Article 1 |
Participative research, multiterritorial, conducted with beneficiaries, managers, professionals, and representatives of social movements and from the Legislative Power. Data collection through interviews and focus groups |
BHP makes deinstitutionalization possible, as do de-hospitalization, social reinsertion, autonomy, citizenship, and contractualism. Governmental uncertainties, social conflicts, difficulties in access to the program, and regional inequalities in its distribution are a challenge for its effectiveness. The expansion of the scientific production, which evaluates this policy on a national level, is recommended |
Article 2 |
Evaluative research, multicentric, conducted with beneficiaries. Data collection through interviews and the production of narratives |
There are regional inequalities in the distribution of benefits. Although there are challenges to bring together the beneficiary and the researcher, it is important to suggest the participation of both in the production of knowledge on the theme |
Article 3 |
Evaluative research, multiterritorial, conducted with beneficiaries. Data collected through participant observation and interviews, analysis of narratives |
The BHP promotes deinstitutionalization, de-hospitalization, use of RAPS, social reinsertion, autonomy, contractualism and criticality. Underuse of monetary benefits over the years is criticized |
Article 4 |
Case studies of beneficiaries from Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Analysis based on the psychoanalytical perspective |
Benefits make social reinsertion viable but may corroborate symptomatic arrangements. Singular practices are recommended, and the implication of the subject in the concession of benefits, besides the social reinsertion through work |
Article 5 |
Qualitative research, based on the constructivist paradigm, developed with beneficiaries in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Data collection from patient files and through interviews. Thematic analysis |
The benefit allows for living in the city and expanding decision power and autonomy. Dependence from mental healthcare workers; insufficient appropriation of this financial resource are hurdles for social reinsertion. Training healthcare workers is recommended, as is investment in social insertion through work |
Article 6 |
Action-Research conducted with beneficiaries in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Data collection through ethnographic observation and field diaries. Categorical analysis. |
BHP made the deinstitutionalization policy sustainable. Such a process was possible due to the existence of a mental healthcare network, which takes care of patients and provides continuity of treatment and recovery of citizenship. |
Article 7 |
Qualitative study conducted with beneficiaries and mental health professionals in Salvador, BA, Brazil. Data collection through participant observation, informal conversations and field diaries. |
BHP promotes autonomy, empowerment, and self-care. The literature on the theme and its repercussions are still incipient; professionals give little consideration to the program and its potential for deinstitutionalization; beneficiaries do not understand it, do not resort to it, or have no autonomy to use this benefit. |
Article 8 |
Retrospective reflection. Analysis of management mechanisms that affect Psychiatric Reforms |
The number of BHP beneficiaries is low. Difficulty in the deinstitutionalization of patients residing in psychiatric hospitals for longer periods of time |
Article 9 |
Data from the evaluation of RTS and BHP in Brazil, obtained in a systematic manner |
There are regional inequalities in access to the BHP. The number of beneficiaries is too low. Problems in obtaining documentation and locating families compromise deinstitutionalization |