A estrutura de estudos qualitativos: um padrão bibliométrico da literatura biomédica

Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida; Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira; Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro; Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de; Rodrigues, Larissa; Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro; Turato, Egberto Ribeiro

doi:10.1590/1413-81232021268.12922020

person Rodrigo Almeida Bastos

schoolDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP). R. Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária. 13083-887 Campinas SP Brasil. almeidabastos.rodrigo@gmail.com

0000-0002-6159-8048

person Vera Lucia Pereira Alves

schoolDepartamento de Psicologia Médica e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UNICAMP. Campinas SP Brasil.

0000-0003-4293-1439

person Rômulo Magnus de Castro Sena

schoolDepartamento de Psicologia Médica e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UNICAMP. Campinas SP Brasil.

0000-0001-6802-0786

person Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de Jesus

schoolDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP). R. Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária. 13083-887 Campinas SP Brasil. almeidabastos.rodrigo@gmail.com

0000-0001-9136-478X

person Larissa Rodrigues

schoolDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP). R. Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária. 13083-887 Campinas SP Brasil. almeidabastos.rodrigo@gmail.com

0000-0001-8714-7010

person Fernanda Garanhani de Castro Surita

schoolDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP). R. Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária. 13083-887 Campinas SP Brasil. almeidabastos.rodrigo@gmail.com

0000-0003-4335-0337

person Egberto Ribeiro Turato

schoolDepartamento de Psicologia Médica e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UNICAMP. Campinas SP Brasil.

0000-0002-7857-1482

groupsCollaborations

RA Bastos worked on the design, data collection and final text. The authors VLP Alves, RMC Sena, JVF Jesus and L Rodrigues worked on data collection and critical review of the research. The authors FGC Surita and ER Turato worked on the methodology, critical review and final text of the article.

Chief Editors:

Romeu Gomes, Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva

Variables		Number of Studies	(%)	Impact Factor (2017)
Journal (N=1,725)
	BMJ open	57	3.3	2.41
	PLOS ONE	48	2.8	2.77
	Journal of Clinical Nursing	46	2.7	1.64
	Disability and Rehabilitation	29	1.7	2.04
	Health Expectations	27	1.6	2.18
	Other (n=615)	1518	87.9
Verbs (N=1,725)
	To Explore	651	37.7
	To Examine	159	9.2
	To Understand	132	7.8
	To Describe	131	7.6
	To Identify	121	7.0
	Other (n=147)	531	30.7
Sample size (N=1,390) Mean: 29.56; SD: 20.68; Mode: 20.00 Min: 1.00; Q1: 15.00; Median: 23.00; Q3: 37.00; Max: 99.00
	1-10	152	10.94
	11-20	468	33.67
	21-30	294	21.15
	>30	476	34.24
Framework mentioned (N=325)
	Grounded theory	156	9.04
	Phenomenological analysis	66	3.83
	Framework analysis approach	23	1.33
	Ethnographic study	6	0.35
	Graneheim and Lundman’s approach	4	0.23
Software use mentioned (N=1,725)
	Yes	81	4.70
	No	1644	95.30

Health Themes	Health Knowledge Areas				Total (%)
Health Themes	Nursing	Medicine	Psychology	Public Health
Health Management	27 18.88	25 7.27	22 4.27	130 17.98	204 (12.0)
Women Heath	9 6.29	28 8.14	82 15.92	50 6.92	169 (9.8)
Mental Health	14 9.79	36 10.47	60 11.65	56 7.75	166 (9.6)
Teaching in Health	38 26.57	22 6.40	12 2.33	47 6.50	119 (6.9)
Infectiology	0 0.00	16 4.65	16 3.11	78 10.79	110 (6.4)

		Framework
		Ethnographic	Framework Analysis	Graneheim and Lundman’s	Grounded Theory	Phenomenological Analysis
Participants
Patients (p=0.055)	Yes	3 1.51	9 4.52	3 1.51	94 47.24	49 24.62
Patients (p=0.055)	No	3 2.38	14 11.11	1 0.79	62 49.21	17 13.49
Families (p=0.013)	Yes	1 2.78	7 19.44	1 2.78	10 27.78	9 25.00
Families (p=0.013)	No	5 1.73	16 5.54	3 1.04	146 50.52	57 19.72
Workers (p<0.001)	Yes	3 2.86	16 15.24	2 1.90	58 55.24	9 8.57
Workers (p<0.001)	No	3 1.36	17 3.18	2 0.91	98 44.55	57 21.91
Students (p=0.569)	Yes	0 0.00	0 0.00	0 0.00	1 50.00	1 50.00
Students (p=0.569)	No	06 1.86	23 7.12	4 1.24	155 47.99	65 21.67
Collection Strategies
Number of Strategies (p=0.002)	1	2 0.74	17 6.30	3 1.11	132 48.89	60 22.22
Number of Strategies (p=0.002)	2	3 7.14	6 14.29	1 2.38	22 52.38	2 4.76
Individual Interviews (p=0.122)	Yes	4 1.52	20 7.58	4 1.52	133 50.38	56 21.21
Individual Interviews (p=0.122)	No	1 2.08	3 6.25	0 0.00	21 43.75	6 12.50
Focus Group (p=0.006)	Yes	3 4.17	8 11.11	1 1.39	38 52.78	5 6.94
Focus Group (p=0.006)	No	2 0.83	15 6.25	3 1.25	116 48.33	57 23.75
Participant Observation (p=0.455)	Yes	0 0.00	0 0.00	0 0.00	1 33.33	0 0.00
Participant Observation (p=0.455)	No	5 1.62	23 7.44	4 1.29	153 49.51	62 20.06
Software Use	Yes	0 0.00	1 16.67	0 0.00	4 66.67	0 0.00
Software Use	No	6 1.88	22 6.90	4 1.25	152 47.65	66 20.69

[TFN1] Source: Elaborated by the authors.

A estrutura de estudos qualitativos: um padrão bibliométrico da literatura biomédica

Resumo