Reaction Level |
CQSSP Reaction Level Assessment of students from the state of Minas Gerais, best and worst analysis units evaluated by category Brazil, 2017. |
Assessment Categories / Units of Analysis |
Totally Disagree |
Partially Disagree |
Neither Disagree or Agree |
Partially Agree |
Totally Agree |
Total |
Assessment Category: Learning Material and Program Content |
- |
- |
neutro |
+ |
+ |
Total |
Best: Theoretical Content / relevant to the health area |
0% |
0% |
0% |
6% |
94% |
100% |
Worst: Theoretical Content/ it was adequate to my expectations |
0% |
3% |
3% |
26% |
68% |
100% |
Assessment Category: Activities |
- |
- |
neutro |
+ |
+ |
Total |
Best: Activities Requested in the AVA/Adequate time for its realization |
0% |
3% |
0% |
41% |
56% |
100% |
Worst: Forum and chats / Promoted greater interaction of the hospital group |
3% |
15% |
6% |
50% |
26% |
100% |
Assessment Category: Tutorship System |
- |
- |
neutro |
+ |
+ |
Total |
Best: Tutor/ he/she was committed |
0% |
0% |
3% |
18% |
79% |
100% |
Worst: Tutor/ He/she used good strategies to facilitate student learning |
0% |
3% |
15% |
36% |
46% |
100% |
Assessment Category: Learning support structure |
- |
- |
neutro |
+ |
+ |
Total |
Best: It had good learning resources (videos, links, and the like) |
0% |
3% |
6% |
21% |
70% |
100% |
Worst: AVA/ It had good data network quality |
3% |
6% |
3% |
32% |
56% |
100% |
Learning Level |
Individual Performance of CQSSP students in the state of Minas Gerais, Learning Unit I, II, III, and TCC Brasil, 2017. |
Concepts |
A (Excellent) |
B (Good) |
C (Fair) |
D (Insufficient) |
Concepts |
A (Excellent) |
Theme |
Assessment Category |
9.0 - 10 |
7.5 - 8.9 |
6.0 - 7.4 |
Theme |
Assessment Category |
Quality in Patient Health and Safety: fundamental aspects Risk assessment and management in healthcare organizations Patient Health and Safety Management: Cross-sectional and Transdisciplinary Aspects Patient Safety Plan |
Performance LU-I |
73.91% |
19.57% |
6.52% |
0.00% |
100.00% |
Performance LU-II |
63.04% |
30.43% |
6.52% |
0.00% |
100.00% |
Performance LU-III |
73.91% |
17.39% |
8.70% |
0.00% |
100.00% |
Performance TCC |
65.22% |
28.26% |
6.52% |
0.00% |
100.00% |
Behavior Level |
Assessment of Results Behavior Level of the CQSSP of graduate students from the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2017. |
Protocols |
Totally Disagree |
Partially Disagree |
Neither Disagree or Agree |
Partially Agree |
Totally Agree |
Total |
Participation of CQSSP graduates in discussions about patient safety at the hospital where they work after the course |
3% |
6% |
6% |
41% |
44% |
100% |
Encouragement of team interaction, and support in patient safety issues, provided by CQSSP graduates at the hospitals where they work |
3% |
0% |
9% |
41% |
47% |
100% |
Incorporation of knowledge into professional practice by CQSSP graduates |
0% |
3% |
3% |
26% |
68% |
100% |
Percentage of CQSSP graduates who started to consider error as a possibility in professional practice after the course |
0% |
0% |
6% |
12% |
82% |
100% |
Percentage of CQSSP graduates who began studying and researching on topics related to patient safety, risk management, and health quality after the course |
0% |
3% |
3% |
21% |
73% |
100% |
Percentage of CQSSP graduates who started to identify the existing risks in the hospital and the best ways to reduce them |
0% |
3% |
0% |
35% |
62% |
100% |
Percentage of CQSSP graduates who started to propose patient safety actions to contribute to the change of culture in the hospital after the course |
3% |
3% |
0% |
24% |
70% |
100% |
Percentage of CQSSP graduates who began to encourage patient participation in issues of their safety after the course |
6% |
3% |
24% |
32% |
35% |
100% |
Percentage of CQSSP graduates who started to value error as an opportunity to improve the quality of care |
0% |
0% |
3% |
15% |
82% |
100% |
|
Relationship between learning the CQSSP and the implementation of patient safety protocols in the |
|
Assessment |
Patient identification |
Hand hygiene |
Pressure ulcer prevention |
Prevention of falls |
Safety in the prescription, use, and administration of medicines |
Safe surgery |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Disagree |
0% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
0% |
Partially Disagree |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Neither Agree nor Disagree |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
0% |
Partially Agree |
50% |
10% |
30% |
40% |
30% |
40% |
Totally Agree |
10% |
20% |
0% |
30% |
30% |
20% |
Not applicable |
0% |
0% |
30% |
0% |
10% |
20% |
Not applicable because the protocol was already in place before the course. |
30% |
50% |
20% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
Cannot answer |
10% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Did not answer |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
0% |
10% |
Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |