientific evidence and high cost of treatments |
Risk sharing agreements |
| Blonda A et al., 202220 |
High cost of treatment |
Financial-based Managed Entry Agreements, when related to a discounted price, and/or performance-based, where additional data on the efficacy of the drug in the real world will be collected |
| Blonda A et al., 202221 |
Drugs at rising prices and uncertainties regarding cost-effectiveness |
Managed entry agreements that allow for a temporary refund upon providing a price reduction (on a financial basis) or on the condition that additional data about real-world effectiveness is collected in a record (based on results or performance) |
| Guarga L et al., 202222 |
Uncertainties about effectiveness, cost-effectiveness or budgetary impact |
Performance-linked reimbursements and cost-sharing agreements |
| Shengnan D et al., 202223 |
High cost of treatment; small population in studies; and uncertainty regarding the clinical evidence of orphan oncology drugs |
Managed access agreements |
| Simoens S et al., 202224 |
Failure to identify unmet medical needs in all therapeutic areas; limitations of available clinical evidence (long-term efficacy and safety); high budgetary impact |
Managed entry agreements |
| Iglesias-López C et al., 202325 |
Uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness of drugs (high costs and uncertainties regarding clinical evidence) |
Managed entry agreements and results-based payment |
| Kim H et al., 202326 |
High cost of drugs; uncertainty about the effectiveness of drugs |
Financial-based and outcome-based agreements |
| Ng QX et al., 202427 |
High cost of treatment; difficulties in financing and reimbursing medicines |
Agreements between governments or health systems and pharmaceutical companies to manage uncertainty regarding the cost and effectiveness of high-cost medicines |
| Douglas CMW, Grunebaum S, 202428 |
Uncertainty about the effectiveness of therapies; High costs |
Agreements between payers and pharmaceutical companies to address uncertainty about the effectiveness of treatments and contain costs. Performance-based, to reduce the uncertainty of effectiveness, or financial-based, to limit expenses |
| Nieto-Gómez P, Castaño-Amores C., 202429 |
High cost of medicines; lack of transparency regarding the criteria used for the price and reimbursement of medicines; uncertainty regarding the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of medicines |
Performance-based agreements and country-specific adaptations that allow flexible reimbursement strategies while ensuring patient access to necessary treatments |